Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Missouri
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Harwood 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#1 6.9% (+93.1)#41
2. Bigelow 100.0% 6.8% (+93.2)#2 6.9% (+93.1)#44
3. La Due 80.0% 6.8% (+73.2)#3 6.9% (+73.1)#62
4. Revere 70.3% 6.8% (+63.5)#4 6.9% (+63.4)#88
5. Iantha 63.6% 6.8% (+56.9)#5 6.9% (+56.8)#112
6. Paynesville 44.4% 6.8% (+37.7)#6 6.9% (+37.6)#284
7. South Lineville 42.9% 6.8% (+36.1)#7 6.9% (+36.0)#308
8. Syracuse 41.0% 6.8% (+34.2)#8 6.9% (+34.1)#337
9. Miramiguoa Park 40.4% 6.8% (+33.6)#9 6.9% (+33.5)#347
10. Arbela 40.0% 6.8% (+33.2)#10 6.9% (+33.1)#362
11. Cherokee Pass 39.3% 6.8% (+32.6)#11 6.9% (+32.4)#375
12. Gravois Mills 38.5% 6.8% (+31.7)#12 6.9% (+31.6)#397
13. Caledonia 35.7% 6.8% (+29.0)#13 6.9% (+28.8)#489
14. Indian Lake 33.7% 6.8% (+26.9)#14 6.9% (+26.8)#560
15. Stoutsville 33.3% 6.8% (+26.6)#15 6.9% (+26.5)#584
16. Grand Pass 33.3% 6.8% (+26.6)#16 6.9% (+26.5)#586
17. Irena 33.3% 6.8% (+26.6)#17 6.9% (+26.5)#591
18. Fairdealing 31.9% 6.8% (+25.2)#18 6.9% (+25.1)#642
19. Whiteside 31.5% 6.8% (+24.7)#19 6.9% (+24.6)#668
20. Curryville 30.8% 6.8% (+24.0)#20 6.9% (+23.9)#701
21. Hartsburg 30.2% 6.8% (+23.5)#21 6.9% (+23.4)#730
22. Reeds 30.1% 6.8% (+23.4)#22 6.9% (+23.3)#738
23. Connelsville 30.0% 6.8% (+23.2)#23 6.9% (+23.1)#744
24. Defiance 29.5% 6.8% (+22.8)#24 6.9% (+22.6)#774
25. Foley 29.2% 6.8% (+22.5)#25 6.9% (+22.4)#789
26. Burfordville 29.2% 6.8% (+22.4)#26 6.9% (+22.3)#794
27. Easton 28.7% 6.8% (+21.9)#27 6.9% (+21.8)#815
28. Darlington 28.6% 6.8% (+21.8)#28 6.9% (+21.7)#835
29. Vista 28.6% 6.8% (+21.8)#29 6.9% (+21.7)#841
30. Climax Springs 28.2% 6.8% (+21.4)#30 6.9% (+21.3)#871
31. Winston 27.7% 6.8% (+20.9)#31 6.9% (+20.8)#909
32. Creighton 27.5% 6.8% (+20.8)#32 6.9% (+20.7)#917
33. Birmingham 27.5% 6.8% (+20.8)#33 6.9% (+20.7)#918
34. Clifton Hill 26.8% 6.8% (+20.1)#34 6.9% (+20.0)#987
35. New Cambria 26.7% 6.8% (+19.9)#35 6.9% (+19.8)#999
36. Marthasville 26.4% 6.8% (+19.7)#36 6.9% (+19.6)#1,013
37. Freeman 26.1% 6.8% (+19.4)#37 6.9% (+19.2)#1,037
38. Norwood 25.9% 6.8% (+19.2)#38 6.9% (+19.0)#1,047
39. Bolckow 25.6% 6.8% (+18.9)#39 6.9% (+18.8)#1,073
40. Saginaw 25.4% 6.8% (+18.6)#40 6.9% (+18.5)#1,093
41. Vandiver 25.0% 6.8% (+18.2)#41 6.9% (+18.1)#1,133
42. Wooldridge 25.0% 6.8% (+18.2)#42 6.9% (+18.1)#1,148
43. Strasburg 24.7% 6.8% (+17.9)#43 6.9% (+17.8)#1,163
44. Humansville 24.5% 6.8% (+17.7)#44 6.9% (+17.6)#1,177
45. Clark 24.1% 6.8% (+17.4)#45 6.9% (+17.3)#1,223
46. Newark 24.1% 6.8% (+17.4)#46 6.9% (+17.3)#1,229
47. Rhineland 24.0% 6.8% (+17.2)#47 6.9% (+17.1)#1,241
48. Hurley 23.9% 6.8% (+17.2)#48 6.9% (+17.1)#1,251
49. Big Lake 23.8% 6.8% (+17.1)#49 6.9% (+16.9)#1,267
50. Napoleon 23.6% 6.8% (+16.8)#50 6.9% (+16.7)#1,297
51. Pendleton 23.3% 6.8% (+16.6)#51 6.9% (+16.5)#1,345
52. Cole Camp 23.1% 6.8% (+16.3)#52 6.9% (+16.2)#1,368
53. Fidelity 23.1% 6.8% (+16.3)#53 6.9% (+16.2)#1,369
54. Craig 23.1% 6.8% (+16.3)#54 6.9% (+16.2)#1,377
55. Tightwad 23.1% 6.8% (+16.3)#55 6.9% (+16.2)#1,378
