Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Lewistown 48.0% 0.92% (+47.1)#1 1.2% (+46.8)#10
2. Mccutchenville 25.9% 0.92% (+25.0)#2 1.2% (+24.7)#31
3. Woodsdale 14.3% 0.92% (+13.3)#3 1.2% (+13.1)#118
4. Bentleyville 9.8% 0.92% (+8.88)#4 1.2% (+8.62)#235
5. Linndale 9.7% 0.92% (+8.78)#5 1.2% (+8.52)#244
6. Wilson 9.1% 0.92% (+8.17)#6 1.2% (+7.91)#266
7. Brice 8.5% 0.92% (+7.59)#7 1.2% (+7.33)#304
8. Hills And Dales 8.3% 0.92% (+7.41)#8 1.2% (+7.15)#318
9. Bratenahl 7.6% 0.92% (+6.69)#9 1.2% (+6.43)#365
10. Grandview Heights 7.4% 0.92% (+6.43)#10 1.2% (+6.17)#397
11. Highland Heights 6.7% 0.92% (+5.77)#11 1.2% (+5.51)#475
12. Lansing 6.6% 0.92% (+5.68)#12 1.2% (+5.42)#488
13. Gates Mills 6.4% 0.92% (+5.50)#13 1.2% (+5.24)#529
14. Middlefield 6.1% 0.92% (+5.19)#14 1.2% (+4.93)#581
15. Duncan Falls 6.0% 0.92% (+5.09)#15 1.2% (+4.83)#599
16. Coldstream 5.9% 0.92% (+4.93)#16 1.2% (+4.67)#632
17. Orange 5.6% 0.92% (+4.66)#17 1.2% (+4.41)#691
18. Reno 5.6% 0.92% (+4.65)#18 1.2% (+4.39)#694
19. Fruit Hill 5.3% 0.92% (+4.41)#19 1.2% (+4.15)#751
20. Moreland Hills 5.3% 0.92% (+4.35)#20 1.2% (+4.09)#761
21. Lakeside 5.3% 0.92% (+4.34)#21 1.2% (+4.08)#765
22. Dunkirk 5.2% 0.92% (+4.26)#22 1.2% (+4.00)#795
23. Rocky River 5.2% 0.92% (+4.23)#23 1.2% (+3.97)#805
24. Granville South 5.1% 0.92% (+4.21)#24 1.2% (+3.95)#811
25. Buchtel 5.1% 0.92% (+4.20)#25 1.2% (+3.94)#814
26. Waite Hill 5.0% 0.92% (+4.08)#26 1.2% (+3.82)#838
27. Kirtland 4.6% 0.92% (+3.72)#27 1.2% (+3.46)#971
28. Hunting Valley 4.5% 0.92% (+3.53)#28 1.2% (+3.27)#1,028
29. Upper Arlington 4.4% 0.92% (+3.51)#29 1.2% (+3.25)#1,036
30. Harrisville 4.4% 0.92% (+3.49)#30 1.2% (+3.23)#1,043
31. Highland Holiday 4.4% 0.92% (+3.44)#31 1.2% (+3.19)#1,054
32. Meyers Lake 4.2% 0.92% (+3.31)#32 1.2% (+3.05)#1,115
33. Marble Cliff 4.2% 0.92% (+3.29)#33 1.2% (+3.03)#1,128
34. Shaker Heights 4.2% 0.92% (+3.23)#34 1.2% (+2.97)#1,157
35. Port William 4.0% 0.92% (+3.04)#35 1.2% (+2.78)#1,250
36. Bexley 3.9% 0.92% (+3.00)#36 1.2% (+2.74)#1,272
37. Powell 3.9% 0.92% (+2.99)#37 1.2% (+2.73)#1,274
38. Riverlea 3.8% 0.92% (+2.92)#38 1.2% (+2.66)#1,305
39. Boston Heights 3.8% 0.92% (+2.84)#39 1.2% (+2.58)#1,342
40. Pepper Pike 3.7% 0.92% (+2.79)#40 1.2% (+2.53)#1,385
