Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. North Bay 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#630
2. Springfield 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#865
3. Fenwood 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#922
4. Pulcifer 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#1,020
5. Grand Marsh 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#1,040
6. Pine River 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#1,050
7. Clarks Mills 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#1,055
8. Dekorra 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#1,206
9. Houlton 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#1,209
10. Cornucopia 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#1,257
11. Stockholm 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#1,347
12. Townsend 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#1,385
13. Barronett 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#1,386
14. Dunbar 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,400
15. Waumandee 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,533
16. Summit Lake 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,566
17. Odanah 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,617
18. Clam Lake 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,799
19. Long Lake 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,861
20. Thornton 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,876
21. Fulton 100.0% 67.7% (+32.3)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,999
22. Lake Sherwood 99.5% 67.7% (+31.8)#23 64.8% (+34.7)#2,653
23. Bayfront 98.7% 67.7% (+31.1)#24 64.8% (+33.9)#2,727
24. Powers Lake 98.4% 67.7% (+30.7)#25 64.8% (+33.6)#2,783
25. Pence 98.3% 67.7% (+30.7)#26 64.8% (+33.5)#2,797
26. Elmwood Park 98.3% 67.7% (+30.6)#27 64.8% (+33.5)#2,798
27. Lake Arrowhead 98.2% 67.7% (+30.6)#28 64.8% (+33.4)#2,807
28. Couderay 98.1% 67.7% (+30.4)#29 64.8% (+33.3)#2,846
29. Angelica 98.0% 67.7% (+30.3)#30 64.8% (+33.2)#2,857
30. Alto 98.0% 67.7% (+30.3)#31 64.8% (+33.1)#2,865
31. Brothertown 97.9% 67.7% (+30.2)#32 64.8% (+33.0)#2,893
32. Wind Point 97.7% 67.7% (+30.1)#33 64.8% (+32.9)#2,916
33. Post Lake 97.6% 67.7% (+30.0)#34 64.8% (+32.8)#2,942
34. Arkdale 97.6% 67.7% (+29.9)#35 64.8% (+32.8)#2,960
35. Diamond Bluff 97.5% 67.7% (+29.9)#36 64.8% (+32.7)#2,982
36. Lake Ivanhoe 97.5% 67.7% (+29.8)#37 64.8% (+32.7)#3,000
37. St Peter 97.5% 67.7% (+29.8)#38 64.8% (+32.7)#3,003
38. Merton 97.4% 67.7% (+29.7)#39 64.8% (+32.6)#3,032
39. Richfield 97.4% 67.7% (+29.7)#40 64.8% (+32.6)#3,035
40. Seymour 97.4% 67.7% (+29.7)#41 64.8% (+32.6)#3,038
41. Browns Lake 97.1% 67.7% (+29.4)#42 64.8% (+32.2)#3,120
42. Lake Camelot 96.8% 67.7% (+29.1)#43 64.8% (+32.0)#3,207
43. Raymond 96.7% 67.7% (+29.0)#44 64.8% (+31.8)#3,260
44. Lauderdale Lakes 96.6% 67.7% (+28.9)#45 64.8% (+31.7)#3,295
45. Greenbush 96.3% 67.7% (+28.7)#46 64.8% (+31.5)#3,365
46. Grand View 96.3% 67.7% (+28.6)#47 64.8% (+31.5)#3,381
47. Sherwood 96.3% 67.7% (+28.6)#48 64.8% (+31.4)#3,396
48. Oconomowoc Lake 96.3% 67.7% (+28.6)#49 64.8% (+31.4)#3,397
