Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Gregory 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#343
2. New Eucha 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#428
3. Gideon 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#523
4. Rose 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#620
5. Cloud Creek 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#691
6. Bug Tussle 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#779
7. Dixon 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#829
8. Cimarron City 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#852
9. Edgewater Park 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#931
10. Sams Corner 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#945
11. Hennepin 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#950
12. Welty 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#955
13. Middleberg 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#1,023
14. Bull Hollow 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#1,086
15. Fairmont 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,099
16. Lawtonka Acres 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,137
17. Mazie 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,151
18. Nardin 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,187
19. Narcissa 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,192
20. Pensacola 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,199
21. Brush Creek 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,269
22. Panola 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,271
23. Baker 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,294
24. Carrier 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,371
25. Dotyville 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,412
26. Pontotoc 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,425
27. Mcbride 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,426
28. Bentley 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,448
29. Earl 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,460
30. Olive 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,461
31. Bison 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,535
32. Sycamore 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,568
33. Lone Chimney 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,647
34. Fay 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#1,716
35. Blackgum 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,739
36. Vanoss 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#1,740
37. Lake Aluma 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,762
38. Renfrow 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,780
39. Lovell 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,800
40. Webb City 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#1,814
41. Dripping Springs 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,845
42. Terlton 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,848
43. Strong City 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,849
44. Putnam 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,850
45. Shamrock 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,923
46. Hollister 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#1,924
47. Elmer 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#1,941
48. Grainola 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#1,942
49. Golden 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#1,955
50. Scipio 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#1,986
51. Durham 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#2,005
52. Etta 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#2,017
53. Zion 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#2,018
54. Fallis 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,035
55. Douglas 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,096
56. Watova 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#2,102
57. New Woodville 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#2,148
58. Meridian 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#2,184
59. Piney 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#2,242
60. Hitchcock 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#2,362
61. Eagle 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#2,384
62. Bryant 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#2,430
63. Quay 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#2,447
64. Friendship 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#66 64.8% (+35.2)#2,448
65. Foraker 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#67 64.8% (+35.2)#2,449
66. Sumner 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#68 64.8% (+35.2)#2,474
67. Byron 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#69 64.8% (+35.2)#2,494
68. Jefferson 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#70 64.8% (+35.2)#2,507
69. Texola 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#71 64.8% (+35.2)#2,508
70. Lotsee 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#72 64.8% (+35.2)#2,596
71. Mulhall 98.1% 65.9% (+32.2)#73 64.8% (+33.3)#2,839
72. Marshall 97.5% 65.9% (+31.5)#74 64.8% (+32.7)#3,008
73. Brushy 97.4% 65.9% (+31.5)#75 64.8% (+32.6)#3,025
74. Simms 97.0% 65.9% (+31.1)#76 64.8% (+32.2)#3,136
75. Goltry 97.0% 65.9% (+31.1)#77 64.8% (+32.2)#3,138
76. Foss 97.0% 65.9% (+31.0)#78 64.8% (+32.2)#3,156
77. Hickory 97.0% 65.9% (+31.0)#79 64.8% (+32.2)#3,157
78. Nash 96.9% 65.9% (+31.0)#80 64.8% (+32.1)#3,175
79. Loco 96.8% 65.9% (+30.8)#81 64.8% (+32.0)#3,225
80. Deer Creek 96.6% 65.9% (+30.6)#82 64.8% (+31.7)#3,297
81. Sequoyah 96.4% 65.9% (+30.5)#83 64.8% (+31.6)#3,338
82. Forest Park 96.3% 65.9% (+30.3)#84 64.8% (+31.5)#3,391
83. Manchester 96.2% 65.9% (+30.3)#85 64.8% (+31.4)#3,411
84. Short 96.0% 65.9% (+30.0)#86 64.8% (+31.1)#3,493
85. Cookson 95.9% 65.9% (+29.9)#87 64.8% (+31.0)#3,518
86. Nichols Hills 95.9% 65.9% (+29.9)#88 64.8% (+31.0)#3,519
87. Iron Post 95.7% 65.9% (+29.7)#89 64.8% (+30.8)#3,592
88. Titanic 95.5% 65.9% (+29.5)#90 64.8% (+30.6)#3,663
89. Flint Creek 95.3% 65.9% (+29.4)#91 64.8% (+30.5)#3,729
90. Paradise Hill 95.2% 65.9% (+29.3)#92 64.8% (+30.4)#3,761
91. Utica 95.2% 65.9% (+29.3)#93 64.8% (+30.4)#3,767
92. White Oak 95.2% 65.9% (+29.2)#94 64.8% (+30.3)#3,794
93. Smith Village 95.1% 65.9% (+29.2)#95 64.8% (+30.3)#3,816
94. Cornish 95.1% 65.9% (+29.1)#96 64.8% (+30.3)#3,830
95. Hallett 95.0% 65.9% (+29.1)#97 64.8% (+30.2)#3,865
96. Clearview 95.0% 65.9% (+29.1)#98 64.8% (+30.2)#3,866
97. Lebanon 94.6% 65.9% (+28.7)#99 64.8% (+29.8)#4,030
98. Hochatown 94.6% 65.9% (+28.6)#100 64.8% (+29.7)#4,039
99. Akins 94.6% 65.9% (+28.6)#101 64.8% (+29.7)#4,046
100. Taylor Ferry 94.4% 65.9% (+28.5)#102 64.8% (+29.6)#4,095

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Gregory has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 65.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.