Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New York
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York

City % Carpool vs State vs National
1. Windsor 85.3% 40.9% (+44.4)#1 38.2% (+47.1)#2
2. Clarence Center 84.6% 40.9% (+43.7)#2 38.2% (+46.4)#3
3. Plandome Manor 75.3% 40.9% (+34.4)#3 38.2% (+37.1)#21
4. Oyster Bay Cove 72.1% 40.9% (+31.2)#4 38.2% (+33.9)#42
5. Saddle Rock 68.8% 40.9% (+27.9)#5 38.2% (+30.6)#77
6. Rhinebeck 67.7% 40.9% (+26.8)#6 38.2% (+29.5)#91
7. Greenville Cdp Westchester County 67.4% 40.9% (+26.5)#7 38.2% (+29.2)#97
8. Old Field 66.1% 40.9% (+25.2)#8 38.2% (+27.9)#133
9. Fort Montgomery 65.3% 40.9% (+24.4)#9 38.2% (+27.1)#146
10. East Atlantic Beach 64.3% 40.9% (+23.4)#10 38.2% (+26.1)#178
11. Montauk 63.2% 40.9% (+22.3)#11 38.2% (+25.0)#229
12. Sunset Bay 62.6% 40.9% (+21.7)#12 38.2% (+24.4)#266
13. Crugers 62.4% 40.9% (+21.5)#13 38.2% (+24.2)#285
14. Lake George 62.2% 40.9% (+21.3)#14 38.2% (+24.0)#309
15. Bardonia 61.5% 40.9% (+20.6)#15 38.2% (+23.3)#344
16. Upper Brookville 61.5% 40.9% (+20.6)#16 38.2% (+23.3)#346
17. Camden 61.4% 40.9% (+20.5)#17 38.2% (+23.2)#370
18. Skaneateles 61.3% 40.9% (+20.4)#18 38.2% (+23.1)#381
19. Machias 61.2% 40.9% (+20.3)#19 38.2% (+23.0)#394
20. Southampton 61.1% 40.9% (+20.2)#20 38.2% (+22.9)#403
21. Village Green 61.1% 40.9% (+20.2)#21 38.2% (+22.9)#404
22. Sylvan Beach 61.1% 40.9% (+20.2)#22 38.2% (+22.9)#409
23. Chatham 61.0% 40.9% (+20.1)#23 38.2% (+22.8)#416
24. Searingtown 60.6% 40.9% (+19.7)#24 38.2% (+22.4)#440
25. Asharoken 60.6% 40.9% (+19.7)#25 38.2% (+22.4)#448
26. Orient 60.5% 40.9% (+19.6)#26 38.2% (+22.3)#456
27. South Hempstead 60.3% 40.9% (+19.4)#27 38.2% (+22.1)#485
28. Cutchogue 60.3% 40.9% (+19.4)#28 38.2% (+22.1)#486
29. Tarrytown 59.8% 40.9% (+18.9)#29 38.2% (+21.6)#550
30. Bridgeport 59.8% 40.9% (+18.9)#30 38.2% (+21.6)#554
31. Hammondsport 59.8% 40.9% (+18.9)#31 38.2% (+21.6)#556
32. Muttontown 59.7% 40.9% (+18.8)#32 38.2% (+21.5)#562
33. Tully 59.6% 40.9% (+18.7)#33 38.2% (+21.4)#571
34. Springfield Center 59.5% 40.9% (+18.6)#34 38.2% (+21.3)#596
35. Garden City South 59.4% 40.9% (+18.5)#35 38.2% (+21.2)#605
36. Springwater 59.4% 40.9% (+18.5)#36 38.2% (+21.2)#618
37. Sands Point 59.3% 40.9% (+18.4)#37 38.2% (+21.1)#626
38. Herricks 59.2% 40.9% (+18.3)#38 38.2% (+21.0)#644
39. Merritt Park 59.2% 40.9% (+18.3)#39 38.2% (+21.0)#646
40. Hartsdale 59.1% 40.9% (+18.2)#40 38.2% (+20.9)#658
41. Kerhonkson 59.1% 40.9% (+18.2)#41 38.2% (+20.9)#660
42. Russell Gardens 59.1% 40.9% (+18.2)#42 38.2% (+20.9)#664
43. Sandy Creek 59.1% 40.9% (+18.2)#43 38.2% (+20.9)#666
44. Hewlett Neck 58.5% 40.9% (+17.6)#44 38.2% (+20.3)#722
45. Woodbury 58.3% 40.9% (+17.4)#45 38.2% (+20.1)#744
46. Oakdale 58.2% 40.9% (+17.3)#46 38.2% (+20.0)#783
47. Marathon 58.2% 40.9% (+17.3)#47 38.2% (+20.0)#791
48. Port Jefferson Station 58.1% 40.9% (+17.2)#48 38.2% (+19.9)#801
49. Tannersville 58.1% 40.9% (+17.2)#49 38.2% (+19.9)#813
50. Port Henry 57.9% 40.9% (+17.0)#50 38.2% (+19.7)#832
51. Fire Island 57.8% 40.9% (+16.9)#51 38.2% (+19.6)#845
52. Beaver Dam Lake 57.4% 40.9% (+16.5)#52 38.2% (+19.2)#882
53. Homer 57.2% 40.9% (+16.3)#53 38.2% (+19.0)#918
54. Great Neck Estates 57.2% 40.9% (+16.3)#54 38.2% (+19.0)#919
