Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Plymouth 81.4% 37.5% (+43.9)#1 38.2% (+43.2)#7
2. Blue Hill 78.3% 37.5% (+40.8)#2 38.2% (+40.1)#14
3. Murdock 75.1% 37.5% (+37.6)#3 38.2% (+36.9)#25
4. Deshler 70.3% 37.5% (+32.8)#4 38.2% (+32.1)#56
5. Spalding 66.3% 37.5% (+28.8)#5 38.2% (+28.1)#123
6. Bayard 66.1% 37.5% (+28.6)#6 38.2% (+27.9)#132
7. Lynch 65.1% 37.5% (+27.6)#7 38.2% (+26.9)#160
8. Arapahoe 62.5% 37.5% (+25.0)#8 38.2% (+24.3)#271
9. Bassett 62.3% 37.5% (+24.8)#9 38.2% (+24.1)#298
10. Morrill 61.6% 37.5% (+24.1)#10 38.2% (+23.4)#340
11. Wallace 60.5% 37.5% (+23.0)#11 38.2% (+22.3)#468
12. Spencer 59.7% 37.5% (+22.2)#12 38.2% (+21.5)#566
13. Milligan 59.6% 37.5% (+22.1)#13 38.2% (+21.4)#573
14. Whitney 59.5% 37.5% (+22.0)#14 38.2% (+21.3)#602
15. Hayes Center 59.4% 37.5% (+21.9)#15 38.2% (+21.2)#621
16. Weston 59.3% 37.5% (+21.8)#16 38.2% (+21.1)#638
17. Newcastle 59.2% 37.5% (+21.7)#17 38.2% (+21.0)#652
18. Litchfield 59.0% 37.5% (+21.5)#18 38.2% (+20.8)#678
19. Anselmo 58.5% 37.5% (+21.0)#19 38.2% (+20.3)#731
20. Scotia 58.4% 37.5% (+20.9)#20 38.2% (+20.2)#742
21. North Loup 58.3% 37.5% (+20.8)#21 38.2% (+20.1)#777
22. Rulo 58.3% 37.5% (+20.8)#22 38.2% (+20.1)#780
23. Potter 58.2% 37.5% (+20.7)#23 38.2% (+20.0)#797
24. Big Springs 57.5% 37.5% (+20.0)#24 38.2% (+19.3)#871
25. Brady 57.5% 37.5% (+20.0)#25 38.2% (+19.3)#872
26. Octavia 57.5% 37.5% (+20.0)#26 38.2% (+19.3)#878
27. Waco 57.3% 37.5% (+19.8)#27 38.2% (+19.1)#909
28. Republican City 57.3% 37.5% (+19.8)#28 38.2% (+19.1)#910
29. Filley 57.3% 37.5% (+19.8)#29 38.2% (+19.1)#911
30. Staplehurst 57.0% 37.5% (+19.5)#30 38.2% (+18.8)#963
31. Wolbach 56.5% 37.5% (+19.0)#31 38.2% (+18.3)#1,039
32. Cedar Bluffs 56.4% 37.5% (+18.9)#32 38.2% (+18.2)#1,058
33. Chapman 56.4% 37.5% (+18.9)#33 38.2% (+18.2)#1,062
34. Verdon 56.3% 37.5% (+18.8)#34 38.2% (+18.1)#1,091
35. Crete 56.0% 37.5% (+18.5)#35 38.2% (+17.8)#1,152
36. Bladen 55.7% 37.5% (+18.2)#36 38.2% (+17.5)#1,210
37. Union 55.5% 37.5% (+18.0)#37 38.2% (+17.3)#1,257
38. Curtis 55.3% 37.5% (+17.8)#38 38.2% (+17.1)#1,287
39. Peru 54.9% 37.5% (+17.4)#39 38.2% (+16.7)#1,389
40. Ewing 54.5% 37.5% (+17.0)#40 38.2% (+16.3)#1,469
41. Yutan 54.2% 37.5% (+16.7)#41 38.2% (+16.0)#1,555
42. Albion 54.1% 37.5% (+16.6)#42 38.2% (+15.9)#1,577
43. Shickley 54.1% 37.5% (+16.6)#43 38.2% (+15.9)#1,591
44. Wauneta 53.3% 37.5% (+15.8)#44 38.2% (+15.1)#1,778
45. Crawford 53.0% 37.5% (+15.5)#45 38.2% (+14.8)#1,850
46. Elba 52.6% 37.5% (+15.1)#46 38.2% (+14.4)#1,925
47. Broadwater 52.5% 37.5% (+15.0)#47 38.2% (+14.3)#1,964
48. Firth 52.3% 37.5% (+14.8)#48 38.2% (+14.1)#2,017
49. Platte Center 52.0% 37.5% (+14.5)#49 38.2% (+13.8)#2,110
50. Douglas 52.0% 37.5% (+14.5)#50 38.2% (+13.8)#2,114
51. Wisner 51.4% 37.5% (+13.9)#51 38.2% (+13.2)#2,275
52. Prague 51.1% 37.5% (+13.6)#52 38.2% (+12.9)#2,405
53. Pleasant Dale 51.0% 37.5% (+13.5)#53 38.2% (+12.8)#2,438
54. Dodge 50.8% 37.5% (+13.3)#54 38.2% (+12.6)#2,493
