Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arkansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Floyd 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#131
2. Wesley 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#303
3. Henderson 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#344
4. New Blaine 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#364
5. Buckner 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#446
6. Maysville 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#642
7. Center Ridge 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#716
8. Knobel 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#722
9. Mount Holly 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#768
10. Banks 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#769
11. Collins 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#822
12. Aplin 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#861
13. Hattieville 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#862
14. New Edinburg 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#875
15. Staves 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#939
16. Boles 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,068
17. Kingston 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,076
18. Lawson 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,130
19. Urbana 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,131
20. Ponca 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,188
21. Bee Branch 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,253
22. Springtown 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,270
23. Tucker 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,280
24. Higden 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,318
25. Bethesda 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,336
26. Oakland 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,343
27. Canehill 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,351
28. Black Springs 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,362
29. Ivan 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,390
30. Dora 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,410
31. Hagarville 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,411
32. Alleene 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,429
33. Mcdougal 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,444
34. Peach Orchard 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#1,446
35. Amagon 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#1,479
36. Mount Olive 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,496
37. Evansville 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#1,507
38. Georgetown 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,508
39. Alix 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,513
40. Mount Judea 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,604
41. Patmos 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#1,605
42. Caddo Gap 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,627
43. Jones Mills 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#1,642
44. Bowman 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,669
45. Violet Hill 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,756
46. Poplar Grove 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,787
47. Floral 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,793
48. Fair Oaks 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#1,804
49. Monroe 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#1,833
50. Whelen Springs 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#1,841
51. Edgemont 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#2,029
52. Cherokee City 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#2,098
53. Jerusalem 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#2,126
54. Lagrange 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#2,127
55. Saratoga 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,143
56. Oark 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,334
57. Gamaliel 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#2,360
58. Fourche 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#2,403
59. Gregory 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#2,463
60. Wiederkehr Village 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#2,464
61. Halley 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#2,465
62. Walcott 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#2,493
63. Princeton 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#2,603
64. Gilbert 100.0% 66.2% (+33.8)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#2,613
65. Yarborough Landing 98.6% 66.2% (+32.4)#66 64.8% (+33.8)#2,747
66. Clarkedale 98.6% 66.2% (+32.3)#67 64.8% (+33.7)#2,751
67. Armorel 98.2% 66.2% (+32.0)#68 64.8% (+33.4)#2,815
68. Roe 97.8% 66.2% (+31.6)#69 64.8% (+33.0)#2,907
69. Wayton 96.4% 66.2% (+30.2)#70 64.8% (+31.6)#3,339
70. Concord 96.4% 66.2% (+30.2)#71 64.8% (+31.6)#3,343
71. Natural Steps 96.2% 66.2% (+30.0)#72 64.8% (+31.4)#3,428
72. South Lead Hill 96.0% 66.2% (+29.8)#73 64.8% (+31.2)#3,484
73. Harrell 95.9% 66.2% (+29.7)#74 64.8% (+31.1)#3,508
74. Dennard 95.9% 66.2% (+29.7)#75 64.8% (+31.1)#3,509
75. Franklin 95.8% 66.2% (+29.6)#76 64.8% (+31.0)#3,524
76. Ulm 95.8% 66.2% (+29.6)#77 64.8% (+31.0)#3,547
77. Campbell Station 95.7% 66.2% (+29.5)#78 64.8% (+30.9)#3,569
78. Cave Springs 95.4% 66.2% (+29.2)#79 64.8% (+30.6)#3,679
79. Goshen 95.3% 66.2% (+29.1)#80 64.8% (+30.5)#3,740
80. Almyra 95.2% 66.2% (+29.0)#81 64.8% (+30.4)#3,785
81. Huttig 95.1% 66.2% (+28.8)#82 64.8% (+30.2)#3,834
82. Rye 94.7% 66.2% (+28.5)#83 64.8% (+29.9)#3,965
83. Lost Bridge Village 94.7% 66.2% (+28.5)#84 64.8% (+29.9)#3,984
84. Pindall 94.5% 66.2% (+28.3)#85 64.8% (+29.7)#4,050
85. Okolona 94.3% 66.2% (+28.0)#86 64.8% (+29.4)#4,178
86. Vanndale 94.1% 66.2% (+27.9)#87 64.8% (+29.3)#4,213
87. Tillar 94.0% 66.2% (+27.8)#88 64.8% (+29.2)#4,268
88. Elm Springs 93.8% 66.2% (+27.5)#89 64.8% (+29.0)#4,364
89. Tumbling Shoals 93.6% 66.2% (+27.4)#90 64.8% (+28.8)#4,424
90. Avilla 93.5% 66.2% (+27.3)#91 64.8% (+28.7)#4,492
91. Traskwood 93.5% 66.2% (+27.3)#92 64.8% (+28.7)#4,495
92. Bodcaw 93.3% 66.2% (+27.1)#93 64.8% (+28.5)#4,553
93. Oakhaven 93.3% 66.2% (+27.1)#94 64.8% (+28.5)#4,560
94. Daisy 93.2% 66.2% (+27.0)#95 64.8% (+28.4)#4,610
95. Woodlawn 93.1% 66.2% (+26.9)#96 64.8% (+28.3)#4,641
96. Menifee 92.9% 66.2% (+26.6)#97 64.8% (+28.0)#4,766
97. Avoca 92.7% 66.2% (+26.5)#98 64.8% (+27.9)#4,838
98. Datto 92.6% 66.2% (+26.4)#99 64.8% (+27.8)#4,903
99. Cedarville 92.4% 66.2% (+26.2)#100 64.8% (+27.6)#4,969
100. Valley Springs 92.4% 66.2% (+26.2)#101 64.8% (+27.6)#4,980

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas?
New Blaine has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Arkansas?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Arkansas is 66.2%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.