Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Butler100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#16.9%(+93.1)#3
2.Renfrow100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#26.9%(+93.1)#22
3.Cooperton100.0%7.2%(+92.8)#36.9%(+93.1)#43
4.Sour John80.0%7.2%(+72.8)#46.9%(+73.1)#61
5.Lakeside78.6%7.2%(+71.4)#56.9%(+71.7)#64
6.Stidham72.7%7.2%(+65.6)#66.9%(+65.9)#81
7.Mehan70.0%7.2%(+62.8)#76.9%(+63.1)#89
8.Moyers64.0%7.2%(+56.8)#86.9%(+57.1)#110
9.Smith Village57.6%7.2%(+50.4)#96.9%(+50.7)#147
10.Lovell52.0%7.2%(+44.8)#106.9%(+45.1)#196
11.Eagle50.0%7.2%(+42.8)#116.9%(+43.1)#226
12.Bison44.4%7.2%(+37.3)#126.9%(+37.6)#282
13.Adams41.5%7.2%(+34.3)#136.9%(+34.6)#331
14.Durham40.0%7.2%(+32.8)#146.9%(+33.1)#361
15.Mcbride39.3%7.2%(+32.1)#156.9%(+32.4)#379
16.Notchietown38.6%7.2%(+31.4)#166.9%(+31.7)#392
17.Burlington38.1%7.2%(+30.9)#176.9%(+31.2)#406
18.Rentiesville37.3%7.2%(+30.1)#186.9%(+30.4)#440
19.Moodys36.6%7.2%(+29.4)#196.9%(+29.7)#463
20.Hitchita36.4%7.2%(+29.2)#206.9%(+29.5)#470
21.Bessie35.8%7.2%(+28.6)#216.9%(+28.9)#486
22.Hastings34.6%7.2%(+27.4)#226.9%(+27.7)#528
23.Mazie34.1%7.2%(+27.0)#236.9%(+27.3)#543
24.Emet33.3%7.2%(+26.2)#246.9%(+26.5)#579
25.Utica33.3%7.2%(+26.2)#256.9%(+26.5)#580
26.Pump Back32.6%7.2%(+25.4)#266.9%(+25.7)#622
27.Lowrey31.9%7.2%(+24.7)#276.9%(+25.0)#643
28.Johnson Prairie31.1%7.2%(+23.9)#286.9%(+24.2)#684
29.Felt31.0%7.2%(+23.9)#296.9%(+24.2)#689
30.Peckham29.6%7.2%(+22.5)#306.9%(+22.8)#767
31.Strong City28.6%7.2%(+21.4)#316.9%(+21.7)#837
32.Honey Hill28.3%7.2%(+21.1)#326.9%(+21.4)#863
33.Slick28.1%7.2%(+20.9)#336.9%(+21.2)#879
34.Flute Springs27.8%7.2%(+20.6)#346.9%(+20.9)#901
35.Greenville26.9%7.2%(+19.8)#356.9%(+20.0)#981
36.Swink26.3%7.2%(+19.1)#366.9%(+19.4)#1,023
37.Tenkiller26.2%7.2%(+19.0)#376.9%(+19.3)#1,035
38.Lehigh25.8%7.2%(+18.7)#386.9%(+19.0)#1,055
39.Ballou25.8%7.2%(+18.7)#396.9%(+19.0)#1,056
40.Snake Creek25.2%7.2%(+18.0)#406.9%(+18.3)#1,112
41.May25.0%7.2%(+17.8)#416.9%(+18.1)#1,144
42.Knowles25.0%7.2%(+17.8)#426.9%(+18.1)#1,151
43.Colbert24.3%7.2%(+17.1)#436.9%(+17.4)#1,199
44.Barber23.9%7.2%(+16.7)#446.9%(+17.0)#1,258
45.Wakita23.5%7.2%(+16.4)#456.9%(+16.7)#1,306
46.Bridge Creek23.3%7.2%(+16.2)#466.9%(+16.5)#1,340
47.Fittstown23.3%7.2%(+16.2)#476.9%(+16.5)#1,344
48.Teresita23.1%7.2%(+15.9)#486.9%(+16.2)#1,373
49.Taft23.1%7.2%(+15.9)#496.9%(+16.2)#1,375
50.Schulter22.9%7.2%(+15.7)#506.9%(+16.0)#1,403
51.Olive22.7%7.2%(+15.6)#516.9%(+15.9)#1,436
52.Redbird Smith22.6%7.2%(+15.5)#526.9%(+15.8)#1,444