55. Fair Haven 57.2% 40.9% (+16.3)#55 38.2% (+19.0)#923
56. Irvington 57.1% 40.9% (+16.2)#56 38.2% (+18.9)#930
57. Glen Park 57.1% 40.9% (+16.2)#57 38.2% (+18.9)#945
58. Washington Mills 57.0% 40.9% (+16.1)#58 38.2% (+18.8)#955
59. Maybrook 56.9% 40.9% (+16.0)#59 38.2% (+18.7)#973
60. Sparkill 56.9% 40.9% (+16.0)#60 38.2% (+18.7)#975
61. Carle Place 56.6% 40.9% (+15.7)#61 38.2% (+18.4)#1,008
62. Lincolndale 56.6% 40.9% (+15.7)#62 38.2% (+18.4)#1,012
63. West Chazy 56.6% 40.9% (+15.7)#63 38.2% (+18.4)#1,015
64. Yorktown Heights 56.5% 40.9% (+15.6)#64 38.2% (+18.3)#1,021
65. Aquebogue 56.4% 40.9% (+15.5)#65 38.2% (+18.2)#1,052
66. Jordan 56.4% 40.9% (+15.5)#66 38.2% (+18.2)#1,054
67. Limestone 56.4% 40.9% (+15.5)#67 38.2% (+18.2)#1,060
68. Cold Brook 56.3% 40.9% (+15.4)#68 38.2% (+18.1)#1,092
69. Savona 56.2% 40.9% (+15.3)#69 38.2% (+18.0)#1,116
70. Wampsville 56.2% 40.9% (+15.3)#70 38.2% (+18.0)#1,118
71. Munsey Park 56.1% 40.9% (+15.2)#71 38.2% (+17.9)#1,130
72. Narrowsburg 56.1% 40.9% (+15.2)#72 38.2% (+17.9)#1,145
73. Bolton Landing 56.1% 40.9% (+15.2)#73 38.2% (+17.9)#1,147
74. Lake Success 56.0% 40.9% (+15.1)#74 38.2% (+17.8)#1,157
75. Round Lake 56.0% 40.9% (+15.1)#75 38.2% (+17.8)#1,160
76. Oxford 55.6% 40.9% (+14.7)#76 38.2% (+17.4)#1,215
77. Cedarhurst 55.5% 40.9% (+14.6)#77 38.2% (+17.3)#1,226
78. Roslyn Harbor 55.5% 40.9% (+14.6)#78 38.2% (+17.3)#1,235
79. Brookville 55.3% 40.9% (+14.4)#79 38.2% (+17.1)#1,280
80. Hartwick 55.2% 40.9% (+14.3)#80 38.2% (+17.0)#1,320
81. Warsaw 54.9% 40.9% (+14.0)#81 38.2% (+16.7)#1,378
82. Chadwicks 54.9% 40.9% (+14.0)#82 38.2% (+16.7)#1,387
83. East Randolph 54.8% 40.9% (+13.9)#83 38.2% (+16.6)#1,408
84. Gainesville 54.8% 40.9% (+13.9)#84 38.2% (+16.6)#1,412
85. Sloan 54.7% 40.9% (+13.8)#85 38.2% (+16.5)#1,414
86. Schroon Lake 54.7% 40.9% (+13.8)#86 38.2% (+16.5)#1,422
87. Oyster Bay 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#87 38.2% (+16.3)#1,444
88. Hawthorne 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#88 38.2% (+16.3)#1,447
89. Montebello 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#89 38.2% (+16.3)#1,448
90. Trumansburg 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#90 38.2% (+16.3)#1,458
91. Weston Mills 54.5% 40.9% (+13.6)#91 38.2% (+16.3)#1,460
92. Blauvelt 54.3% 40.9% (+13.4)#92 38.2% (+16.1)#1,503
93. Akwesasne 54.3% 40.9% (+13.4)#93 38.2% (+16.1)#1,506
94. Great Neck 54.1% 40.9% (+13.2)#94 38.2% (+15.9)#1,566
95. Catskill 54.1% 40.9% (+13.2)#95 38.2% (+15.9)#1,570
96. North Babylon 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#96 38.2% (+15.8)#1,595
97. New Hyde Park 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#97 38.2% (+15.8)#1,596
98. Big Flats 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#98 38.2% (+15.8)#1,597
99. Speculator 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#99 38.2% (+15.8)#1,608
100. Cayuga 54.0% 40.9% (+13.1)#100 38.2% (+15.8)#1,609

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York?
Windsor has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York with 85.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the State of New York?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in New York is 40.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.