Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Production
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Marathon 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#1 5.5% (+94.5)#9
2. Wightmans Grove 100.0% 8.1% (+91.9)#2 5.5% (+94.5)#38
3. Dundee 84.8% 8.1% (+76.7)#3 5.5% (+79.3)#53
4. Kansas 64.2% 8.1% (+56.1)#4 5.5% (+58.7)#96
5. New Bloomington 62.4% 8.1% (+54.3)#5 5.5% (+56.9)#106
6. Belmore 55.3% 8.1% (+47.2)#6 5.5% (+49.8)#157
7. Neville 47.8% 8.1% (+39.8)#7 5.5% (+42.4)#229
8. Oceola 44.4% 8.1% (+36.3)#8 5.5% (+38.9)#276
9. Richmond Dale 43.3% 8.1% (+35.2)#9 5.5% (+37.8)#290
10. Moscow 42.0% 8.1% (+33.9)#10 5.5% (+36.5)#314
11. Rosewood 41.8% 8.1% (+33.7)#11 5.5% (+36.3)#322
12. Lincoln Heights 41.0% 8.1% (+32.9)#12 5.5% (+35.5)#335
13. Barnhill 39.2% 8.1% (+31.1)#13 5.5% (+33.7)#380
14. Melmore 38.7% 8.1% (+30.7)#14 5.5% (+33.2)#392
15. Kettlersville 38.2% 8.1% (+30.2)#15 5.5% (+32.8)#404
16. East Liberty 37.9% 8.1% (+29.9)#16 5.5% (+32.4)#415
17. Harrisburg 37.1% 8.1% (+29.1)#17 5.5% (+31.7)#436
18. Ithaca 37.0% 8.1% (+28.9)#18 5.5% (+31.5)#441
19. Waterford 36.3% 8.1% (+28.2)#19 5.5% (+30.8)#459
20. Bentonville 35.9% 8.1% (+27.8)#20 5.5% (+30.4)#467
21. Raymond 35.6% 8.1% (+27.5)#21 5.5% (+30.1)#481
22. Higginsport 35.3% 8.1% (+27.3)#22 5.5% (+29.9)#488
23. Centerville Thurman 35.3% 8.1% (+27.2)#23 5.5% (+29.8)#489
24. Dexter City 35.1% 8.1% (+27.0)#24 5.5% (+29.6)#500
25. Ohio City 35.0% 8.1% (+26.9)#25 5.5% (+29.5)#505
26. Alvordton 34.2% 8.1% (+26.2)#26 5.5% (+28.7)#528
27. Yorkshire 34.1% 8.1% (+26.0)#27 5.5% (+28.6)#535
28. Quincy 33.8% 8.1% (+25.7)#28 5.5% (+28.3)#547
29. Tiro 33.6% 8.1% (+25.6)#29 5.5% (+28.1)#557
30. Kunkle 32.8% 8.1% (+24.8)#30 5.5% (+27.3)#604
31. Cecil 32.8% 8.1% (+24.8)#31 5.5% (+27.3)#605
32. Palestine 32.8% 8.1% (+24.7)#32 5.5% (+27.3)#607
33. Bloomdale 32.6% 8.1% (+24.5)#33 5.5% (+27.1)#616
34. Latty 32.4% 8.1% (+24.3)#34 5.5% (+26.9)#623
35. Valley Hi 32.2% 8.1% (+24.1)#35 5.5% (+26.7)#635
36. Carbon Hill 31.9% 8.1% (+23.8)#36 5.5% (+26.4)#647
37. Vinton 31.5% 8.1% (+23.4)#37 5.5% (+26.0)#678
38. Wharton 31.0% 8.1% (+22.9)#38 5.5% (+25.5)#708
39. Melrose 31.0% 8.1% (+22.9)#39 5.5% (+25.5)#709
40. Mendon 30.9% 8.1% (+22.8)#40 5.5% (+25.4)#714
41. Radnor 30.8% 8.1% (+22.7)#41 5.5% (+25.3)#721
42. New Weston 30.8% 8.1% (+22.7)#42 5.5% (+25.3)#723
43. Middle Point 30.4% 8.1% (+22.3)#43 5.5% (+24.9)#743
44. New Hampshire 29.4% 8.1% (+21.3)#44 5.5% (+23.9)#814
45. North Robinson 29.3% 8.1% (+21.2)#45 5.5% (+23.8)#820
46. Chippewa Park 28.8% 8.1% (+20.7)#46 5.5% (+23.3)#857
47. Union City 28.4% 8.1% (+20.3)#47 5.5% (+22.9)#898
48. La Rue 28.2% 8.1% (+20.2)#48 5.5% (+22.8)#916
49. Massieville 28.2% 8.1% (+20.1)#49 5.5% (+22.7)#921
50. West Unity 28.1% 8.1% (+20.1)#50 5.5% (+22.7)#924
51. Verona 28.1% 8.1% (+20.0)#51 5.5% (+22.6)#928
52. Marne 27.8% 8.1% (+19.7)#52 5.5% (+22.3)#951
53. Kinsman Center 27.4% 8.1% (+19.4)#53 5.5% (+21.9)#984
54. Edgerton 27.4% 8.1% (+19.4)#54 5.5% (+21.9)#985
