Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Kent Estates 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#25
2. Alleman 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#361
3. Donahue 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#375
4. Sandusky 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#378
5. Bronson 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#475
6. Mooar 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#530
7. Bertram 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#570
8. Alvord 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#619
9. Bentley 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#778
10. Haverhill 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#823
11. South Amana 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#909
12. St Lucas 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#935
13. Elberon 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#978
14. Chapin 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#995
15. Franklin 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,070
16. Garden City 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,071
17. Homestead 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,077
18. Oak Hills 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,156
19. Swedesburg 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,212
20. Stone City 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,231
21. Kinross 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,252
22. Lowell 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,254
23. High Amana 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,335
24. Weston 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,340
25. Westwood 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,409
26. Downey 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,438
27. California Junction 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,463
28. Climbing Hill 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,542
29. Trenton 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,553
30. Randalia 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,605
31. Watkins 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,624
32. Pleasanton 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,638
33. Carbon 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#1,681
34. Thornburg 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#1,682
35. New Haven 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,692
36. Augusta 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#1,706
37. Beaver 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,707
38. Miller 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,774
39. Rinard 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,775
40. Imogene 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#1,786
41. Rochester 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,824
42. Sandyville 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#1,859
43. St Benedict 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,887
44. Thayer 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,901
45. Anderson 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,902
46. Loveland 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,903
47. Argyle 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#1,918
48. Gillett Grove 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#1,972
49. Little Cedar 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#1,973
50. Rathbun 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#1,996
51. Buck Grove 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#2,011
52. Jackson Junction 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#2,012
53. Frytown 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#2,050
54. Kingston 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#2,051
55. Blanchard 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,059
56. Varina 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,093
57. Conway 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#2,111
58. Portland 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#2,156
59. Mineola 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#2,193
60. Mona 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#2,194
61. Otranto 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#2,250
62. Leando 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#2,251
63. Owasa 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#2,271
64. Benton 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#2,272
65. Toeterville 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#66 64.8% (+35.2)#2,291
66. Hayfield 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#67 64.8% (+35.2)#2,310
67. Elkport 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#68 64.8% (+35.2)#2,375
68. Hardy 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#69 64.8% (+35.2)#2,376
69. Durango 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#70 64.8% (+35.2)#2,398
70. Rodman 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#71 64.8% (+35.2)#2,399
71. Hepburn 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#72 64.8% (+35.2)#2,420
72. Roseville 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#74 64.8% (+35.2)#2,489
73. Bartlett 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#75 64.8% (+35.2)#2,490
74. Argo 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#76 64.8% (+35.2)#2,491
75. Plainview 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#77 64.8% (+35.2)#2,516
76. Corley 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#78 64.8% (+35.2)#2,587
77. River Sioux 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#79 64.8% (+35.2)#2,600
78. Jacksonville 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#80 64.8% (+35.2)#2,612
79. Athelstan 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#81 64.8% (+35.2)#2,619
80. Berkley 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#82 64.8% (+35.2)#2,623
81. Bankston 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#83 64.8% (+35.2)#2,633
82. Beaconsfield 100.0% 71.5% (+28.5)#84 64.8% (+35.2)#2,634
83. Lambs Grove 98.9% 71.5% (+27.4)#85 64.8% (+34.1)#2,705
84. Dedham 98.7% 71.5% (+27.2)#86 64.8% (+33.9)#2,725
85. Shueyville 98.7% 71.5% (+27.2)#87 64.8% (+33.9)#2,734
86. Halbur 98.4% 71.5% (+26.9)#88 64.8% (+33.6)#2,773
87. Superior 98.4% 71.5% (+26.9)#89 64.8% (+33.6)#2,780
88. Melrose 98.2% 71.5% (+26.7)#90 64.8% (+33.4)#2,819
89. Panorama Park 98.1% 71.5% (+26.6)#91 64.8% (+33.3)#2,825
90. Mcclelland 98.0% 71.5% (+26.4)#92 64.8% (+33.1)#2,864
91. Mitchell 97.7% 71.5% (+26.2)#93 64.8% (+32.9)#2,935
92. Keomah Village 97.6% 71.5% (+26.1)#94 64.8% (+32.8)#2,950
93. Columbus City 97.5% 71.5% (+26.0)#95 64.8% (+32.7)#2,991
94. Northboro 97.5% 71.5% (+26.0)#96 64.8% (+32.7)#2,995
95. Vining 97.4% 71.5% (+25.9)#97 64.8% (+32.6)#3,044
96. Lanesboro 97.3% 71.5% (+25.8)#98 64.8% (+32.5)#3,057
97. Derby 97.1% 71.5% (+25.6)#99 64.8% (+32.3)#3,100
98. Baldwin 96.9% 71.5% (+25.4)#100 64.8% (+32.1)#3,187
99. Hamilton 96.8% 71.5% (+25.3)#101 64.8% (+32.0)#3,224
100. Lake Panorama 96.8% 71.5% (+25.2)#102 64.8% (+31.9)#3,234

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa?
Alleman has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Iowa is 71.5%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.