Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Ponshewaing 62.7% 5.8% (+57.0)#1 6.9% (+55.9)#116
2. Winn 45.9% 5.8% (+40.1)#2 6.9% (+39.0)#261
3. St James 40.0% 5.8% (+34.2)#3 6.9% (+33.1)#357
4. Cross Village 37.5% 5.8% (+31.7)#4 6.9% (+30.6)#428
5. Palo 33.6% 5.8% (+27.8)#5 6.9% (+26.7)#564
6. Millersburg 32.7% 5.8% (+26.9)#6 6.9% (+25.8)#618
7. Woodland Beach 29.0% 5.8% (+23.2)#7 6.9% (+22.1)#806
8. Wolverine 28.0% 5.8% (+22.2)#8 6.9% (+21.1)#887
9. Maple City 27.2% 5.8% (+21.4)#9 6.9% (+20.3)#956
10. Breedsville 27.0% 5.8% (+21.3)#10 6.9% (+20.2)#970
11. Interlochen 26.7% 5.8% (+20.9)#11 6.9% (+19.8)#995
12. Turner 25.0% 5.8% (+19.2)#12 6.9% (+18.1)#1,136
13. Garden 24.3% 5.8% (+18.5)#13 6.9% (+17.4)#1,198
14. Loomis 24.2% 5.8% (+18.4)#14 6.9% (+17.3)#1,216
15. Alden 24.0% 5.8% (+18.2)#15 6.9% (+17.1)#1,242
16. Greenland 22.4% 5.8% (+16.6)#16 6.9% (+15.5)#1,491
17. Canada Creek Ranch 22.0% 5.8% (+16.2)#17 6.9% (+15.1)#1,546
18. Lake Leelanau 21.7% 5.8% (+15.9)#18 6.9% (+14.8)#1,604
19. Prescott 21.6% 5.8% (+15.8)#19 6.9% (+14.7)#1,623
20. Levering 20.8% 5.8% (+15.1)#20 6.9% (+14.0)#1,741
21. Barnes Lake 20.8% 5.8% (+15.0)#21 6.9% (+13.9)#1,752
22. Ahmeek 20.5% 5.8% (+14.7)#22 6.9% (+13.6)#1,801
23. Dowling 20.4% 5.8% (+14.7)#23 6.9% (+13.6)#1,803
24. Dorr 20.4% 5.8% (+14.6)#24 6.9% (+13.5)#1,812
25. Luther 20.4% 5.8% (+14.6)#25 6.9% (+13.5)#1,817
26. Rapid River 19.7% 5.8% (+14.0)#26 6.9% (+12.8)#1,962
27. Imlay City 19.4% 5.8% (+13.7)#27 6.9% (+12.6)#2,024
28. Manistee Lake 19.2% 5.8% (+13.5)#28 6.9% (+12.4)#2,082
29. Jennings 18.8% 5.8% (+13.1)#29 6.9% (+11.9)#2,195
30. Mohawk 18.6% 5.8% (+12.9)#30 6.9% (+11.8)#2,238
31. Rapid City 18.0% 5.8% (+12.2)#31 6.9% (+11.1)#2,428
32. Lakeview 18.0% 5.8% (+12.2)#32 6.9% (+11.1)#2,443
33. Trimountain 17.5% 5.8% (+11.7)#33 6.9% (+10.6)#2,582
34. Mount Morris 16.9% 5.8% (+11.2)#34 6.9% (+10.1)#2,760
35. Lupton 16.5% 5.8% (+10.7)#35 6.9% (+9.59)#2,970
36. Vassar 16.3% 5.8% (+10.6)#36 6.9% (+9.45)#3,016
37. Indian River 16.2% 5.8% (+10.4)#37 6.9% (+9.28)#3,073
38. Pearl Beach 15.9% 5.8% (+10.1)#38 6.9% (+8.98)#3,201
39. Brutus 15.7% 5.8% (+9.98)#39 6.9% (+8.87)#3,244
40. Canadian Lakes 15.7% 5.8% (+9.94)#40 6.9% (+8.83)#3,264
41. Gaastra 15.4% 5.8% (+9.62)#41 6.9% (+8.51)#3,385
42. Skanee 15.4% 5.8% (+9.62)#42 6.9% (+8.51)#3,403
43. Wakefield 15.3% 5.8% (+9.50)#43 6.9% (+8.39)#3,463
44. Vanderbilt 15.1% 5.8% (+9.29)#44 6.9% (+8.19)#3,563
45. Glen Arbor 15.0% 5.8% (+9.28)#45 6.9% (+8.17)#3,570
46. Burt 14.9% 5.8% (+9.09)#46 6.9% (+7.98)#3,695
47. Freeport 14.7% 5.8% (+8.98)#47 6.9% (+7.87)#3,766
48. Shaftsburg 14.5% 5.8% (+8.76)#48 6.9% (+7.65)#3,903
49. Melvin 14.5% 5.8% (+8.71)#49 6.9% (+7.60)#3,935
50. Benton Heights 14.4% 5.8% (+8.67)#50 6.9% (+7.56)#3,949
51. Otisville 14.3% 5.8% (+8.55)#51 6.9% (+7.45)#4,004
52. Lyons 14.3% 5.8% (+8.55)#52 6.9% (+7.44)#4,005
53. Kingsley 14.3% 5.8% (+8.54)#53 6.9% (+7.43)#4,011
54. Daggett 14.3% 5.8% (+8.52)#54 6.9% (+7.41)#4,036