56. Verona 23.0% 6.8% (+16.2)#56 6.9% (+16.1)#1,392
57. Amsterdam 22.6% 6.8% (+15.9)#57 6.9% (+15.8)#1,447
58. Tallapoosa 22.5% 6.8% (+15.7)#58 6.9% (+15.6)#1,467
59. New Market 22.4% 6.8% (+15.7)#59 6.9% (+15.6)#1,476
60. Frankford 22.3% 6.8% (+15.6)#60 6.9% (+15.4)#1,499
61. Diehlstadt 21.7% 6.8% (+15.0)#61 6.9% (+14.9)#1,587
62. Washburn 21.6% 6.8% (+14.8)#62 6.9% (+14.7)#1,613
63. Old Appleton 21.6% 6.8% (+14.8)#63 6.9% (+14.7)#1,620
64. Niangua 21.4% 6.8% (+14.7)#64 6.9% (+14.6)#1,631
65. La Russell 21.4% 6.8% (+14.7)#65 6.9% (+14.6)#1,636
66. Lake St. Clair 21.2% 6.8% (+14.4)#66 6.9% (+14.3)#1,669
67. Raintree Plantation 20.9% 6.8% (+14.2)#67 6.9% (+14.1)#1,710
68. Prathersville 20.9% 6.8% (+14.2)#68 6.9% (+14.1)#1,714
69. Ridgely 20.6% 6.8% (+13.9)#69 6.9% (+13.8)#1,770
70. Sumner 20.6% 6.8% (+13.8)#70 6.9% (+13.7)#1,779
71. Brownington 20.6% 6.8% (+13.8)#71 6.9% (+13.7)#1,780
72. Emma 20.3% 6.8% (+13.5)#72 6.9% (+13.4)#1,836
73. Mendon 20.2% 6.8% (+13.4)#73 6.9% (+13.3)#1,854
74. Saverton 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#74 6.9% (+13.1)#1,896
75. Edinburg 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#75 6.9% (+13.1)#1,897
76. Blairstown 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#76 6.9% (+13.1)#1,902
77. Merwin 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#77 6.9% (+13.1)#1,906
78. Burgess 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#78 6.9% (+13.1)#1,908
79. Cliff Village 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#79 6.9% (+13.1)#1,910
80. St Cloud 20.0% 6.8% (+13.2)#80 6.9% (+13.1)#1,911
81. Wyaconda 19.8% 6.8% (+13.0)#81 6.9% (+12.9)#1,948
82. Rosendale 19.2% 6.8% (+12.5)#82 6.9% (+12.4)#2,084
83. Sundown 19.1% 6.8% (+12.4)#83 6.9% (+12.3)#2,104
84. Dawn 19.1% 6.8% (+12.4)#84 6.9% (+12.3)#2,106
85. Montier 19.0% 6.8% (+12.3)#85 6.9% (+12.2)#2,128
86. West Line 18.3% 6.8% (+11.6)#86 6.9% (+11.5)#2,319
87. Galena 18.2% 6.8% (+11.5)#87 6.9% (+11.4)#2,343
88. Chilhowee 18.2% 6.8% (+11.4)#88 6.9% (+11.3)#2,366
89. St Paul 18.1% 6.8% (+11.4)#89 6.9% (+11.2)#2,410
90. Lake Timberline 18.0% 6.8% (+11.3)#90 6.9% (+11.2)#2,424
91. Leslie 17.6% 6.8% (+10.9)#91 6.9% (+10.8)#2,548
92. Flemington 17.6% 6.8% (+10.9)#92 6.9% (+10.8)#2,549
93. Villa Ridge 17.5% 6.8% (+10.7)#93 6.9% (+10.6)#2,583
94. Macks Creek 17.4% 6.8% (+10.6)#94 6.9% (+10.5)#2,616
95. Richards 17.4% 6.8% (+10.6)#95 6.9% (+10.5)#2,618
96. Novinger 17.4% 6.8% (+10.6)#96 6.9% (+10.5)#2,622
97. Dixon 17.1% 6.8% (+10.4)#97 6.9% (+10.3)#2,681
98. Tebbetts 17.1% 6.8% (+10.4)#98 6.9% (+10.2)#2,696
99. Bellflower 17.1% 6.8% (+10.3)#99 6.9% (+10.2)#2,717
100. Clarksville 17.0% 6.8% (+10.3)#100 6.9% (+10.2)#2,730

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
80.0%
#4
70.3%
#5
44.4%
#6
42.9%
#7
41.0%
#8
40.4%
#9
40.0%
#10
39.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri?
Harwood has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Missouri?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Missouri is 6.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.