Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Butler 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#3
2. Renfrow 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#22
3. Cooperton 100.0% 7.2% (+92.8)#3 6.9% (+93.1)#43
4. Sour John 80.0% 7.2% (+72.8)#4 6.9% (+73.1)#61
5. Lakeside 78.6% 7.2% (+71.4)#5 6.9% (+71.7)#64
6. Stidham 72.7% 7.2% (+65.6)#6 6.9% (+65.9)#81
7. Mehan 70.0% 7.2% (+62.8)#7 6.9% (+63.1)#89
8. Moyers 64.0% 7.2% (+56.8)#8 6.9% (+57.1)#110
9. Smith Village 57.6% 7.2% (+50.4)#9 6.9% (+50.7)#147
10. Lovell 52.0% 7.2% (+44.8)#10 6.9% (+45.1)#196
11. Eagle 50.0% 7.2% (+42.8)#11 6.9% (+43.1)#226
12. Bison 44.4% 7.2% (+37.3)#12 6.9% (+37.6)#282
13. Adams 41.5% 7.2% (+34.3)#13 6.9% (+34.6)#331
14. Durham 40.0% 7.2% (+32.8)#14 6.9% (+33.1)#361
15. Mcbride 39.3% 7.2% (+32.1)#15 6.9% (+32.4)#379
16. Notchietown 38.6% 7.2% (+31.4)#16 6.9% (+31.7)#392
17. Burlington 38.1% 7.2% (+30.9)#17 6.9% (+31.2)#406
18. Rentiesville 37.3% 7.2% (+30.1)#18 6.9% (+30.4)#440
19. Moodys 36.6% 7.2% (+29.4)#19 6.9% (+29.7)#463
20. Hitchita 36.4% 7.2% (+29.2)#20 6.9% (+29.5)#470
21. Bessie 35.8% 7.2% (+28.6)#21 6.9% (+28.9)#486
22. Hastings 34.6% 7.2% (+27.4)#22 6.9% (+27.7)#528
23. Mazie 34.1% 7.2% (+27.0)#23 6.9% (+27.3)#543
24. Emet 33.3% 7.2% (+26.2)#24 6.9% (+26.5)#579
25. Utica 33.3% 7.2% (+26.2)#25 6.9% (+26.5)#580
26. Pump Back 32.6% 7.2% (+25.4)#26 6.9% (+25.7)#622
27. Lowrey 31.9% 7.2% (+24.7)#27 6.9% (+25.0)#643
28. Johnson Prairie 31.1% 7.2% (+23.9)#28 6.9% (+24.2)#684
29. Felt 31.0% 7.2% (+23.9)#29 6.9% (+24.2)#689
30. Peckham 29.6% 7.2% (+22.5)#30 6.9% (+22.8)#767
31. Strong City 28.6% 7.2% (+21.4)#31 6.9% (+21.7)#837
32. Honey Hill 28.3% 7.2% (+21.1)#32 6.9% (+21.4)#863
33. Slick 28.1% 7.2% (+20.9)#33 6.9% (+21.2)#879
34. Flute Springs 27.8% 7.2% (+20.6)#34 6.9% (+20.9)#901
35. Greenville 26.9% 7.2% (+19.8)#35 6.9% (+20.0)#981
36. Swink 26.3% 7.2% (+19.1)#36 6.9% (+19.4)#1,023
37. Tenkiller 26.2% 7.2% (+19.0)#37 6.9% (+19.3)#1,035
38. Lehigh 25.8% 7.2% (+18.7)#38 6.9% (+19.0)#1,055
39. Ballou 25.8% 7.2% (+18.7)#39 6.9% (+19.0)#1,056
40. Snake Creek 25.2% 7.2% (+18.0)#40 6.9% (+18.3)#1,112
41. May 25.0% 7.2% (+17.8)#41 6.9% (+18.1)#1,144
42. Knowles 25.0% 7.2% (+17.8)#42 6.9% (+18.1)#1,151
43. Colbert 24.3% 7.2% (+17.1)#43 6.9% (+17.4)#1,199
44. Barber 23.9% 7.2% (+16.7)#44 6.9% (+17.0)#1,258
45. Wakita 23.5% 7.2% (+16.4)#45 6.9% (+16.7)#1,306
46. Bridge Creek 23.3% 7.2% (+16.2)#46 6.9% (+16.5)#1,340
47. Fittstown 23.3% 7.2% (+16.2)#47 6.9% (+16.5)#1,344
48. Teresita 23.1% 7.2% (+15.9)#48 6.9% (+16.2)#1,373
49. Taft 23.1% 7.2% (+15.9)#49 6.9% (+16.2)#1,375
50. Schulter 22.9% 7.2% (+15.7)#50 6.9% (+16.0)#1,403
51. Olive 22.7% 7.2% (+15.6)#51 6.9% (+15.9)#1,436
52. Redbird Smith 22.6% 7.2% (+15.5)#52 6.9% (+15.8)#1,444
53. Cement 22.5% 7.2% (+15.3)#53 6.9% (+15.6)#1,472