49. Jump River 96.2% 67.7% (+28.5)#50 64.8% (+31.3)#3,440
50. Vernon 96.1% 67.7% (+28.4)#51 64.8% (+31.3)#3,449
51. Nashotah 96.0% 67.7% (+28.3)#52 64.8% (+31.2)#3,486
52. Waukau 95.6% 67.7% (+27.9)#53 64.8% (+30.8)#3,618
53. Newald 95.5% 67.7% (+27.8)#54 64.8% (+30.6)#3,669
54. Hingham 95.4% 67.7% (+27.7)#55 64.8% (+30.6)#3,685
55. Tilleda 95.2% 67.7% (+27.6)#56 64.8% (+30.4)#3,764
56. Lewis 95.1% 67.7% (+27.4)#57 64.8% (+30.2)#3,838
57. Westboro 95.0% 67.7% (+27.3)#58 64.8% (+30.2)#3,859
58. Babcock 94.9% 67.7% (+27.2)#59 64.8% (+30.1)#3,909
59. Lily Lake 94.8% 67.7% (+27.1)#60 64.8% (+30.0)#3,945
60. Maple Bluff 94.6% 67.7% (+26.9)#61 64.8% (+29.8)#4,022
61. Seneca 94.5% 67.7% (+26.8)#62 64.8% (+29.7)#4,069
62. Mountain 94.5% 67.7% (+26.8)#63 64.8% (+29.7)#4,079
63. River Hills 94.4% 67.7% (+26.8)#64 64.8% (+29.6)#4,115
64. Springbrook 94.3% 67.7% (+26.6)#65 64.8% (+29.5)#4,170
65. Wilson 94.2% 67.7% (+26.5)#66 64.8% (+29.4)#4,204
66. Ogema 94.2% 67.7% (+26.5)#67 64.8% (+29.4)#4,208
67. Maiden Rock 94.1% 67.7% (+26.4)#68 64.8% (+29.3)#4,236
68. Hebron 94.0% 67.7% (+26.3)#69 64.8% (+29.2)#4,280
69. Saxon 93.9% 67.7% (+26.3)#70 64.8% (+29.1)#4,315
70. Yuba 93.9% 67.7% (+26.3)#71 64.8% (+29.1)#4,316
71. Yorkville 93.9% 67.7% (+26.2)#72 64.8% (+29.1)#4,325
72. Legend Lake 93.6% 67.7% (+25.9)#73 64.8% (+28.7)#4,461
73. Millston 93.5% 67.7% (+25.9)#74 64.8% (+28.7)#4,466
74. Kohler 93.4% 67.7% (+25.8)#75 64.8% (+28.6)#4,513
75. Tichigan 93.4% 67.7% (+25.7)#76 64.8% (+28.6)#4,522
76. Kennan 93.3% 67.7% (+25.7)#77 64.8% (+28.5)#4,554
77. Catawba 93.3% 67.7% (+25.7)#78 64.8% (+28.5)#4,555
78. Helenville 93.2% 67.7% (+25.5)#79 64.8% (+28.3)#4,624
79. Kekoskee 93.1% 67.7% (+25.4)#80 64.8% (+28.3)#4,631
80. Lake Koshkonong 93.1% 67.7% (+25.4)#81 64.8% (+28.3)#4,655
81. Potter Lake 93.1% 67.7% (+25.4)#82 64.8% (+28.3)#4,657
82. Ellison Bay 93.1% 67.7% (+25.4)#83 64.8% (+28.2)#4,671
83. Dellwood 93.0% 67.7% (+25.4)#84 64.8% (+28.2)#4,677
84. Waukesha 93.0% 67.7% (+25.3)#85 64.8% (+28.2)#4,705
85. Shopiere 93.0% 67.7% (+25.3)#86 64.8% (+28.1)#4,720
86. Eagle Lake 93.0% 67.7% (+25.3)#87 64.8% (+28.1)#4,722
87. North Prairie 92.9% 67.7% (+25.3)#88 64.8% (+28.1)#4,728
88. Brice Prairie 92.7% 67.7% (+25.0)#89 64.8% (+27.9)#4,857
89. Lake Wisconsin 92.6% 67.7% (+24.9)#90 64.8% (+27.8)#4,882
90. Paac Ciinak 92.6% 67.7% (+24.9)#91 64.8% (+27.8)#4,902
91. Krakow 92.5% 67.7% (+24.8)#92 64.8% (+27.7)#4,945
92. Whittlesey 92.3% 67.7% (+24.6)#93 64.8% (+27.5)#5,042
93. Argonne 92.3% 67.7% (+24.6)#94 64.8% (+27.5)#5,044
94. Livingston 92.3% 67.7% (+24.6)#95 64.8% (+27.5)#5,061
95. Buffalo City 92.1% 67.7% (+24.4)#96 64.8% (+27.3)#5,129
96. Abrams 91.7% 67.7% (+24.1)#97 64.8% (+26.9)#5,299
97. Stone Lake 91.7% 67.7% (+24.0)#98 64.8% (+26.9)#5,343
98. Wiota 91.7% 67.7% (+24.0)#99 64.8% (+26.9)#5,344
99. Knowlton 91.7% 67.7% (+24.0)#100 64.8% (+26.9)#5,349
100. Glen Haven 91.7% 67.7% (+24.0)#101 64.8% (+26.9)#5,353

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin?
North Bay has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Wisconsin is 67.7%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.