Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utility Gas Heating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio

City Utility Gas Heating vs State vs National
1. South Mount Vernon 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#13
2. Hilltop 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#19
3. Ridgewood 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#22
4. Lake Milton 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#29
5. Brownsville 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#42
6. Linndale 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#62
7. Old Fort 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#117
8. Castine 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#8 47.1% (+52.9)#128
9. Birmingham 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#9 47.1% (+52.9)#135
10. Lower Salem 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#10 47.1% (+52.9)#137
11. Sandyville 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#11 47.1% (+52.9)#219
12. Kilbourne 100.0% 64.7% (+35.3)#12 47.1% (+52.9)#246
13. Burbank 97.9% 64.7% (+33.2)#13 47.1% (+50.8)#322
14. Eaton Estates 97.1% 64.7% (+32.4)#14 47.1% (+50.0)#359
15. Donnelsville 97.0% 64.7% (+32.3)#15 47.1% (+49.9)#366
16. Yankee Lake 96.9% 64.7% (+32.2)#16 47.1% (+49.8)#374
17. Graysville 96.9% 64.7% (+32.2)#17 47.1% (+49.8)#375
18. Dundee 96.5% 64.7% (+31.8)#18 47.1% (+49.4)#392
19. Silver Lake 96.4% 64.7% (+31.7)#19 47.1% (+49.3)#396
20. Lowell 96.3% 64.7% (+31.6)#20 47.1% (+49.2)#404
21. Masury 96.2% 64.7% (+31.5)#21 47.1% (+49.1)#409
22. Walton Hills 96.2% 64.7% (+31.5)#22 47.1% (+49.1)#410
23. Lakeline 96.0% 64.7% (+31.3)#23 47.1% (+48.9)#420
24. Brooklyn Heights 95.8% 64.7% (+31.1)#24 47.1% (+48.7)#427
25. Hollansburg 95.7% 64.7% (+31.0)#25 47.1% (+48.6)#436
26. Independence 95.6% 64.7% (+30.9)#26 47.1% (+48.5)#439
27. Duncan Falls 95.6% 64.7% (+30.9)#27 47.1% (+48.5)#441
28. New Haven Cdp Huron County 95.6% 64.7% (+30.9)#28 47.1% (+48.5)#444
29. Valley View 95.4% 64.7% (+30.7)#29 47.1% (+48.3)#458
30. Newburgh Heights 95.4% 64.7% (+30.7)#30 47.1% (+48.3)#459
31. Sugar Bush Knolls 95.4% 64.7% (+30.7)#31 47.1% (+48.3)#464
32. Green Meadows 95.3% 64.7% (+30.6)#32 47.1% (+48.2)#468
33. Risingsun 95.2% 64.7% (+30.5)#33 47.1% (+48.1)#480
34. Limaville 95.2% 64.7% (+30.5)#34 47.1% (+48.1)#485
35. Lakemore 95.0% 64.7% (+30.3)#35 47.1% (+47.9)#503
36. St Louisville 94.9% 64.7% (+30.2)#36 47.1% (+47.8)#515
37. Norwich 94.9% 64.7% (+30.2)#37 47.1% (+47.8)#518
38. Uniontown 94.7% 64.7% (+30.0)#38 47.1% (+47.6)#530
39. Grand River 94.7% 64.7% (+30.0)#39 47.1% (+47.6)#535
40. Richfield 94.5% 64.7% (+29.8)#40 47.1% (+47.4)#555
41. Kinsman Center 94.5% 64.7% (+29.8)#41 47.1% (+47.4)#557
42. South Amherst 94.4% 64.7% (+29.7)#42 47.1% (+47.3)#568
43. Liberty Center 94.4% 64.7% (+29.7)#43 47.1% (+47.3)#570
44. Suffield 94.3% 64.7% (+29.6)#44 47.1% (+47.2)#578
45. Poland 93.7% 64.7% (+29.0)#45 47.1% (+46.6)#632
46. Mckinley Heights 93.5% 64.7% (+28.8)#46 47.1% (+46.4)#654
47. Fairport Harbor 93.3% 64.7% (+28.6)#47 47.1% (+46.2)#669
48. Roseland 93.3% 64.7% (+28.6)#48 47.1% (+46.2)#671
49. Seven Hills 93.2% 64.7% (+28.5)#49 47.1% (+46.1)#680
