Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Trinway 69.6% 10.0% (+59.7)#1 11.2% (+58.4)#88
2. Lewistown 48.0% 10.0% (+38.0)#2 11.2% (+36.8)#225
3. Sugar Bush Knolls 40.3% 10.0% (+30.3)#3 11.2% (+29.0)#344
4. Brice 36.2% 10.0% (+26.2)#4 11.2% (+25.0)#457
5. Ridgewood 36.2% 10.0% (+26.2)#5 11.2% (+24.9)#459
6. Derby 35.4% 10.0% (+25.4)#6 11.2% (+24.2)#485
7. Amesville 35.3% 10.0% (+25.3)#7 11.2% (+24.1)#486
8. Harrisburg 35.2% 10.0% (+25.3)#8 11.2% (+24.0)#490
9. Miamiville 34.9% 10.0% (+25.0)#9 11.2% (+23.7)#502
10. Vincent 30.7% 10.0% (+20.7)#10 11.2% (+19.5)#710
11. Etna 29.6% 10.0% (+19.7)#11 11.2% (+18.4)#780
12. Lake Tomahawk 28.8% 10.0% (+18.8)#12 11.2% (+17.6)#842
13. Gambier 28.7% 10.0% (+18.7)#13 11.2% (+17.5)#850
14. Chilo 28.6% 10.0% (+18.6)#14 11.2% (+17.4)#867
15. Hannibal 27.9% 10.0% (+17.9)#15 11.2% (+16.7)#916
16. Mccutchenville 27.6% 10.0% (+17.7)#16 11.2% (+16.4)#939
17. South Webster 27.4% 10.0% (+17.4)#17 11.2% (+16.2)#962
18. Madison Place 26.9% 10.0% (+16.9)#18 11.2% (+15.7)#1,021
19. Pigeon Creek 25.8% 10.0% (+15.9)#19 11.2% (+14.6)#1,118
20. Riverlea 25.5% 10.0% (+15.6)#20 11.2% (+14.3)#1,146
21. De Graff 24.9% 10.0% (+15.0)#21 11.2% (+13.7)#1,248
22. Oberlin 24.6% 10.0% (+14.6)#22 11.2% (+13.4)#1,291
23. Austinburg 24.6% 10.0% (+14.6)#23 11.2% (+13.3)#1,295
24. Gates Mills 24.3% 10.0% (+14.4)#24 11.2% (+13.1)#1,337
25. Yellow Springs 24.3% 10.0% (+14.3)#25 11.2% (+13.1)#1,345
26. Oxford 24.1% 10.0% (+14.2)#26 11.2% (+12.9)#1,367
27. Athens 23.8% 10.0% (+13.9)#27 11.2% (+12.6)#1,420
28. Sardis 23.6% 10.0% (+13.6)#28 11.2% (+12.4)#1,471
29. Buchtel 23.6% 10.0% (+13.6)#29 11.2% (+12.4)#1,472
30. Kingsville 23.0% 10.0% (+13.1)#30 11.2% (+11.8)#1,600
31. Bexley 22.9% 10.0% (+13.0)#31 11.2% (+11.7)#1,616
32. Mariemont 22.6% 10.0% (+12.6)#32 11.2% (+11.3)#1,695
33. Saybrook-On-The-Lake 22.5% 10.0% (+12.5)#33 11.2% (+11.2)#1,720
34. Orange 22.3% 10.0% (+12.3)#34 11.2% (+11.1)#1,756
35. East Liberty 22.2% 10.0% (+12.3)#35 11.2% (+11.0)#1,768
36. Fairview 22.2% 10.0% (+12.3)#36 11.2% (+11.0)#1,779
37. Gallipolis 22.0% 10.0% (+12.1)#37 11.2% (+10.8)#1,817
38. Bolton 21.8% 10.0% (+11.8)#38 11.2% (+10.5)#1,876
39. New Haven Cdp Hamilton County 21.3% 10.0% (+11.3)#39 11.2% (+10.1)#1,989
40. Parkman 21.2% 10.0% (+11.3)#40 11.2% (+10.0)#1,996
41. Grandview Heights 21.1% 10.0% (+11.2)#41 11.2% (+9.92)#2,024
42. West Union 21.1% 10.0% (+11.1)#42 11.2% (+9.84)#2,038
43. North Lima 20.8% 10.0% (+10.9)#43 11.2% (+9.63)#2,099
44. East Alliance 20.8% 10.0% (+10.9)#44 11.2% (+9.62)#2,104
45. Shaker Heights 20.8% 10.0% (+10.9)#45 11.2% (+9.61)#2,112
46. Reno Beach 20.7% 10.0% (+10.8)#46 11.2% (+9.52)#2,132
47. Forestville 20.7% 10.0% (+10.7)#47 11.2% (+9.49)#2,142
48. The Plains 20.5% 10.0% (+10.6)#48 11.2% (+9.31)#2,197
49. Cherry Grove 20.3% 10.0% (+10.3)#49 11.2% (+9.04)#2,294
50. Bluffton 20.2% 10.0% (+10.3)#50 11.2% (+9.03)#2,297
51. Hiram 20.2% 10.0% (+10.3)#51 11.2% (+9.02)#2,307
52. Coal Grove 20.0% 10.0% (+10.1)#52 11.2% (+8.81)#2,376
53. Nankin 20.0% 10.0% (+10.0)#53 11.2% (+8.79)#2,386