55. Funk 50.5% 37.5% (+13.0)#55 38.2% (+12.3)#2,621
56. Craig 50.5% 37.5% (+13.0)#56 38.2% (+12.3)#2,625
57. Foster 50.5% 37.5% (+13.0)#57 38.2% (+12.3)#2,628
58. De Witt 50.4% 37.5% (+12.9)#58 38.2% (+12.2)#2,651
59. Otoe 50.0% 37.5% (+12.5)#59 38.2% (+11.8)#2,818
60. Valley 49.5% 37.5% (+12.0)#60 38.2% (+11.3)#2,942
61. Decatur 49.5% 37.5% (+12.0)#61 38.2% (+11.3)#2,968
62. Pleasanton 49.4% 37.5% (+11.9)#62 38.2% (+11.2)#3,025
63. Dawson 49.3% 37.5% (+11.8)#63 38.2% (+11.1)#3,087
64. Stanton 49.2% 37.5% (+11.7)#64 38.2% (+11.0)#3,109
65. Grant 49.1% 37.5% (+11.6)#65 38.2% (+10.9)#3,152
66. Newman Grove 48.8% 37.5% (+11.3)#66 38.2% (+10.6)#3,268
67. Winside 48.5% 37.5% (+11.0)#67 38.2% (+10.3)#3,395
68. Cambridge 48.4% 37.5% (+10.9)#68 38.2% (+10.2)#3,443
69. Cozad 48.3% 37.5% (+10.8)#69 38.2% (+10.1)#3,471
70. Imperial 48.3% 37.5% (+10.8)#70 38.2% (+10.1)#3,478
71. Stapleton 48.3% 37.5% (+10.8)#71 38.2% (+10.1)#3,513
72. Tekamah 48.0% 37.5% (+10.5)#72 38.2% (+9.80)#3,617
73. Panama 48.0% 37.5% (+10.5)#73 38.2% (+9.80)#3,637
74. Hartington 47.8% 37.5% (+10.3)#74 38.2% (+9.60)#3,691
75. Leigh 47.8% 37.5% (+10.3)#75 38.2% (+9.60)#3,702
76. Salem 47.7% 37.5% (+10.2)#76 38.2% (+9.50)#3,744
77. Fort Calhoun 47.5% 37.5% (+10.00)#77 38.2% (+9.30)#3,833
78. Wynot 47.5% 37.5% (+10.00)#78 38.2% (+9.30)#3,871
79. Ohiowa 47.4% 37.5% (+9.90)#79 38.2% (+9.20)#3,927
80. Ogallala 47.3% 37.5% (+9.80)#80 38.2% (+9.10)#3,947
81. Shelby 47.3% 37.5% (+9.80)#81 38.2% (+9.10)#3,981
82. Schuyler 47.0% 37.5% (+9.50)#82 38.2% (+8.80)#4,114
83. Silver Creek 46.5% 37.5% (+9.00)#83 38.2% (+8.30)#4,350
84. Endicott 46.5% 37.5% (+9.00)#84 38.2% (+8.30)#4,360
85. Shelton 46.3% 37.5% (+8.80)#85 38.2% (+8.10)#4,442
86. Stuart 46.3% 37.5% (+8.80)#86 38.2% (+8.10)#4,456
87. Niobrara 46.0% 37.5% (+8.50)#87 38.2% (+7.80)#4,619
88. Duncan 45.8% 37.5% (+8.30)#88 38.2% (+7.60)#4,696
89. Waterloo 45.6% 37.5% (+8.10)#89 38.2% (+7.40)#4,779
90. Genoa 45.6% 37.5% (+8.10)#90 38.2% (+7.40)#4,783
91. Ansley 45.6% 37.5% (+8.10)#91 38.2% (+7.40)#4,787
92. Palisade 45.5% 37.5% (+8.00)#92 38.2% (+7.30)#4,883
93. Miller 45.5% 37.5% (+8.00)#93 38.2% (+7.30)#4,901
94. Wakefield 45.4% 37.5% (+7.90)#94 38.2% (+7.20)#4,943
95. Dix 45.4% 37.5% (+7.90)#95 38.2% (+7.20)#4,958
96. Uehling 45.4% 37.5% (+7.90)#96 38.2% (+7.20)#4,960
97. Syracuse 45.3% 37.5% (+7.80)#97 38.2% (+7.10)#4,994
98. Goehner 45.3% 37.5% (+7.80)#98 38.2% (+7.10)#5,027
99. Bee 45.2% 37.5% (+7.70)#99 38.2% (+7.00)#5,085
100. Clatonia 44.9% 37.5% (+7.40)#100 38.2% (+6.70)#5,217

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska are:
#1
81.4%
#2
78.3%
#3
75.1%
#4
70.3%
#5
66.3%
#6
66.1%
#7
65.1%
#8
62.5%
#9
62.3%
#10
61.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska?
Plymouth has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska with 81.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Nebraska is 37.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.