50. Reminderville 93.2% 64.7% (+28.5)#50 47.1% (+46.1)#682
51. North Perry 93.2% 64.7% (+28.5)#51 47.1% (+46.1)#691
52. Lewisville 93.2% 64.7% (+28.5)#52 47.1% (+46.1)#702
53. Lyons 93.1% 64.7% (+28.4)#53 47.1% (+46.0)#713
54. Waterford 93.1% 64.7% (+28.4)#54 47.1% (+46.0)#717
55. West Rushville 93.1% 64.7% (+28.4)#55 47.1% (+46.0)#720
56. Pepper Pike 92.9% 64.7% (+28.2)#56 47.1% (+45.8)#737
57. Brady Lake 92.7% 64.7% (+28.0)#57 47.1% (+45.6)#765
58. Nankin 92.7% 64.7% (+28.0)#58 47.1% (+45.6)#766
59. Brice 92.6% 64.7% (+27.9)#59 47.1% (+45.5)#785
60. Highland Heights 92.5% 64.7% (+27.8)#60 47.1% (+45.4)#787
61. Thornport 92.4% 64.7% (+27.7)#61 47.1% (+45.3)#809
62. Timberlake 92.4% 64.7% (+27.7)#62 47.1% (+45.3)#812
63. South Euclid 92.3% 64.7% (+27.6)#63 47.1% (+45.2)#819
64. Jeromesville 92.3% 64.7% (+27.6)#64 47.1% (+45.2)#833
65. Caledonia 92.2% 64.7% (+27.5)#65 47.1% (+45.1)#846
66. Dellroy 92.1% 64.7% (+27.4)#66 47.1% (+45.0)#864
67. Kipton 92.1% 64.7% (+27.4)#67 47.1% (+45.0)#866
68. Magnetic Springs 91.9% 64.7% (+27.2)#68 47.1% (+44.8)#897
69. Wyoming 91.8% 64.7% (+27.1)#69 47.1% (+44.7)#902
70. Holiday Valley 91.7% 64.7% (+27.0)#70 47.1% (+44.6)#926
71. Petersburg 91.7% 64.7% (+27.0)#71 47.1% (+44.6)#937
72. Aurora 91.6% 64.7% (+26.9)#72 47.1% (+44.5)#945
73. Perry Heights 91.6% 64.7% (+26.9)#73 47.1% (+44.5)#949
74. Belle Center 91.5% 64.7% (+26.8)#74 47.1% (+44.4)#983
75. Midway 91.5% 64.7% (+26.8)#75 47.1% (+44.4)#987
76. Girard 91.4% 64.7% (+26.7)#76 47.1% (+44.3)#995
77. Park Layne 91.4% 64.7% (+26.7)#77 47.1% (+44.3)#997
78. Cuyahoga Heights 91.4% 64.7% (+26.7)#78 47.1% (+44.3)#1,008
79. Howard 91.4% 64.7% (+26.7)#79 47.1% (+44.3)#1,009
80. Harpster 91.3% 64.7% (+26.6)#80 47.1% (+44.2)#1,034
81. Marble Cliff 91.0% 64.7% (+26.3)#81 47.1% (+43.9)#1,078
82. North Hampton 91.0% 64.7% (+26.3)#82 47.1% (+43.9)#1,083
83. Macedonia 90.9% 64.7% (+26.2)#83 47.1% (+43.8)#1,089
84. Hubbard 90.9% 64.7% (+26.2)#84 47.1% (+43.8)#1,093
85. Struthers 90.8% 64.7% (+26.1)#85 47.1% (+43.7)#1,112
86. Meyers Lake 90.8% 64.7% (+26.1)#86 47.1% (+43.7)#1,120
87. Lore City 90.8% 64.7% (+26.1)#87 47.1% (+43.7)#1,122
88. Brecksville 90.7% 64.7% (+26.0)#88 47.1% (+43.6)#1,127
89. Campbell 90.6% 64.7% (+25.9)#89 47.1% (+43.5)#1,147
90. Marshallville 90.6% 64.7% (+25.9)#90 47.1% (+43.5)#1,162
91. Tiro 90.5% 64.7% (+25.8)#91 47.1% (+43.4)#1,183
92. Orange 90.4% 64.7% (+25.7)#92 47.1% (+43.3)#1,190
93. Richville 90.3% 64.7% (+25.6)#93 47.1% (+43.2)#1,213
94. New Franklin 90.2% 64.7% (+25.5)#94 47.1% (+43.1)#1,233
95. North Robinson 90.1% 64.7% (+25.4)#95 47.1% (+43.0)#1,267
96. Holland 90.0% 64.7% (+25.3)#96 47.1% (+42.9)#1,280
97. Harrisburg 90.0% 64.7% (+25.3)#97 47.1% (+42.9)#1,299
98. Summerfield 90.0% 64.7% (+25.3)#98 47.1% (+42.9)#1,301
99. Homeworth 89.9% 64.7% (+25.2)#99 47.1% (+42.8)#1,317
100. Nashport 89.9% 64.7% (+25.2)#100 47.1% (+42.8)#1,322

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
97.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio?
Hilltop has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Ohio is 64.7%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States?
Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States is 47.1%.