Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Marathon 100.0% 33.2% (+66.8)#1 35.2% (+64.8)#112
2. Rockbridge 100.0% 33.2% (+66.8)#2 35.2% (+64.8)#147
3. Cynthiana 100.0% 33.2% (+66.8)#3 35.2% (+64.8)#186
4. Wright Patterson Afb 99.3% 33.2% (+66.1)#4 35.2% (+64.1)#246
5. Urbancrest 80.7% 33.2% (+47.5)#5 35.2% (+45.5)#428
6. Beulah Beach 77.1% 33.2% (+44.0)#6 35.2% (+42.0)#507
7. Felicity 75.6% 33.2% (+42.5)#7 35.2% (+40.5)#530
8. Lincoln Heights 75.5% 33.2% (+42.3)#8 35.2% (+40.3)#534
9. North Randall 74.7% 33.2% (+41.6)#9 35.2% (+39.6)#555
10. Valley Hi 73.7% 33.2% (+40.5)#10 35.2% (+38.5)#579
11. Woodmere 73.2% 33.2% (+40.0)#11 35.2% (+38.0)#592
12. Miamitown 72.8% 33.2% (+39.6)#12 35.2% (+37.6)#602
13. Birmingham 71.3% 33.2% (+38.1)#13 35.2% (+36.1)#660
14. Highland Hills 71.1% 33.2% (+37.9)#14 35.2% (+35.9)#668
15. Proctorville 69.8% 33.2% (+36.7)#15 35.2% (+34.7)#715
16. New Boston 69.2% 33.2% (+36.0)#16 35.2% (+34.0)#754
17. East Cleveland 69.1% 33.2% (+35.9)#17 35.2% (+33.9)#758
18. Rio Grande 67.8% 33.2% (+34.6)#18 35.2% (+32.6)#805
19. Athens 67.8% 33.2% (+34.6)#19 35.2% (+32.6)#807
20. Bascom 67.4% 33.2% (+34.3)#20 35.2% (+32.3)#822
21. Canal Lewisville 66.5% 33.2% (+33.3)#21 35.2% (+31.3)#878
22. Pleasant City 64.4% 33.2% (+31.2)#22 35.2% (+29.2)#995
23. Bowling Green 64.2% 33.2% (+31.1)#23 35.2% (+29.1)#1,009
24. Kansas 64.2% 33.2% (+31.0)#24 35.2% (+29.0)#1,016
25. South Mount Vernon 63.9% 33.2% (+30.8)#25 35.2% (+28.8)#1,030
26. Malvern 63.5% 33.2% (+30.3)#26 35.2% (+28.3)#1,067
27. Woodlawn 63.0% 33.2% (+29.8)#27 35.2% (+27.8)#1,105
28. Matamoras 62.9% 33.2% (+29.7)#28 35.2% (+27.7)#1,112
29. Oxford 61.9% 33.2% (+28.7)#29 35.2% (+26.7)#1,192
30. Mitiwanga 61.9% 33.2% (+28.7)#30 35.2% (+26.7)#1,198
31. Ithaca 61.8% 33.2% (+28.6)#31 35.2% (+26.6)#1,201
32. Linndale 61.8% 33.2% (+28.6)#32 35.2% (+26.6)#1,205
33. Owensville 61.6% 33.2% (+28.4)#33 35.2% (+26.4)#1,227
34. Warrensville Heights 61.5% 33.2% (+28.3)#34 35.2% (+26.3)#1,237
35. Portage 60.9% 33.2% (+27.7)#35 35.2% (+25.7)#1,286
36. Cincinnati 60.7% 33.2% (+27.5)#36 35.2% (+25.5)#1,308
37. Peebles 60.5% 33.2% (+27.3)#37 35.2% (+25.3)#1,320
38. Jeffersonville 59.5% 33.2% (+26.3)#38 35.2% (+24.3)#1,428
39. Burlington 59.4% 33.2% (+26.3)#39 35.2% (+24.2)#1,437
40. Cleveland 59.1% 33.2% (+25.9)#40 35.2% (+23.9)#1,476
41. Addyston 58.8% 33.2% (+25.6)#41 35.2% (+23.6)#1,500
42. Whitehall 58.8% 33.2% (+25.6)#42 35.2% (+23.6)#1,505
43. Flat Rock 57.9% 33.2% (+24.8)#43 35.2% (+22.8)#1,595
44. Zanesville 57.9% 33.2% (+24.7)#44 35.2% (+22.7)#1,610
45. Gann Brinkhaven 57.7% 33.2% (+24.6)#45 35.2% (+22.6)#1,627
46. Carbon Hill 57.7% 33.2% (+24.5)#46 35.2% (+22.5)#1,638
47. Whites Landing 57.4% 33.2% (+24.2)#47 35.2% (+22.2)#1,680
48. Piketon 57.3% 33.2% (+24.2)#48 35.2% (+22.2)#1,686
49. Kent 57.3% 33.2% (+24.1)#49 35.2% (+22.1)#1,697
50. New Springfield 57.2% 33.2% (+24.0)#50 35.2% (+22.0)#1,706
51. Nelsonville 57.2% 33.2% (+24.0)#51 35.2% (+22.0)#1,708
