Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Madison Place 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#80
2. Hamburg 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#114
3. Stewart 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#129
4. Flat Rock 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#149
5. Trinway 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#201
6. Lewistown 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#278
7. East Fultonham 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#279
8. Cecil 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#291
9. Connorville 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#331
10. Antioch 100.0% 18.8% (+81.2)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#439
11. Sardis 89.4% 18.8% (+70.6)#11 16.9% (+72.4)#589
12. Old Washington 87.8% 18.8% (+69.1)#12 16.9% (+70.9)#626
13. Miltonsburg 84.2% 18.8% (+65.5)#13 16.9% (+67.3)#731
14. Mifflin 84.1% 18.8% (+65.3)#14 16.9% (+67.2)#732
15. Kunkle 81.8% 18.8% (+63.1)#15 16.9% (+64.9)#784
16. West Elkton 78.9% 18.8% (+60.2)#16 16.9% (+62.0)#872
17. Haydenville 78.3% 18.8% (+59.6)#17 16.9% (+61.4)#891
18. Scio 77.2% 18.8% (+58.4)#18 16.9% (+60.2)#935
19. New Bloomington 76.1% 18.8% (+57.3)#19 16.9% (+59.1)#979
20. Mingo Junction 75.4% 18.8% (+56.6)#20 16.9% (+58.5)#1,001
21. Castalia 74.3% 18.8% (+55.5)#21 16.9% (+57.3)#1,049
22. Windham 73.0% 18.8% (+54.2)#22 16.9% (+56.0)#1,103
23. Skyline Acres 72.3% 18.8% (+53.5)#23 16.9% (+55.4)#1,134
24. Derby 71.0% 18.8% (+52.2)#24 16.9% (+54.0)#1,197
25. Brownsville 69.1% 18.8% (+50.4)#25 16.9% (+52.2)#1,291
26. Nellie 68.4% 18.8% (+49.6)#26 16.9% (+51.4)#1,328
27. Alger 67.6% 18.8% (+48.8)#27 16.9% (+50.7)#1,352
28. Jeffersonville 67.5% 18.8% (+48.7)#28 16.9% (+50.5)#1,358
29. Shawnee 66.3% 18.8% (+47.6)#29 16.9% (+49.4)#1,429
30. Pleasant Hills 66.0% 18.8% (+47.3)#30 16.9% (+49.1)#1,450
31. Coalton 65.9% 18.8% (+47.1)#31 16.9% (+48.9)#1,456
32. Patterson 65.8% 18.8% (+47.0)#32 16.9% (+48.9)#1,458
33. Peebles 65.5% 18.8% (+46.8)#33 16.9% (+48.6)#1,469
34. Urbancrest 65.2% 18.8% (+46.5)#34 16.9% (+48.3)#1,490
35. Centerville Thurman 64.3% 18.8% (+45.5)#35 16.9% (+47.3)#1,555
36. Russells Point 63.7% 18.8% (+45.0)#36 16.9% (+46.8)#1,579
37. Lockland 63.6% 18.8% (+44.8)#37 16.9% (+46.7)#1,593
38. South Canal 63.3% 18.8% (+44.6)#38 16.9% (+46.4)#1,609
39. New Holland 63.1% 18.8% (+44.4)#39 16.9% (+46.2)#1,629
40. Empire 63.0% 18.8% (+44.2)#40 16.9% (+46.0)#1,636
41. Union City 62.8% 18.8% (+44.0)#41 16.9% (+45.8)#1,652
42. Harbor View 61.1% 18.8% (+42.4)#42 16.9% (+44.2)#1,769
43. West Lafayette 60.2% 18.8% (+41.5)#43 16.9% (+43.3)#1,830
44. Bowerston 59.8% 18.8% (+41.0)#44 16.9% (+42.9)#1,877
45. Irondale 59.8% 18.8% (+41.0)#45 16.9% (+42.8)#1,879
46. Stony Prairie 59.7% 18.8% (+41.0)#46 16.9% (+42.8)#1,887
47. Cygnet 59.6% 18.8% (+40.9)#47 16.9% (+42.7)#1,897
48. Seaman 59.5% 18.8% (+40.7)#48 16.9% (+42.5)#1,903
49. Mcarthur 59.3% 18.8% (+40.6)#49 16.9% (+42.4)#1,914
50. Sulphur Springs 58.3% 18.8% (+39.6)#50 16.9% (+41.4)#1,991
51. Holloway 57.9% 18.8% (+39.1)#51 16.9% (+41.0)#2,025
52. New Lebanon 57.6% 18.8% (+38.9)#52 16.9% (+40.7)#2,048