53.Cement22.5%7.2%(+15.3)#536.9%(+15.6)#1,472
54.Optima22.0%7.2%(+14.9)#546.9%(+15.2)#1,538
55.Sparrowhawk22.0%7.2%(+14.9)#556.9%(+15.2)#1,539
56.Ninnekah21.8%7.2%(+14.6)#566.9%(+14.9)#1,573
57.Hanna21.7%7.2%(+14.6)#576.9%(+14.9)#1,589
58.Welling21.6%7.2%(+14.4)#586.9%(+14.7)#1,611
59.Rocky21.6%7.2%(+14.4)#596.9%(+14.7)#1,614
60.Sand Point21.6%7.2%(+14.4)#606.9%(+14.7)#1,616
61.Dotyville21.5%7.2%(+14.4)#616.9%(+14.7)#1,624
62.Indiahoma21.2%7.2%(+14.0)#626.9%(+14.3)#1,666
63.Cottonwood21.1%7.2%(+13.9)#636.9%(+14.2)#1,696
64.Sportmans Shores20.8%7.2%(+13.7)#646.9%(+14.0)#1,735
65.Christie20.7%7.2%(+13.6)#656.9%(+13.9)#1,758
66.Wainwright20.5%7.2%(+13.3)#666.9%(+13.6)#1,792
67.Yale20.4%7.2%(+13.2)#676.9%(+13.5)#1,813
68.Haywood20.4%7.2%(+13.2)#686.9%(+13.5)#1,819
69.Carney20.4%7.2%(+13.2)#696.9%(+13.5)#1,820
70.Lucien19.8%7.2%(+12.6)#706.9%(+12.9)#1,952
71.Lamar19.7%7.2%(+12.5)#716.9%(+12.8)#1,969
72.Baker19.4%7.2%(+12.2)#726.9%(+12.5)#2,039
73.Blackburn19.4%7.2%(+12.2)#736.9%(+12.5)#2,057
74.Lamont19.0%7.2%(+11.8)#746.9%(+12.1)#2,142
75.Tribbey18.6%7.2%(+11.4)#756.9%(+11.7)#2,241
76.Manchester18.6%7.2%(+11.4)#766.9%(+11.7)#2,243
77.Marble City18.5%7.2%(+11.3)#776.9%(+11.6)#2,274
78.Custer City18.2%7.2%(+11.0)#786.9%(+11.3)#2,361
79.Monroe18.2%7.2%(+11.0)#796.9%(+11.3)#2,371
80.Greenfield18.2%7.2%(+11.0)#806.9%(+11.3)#2,374
81.Kildare18.2%7.2%(+11.0)#816.9%(+11.3)#2,380
82.Thackerville17.9%7.2%(+10.7)#826.9%(+11.0)#2,455
83.Tryon17.6%7.2%(+10.5)#836.9%(+10.8)#2,537
84.Arpelar17.2%7.2%(+10.1)#846.9%(+10.4)#2,651
85.Sportsmen Acres17.2%7.2%(+9.99)#856.9%(+10.3)#2,679
86.Wauhillau17.1%7.2%(+9.92)#866.9%(+10.2)#2,706
87.Hennepin17.1%7.2%(+9.90)#876.9%(+10.2)#2,720
88.Rocky Ford16.8%7.2%(+9.67)#886.9%(+9.97)#2,796
89.Garvin16.7%7.2%(+9.50)#896.9%(+9.79)#2,886
90.Terlton16.7%7.2%(+9.50)#906.9%(+9.79)#2,905
91.Elohim16.7%7.2%(+9.50)#916.9%(+9.79)#2,907
92.Dwight Mission16.7%7.2%(+9.50)#926.9%(+9.79)#2,908
93.Douglas16.7%7.2%(+9.50)#936.9%(+9.79)#2,909
94.Gans16.4%7.2%(+9.21)#946.9%(+9.50)#2,998
95.Zeb16.4%7.2%(+9.19)#956.9%(+9.48)#3,009
96.Boswell16.3%7.2%(+9.11)#966.9%(+9.40)#3,031
97.Clarita16.1%7.2%(+8.96)#976.9%(+9.25)#3,083
98.Stilwell16.1%7.2%(+8.96)#986.9%(+9.25)#3,087
99.Meno16.1%7.2%(+8.91)#996.9%(+9.21)#3,101
100.Warr Acres16.1%7.2%(+8.90)#1006.9%(+9.19)#3,106

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
80.0%
#5
72.7%
#6
57.6%
#7
44.4%
#8
38.6%
#9
38.1%
#10
37.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma?
Butler has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.