52. Atwater 56.8% 33.2% (+23.6)#52 35.2% (+21.6)#1,748
53. Brice 56.8% 33.2% (+23.6)#53 35.2% (+21.6)#1,749
54. Bedford Heights 56.4% 33.2% (+23.2)#54 35.2% (+21.2)#1,803
55. Euclid 56.3% 33.2% (+23.1)#55 35.2% (+21.1)#1,827
56. Lakewood 56.2% 33.2% (+23.0)#56 35.2% (+21.0)#1,841
57. Beaver 56.0% 33.2% (+22.8)#57 35.2% (+20.8)#1,871
58. Willoughby Hills 55.7% 33.2% (+22.5)#58 35.2% (+20.5)#1,906
59. Columbus 55.3% 33.2% (+22.1)#59 35.2% (+20.1)#1,985
60. Bolton 55.2% 33.2% (+22.0)#60 35.2% (+20.0)#1,996
61. Hemlock 55.1% 33.2% (+21.9)#61 35.2% (+19.9)#2,013
62. Mount Healthy 54.9% 33.2% (+21.8)#62 35.2% (+19.8)#2,043
63. Utica 54.7% 33.2% (+21.5)#63 35.2% (+19.5)#2,075
64. Mayfield Heights 54.7% 33.2% (+21.5)#64 35.2% (+19.5)#2,078
65. Celeryville 54.7% 33.2% (+21.5)#65 35.2% (+19.5)#2,080
66. West Union 54.7% 33.2% (+21.5)#66 35.2% (+19.5)#2,082
67. Withamsville 54.6% 33.2% (+21.4)#67 35.2% (+19.4)#2,097
68. Orwell 54.6% 33.2% (+21.4)#68 35.2% (+19.4)#2,099
69. Elmwood Place 54.3% 33.2% (+21.1)#69 35.2% (+19.1)#2,142
70. Newburgh Heights 54.2% 33.2% (+21.0)#70 35.2% (+19.0)#2,153
71. Olde West Chester 54.0% 33.2% (+20.8)#71 35.2% (+18.8)#2,182
72. Tippecanoe 53.7% 33.2% (+20.5)#72 35.2% (+18.5)#2,238
73. Norwood 53.6% 33.2% (+20.4)#73 35.2% (+18.4)#2,247
74. Lima 53.4% 33.2% (+20.2)#74 35.2% (+18.2)#2,295
75. Mckinley Heights 53.3% 33.2% (+20.2)#75 35.2% (+18.2)#2,302
76. Portsmouth 52.5% 33.2% (+19.3)#76 35.2% (+17.3)#2,484
77. Minford 52.4% 33.2% (+19.2)#77 35.2% (+17.2)#2,505
78. Mechanicsburg 52.2% 33.2% (+19.1)#78 35.2% (+17.0)#2,542
79. Old Washington 52.2% 33.2% (+19.0)#79 35.2% (+17.0)#2,547
80. Cambridge 52.1% 33.2% (+19.0)#80 35.2% (+17.0)#2,564
81. Alliance 52.0% 33.2% (+18.8)#81 35.2% (+16.8)#2,588
82. Greenfield 51.9% 33.2% (+18.7)#82 35.2% (+16.7)#2,610
83. Painesville 51.8% 33.2% (+18.6)#83 35.2% (+16.6)#2,632
84. Canton 51.8% 33.2% (+18.6)#84 35.2% (+16.6)#2,633
85. Ashley 51.7% 33.2% (+18.5)#85 35.2% (+16.5)#2,659
86. Dayton 51.6% 33.2% (+18.5)#86 35.2% (+16.5)#2,666
87. Fairborn 51.4% 33.2% (+18.3)#87 35.2% (+16.3)#2,715
88. Clarksburg 51.3% 33.2% (+18.1)#88 35.2% (+16.1)#2,758
89. New Lexington 51.1% 33.2% (+17.9)#89 35.2% (+15.9)#2,804
90. Mantua 51.1% 33.2% (+17.9)#90 35.2% (+15.9)#2,819
91. West Logan 51.0% 33.2% (+17.9)#91 35.2% (+15.9)#2,836
92. Milford 51.0% 33.2% (+17.8)#92 35.2% (+15.8)#2,842
93. Sebring 50.9% 33.2% (+17.7)#93 35.2% (+15.7)#2,879
94. Bentonville 50.8% 33.2% (+17.6)#94 35.2% (+15.6)#2,900
95. Orangeville 50.8% 33.2% (+17.6)#95 35.2% (+15.6)#2,905
96. Dennison 50.7% 33.2% (+17.5)#96 35.2% (+15.5)#2,912
97. Manchester 50.6% 33.2% (+17.5)#97 35.2% (+15.5)#2,933
98. New Miami 50.3% 33.2% (+17.1)#98 35.2% (+15.1)#3,015
99. Waverly 50.1% 33.2% (+17.0)#99 35.2% (+15.0)#3,053
100. Elizabethtown 50.0% 33.2% (+16.8)#100 35.2% (+14.8)#3,095

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio?
Rockbridge has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Ohio is 33.2%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.