53. Dillonvale 57.3% 18.8% (+38.6)#53 16.9% (+40.4)#2,072
54. Warren 57.3% 18.8% (+38.6)#54 16.9% (+40.4)#2,073
55. West Union 57.3% 18.8% (+38.5)#55 16.9% (+40.4)#2,079
56. La Rue 56.9% 18.8% (+38.1)#56 16.9% (+39.9)#2,121
57. Moscow 56.7% 18.8% (+37.9)#57 16.9% (+39.7)#2,132
58. Lincoln Heights 56.6% 18.8% (+37.9)#58 16.9% (+39.7)#2,138
59. Petersburg 56.2% 18.8% (+37.5)#59 16.9% (+39.3)#2,157
60. Sardinia 56.0% 18.8% (+37.3)#60 16.9% (+39.1)#2,175
61. Fairfield Beach 55.8% 18.8% (+37.1)#61 16.9% (+38.9)#2,191
62. Friendship 55.6% 18.8% (+36.9)#62 16.9% (+38.7)#2,209
63. Highland Holiday 55.6% 18.8% (+36.8)#63 16.9% (+38.7)#2,210
64. Sarahsville 55.6% 18.8% (+36.8)#64 16.9% (+38.6)#2,222
65. Youngstown 54.2% 18.8% (+35.5)#65 16.9% (+37.3)#2,357
66. Pomeroy 53.6% 18.8% (+34.9)#66 16.9% (+36.7)#2,398
67. Owensville 53.2% 18.8% (+34.5)#67 16.9% (+36.3)#2,428
68. Rogers 53.1% 18.8% (+34.3)#68 16.9% (+36.1)#2,445
69. South Mount Vernon 53.0% 18.8% (+34.3)#69 16.9% (+36.1)#2,449
70. Bidwell 52.7% 18.8% (+33.9)#70 16.9% (+35.7)#2,487
71. Crooksville 51.7% 18.8% (+33.0)#71 16.9% (+34.8)#2,586
72. Felicity 51.4% 18.8% (+32.6)#72 16.9% (+34.4)#2,626
73. Amsterdam 51.4% 18.8% (+32.6)#73 16.9% (+34.4)#2,627
74. Vienna Center 51.3% 18.8% (+32.5)#74 16.9% (+34.3)#2,633
75. Hoytville 51.2% 18.8% (+32.5)#75 16.9% (+34.3)#2,639
76. Fairport Harbor 51.2% 18.8% (+32.5)#76 16.9% (+34.3)#2,641
77. Portsmouth 51.1% 18.8% (+32.4)#77 16.9% (+34.2)#2,654
78. Chauncey 50.8% 18.8% (+32.1)#78 16.9% (+33.9)#2,682
79. Potsdam 50.6% 18.8% (+31.8)#79 16.9% (+33.6)#2,704
80. Corning 50.4% 18.8% (+31.7)#80 16.9% (+33.5)#2,716
81. Yorkville 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#81 16.9% (+33.1)#2,751
82. Beallsville 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#82 16.9% (+33.1)#2,766
83. Marne 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#83 16.9% (+33.1)#2,770
84. Fairview 50.0% 18.8% (+31.2)#84 16.9% (+33.1)#2,824
85. Manchester 49.9% 18.8% (+31.1)#85 16.9% (+33.0)#2,831
86. Greenfield 49.9% 18.8% (+31.1)#86 16.9% (+32.9)#2,832
87. North College Hill 49.8% 18.8% (+31.1)#87 16.9% (+32.9)#2,834
88. Matamoras 49.6% 18.8% (+30.9)#88 16.9% (+32.7)#2,853
89. Port William 49.4% 18.8% (+30.6)#89 16.9% (+32.4)#2,871
90. Sabina 48.9% 18.8% (+30.2)#90 16.9% (+32.0)#2,913
91. Castine 48.8% 18.8% (+30.1)#91 16.9% (+31.9)#2,928
92. Canton 48.7% 18.8% (+30.0)#92 16.9% (+31.8)#2,937
93. East Cleveland 48.7% 18.8% (+29.9)#93 16.9% (+31.7)#2,941
94. Bergholz 48.3% 18.8% (+29.6)#94 16.9% (+31.4)#2,980
95. East Liverpool 48.0% 18.8% (+29.3)#95 16.9% (+31.1)#3,013
96. Lowell 47.4% 18.8% (+28.7)#96 16.9% (+30.5)#3,096
97. Addyston 47.3% 18.8% (+28.6)#97 16.9% (+30.4)#3,112
98. Bolindale 47.3% 18.8% (+28.5)#98 16.9% (+30.4)#3,115
99. New Burlington 47.1% 18.8% (+28.4)#99 16.9% (+30.2)#3,128
100. Aberdeen 47.1% 18.8% (+28.4)#100 16.9% (+30.2)#3,130

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
89.4%
#10
87.8%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio?
Stewart has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Ohio?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Ohio is 18.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.