54. Optima 22.0% 7.2% (+14.9)#54 6.9% (+15.2)#1,538
55. Sparrowhawk 22.0% 7.2% (+14.9)#55 6.9% (+15.2)#1,539
56. Ninnekah 21.8% 7.2% (+14.6)#56 6.9% (+14.9)#1,573
57. Hanna 21.7% 7.2% (+14.6)#57 6.9% (+14.9)#1,589
58. Welling 21.6% 7.2% (+14.4)#58 6.9% (+14.7)#1,611
59. Rocky 21.6% 7.2% (+14.4)#59 6.9% (+14.7)#1,614
60. Sand Point 21.6% 7.2% (+14.4)#60 6.9% (+14.7)#1,616
61. Dotyville 21.5% 7.2% (+14.4)#61 6.9% (+14.7)#1,624
62. Indiahoma 21.2% 7.2% (+14.0)#62 6.9% (+14.3)#1,666
63. Cottonwood 21.1% 7.2% (+13.9)#63 6.9% (+14.2)#1,696
64. Sportmans Shores 20.8% 7.2% (+13.7)#64 6.9% (+14.0)#1,735
65. Christie 20.7% 7.2% (+13.6)#65 6.9% (+13.9)#1,758
66. Wainwright 20.5% 7.2% (+13.3)#66 6.9% (+13.6)#1,792
67. Yale 20.4% 7.2% (+13.2)#67 6.9% (+13.5)#1,813
68. Haywood 20.4% 7.2% (+13.2)#68 6.9% (+13.5)#1,819
69. Carney 20.4% 7.2% (+13.2)#69 6.9% (+13.5)#1,820
70. Lucien 19.8% 7.2% (+12.6)#70 6.9% (+12.9)#1,952
71. Lamar 19.7% 7.2% (+12.5)#71 6.9% (+12.8)#1,969
72. Baker 19.4% 7.2% (+12.2)#72 6.9% (+12.5)#2,039
73. Blackburn 19.4% 7.2% (+12.2)#73 6.9% (+12.5)#2,057
74. Lamont 19.0% 7.2% (+11.8)#74 6.9% (+12.1)#2,142
75. Tribbey 18.6% 7.2% (+11.4)#75 6.9% (+11.7)#2,241
76. Manchester 18.6% 7.2% (+11.4)#76 6.9% (+11.7)#2,243
77. Marble City 18.5% 7.2% (+11.3)#77 6.9% (+11.6)#2,274
78. Custer City 18.2% 7.2% (+11.0)#78 6.9% (+11.3)#2,361
79. Monroe 18.2% 7.2% (+11.0)#79 6.9% (+11.3)#2,371
80. Greenfield 18.2% 7.2% (+11.0)#80 6.9% (+11.3)#2,374
81. Kildare 18.2% 7.2% (+11.0)#81 6.9% (+11.3)#2,380
82. Thackerville 17.9% 7.2% (+10.7)#82 6.9% (+11.0)#2,455
83. Tryon 17.6% 7.2% (+10.5)#83 6.9% (+10.8)#2,537
84. Arpelar 17.2% 7.2% (+10.1)#84 6.9% (+10.4)#2,651
85. Sportsmen Acres 17.2% 7.2% (+9.99)#85 6.9% (+10.3)#2,679
86. Wauhillau 17.1% 7.2% (+9.92)#86 6.9% (+10.2)#2,706
87. Hennepin 17.1% 7.2% (+9.90)#87 6.9% (+10.2)#2,720
88. Rocky Ford 16.8% 7.2% (+9.67)#88 6.9% (+9.97)#2,796
89. Garvin 16.7% 7.2% (+9.50)#89 6.9% (+9.79)#2,886
90. Terlton 16.7% 7.2% (+9.50)#90 6.9% (+9.79)#2,905
91. Elohim 16.7% 7.2% (+9.50)#91 6.9% (+9.79)#2,907
92. Dwight Mission 16.7% 7.2% (+9.50)#92 6.9% (+9.79)#2,908
93. Douglas 16.7% 7.2% (+9.50)#93 6.9% (+9.79)#2,909
94. Gans 16.4% 7.2% (+9.21)#94 6.9% (+9.50)#2,998
95. Zeb 16.4% 7.2% (+9.19)#95 6.9% (+9.48)#3,009
96. Boswell 16.3% 7.2% (+9.11)#96 6.9% (+9.40)#3,031
97. Clarita 16.1% 7.2% (+8.96)#97 6.9% (+9.25)#3,083
98. Stilwell 16.1% 7.2% (+8.96)#98 6.9% (+9.25)#3,087
99. Meno 16.1% 7.2% (+8.91)#99 6.9% (+9.21)#3,101
100. Warr Acres 16.1% 7.2% (+8.90)#100 6.9% (+9.19)#3,106

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
80.0%
#5
72.7%
#6
57.6%
#7
44.4%
#8
38.6%
#9
38.1%
#10
37.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma?
Butler has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Oklahoma is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.