Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

City Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. Little Hocking 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#125
2. Hooven 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#135
3. Madison Place 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#152
4. Sardis 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#203
5. Marne 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#219
6. Plumwood 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#271
7. Kunkle 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#324
8. Trinway 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#325
9. Rarden 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#406
10. East Fultonham 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#421
11. Cecil 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#437
12. Connorville 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#486
13. Miltonsburg 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#577
14. Octa 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#601
15. Antioch 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#609
16. Mifflin 95.8% 18.8% (+77.0)#16 16.9% (+78.9)#671
17. Old Washington 95.3% 18.8% (+76.5)#17 16.9% (+78.4)#673
18. West Elkton 90.7% 18.8% (+71.9)#18 16.9% (+73.8)#722
19. Castalia 85.9% 18.8% (+67.1)#19 16.9% (+69.0)#819
20. Derby 84.6% 18.8% (+65.8)#20 16.9% (+67.7)#850
21. Harbor View 84.6% 18.8% (+65.8)#21 16.9% (+67.7)#853
22. Scio 83.6% 18.8% (+64.8)#22 16.9% (+66.7)#881
23. Pleasant Hills 82.7% 18.8% (+63.9)#23 16.9% (+65.8)#918
24. Bowerston 81.8% 18.8% (+63.0)#24 16.9% (+64.9)#941
25. Felicity 81.6% 18.8% (+62.8)#25 16.9% (+64.7)#956
26. Shawnee 81.1% 18.8% (+62.3)#26 16.9% (+64.2)#973
27. Windham 78.7% 18.8% (+59.9)#27 16.9% (+61.8)#1,060
28. Lincoln Heights 77.9% 18.8% (+59.1)#28 16.9% (+61.0)#1,084
29. New Lebanon 74.6% 18.8% (+55.8)#29 16.9% (+57.7)#1,215
30. Peebles 74.4% 18.8% (+55.6)#30 16.9% (+57.5)#1,219
31. New Athens 72.7% 18.8% (+53.9)#31 16.9% (+55.8)#1,294
32. Harpster 71.4% 18.8% (+52.6)#32 16.9% (+54.5)#1,345
33. Mingo Junction 71.2% 18.8% (+52.4)#33 16.9% (+54.3)#1,366
34. Alger 71.0% 18.8% (+52.1)#34 16.9% (+54.1)#1,372
35. Patterson 70.4% 18.8% (+51.6)#35 16.9% (+53.5)#1,404
36. Iberia 70.0% 18.8% (+51.2)#36 16.9% (+53.1)#1,419
37. Potsdam 70.0% 18.8% (+51.2)#37 16.9% (+53.1)#1,420
38. Lockland 69.8% 18.8% (+51.0)#38 16.9% (+52.9)#1,432
39. Buckeye Lake 69.8% 18.8% (+51.0)#39 16.9% (+52.9)#1,433
40. Haydenville 69.4% 18.8% (+50.6)#40 16.9% (+52.5)#1,447
41. Stony Prairie 69.3% 18.8% (+50.5)#41 16.9% (+52.4)#1,451
42. Coalton 68.4% 18.8% (+49.6)#42 16.9% (+51.5)#1,492
43. Empire 66.7% 18.8% (+47.8)#43 16.9% (+49.8)#1,584
44. Chesterville 66.7% 18.8% (+47.8)#44 16.9% (+49.8)#1,588
45. Milton Center 66.7% 18.8% (+47.8)#45 16.9% (+49.8)#1,589
46. Moscow 64.7% 18.8% (+45.9)#46 16.9% (+47.8)#1,700
47. Sulphur Springs 64.5% 18.8% (+45.7)#47 16.9% (+47.6)#1,708
48. Martins Ferry 64.5% 18.8% (+45.6)#48 16.9% (+47.6)#1,711
49. Irondale 64.3% 18.8% (+45.5)#49 16.9% (+47.4)#1,732
50. New Bloomington 62.5% 18.8% (+43.7)#50 16.9% (+45.6)#1,833
51. Skyline Acres 62.4% 18.8% (+43.6)#51 16.9% (+45.5)#1,849
52. New Holland 62.1% 18.8% (+43.2)#52 16.9% (+45.2)#1,865
