Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Reile S Acres 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#115
2. Argusville 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#218
3. Oxbow 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#388
4. Apple Valley 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#511
5. Colfax 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#553
6. Logan 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#558
7. Benedict 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#587
8. Harmon 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#608
9. Spiritwood Lake 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#848
10. Brooktree Park 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#890
11. Arnegard 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#892
12. East Fairview 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#12 64.8% (+35.2)#1,138
13. Forest River 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#1,153
14. Blacktail 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#1,177
15. Epping 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,180
16. Mcgregor 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,190
17. Coleharbor 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,364
18. Havana 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,378
19. Buchanan 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,431
20. White Earth 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,490
21. Dawson 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,527
22. Gardner 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,544
23. Alamo 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,549
24. Caledonia 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,562
25. Selz 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,588
26. Foxholm 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,621
27. Milton 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,661
28. Mchenry 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,686
29. Wheatland 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,687
30. Briarwood 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,723
31. Fortuna 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,744
32. Courtenay 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,758
33. Jessie 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,768
34. Nome 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#1,788
35. North River 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,789
36. Long Creek 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#37 64.8% (+35.2)#1,810
37. Bucyrus 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,811
38. Sentinel Butte 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,867
39. Alice 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,883
40. Flaxton 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#1,884
41. Mcleod 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,911
42. Rogers 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#1,927
43. Sutton 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,928
44. Cayuga 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,943
45. Heimdal 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,967
46. Haynes 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,988
47. Prairie Rose 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#2,019
48. Mantador 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#2,066
49. Luverne 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#2,072
50. Brocket 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#2,087
51. Embden 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#2,088
52. Amidon 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#2,106
53. Great Bend 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#2,107
54. Knox 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#2,123
55. Dahlen 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,150
56. Ludden 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,165
57. Inkster 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#2,188
58. Kramer 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#2,209
59. Fredonia 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#2,210
60. Gascoyne 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#2,224
61. Spiritwood 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#2,259
62. Ardoch 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#2,302
63. Forbes 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#2,303
64. Monango 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#2,322
65. Brinsmade 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#66 64.8% (+35.2)#2,323
66. Lawton 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#70 64.8% (+35.2)#2,349
67. Denhoff 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#71 64.8% (+35.2)#2,350
68. Sibley 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#72 64.8% (+35.2)#2,351
69. Sarles 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#73 64.8% (+35.2)#2,352
70. Nekoma 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#74 64.8% (+35.2)#2,353
71. Perth 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#75 64.8% (+35.2)#2,369
72. Fairdale 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#76 64.8% (+35.2)#2,370
73. Overly 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#77 64.8% (+35.2)#2,386
74. Braddock 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#78 64.8% (+35.2)#2,387
75. Hamberg 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#79 64.8% (+35.2)#2,414
76. Calvin 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#80 64.8% (+35.2)#2,433
77. Antler 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#81 64.8% (+35.2)#2,452
78. Kief 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#82 64.8% (+35.2)#2,454
79. Conway 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#83 64.8% (+35.2)#2,455
80. Raleigh 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#84 64.8% (+35.2)#2,520
81. Auburn 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#85 64.8% (+35.2)#2,521
82. Leal 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#86 64.8% (+35.2)#2,529
83. Ypsilanti 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#87 64.8% (+35.2)#2,530
84. Pillsbury 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#88 64.8% (+35.2)#2,531
85. Loraine 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#89 64.8% (+35.2)#2,553
86. Wales 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#90 64.8% (+35.2)#2,554
87. Nash 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#91 64.8% (+35.2)#2,571
88. Calio 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#92 64.8% (+35.2)#2,584
89. Bantry 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#93 64.8% (+35.2)#2,598
90. Larson 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#94 64.8% (+35.2)#2,607
91. Ruso 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#95 64.8% (+35.2)#2,608
92. Churchs Ferry 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#96 64.8% (+35.2)#2,634
93. Grano 100.0% 63.2% (+36.8)#97 64.8% (+35.2)#2,635
94. Harwood 99.2% 63.2% (+36.0)#98 64.8% (+34.4)#2,682
95. Frontier 98.6% 63.2% (+35.4)#99 64.8% (+33.8)#2,741
96. Sheldon 98.4% 63.2% (+35.2)#100 64.8% (+33.6)#2,786
97. Carpio 98.2% 63.2% (+35.0)#101 64.8% (+33.4)#2,813
98. Horace 96.9% 63.2% (+33.8)#102 64.8% (+32.1)#3,171
99. Pettibone 96.7% 63.2% (+33.5)#103 64.8% (+31.9)#3,259
100. Surrey 96.6% 63.2% (+33.5)#104 64.8% (+31.8)#3,265

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota?
Reile s Acres has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in North Dakota is 63.2%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.