Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Jacksontown 59.8% 5.8% (+54.0)#1 6.9% (+52.9)#135
2. Pancoastburg 50.0% 5.8% (+44.2)#2 6.9% (+43.1)#218
3. Rudolph 44.0% 5.8% (+38.2)#3 6.9% (+37.2)#290
4. Buffalo 39.5% 5.8% (+33.6)#4 6.9% (+32.6)#373
5. New Haven Cdp Hamilton County 39.4% 5.8% (+33.5)#5 6.9% (+32.5)#374
6. Venedocia 36.5% 5.8% (+30.7)#6 6.9% (+29.7)#467
7. Bannock 34.0% 5.8% (+28.2)#7 6.9% (+27.1)#549
8. Sullivan 33.7% 5.8% (+27.8)#8 6.9% (+26.8)#561
9. Bourneville 33.6% 5.8% (+27.8)#9 6.9% (+26.8)#563
10. West Farmington 31.5% 5.8% (+25.7)#10 6.9% (+24.6)#665
11. Trimble 31.3% 5.8% (+25.5)#11 6.9% (+24.4)#675
12. Jacksonburg 30.8% 5.8% (+24.9)#12 6.9% (+23.9)#704
13. Homeworth 30.5% 5.8% (+24.7)#13 6.9% (+23.6)#716
14. Yankee Lake 30.3% 5.8% (+24.5)#14 6.9% (+23.4)#728
15. Miamiville 30.2% 5.8% (+24.3)#15 6.9% (+23.3)#735
16. Collins 28.5% 5.8% (+22.7)#16 6.9% (+21.6)#846
17. Williston 28.3% 5.8% (+22.4)#17 6.9% (+21.4)#862
18. Howard 26.6% 5.8% (+20.7)#18 6.9% (+19.7)#1,005
19. Maple Ridge 26.4% 5.8% (+20.6)#19 6.9% (+19.6)#1,012
20. East Rochester 26.3% 5.8% (+20.5)#20 6.9% (+19.4)#1,021
21. Graysville 26.1% 5.8% (+20.3)#21 6.9% (+19.2)#1,039
22. Brunersburg 25.8% 5.8% (+19.9)#22 6.9% (+18.9)#1,060
23. Caledonia 24.7% 5.8% (+18.9)#23 6.9% (+17.9)#1,159
24. Holloway 24.5% 5.8% (+18.7)#24 6.9% (+17.6)#1,176
25. Butlerville 24.5% 5.8% (+18.6)#25 6.9% (+17.6)#1,180
26. Little Hocking 24.4% 5.8% (+18.6)#26 6.9% (+17.6)#1,186
27. Gomer 23.8% 5.8% (+18.0)#27 6.9% (+16.9)#1,264
28. Pekin 23.8% 5.8% (+18.0)#28 6.9% (+16.9)#1,270
29. Addyston 23.7% 5.8% (+17.9)#29 6.9% (+16.9)#1,275
30. Batesville 23.5% 5.8% (+17.7)#30 6.9% (+16.7)#1,310
31. Vickery 23.5% 5.8% (+17.7)#31 6.9% (+16.6)#1,317
32. Buford 22.9% 5.8% (+17.1)#32 6.9% (+16.1)#1,399
33. Chesterville 22.2% 5.8% (+16.4)#33 6.9% (+15.3)#1,509
34. Castine 22.2% 5.8% (+16.4)#34 6.9% (+15.3)#1,514
35. Rossmoyne 21.9% 5.8% (+16.1)#35 6.9% (+15.0)#1,559
36. Lakeview 21.8% 5.8% (+15.9)#36 6.9% (+14.9)#1,579
37. Hemlock 21.7% 5.8% (+15.9)#37 6.9% (+14.9)#1,584
38. Neville 21.7% 5.8% (+15.9)#38 6.9% (+14.9)#1,591
39. Milledgeville 21.2% 5.8% (+15.3)#39 6.9% (+14.3)#1,676
40. Neapolis 20.9% 5.8% (+15.1)#40 6.9% (+14.0)#1,715
41. East Alliance 20.8% 5.8% (+15.0)#41 6.9% (+14.0)#1,737
42. Mount Pleasant 20.8% 5.8% (+14.9)#42 6.9% (+13.9)#1,751
43. Bentonville 20.5% 5.8% (+14.7)#43 6.9% (+13.6)#1,790
44. Bolton 20.2% 5.8% (+14.4)#44 6.9% (+13.4)#1,851
45. Marlboro 20.2% 5.8% (+14.3)#45 6.9% (+13.3)#1,860
46. Valley City 20.1% 5.8% (+14.2)#46 6.9% (+13.2)#1,873
47. Derby 19.8% 5.8% (+14.0)#47 6.9% (+12.9)#1,938
48. New Lebanon 19.7% 5.8% (+13.9)#48 6.9% (+12.9)#1,957
49. Thurston 19.7% 5.8% (+13.9)#49 6.9% (+12.8)#1,974
50. Camden 19.7% 5.8% (+13.8)#50 6.9% (+12.8)#1,977
51. Sardis 19.7% 5.8% (+13.8)#51 6.9% (+12.8)#1,978
52. Fairfield Beach 19.4% 5.8% (+13.5)#52 6.9% (+12.5)#2,046
53. Conesville 19.1% 5.8% (+13.3)#53 6.9% (+12.3)#2,101
54. Somerville 19.0% 5.8% (+13.2)#54 6.9% (+12.1)#2,139