55. Pierson 14.3% 5.8% (+8.52)#55 6.9% (+7.41)#4,043
56. Fife Lake 14.1% 5.8% (+8.36)#56 6.9% (+7.25)#4,139
57. Attica 14.1% 5.8% (+8.35)#57 6.9% (+7.24)#4,141
58. Ida 14.0% 5.8% (+8.28)#58 6.9% (+7.17)#4,181
59. Laingsburg 13.9% 5.8% (+8.10)#59 6.9% (+6.99)#4,296
60. Grand Marais 13.7% 5.8% (+7.93)#60 6.9% (+6.82)#4,411
61. Delton 13.7% 5.8% (+7.92)#61 6.9% (+6.81)#4,418
62. Whittemore 13.6% 5.8% (+7.83)#62 6.9% (+6.72)#4,472
63. White Pine 13.6% 5.8% (+7.79)#63 6.9% (+6.68)#4,509
64. Omena 13.5% 5.8% (+7.69)#64 6.9% (+6.59)#4,586
65. Lake Ann 13.1% 5.8% (+7.36)#65 6.9% (+6.25)#4,829
66. Capac 13.1% 5.8% (+7.33)#66 6.9% (+6.22)#4,844
67. Marion 13.1% 5.8% (+7.30)#67 6.9% (+6.19)#4,865
68. Hubbardston 13.0% 5.8% (+7.25)#68 6.9% (+6.14)#4,910
69. Howard City 13.0% 5.8% (+7.24)#69 6.9% (+6.14)#4,913
70. Brethren 12.9% 5.8% (+7.11)#70 6.9% (+6.00)#5,006
71. Bangor 12.8% 5.8% (+7.06)#71 6.9% (+5.96)#5,031
72. Athens 12.8% 5.8% (+7.04)#72 6.9% (+5.93)#5,054
73. Mcbain 12.8% 5.8% (+7.04)#73 6.9% (+5.93)#5,059
74. Merrill 12.8% 5.8% (+7.01)#74 6.9% (+5.90)#5,076
75. Manitou Beach Devils Lake 12.7% 5.8% (+6.97)#75 6.9% (+5.87)#5,096
76. Estral Beach 12.6% 5.8% (+6.86)#76 6.9% (+5.75)#5,165
77. Kent City 12.6% 5.8% (+6.85)#77 6.9% (+5.74)#5,172
78. Swartz Creek 12.5% 5.8% (+6.72)#78 6.9% (+5.61)#5,283
79. Lake Odessa 12.4% 5.8% (+6.65)#79 6.9% (+5.54)#5,333
80. Casnovia 12.4% 5.8% (+6.61)#80 6.9% (+5.50)#5,368
81. Westphalia 12.4% 5.8% (+6.60)#81 6.9% (+5.49)#5,384
82. Argentine 12.3% 5.8% (+6.56)#82 6.9% (+5.45)#5,410
83. Martin 12.3% 5.8% (+6.53)#83 6.9% (+5.42)#5,440
84. Bath 12.3% 5.8% (+6.50)#84 6.9% (+5.39)#5,466
85. Horton Bay 12.3% 5.8% (+6.49)#85 6.9% (+5.38)#5,474
86. Ellsworth 12.2% 5.8% (+6.47)#86 6.9% (+5.36)#5,490
87. Millington 12.2% 5.8% (+6.41)#87 6.9% (+5.30)#5,535
88. Forestville 12.1% 5.8% (+6.35)#88 6.9% (+5.24)#5,587
89. Memphis 11.9% 5.8% (+6.17)#89 6.9% (+5.06)#5,773
90. Cambria 11.9% 5.8% (+6.16)#90 6.9% (+5.05)#5,786
91. Galien 11.9% 5.8% (+6.16)#91 6.9% (+5.05)#5,788
92. Petersburg 11.9% 5.8% (+6.12)#92 6.9% (+5.01)#5,819
93. Crystal Mountain 11.8% 5.8% (+6.00)#93 6.9% (+4.89)#5,946
94. Mayville 11.6% 5.8% (+5.88)#94 6.9% (+4.77)#6,064
95. Harbor Springs 11.5% 5.8% (+5.76)#95 6.9% (+4.65)#6,204
96. Vernon 11.3% 5.8% (+5.56)#96 6.9% (+4.45)#6,394
97. Fostoria 11.3% 5.8% (+5.55)#97 6.9% (+4.44)#6,407
98. Eastport 11.3% 5.8% (+5.55)#98 6.9% (+4.44)#6,412
99. Mendon 11.3% 5.8% (+5.51)#99 6.9% (+4.40)#6,452
100. Mears 11.3% 5.8% (+5.51)#100 6.9% (+4.40)#6,457

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan are:
#1
62.7%
#2
40.0%
#3
37.5%
#4
32.7%
#5
29.0%
#6
28.0%
#7
27.2%
#8
27.0%
#9
26.7%
#10
25.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan?
Ponshewaing has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan with 62.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Michigan is 5.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.