Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. St. John's University 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#33
2. Marion 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#365
3. Searles 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#494
4. Heidelberg 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#672
5. Shelly 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#739
6. Dumont 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#983
7. High Forest 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#1,030
8. Merrifield 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#1,114
9. Perley 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#1,133
10. Knife River 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#1,171
11. Norcross 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#1,250
12. Viking 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#1,277
13. Spring Hill 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#1,290
14. Vining 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#1,293
15. Darfur 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,449
16. Kilkenny 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,487
17. Nimrod 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,497
18. Comstock 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,501
19. Trosky 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,571
20. Turtle River 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,582
21. Georgetown 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,583
22. Kenneth 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,592
23. Roy Lake 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,633
24. Funkley 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,651
25. Essig 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,667
26. Leonidas 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,676
27. Ronneby 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,745
28. Nassau 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,776
29. Lengby 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,853
30. Westport 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,871
31. Dovray 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,872
32. Fish Lake 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,885
33. West Roy Lake 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#1,895
34. Wilder 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#1,913
35. Sargeant 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,931
36. Urbank 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#2,060
37. Hatfield 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#2,089
38. Hubbard 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#2,124
39. Cedar Mills 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#2,135
40. Sedan 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#2,136
41. Kent 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#2,152
42. Denham 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#2,211
43. Johnson 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#2,230
44. Kerrick 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#2,231
45. Louisburg 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#2,264
46. Hillman 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#2,305
47. Doran 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#2,354
48. Manhattan Beach 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#2,393
49. Barry 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#2,418
50. Florence 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#2,435
51. Strathcona 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#2,455
52. Donaldson 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#2,534
53. Goodland 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#2,535
54. Kinbrae 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#2,590
55. The Ranch 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,621
56. Boy River 100.0% 72.3% (+27.7)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,622
57. Sabin 99.5% 72.3% (+27.2)#58 64.8% (+34.7)#2,650
58. Pine Springs 99.3% 72.3% (+27.0)#59 64.8% (+34.5)#2,664
59. Landfall 99.0% 72.3% (+26.6)#60 64.8% (+34.2)#2,700
60. Oronoco 98.3% 72.3% (+26.0)#61 64.8% (+33.5)#2,793
61. New Munich 98.1% 72.3% (+25.8)#62 64.8% (+33.3)#2,845
62. Afton 97.9% 72.3% (+25.5)#63 64.8% (+33.0)#2,890
63. Long Beach 97.9% 72.3% (+25.5)#64 64.8% (+33.0)#2,892
64. Woodland 97.8% 72.3% (+25.4)#65 64.8% (+32.9)#2,912
65. Boyd 97.7% 72.3% (+25.4)#66 64.8% (+32.9)#2,933
66. Ihlen 97.7% 72.3% (+25.4)#67 64.8% (+32.9)#2,937
67. Sunfish Lake 97.7% 72.3% (+25.3)#68 64.8% (+32.8)#2,939
68. Pickwick 97.5% 72.3% (+25.1)#69 64.8% (+32.7)#3,011
69. Lake Henry 97.4% 72.3% (+25.1)#70 64.8% (+32.6)#3,024
70. Dundas 97.3% 72.3% (+25.0)#71 64.8% (+32.5)#3,049
71. Green Isle 97.3% 72.3% (+25.0)#72 64.8% (+32.5)#3,050
72. Gary 97.0% 72.3% (+24.6)#73 64.8% (+32.2)#3,153
73. Credit River 96.9% 72.3% (+24.5)#74 64.8% (+32.0)#3,195
74. Greenfield 96.8% 72.3% (+24.5)#75 64.8% (+32.0)#3,209
75. Seaforth 96.7% 72.3% (+24.3)#76 64.8% (+31.9)#3,257
76. Oak Grove 96.6% 72.3% (+24.3)#77 64.8% (+31.8)#3,270
77. Independence 96.6% 72.3% (+24.2)#78 64.8% (+31.8)#3,292
78. La Salle 96.6% 72.3% (+24.2)#79 64.8% (+31.7)#3,301
79. Taconite 96.5% 72.3% (+24.1)#80 64.8% (+31.6)#3,329
80. New Trier 96.4% 72.3% (+24.1)#81 64.8% (+31.6)#3,345
81. Dellwood 96.3% 72.3% (+23.9)#82 64.8% (+31.4)#3,404
82. Nowthen 96.1% 72.3% (+23.8)#83 64.8% (+31.3)#3,442
83. Frost 96.0% 72.3% (+23.7)#84 64.8% (+31.2)#3,471
84. Conger 96.0% 72.3% (+23.7)#85 64.8% (+31.2)#3,483
85. St Bonifacius 95.9% 72.3% (+23.6)#86 64.8% (+31.1)#3,514
86. Ball Club 95.8% 72.3% (+23.5)#87 64.8% (+31.0)#3,526
87. Quamba 95.8% 72.3% (+23.5)#88 64.8% (+31.0)#3,529
88. Humboldt 95.8% 72.3% (+23.5)#89 64.8% (+31.0)#3,534
89. Marine On St Croix 95.8% 72.3% (+23.5)#90 64.8% (+31.0)#3,538
90. Grasston 95.7% 72.3% (+23.4)#91 64.8% (+30.9)#3,562
91. Minnetrista 95.6% 72.3% (+23.3)#92 64.8% (+30.8)#3,596
92. Fairhaven 95.6% 72.3% (+23.3)#93 64.8% (+30.8)#3,616
93. Harris 95.5% 72.3% (+23.2)#94 64.8% (+30.7)#3,647
94. Dakota 95.5% 72.3% (+23.1)#95 64.8% (+30.6)#3,664
95. Delhi 95.5% 72.3% (+23.1)#96 64.8% (+30.6)#3,675
96. St Stephen 95.3% 72.3% (+23.0)#97 64.8% (+30.5)#3,725
97. Currie 95.3% 72.3% (+23.0)#98 64.8% (+30.5)#3,747
98. Ham Lake 95.2% 72.3% (+22.8)#99 64.8% (+30.3)#3,798
99. Alberta 95.1% 72.3% (+22.8)#100 64.8% (+30.3)#3,814
100. Strandquist 95.1% 72.3% (+22.8)#101 64.8% (+30.3)#3,815

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota?
Searles has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Minnesota is 72.3%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.