Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. South Canal 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#94
2. Sciotodale 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#139
3. Little Hocking 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#191
4. Millville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#199
5. Hooven 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#209
6. Miller 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#239
7. Madison Place 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#243
8. Bowerston 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#279
9. Buchtel 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#318
10. Bourneville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#332
11. Wharton 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#347
12. Brownsville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#349
13. Marne 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#366
14. Petersburg 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#380
15. Stewart 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#15 24.1% (+75.9)#397
16. Burbank 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#16 24.1% (+75.9)#408
17. Flat Rock 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#17 24.1% (+75.9)#431
18. Catawba 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#18 24.1% (+75.9)#478
19. Chatfield 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#19 24.1% (+75.9)#500
20. Lewisville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#20 24.1% (+75.9)#628
21. Rochester 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#21 24.1% (+75.9)#662
22. Cecil 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#22 24.1% (+75.9)#701
23. Lower Salem 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#23 24.1% (+75.9)#744
24. Belmore 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#24 24.1% (+75.9)#794
25. Graysville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#25 24.1% (+75.9)#836
26. Rendville 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#26 24.1% (+75.9)#893
27. Antioch 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#27 24.1% (+75.9)#916
28. Fairview 100.0% 28.5% (+71.5)#28 24.1% (+75.9)#926
29. Old Washington 97.7% 28.5% (+69.1)#29 24.1% (+73.6)#971
30. Gambier 87.5% 28.5% (+59.0)#30 24.1% (+63.4)#1,088
31. Green Camp 85.7% 28.5% (+57.2)#31 24.1% (+61.6)#1,142
32. Owensville 84.7% 28.5% (+56.2)#32 24.1% (+60.6)#1,174
33. Hollansburg 84.2% 28.5% (+55.7)#33 24.1% (+60.1)#1,186
34. New Haven Cdp Huron County 83.6% 28.5% (+55.1)#34 24.1% (+59.6)#1,196
35. Murray City 83.3% 28.5% (+54.8)#35 24.1% (+59.3)#1,214
36. Clay Center 83.3% 28.5% (+54.8)#36 24.1% (+59.3)#1,215
37. Crystal Lakes 83.2% 28.5% (+54.6)#37 24.1% (+59.1)#1,235
38. Mifflin 81.5% 28.5% (+52.9)#38 24.1% (+57.4)#1,285
39. New Bloomington 81.2% 28.5% (+52.7)#39 24.1% (+57.2)#1,295
40. West Elkton 81.0% 28.5% (+52.4)#40 24.1% (+56.9)#1,304
41. Miltonsburg 80.0% 28.5% (+51.5)#41 24.1% (+55.9)#1,357
42. Guilford Lake 78.9% 28.5% (+50.3)#42 24.1% (+54.8)#1,378
43. Cygnet 78.3% 28.5% (+49.7)#43 24.1% (+54.2)#1,400
44. New Richmond 77.8% 28.5% (+49.2)#44 24.1% (+53.7)#1,414
45. Highland Holiday 77.4% 28.5% (+48.9)#45 24.1% (+53.3)#1,448
46. Rushville 76.9% 28.5% (+48.4)#46 24.1% (+52.8)#1,475
47. South Mount Vernon 76.6% 28.5% (+48.1)#47 24.1% (+52.6)#1,485
48. Crooksville 76.6% 28.5% (+48.0)#48 24.1% (+52.5)#1,488
