Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Mission Hills 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#1 64.8% (+35.2)#5
2. Chicopee 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#2 64.8% (+35.2)#350
3. Elyria 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#3 64.8% (+35.2)#544
4. Bremen 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#4 64.8% (+35.2)#659
5. Dennis 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#5 64.8% (+35.2)#830
6. Wilsey 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#6 64.8% (+35.2)#906
7. Summerfield 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#7 64.8% (+35.2)#926
8. Milton 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#8 64.8% (+35.2)#943
9. Falun 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#9 64.8% (+35.2)#960
10. Morland 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#10 64.8% (+35.2)#981
11. Detroit 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#11 64.8% (+35.2)#986
12. Bendena 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#13 64.8% (+35.2)#1,039
13. Mentor 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#14 64.8% (+35.2)#1,040
14. Earlton 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#15 64.8% (+35.2)#1,089
15. Sycamore 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#16 64.8% (+35.2)#1,103
16. Baileyville 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#17 64.8% (+35.2)#1,111
17. Radley 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#18 64.8% (+35.2)#1,181
18. Sharon 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#19 64.8% (+35.2)#1,202
19. Hunter 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#20 64.8% (+35.2)#1,213
20. Woodston 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#21 64.8% (+35.2)#1,263
21. Croweburg 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#22 64.8% (+35.2)#1,314
22. Bucyrus 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#23 64.8% (+35.2)#1,337
23. Centropolis 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#24 64.8% (+35.2)#1,338
24. Levant 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#25 64.8% (+35.2)#1,354
25. Munjor 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#26 64.8% (+35.2)#1,357
26. Kipp 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#27 64.8% (+35.2)#1,382
27. Peck 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#28 64.8% (+35.2)#1,434
28. Lost Springs 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#29 64.8% (+35.2)#1,467
29. Yale 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#30 64.8% (+35.2)#1,488
30. Horace 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#31 64.8% (+35.2)#1,540
31. Farlington 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#32 64.8% (+35.2)#1,616
32. Goff 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#33 64.8% (+35.2)#1,617
33. Glade 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#34 64.8% (+35.2)#1,618
34. Piqua 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#35 64.8% (+35.2)#1,619
35. Zurich 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#36 64.8% (+35.2)#1,623
36. New Albany 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#38 64.8% (+35.2)#1,720
37. Shallow Water 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#39 64.8% (+35.2)#1,721
38. Hallowell 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#40 64.8% (+35.2)#1,722
39. Stuttgart 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#41 64.8% (+35.2)#1,729
40. Somerset 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#42 64.8% (+35.2)#1,785
41. Coyville 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#43 64.8% (+35.2)#1,796
42. Furley 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#44 64.8% (+35.2)#1,797
43. Mahaska 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#45 64.8% (+35.2)#1,807
44. Elgin 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#46 64.8% (+35.2)#1,808
45. Wabaunsee 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#47 64.8% (+35.2)#1,855
46. Devon 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#48 64.8% (+35.2)#1,856
47. Yoder 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#49 64.8% (+35.2)#1,886
48. Bluff City 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#50 64.8% (+35.2)#1,897
49. Marienthal 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#51 64.8% (+35.2)#1,898
50. Newbury 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#52 64.8% (+35.2)#1,932
51. Timken 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#53 64.8% (+35.2)#1,950
52. Beaumont 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#54 64.8% (+35.2)#1,951
53. Frederick 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#55 64.8% (+35.2)#1,995
54. Paradise 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#56 64.8% (+35.2)#2,023
55. Silverdale 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#57 64.8% (+35.2)#2,045
56. Lone Elm 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#58 64.8% (+35.2)#2,046
57. Ada 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#59 64.8% (+35.2)#2,063
58. Idana 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#60 64.8% (+35.2)#2,064
59. Neal 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#61 64.8% (+35.2)#2,065
60. St. Benedict 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#62 64.8% (+35.2)#2,090
61. South Mound 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#63 64.8% (+35.2)#2,154
62. Russell Springs 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#64 64.8% (+35.2)#2,155
63. Mont Ida 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#65 64.8% (+35.2)#2,156
64. Webber 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#66 64.8% (+35.2)#2,172
65. Zeandale 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#67 64.8% (+35.2)#2,173
66. Danville 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#68 64.8% (+35.2)#2,231
67. Scottsville 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#69 64.8% (+35.2)#2,232
68. Bassett 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#70 64.8% (+35.2)#2,246
69. Labette 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#71 64.8% (+35.2)#2,266
70. New Salem 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#72 64.8% (+35.2)#2,268
71. Bavaria 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#73 64.8% (+35.2)#2,269
72. Speed 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#74 64.8% (+35.2)#2,270
73. Urbana 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#75 64.8% (+35.2)#2,307
74. Galatia 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#76 64.8% (+35.2)#2,308
75. Big Bow 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#77 64.8% (+35.2)#2,327
76. Richfield 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#78 64.8% (+35.2)#2,328
77. Beaver 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#79 64.8% (+35.2)#2,355
78. Eastshore 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#80 64.8% (+35.2)#2,372
79. Oak Hill 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#81 64.8% (+35.2)#2,394
80. Hamlin 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#82 64.8% (+35.2)#2,437
81. Cedar 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#83 64.8% (+35.2)#2,458
82. Radium 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#84 64.8% (+35.2)#2,459
83. Byers 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#85 64.8% (+35.2)#2,484
84. Ogallah 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#86 64.8% (+35.2)#2,485
85. Mildred 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#87 64.8% (+35.2)#2,486
86. Opolis 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#88 64.8% (+35.2)#2,501
87. Harris 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#89 64.8% (+35.2)#2,503
88. Garland 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#90 64.8% (+35.2)#2,504
89. Waldron 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#91 64.8% (+35.2)#2,539
90. Norway 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#92 64.8% (+35.2)#2,540
91. Edson 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#93 64.8% (+35.2)#2,541
92. Bridgeport 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#94 64.8% (+35.2)#2,562
93. Roxbury 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#95 64.8% (+35.2)#2,576
94. Woodruff 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#96 64.8% (+35.2)#2,611
95. Penalosa 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#97 64.8% (+35.2)#2,622
96. Cedar Point 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#98 64.8% (+35.2)#2,632
97. Kelly 100.0% 66.9% (+33.1)#99 64.8% (+35.2)#2,637
98. Parkerfield 99.1% 66.9% (+32.2)#100 64.8% (+34.2)#2,691
99. Oketo 98.7% 66.9% (+31.8)#101 64.8% (+33.9)#2,736
100. Parkerville 98.4% 66.9% (+31.6)#102 64.8% (+33.6)#2,781

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas?
Mission Hills has the Highest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Kansas?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Kansas is 66.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.