53. Union City 60.4% 18.8% (+41.6)#53 16.9% (+43.5)#1,973
54. Beallsville 60.0% 18.8% (+41.2)#54 16.9% (+43.1)#1,992
55. Lower Salem 60.0% 18.8% (+41.2)#55 16.9% (+43.1)#2,007
56. Centerville Thurman 60.0% 18.8% (+41.2)#56 16.9% (+43.1)#2,018
57. Bidwell 59.9% 18.8% (+41.1)#57 16.9% (+43.0)#2,023
58. New Burlington 59.0% 18.8% (+40.1)#58 16.9% (+42.1)#2,077
59. West Lafayette 58.9% 18.8% (+40.1)#59 16.9% (+42.0)#2,078
60. Crooksville 58.6% 18.8% (+39.8)#60 16.9% (+41.7)#2,106
61. Urbancrest 58.0% 18.8% (+39.2)#61 16.9% (+41.1)#2,158
62. Russells Point 57.5% 18.8% (+38.7)#62 16.9% (+40.6)#2,191
63. Rocky Fork Point 57.1% 18.8% (+38.3)#63 16.9% (+40.2)#2,220
64. Vienna Center 57.1% 18.8% (+38.3)#64 16.9% (+40.2)#2,221
65. Lowell 56.9% 18.8% (+38.0)#65 16.9% (+40.0)#2,253
66. La Rue 56.4% 18.8% (+37.5)#66 16.9% (+39.5)#2,296
67. Hartford Croton 56.1% 18.8% (+37.3)#67 16.9% (+39.2)#2,314
68. Corning 55.8% 18.8% (+37.0)#68 16.9% (+38.9)#2,332
69. Mcarthur 55.6% 18.8% (+36.7)#69 16.9% (+38.7)#2,347
70. Brookfield Center 55.6% 18.8% (+36.7)#70 16.9% (+38.7)#2,348
71. Addyston 55.3% 18.8% (+36.5)#71 16.9% (+38.4)#2,374
72. Matamoras 55.3% 18.8% (+36.5)#72 16.9% (+38.4)#2,375
73. Youngstown 55.0% 18.8% (+36.2)#73 16.9% (+38.1)#2,391
74. Hoytville 54.5% 18.8% (+35.7)#74 16.9% (+37.6)#2,443
75. North College Hill 54.5% 18.8% (+35.7)#75 16.9% (+37.6)#2,452
76. Jeffersonville 54.3% 18.8% (+35.4)#76 16.9% (+37.4)#2,476
77. Warren 53.4% 18.8% (+34.6)#77 16.9% (+36.5)#2,545
78. Portage 53.3% 18.8% (+34.5)#78 16.9% (+36.4)#2,554
79. Portsmouth 53.3% 18.8% (+34.4)#79 16.9% (+36.3)#2,563
80. Fairport Harbor 53.2% 18.8% (+34.4)#80 16.9% (+36.3)#2,565
81. Cygnet 53.2% 18.8% (+34.4)#81 16.9% (+36.3)#2,569
82. Bridgeport 52.7% 18.8% (+33.9)#82 16.9% (+35.8)#2,619
83. Moraine 52.4% 18.8% (+33.6)#83 16.9% (+35.5)#2,646
84. Rogers 52.2% 18.8% (+33.4)#84 16.9% (+35.3)#2,675
85. Leipsic 52.1% 18.8% (+33.3)#85 16.9% (+35.2)#2,678
86. Seaman 51.8% 18.8% (+33.0)#86 16.9% (+34.9)#2,711
87. Lockbourne 51.1% 18.8% (+32.3)#87 16.9% (+34.2)#2,781
88. Pomeroy 50.6% 18.8% (+31.8)#88 16.9% (+33.7)#2,810
89. Port Clinton 50.6% 18.8% (+31.8)#89 16.9% (+33.7)#2,812
90. West Union 50.6% 18.8% (+31.8)#90 16.9% (+33.7)#2,819
91. Canton 50.6% 18.8% (+31.8)#91 16.9% (+33.7)#2,823
92. Eaton Estates 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#92 16.9% (+33.1)#2,863
93. Rayland 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#93 16.9% (+33.1)#2,891
94. Gratiot 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#94 16.9% (+33.1)#2,928
95. Lewisville 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#95 16.9% (+33.1)#2,938
96. Congress 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#96 16.9% (+33.1)#2,957
97. Reno 49.1% 18.8% (+30.3)#97 16.9% (+32.2)#3,045
98. Fort Mckinley 48.5% 18.8% (+29.7)#98 16.9% (+31.6)#3,111
99. Oakwood Village Cuyahoga County 48.5% 18.8% (+29.6)#99 16.9% (+31.6)#3,116
100. Lakeview 48.1% 18.8% (+29.3)#100 16.9% (+31.2)#3,164

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Little Hocking has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the State of Ohio?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Ohio is 18.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.