49. Irondale 76.5% 28.5% (+47.9)#49 24.1% (+52.4)#1,500
50. West Leipsic 75.0% 28.5% (+46.5)#50 24.1% (+50.9)#1,567
51. Summitville 75.0% 28.5% (+46.5)#51 24.1% (+50.9)#1,571
52. Palestine 75.0% 28.5% (+46.5)#52 24.1% (+50.9)#1,573
53. Williamsport 73.8% 28.5% (+45.3)#53 24.1% (+49.8)#1,629
54. Morgandale 73.3% 28.5% (+44.8)#54 24.1% (+49.3)#1,654
55. St Louisville 72.7% 28.5% (+44.2)#55 24.1% (+48.7)#1,687
56. Lyons 72.4% 28.5% (+43.9)#56 24.1% (+48.3)#1,706
57. La Rue 72.0% 28.5% (+43.5)#57 24.1% (+47.9)#1,725
58. Summerside 71.9% 28.5% (+43.4)#58 24.1% (+47.9)#1,730
59. Pomeroy 71.9% 28.5% (+43.4)#59 24.1% (+47.9)#1,731
60. Pigeon Creek 71.9% 28.5% (+43.3)#60 24.1% (+47.8)#1,732
61. Windham 71.2% 28.5% (+42.7)#61 24.1% (+47.1)#1,782
62. Stony Prairie 70.4% 28.5% (+41.9)#62 24.1% (+46.3)#1,831
63. Haviland 70.0% 28.5% (+41.5)#63 24.1% (+45.9)#1,861
64. Malvern 69.9% 28.5% (+41.4)#64 24.1% (+45.8)#1,875
65. Port William 69.0% 28.5% (+40.4)#65 24.1% (+44.9)#1,939
66. Woodsfield 68.9% 28.5% (+40.4)#66 24.1% (+44.8)#1,945
67. Peebles 67.9% 28.5% (+39.4)#67 24.1% (+43.8)#2,025
68. Camden 67.6% 28.5% (+39.1)#68 24.1% (+43.6)#2,039
69. Valleyview 67.4% 28.5% (+38.9)#69 24.1% (+43.3)#2,053
70. Martins Ferry 67.0% 28.5% (+38.5)#70 24.1% (+42.9)#2,071
71. Pleasant Grove 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#71 24.1% (+42.6)#2,084
72. Twinsburg Heights 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#72 24.1% (+42.6)#2,086
73. Nevada 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#73 24.1% (+42.6)#2,095
74. Amsterdam 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#74 24.1% (+42.6)#2,115
75. Chesterhill 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#75 24.1% (+42.6)#2,130
76. Winesburg 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#76 24.1% (+42.6)#2,154
77. Gilboa 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#77 24.1% (+42.6)#2,157
78. Scott 66.7% 28.5% (+38.1)#78 24.1% (+42.6)#2,161
79. Potsdam 65.6% 28.5% (+37.1)#79 24.1% (+41.5)#2,269
80. Carrollton 65.4% 28.5% (+36.9)#80 24.1% (+41.3)#2,283
81. Mount Orab 65.2% 28.5% (+36.7)#81 24.1% (+41.2)#2,295
82. Shelby 65.2% 28.5% (+36.7)#82 24.1% (+41.1)#2,296
83. Powhatan Point 64.4% 28.5% (+35.9)#83 24.1% (+40.4)#2,360
84. Sardinia 64.3% 28.5% (+35.7)#84 24.1% (+40.2)#2,368
85. Moscow 64.3% 28.5% (+35.7)#85 24.1% (+40.2)#2,385
86. Felicity 63.6% 28.5% (+35.1)#86 24.1% (+39.6)#2,428
87. Shawnee 63.6% 28.5% (+35.1)#87 24.1% (+39.6)#2,431
88. Adamsville 63.6% 28.5% (+35.1)#88 24.1% (+39.6)#2,434
89. Jeffersonville 63.3% 28.5% (+34.8)#89 24.1% (+39.2)#2,464
90. Risingsun 62.5% 28.5% (+34.0)#90 24.1% (+38.4)#2,549
91. Beallsville 62.5% 28.5% (+34.0)#91 24.1% (+38.4)#2,552
92. Cumberland 62.5% 28.5% (+34.0)#92 24.1% (+38.4)#2,558
93. Ansonia 62.1% 28.5% (+33.6)#93 24.1% (+38.0)#2,595
94. Racine 61.8% 28.5% (+33.3)#94 24.1% (+37.8)#2,627
95. Rock Creek 61.5% 28.5% (+33.0)#95 24.1% (+37.5)#2,652
96. Coalton 61.5% 28.5% (+33.0)#96 24.1% (+37.5)#2,657
97. Union City 61.3% 28.5% (+32.7)#97 24.1% (+37.2)#2,687
98. Manchester 60.6% 28.5% (+32.1)#98 24.1% (+36.6)#2,741
99. Russells Point 60.3% 28.5% (+31.7)#99 24.1% (+36.2)#2,775
100. New Paris 60.0% 28.5% (+31.5)#100 24.1% (+35.9)#2,792

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio?
South Canal has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Ohio?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Ohio is 28.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.