Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tennessee
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Castalian Springs 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#189
2. Beech Bluff 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#286
3. Mayland 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#496
4. Statesville 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#518
5. Norene 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#535
6. Big Rock 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#572
7. Pocahontas 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#611
8. Taft 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#708
9. Iron City 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#759
10. Whiteside 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#802
11. Conasauga 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#832
12. Shiloh 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#915
13. Luray 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#961
14. Helenwood 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#974
15. Huron 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,032
16. Bransford 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,042
17. Greenvale 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,129
18. Yuma 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,172
19. Viola 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,245
20. Belvidere 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,522
21. Tuckers Crossroads 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,575
22. Frankewing 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,607
23. Lavinia 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,714
24. Mercer 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,778
25. Coker Creek 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,865
26. Childers Hill 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#2,300
27. Wynnburg 100.0% 67.1% (+32.9)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#2,408
28. Beersheba Springs 99.5% 67.1% (+32.4)#28 64.8% (+34.7)#2,652
29. Tellico Village 98.4% 67.1% (+31.4)#29 64.8% (+33.6)#2,774
30. Forest Hills 97.8% 67.1% (+30.7)#30 64.8% (+33.0)#2,909
31. Dodson Branch 97.4% 67.1% (+30.3)#31 64.8% (+32.5)#3,047
32. Hilham 97.1% 67.1% (+30.1)#32 64.8% (+32.3)#3,110
33. Briceville 97.1% 67.1% (+30.0)#33 64.8% (+32.2)#3,122
34. Rural Hill 97.0% 67.1% (+29.9)#34 64.8% (+32.1)#3,162
35. Belle Meade 96.7% 67.1% (+29.7)#35 64.8% (+31.9)#3,244
36. Oak Grove Cdp Sumner County 96.7% 67.1% (+29.7)#36 64.8% (+31.9)#3,245
37. Walnut Hill 95.5% 67.1% (+28.4)#37 64.8% (+30.7)#3,655
38. Oak Hill 95.2% 67.1% (+28.1)#38 64.8% (+30.3)#3,797
39. Rockvale 94.6% 67.1% (+27.6)#39 64.8% (+29.8)#4,020
40. Kahite 94.5% 67.1% (+27.5)#40 64.8% (+29.7)#4,066
41. Fairmount 94.0% 67.1% (+27.0)#41 64.8% (+29.2)#4,269
42. Baneberry 93.9% 67.1% (+26.8)#42 64.8% (+29.1)#4,322
43. Nolensville 93.2% 67.1% (+26.1)#43 64.8% (+28.4)#4,612
44. Grimsley 93.1% 67.1% (+26.1)#44 64.8% (+28.3)#4,636
45. Morris Chapel 93.1% 67.1% (+26.0)#45 64.8% (+28.3)#4,640
46. La Grange 93.0% 67.1% (+26.0)#46 64.8% (+28.2)#4,688
47. Shackle Island 93.0% 67.1% (+25.9)#47 64.8% (+28.2)#4,697
48. Lake Tansi 93.0% 67.1% (+25.9)#48 64.8% (+28.2)#4,712