55. Drexel 27.3% 8.1% (+19.3)#55 5.5% (+21.9)#993
56. Hilltop 27.2% 8.1% (+19.2)#56 5.5% (+21.8)#1,008
57. Calcutta 27.2% 8.1% (+19.1)#57 5.5% (+21.7)#1,011
58. St Marys 27.0% 8.1% (+18.9)#58 5.5% (+21.5)#1,031
59. Buckland 26.9% 8.1% (+18.9)#59 5.5% (+21.5)#1,034
60. Lake Buckhorn 26.8% 8.1% (+18.8)#60 5.5% (+21.3)#1,050
61. Belle Center 26.7% 8.1% (+18.6)#61 5.5% (+21.2)#1,057
62. Clyde 26.7% 8.1% (+18.6)#62 5.5% (+21.2)#1,059
63. Convoy 26.7% 8.1% (+18.6)#63 5.5% (+21.2)#1,068
64. Mccomb 26.5% 8.1% (+18.5)#64 5.5% (+21.1)#1,072
65. Plumwood 26.5% 8.1% (+18.4)#65 5.5% (+21.0)#1,083
66. Lake Waynoka 26.4% 8.1% (+18.4)#66 5.5% (+21.0)#1,085
67. Antwerp 26.4% 8.1% (+18.3)#67 5.5% (+20.9)#1,091
68. Dillonvale 26.1% 8.1% (+18.0)#68 5.5% (+20.6)#1,126
69. Chesapeake 26.0% 8.1% (+17.9)#69 5.5% (+20.5)#1,134
70. Robertsville 25.5% 8.1% (+17.5)#70 5.5% (+20.1)#1,189
71. Van Wert 25.4% 8.1% (+17.3)#71 5.5% (+19.9)#1,212
72. Wayne Lakes 25.2% 8.1% (+17.2)#72 5.5% (+19.8)#1,227
73. Fayetteville 25.2% 8.1% (+17.1)#73 5.5% (+19.7)#1,236
74. Vanlue 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#74 5.5% (+19.5)#1,252
75. New Pittsburg 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#75 5.5% (+19.5)#1,254
76. Patterson 25.0% 8.1% (+16.9)#76 5.5% (+19.5)#1,263
77. Mcclure 24.9% 8.1% (+16.8)#77 5.5% (+19.4)#1,290
78. Willshire 24.8% 8.1% (+16.7)#78 5.5% (+19.3)#1,312
79. Orwell 24.6% 8.1% (+16.5)#79 5.5% (+19.1)#1,334
80. Bairdstown 24.6% 8.1% (+16.5)#80 5.5% (+19.1)#1,342
81. Plymouth 24.4% 8.1% (+16.3)#81 5.5% (+18.9)#1,362
82. Anna 24.2% 8.1% (+16.1)#82 5.5% (+18.7)#1,391
83. Bolindale 24.2% 8.1% (+16.1)#83 5.5% (+18.7)#1,392
84. Montpelier 24.1% 8.1% (+16.0)#84 5.5% (+18.6)#1,400
85. North Baltimore 24.1% 8.1% (+16.0)#85 5.5% (+18.6)#1,403
86. Rushville 24.0% 8.1% (+16.0)#86 5.5% (+18.6)#1,414
87. Elizabethtown 23.9% 8.1% (+15.9)#87 5.5% (+18.4)#1,434
88. Celina 23.9% 8.1% (+15.8)#88 5.5% (+18.4)#1,436
89. Grover Hill 23.9% 8.1% (+15.8)#89 5.5% (+18.4)#1,438
90. St Paris 23.9% 8.1% (+15.8)#90 5.5% (+18.4)#1,439
91. Scott 23.8% 8.1% (+15.8)#91 5.5% (+18.4)#1,446
92. Attica 23.4% 8.1% (+15.3)#92 5.5% (+17.9)#1,522
93. Kirby 23.3% 8.1% (+15.3)#93 5.5% (+17.9)#1,531
94. Sidney 23.3% 8.1% (+15.2)#94 5.5% (+17.8)#1,547
95. Ansonia 23.2% 8.1% (+15.1)#95 5.5% (+17.7)#1,559
96. Rarden 23.1% 8.1% (+15.0)#96 5.5% (+17.6)#1,579
97. Botkins 22.9% 8.1% (+14.9)#97 5.5% (+17.5)#1,605
98. Miamitown 22.9% 8.1% (+14.8)#98 5.5% (+17.4)#1,612
99. Helena 22.8% 8.1% (+14.7)#99 5.5% (+17.3)#1,627
100. North Lawrence 22.7% 8.1% (+14.6)#100 5.5% (+17.2)#1,646

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
84.8%
#3
64.2%
#4
62.4%
#5
55.3%
#6
47.8%
#7
44.4%
#8
43.3%
#9
42.0%
#10
41.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio?
Wightmans Grove has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in Ohio is 8.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Production in the United States is 5.5%.