54. Oakwood 19.9% 10.0% (+9.99)#54 11.2% (+8.73)#2,436
55. Worthington 19.7% 10.0% (+9.79)#55 11.2% (+8.53)#2,500
56. Marble Cliff 19.7% 10.0% (+9.77)#56 11.2% (+8.52)#2,507
57. Zaleski 19.6% 10.0% (+9.64)#57 11.2% (+8.39)#2,559
58. Waterford 19.5% 10.0% (+9.51)#58 11.2% (+8.25)#2,620
59. Bethesda 19.3% 10.0% (+9.35)#59 11.2% (+8.09)#2,679
60. Cleveland Heights 19.2% 10.0% (+9.26)#60 11.2% (+8.00)#2,715
61. Bay Village 19.2% 10.0% (+9.22)#61 11.2% (+7.96)#2,730
62. Lucasville 19.1% 10.0% (+9.16)#62 11.2% (+7.90)#2,746
63. Lewisville 19.1% 10.0% (+9.15)#63 11.2% (+7.89)#2,751
64. Amberley 19.1% 10.0% (+9.13)#64 11.2% (+7.87)#2,760
65. Miltonsburg 19.0% 10.0% (+9.09)#65 11.2% (+7.83)#2,775
66. Chagrin Falls 19.0% 10.0% (+9.09)#66 11.2% (+7.83)#2,781
67. Clinton 18.9% 10.0% (+8.96)#67 11.2% (+7.70)#2,828
68. Guilford Lake 18.9% 10.0% (+8.93)#68 11.2% (+7.67)#2,841
69. Hemlock 18.8% 10.0% (+8.89)#69 11.2% (+7.63)#2,867
70. Zoar 18.8% 10.0% (+8.86)#70 11.2% (+7.60)#2,876
71. Linndale 18.7% 10.0% (+8.70)#71 11.2% (+7.44)#2,936
72. Andersonville 18.6% 10.0% (+8.68)#72 11.2% (+7.42)#2,950
73. Beachwood 18.5% 10.0% (+8.56)#73 11.2% (+7.31)#2,993
74. Ottawa Hills 18.5% 10.0% (+8.54)#74 11.2% (+7.28)#3,005
75. University Heights 18.5% 10.0% (+8.53)#75 11.2% (+7.28)#3,010
76. Hudson 18.4% 10.0% (+8.47)#76 11.2% (+7.21)#3,034
77. Cedarville 18.2% 10.0% (+8.27)#77 11.2% (+7.02)#3,141
78. Woodmere 18.0% 10.0% (+8.00)#78 11.2% (+6.74)#3,271
79. Upper Arlington 17.9% 10.0% (+7.99)#79 11.2% (+6.74)#3,273
80. Kansas 17.9% 10.0% (+7.95)#80 11.2% (+6.70)#3,293
81. Howland Center 17.9% 10.0% (+7.91)#81 11.2% (+6.66)#3,313
82. Stewart 17.9% 10.0% (+7.90)#82 11.2% (+6.64)#3,322
83. Stafford 17.9% 10.0% (+7.90)#83 11.2% (+6.64)#3,325
84. Ai 17.8% 10.0% (+7.81)#84 11.2% (+6.55)#3,371
85. Pleasant Run 17.7% 10.0% (+7.71)#85 11.2% (+6.45)#3,417
86. New Concord 17.7% 10.0% (+7.70)#86 11.2% (+6.44)#3,426
87. Negley 17.6% 10.0% (+7.64)#87 11.2% (+6.38)#3,465
88. Thornport 17.4% 10.0% (+7.48)#88 11.2% (+6.22)#3,566
89. Bratenahl 17.4% 10.0% (+7.43)#89 11.2% (+6.17)#3,594
90. Lakeline 17.3% 10.0% (+7.32)#90 11.2% (+6.06)#3,662
91. Marne 17.1% 10.0% (+7.17)#91 11.2% (+5.92)#3,746
92. Murray City 17.1% 10.0% (+7.13)#92 11.2% (+5.87)#3,768
93. Wyoming 17.1% 10.0% (+7.11)#93 11.2% (+5.85)#3,782
94. Granville South 17.0% 10.0% (+7.04)#94 11.2% (+5.78)#3,816
95. Bowling Green 17.0% 10.0% (+7.03)#95 11.2% (+5.78)#3,817
96. Kirtland 16.9% 10.0% (+6.98)#96 11.2% (+5.72)#3,836
97. Silverton 16.9% 10.0% (+6.96)#97 11.2% (+5.70)#3,848
98. Westerville 16.9% 10.0% (+6.95)#98 11.2% (+5.69)#3,853
99. Hayesville 16.9% 10.0% (+6.95)#99 11.2% (+5.69)#3,859
100. Medway 16.7% 10.0% (+6.77)#100 11.2% (+5.51)#3,950

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio are:
#1
69.6%
#2
48.0%
#3
40.3%
#4
36.2%
#5
35.4%
#6
35.3%
#7
35.2%
#8
34.9%
#9
30.7%
#10
29.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio?
Trinway has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio with 69.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Ohio is 10.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.