55. Murray City 19.0% 5.8% (+13.2)#55 6.9% (+12.1)#2,143
56. Stone Creek 18.9% 5.8% (+13.1)#56 6.9% (+12.0)#2,161
57. Madison Place 18.9% 5.8% (+13.1)#57 6.9% (+12.0)#2,166
58. Grandview 18.8% 5.8% (+13.0)#58 6.9% (+12.0)#2,190
59. Sharon Center 18.8% 5.8% (+13.0)#59 6.9% (+11.9)#2,197
60. Suffield 18.8% 5.8% (+13.0)#60 6.9% (+11.9)#2,200
61. Elgin 18.6% 5.8% (+12.7)#61 6.9% (+11.7)#2,254
62. Gratis 18.5% 5.8% (+12.7)#62 6.9% (+11.6)#2,282
63. Burbank 18.2% 5.8% (+12.4)#63 6.9% (+11.4)#2,342
64. Bradner 18.2% 5.8% (+12.4)#64 6.9% (+11.3)#2,358
65. Octa 18.2% 5.8% (+12.4)#65 6.9% (+11.3)#2,387
66. Laura 18.1% 5.8% (+12.3)#66 6.9% (+11.2)#2,409
67. Orangeville 17.8% 5.8% (+12.0)#67 6.9% (+10.9)#2,495
68. Beaverdam 17.7% 5.8% (+11.9)#68 6.9% (+10.8)#2,523
69. St Louisville 17.6% 5.8% (+11.8)#69 6.9% (+10.8)#2,538
70. Marengo 17.6% 5.8% (+11.7)#70 6.9% (+10.7)#2,567
71. New Miami 17.5% 5.8% (+11.7)#71 6.9% (+10.6)#2,578
72. Highland Holiday 17.5% 5.8% (+11.6)#72 6.9% (+10.6)#2,591
73. New Straitsville 17.4% 5.8% (+11.6)#73 6.9% (+10.6)#2,602
74. Corwin 17.4% 5.8% (+11.6)#74 6.9% (+10.5)#2,611
75. Valley Hi 17.2% 5.8% (+11.4)#75 6.9% (+10.4)#2,654
76. Somerset 17.1% 5.8% (+11.2)#76 6.9% (+10.2)#2,726
77. Chesterhill 16.9% 5.8% (+11.1)#77 6.9% (+10.0)#2,779
78. Hide A Way Hills 16.8% 5.8% (+10.9)#78 6.9% (+9.88)#2,834
79. Lockbourne 16.7% 5.8% (+10.8)#79 6.9% (+9.79)#2,875
80. Tedrow 16.7% 5.8% (+10.8)#80 6.9% (+9.79)#2,877
81. Port Jefferson 16.5% 5.8% (+10.7)#81 6.9% (+9.60)#2,966
82. Bowersville 16.3% 5.8% (+10.5)#82 6.9% (+9.42)#3,025
83. Harbor Hills 16.3% 5.8% (+10.5)#83 6.9% (+9.40)#3,030
84. Mount Eaton 16.3% 5.8% (+10.5)#84 6.9% (+9.40)#3,033
85. Magnetic Springs 16.3% 5.8% (+10.4)#85 6.9% (+9.37)#3,041
86. Holmesville 16.0% 5.8% (+10.2)#86 6.9% (+9.17)#3,117
87. Rosemount 16.0% 5.8% (+10.2)#87 6.9% (+9.13)#3,131
88. Otway 16.0% 5.8% (+10.2)#88 6.9% (+9.12)#3,139
89. Russells Point 16.0% 5.8% (+10.2)#89 6.9% (+9.12)#3,140
90. Carbon Hill 15.9% 5.8% (+10.1)#90 6.9% (+9.07)#3,157
91. Roseville 15.9% 5.8% (+10.1)#91 6.9% (+9.05)#3,161
92. Tarlton 15.8% 5.8% (+10.0)#92 6.9% (+8.96)#3,205
93. Luckey 15.8% 5.8% (+10.0)#93 6.9% (+8.95)#3,206
94. Glenmoor 15.8% 5.8% (+9.93)#94 6.9% (+8.88)#3,239
95. Atwater 15.5% 5.8% (+9.66)#95 6.9% (+8.61)#3,354
96. Woodsdale 15.5% 5.8% (+9.65)#96 6.9% (+8.60)#3,356
97. Malvern 15.5% 5.8% (+9.63)#97 6.9% (+8.58)#3,363
98. Massieville 15.5% 5.8% (+9.63)#98 6.9% (+8.58)#3,365
99. Marshallville 15.3% 5.8% (+9.43)#99 6.9% (+8.38)#3,466
100. Brecon 15.2% 5.8% (+9.39)#100 6.9% (+8.34)#3,481

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio are:
#1
50.0%
#2
44.0%
#3
39.5%
#4
36.5%
#5
34.0%
#6
33.6%
#7
31.5%
#8
31.3%
#9
30.8%
#10
30.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio?
Pancoastburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio with 50.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Ohio is 5.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.