49. Three Way 92.9% 67.1% (+25.8)#49 64.8% (+28.1)#4,748
50. Watauga 92.9% 67.1% (+25.8)#50 64.8% (+28.1)#4,757
51. Lookout Mountain 92.8% 67.1% (+25.7)#51 64.8% (+27.9)#4,815
52. Banner Hill 92.7% 67.1% (+25.6)#52 64.8% (+27.9)#4,846
53. Bon Air 92.7% 67.1% (+25.6)#53 64.8% (+27.9)#4,851
54. Townsend 92.4% 67.1% (+25.3)#54 64.8% (+27.6)#4,983
55. Medon 92.4% 67.1% (+25.3)#55 64.8% (+27.6)#4,993
56. Pegram 91.9% 67.1% (+24.8)#56 64.8% (+27.0)#5,243
57. Altamont 91.8% 67.1% (+24.7)#57 64.8% (+27.0)#5,290
58. Flat Top Mountain 91.7% 67.1% (+24.6)#58 64.8% (+26.9)#5,312
59. Brentwood 91.6% 67.1% (+24.6)#59 64.8% (+26.8)#5,356
60. Darden 91.4% 67.1% (+24.4)#60 64.8% (+26.6)#5,441
61. Blanche 91.1% 67.1% (+24.1)#61 64.8% (+26.3)#5,610
62. Christiana 91.0% 67.1% (+23.9)#62 64.8% (+26.2)#5,701
63. Parker S Crossroads 90.9% 67.1% (+23.9)#63 64.8% (+26.1)#5,745
64. Coopertown 90.4% 67.1% (+23.4)#64 64.8% (+25.6)#6,000
65. Mowbray Mountain 90.2% 67.1% (+23.2)#65 64.8% (+25.4)#6,099
66. Piperton 90.0% 67.1% (+22.9)#66 64.8% (+25.2)#6,202
67. Wildersville 90.0% 67.1% (+22.9)#67 64.8% (+25.2)#6,218
68. Orlinda 90.0% 67.1% (+22.9)#68 64.8% (+25.1)#6,256
69. Bowman 89.8% 67.1% (+22.7)#69 64.8% (+24.9)#6,357
70. Oakland 89.7% 67.1% (+22.7)#70 64.8% (+24.9)#6,374
71. Fairgarden 89.5% 67.1% (+22.5)#71 64.8% (+24.7)#6,476
72. Fairfield Glade 89.4% 67.1% (+22.4)#72 64.8% (+24.6)#6,529
73. Colonial Heights 89.3% 67.1% (+22.3)#73 64.8% (+24.5)#6,564
74. New Deal 89.3% 67.1% (+22.3)#74 64.8% (+24.5)#6,581
75. Signal Mountain 88.9% 67.1% (+21.9)#75 64.8% (+24.1)#6,797
76. Gruetli Laager 88.6% 67.1% (+21.5)#76 64.8% (+23.7)#6,998
77. Fincastle 88.4% 67.1% (+21.4)#77 64.8% (+23.6)#7,070
78. Green Hill 88.4% 67.1% (+21.3)#78 64.8% (+23.6)#7,086
79. Graball 88.4% 67.1% (+21.3)#79 64.8% (+23.6)#7,099
80. Palmer 88.3% 67.1% (+21.3)#80 64.8% (+23.5)#7,141
81. Crump 88.3% 67.1% (+21.2)#81 64.8% (+23.4)#7,166
82. Centertown 88.1% 67.1% (+21.0)#82 64.8% (+23.3)#7,251
83. Williston 88.0% 67.1% (+21.0)#83 64.8% (+23.2)#7,283
84. Louisville 88.0% 67.1% (+20.9)#84 64.8% (+23.2)#7,318
85. Ridgeside 87.9% 67.1% (+20.8)#85 64.8% (+23.1)#7,374
86. Tusculum 87.8% 67.1% (+20.8)#86 64.8% (+23.0)#7,406
87. Germantown 87.6% 67.1% (+20.5)#87 64.8% (+22.8)#7,557
88. Gladeville 87.6% 67.1% (+20.5)#88 64.8% (+22.7)#7,571
89. Clarkrange 87.4% 67.1% (+20.4)#89 64.8% (+22.6)#7,675
90. Park City 87.3% 67.1% (+20.3)#90 64.8% (+22.5)#7,724
91. Adams 87.3% 67.1% (+20.2)#91 64.8% (+22.5)#7,738
92. Normandy 87.1% 67.1% (+20.0)#92 64.8% (+22.3)#7,869
93. Kingston Springs 86.8% 67.1% (+19.7)#93 64.8% (+22.0)#8,065
94. Michie 86.4% 67.1% (+19.3)#94 64.8% (+21.5)#8,308
95. New Union 86.4% 67.1% (+19.3)#95 64.8% (+21.5)#8,323
96. Mount Carmel 86.3% 67.1% (+19.3)#96 64.8% (+21.5)#8,347
97. Farragut 86.2% 67.1% (+19.2)#97 64.8% (+21.4)#8,409
98. Arlington 86.1% 67.1% (+19.0)#98 64.8% (+21.3)#8,500
99. Fall Branch 86.0% 67.1% (+18.9)#99 64.8% (+21.2)#8,551
100. Allardt 86.0% 67.1% (+18.9)#100 64.8% (+21.2)#8,576

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee?
Castalian Springs has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Tennessee?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tennessee is 67.1%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.