41. Forestville 3.7% 0.92% (+2.77)#41 1.2% (+2.51)#1,402
42. Salem Heights 3.7% 0.92% (+2.76)#42 1.2% (+2.50)#1,407
43. Kirtland Hills 3.7% 0.92% (+2.76)#43 1.2% (+2.50)#1,413
44. Hudson 3.7% 0.92% (+2.75)#44 1.2% (+2.49)#1,415
45. Terrace Park 3.6% 0.92% (+2.71)#45 1.2% (+2.45)#1,442
46. Richfield 3.5% 0.92% (+2.59)#46 1.2% (+2.34)#1,521
47. Montrose Ghent 3.5% 0.92% (+2.59)#47 1.2% (+2.33)#1,523
48. Mason 3.5% 0.92% (+2.55)#48 1.2% (+2.29)#1,557
49. Chagrin Falls 3.4% 0.92% (+2.50)#49 1.2% (+2.24)#1,592
50. Yellow Springs 3.4% 0.92% (+2.48)#50 1.2% (+2.22)#1,608
51. Avon 3.4% 0.92% (+2.44)#51 1.2% (+2.18)#1,631
52. Ottawa Hills 3.3% 0.92% (+2.40)#52 1.2% (+2.14)#1,668
53. South Russell 3.3% 0.92% (+2.39)#53 1.2% (+2.13)#1,672
54. Hilltop 3.3% 0.92% (+2.37)#54 1.2% (+2.11)#1,688
55. Fredericksburg 3.3% 0.92% (+2.35)#55 1.2% (+2.09)#1,704
56. Beachwood 3.2% 0.92% (+2.28)#56 1.2% (+2.02)#1,751
57. Ridgewood 3.2% 0.92% (+2.28)#57 1.2% (+2.02)#1,752
58. South Webster 3.2% 0.92% (+2.27)#58 1.2% (+2.01)#1,759
59. Syracuse 3.2% 0.92% (+2.27)#59 1.2% (+2.01)#1,763
60. Crystal Lakes 3.2% 0.92% (+2.26)#60 1.2% (+2.00)#1,771
61. Valley View 3.2% 0.92% (+2.25)#61 1.2% (+1.99)#1,784
62. Seven Mile 3.2% 0.92% (+2.24)#62 1.2% (+1.98)#1,795
63. Bethesda 3.1% 0.92% (+2.16)#63 1.2% (+1.90)#1,845
64. Worthington 3.0% 0.92% (+2.09)#64 1.2% (+1.83)#1,912
65. Brecksville 3.0% 0.92% (+2.03)#65 1.2% (+1.77)#1,982
66. Bay Village 2.9% 0.92% (+2.01)#66 1.2% (+1.75)#2,003
67. Wilberforce 2.9% 0.92% (+1.94)#67 1.2% (+1.68)#2,053
68. Amherst 2.9% 0.92% (+1.93)#68 1.2% (+1.68)#2,061
69. Fairfax 2.8% 0.92% (+1.90)#69 1.2% (+1.64)#2,102
70. Westlake 2.8% 0.92% (+1.87)#70 1.2% (+1.62)#2,130
71. Pigeon Creek 2.8% 0.92% (+1.86)#71 1.2% (+1.60)#2,147
72. Dublin 2.7% 0.92% (+1.81)#72 1.2% (+1.55)#2,199
73. Amberley 2.7% 0.92% (+1.79)#73 1.2% (+1.53)#2,228
74. Churchill 2.6% 0.92% (+1.70)#74 1.2% (+1.44)#2,308
75. Covedale 2.6% 0.92% (+1.70)#75 1.2% (+1.44)#2,322
76. Mariemont 2.5% 0.92% (+1.60)#76 1.2% (+1.34)#2,425
77. Solon 2.5% 0.92% (+1.59)#77 1.2% (+1.33)#2,430
78. Clarksville 2.5% 0.92% (+1.58)#78 1.2% (+1.32)#2,442
79. Roseland 2.4% 0.92% (+1.51)#79 1.2% (+1.26)#2,517
80. Clarington 2.4% 0.92% (+1.51)#80 1.2% (+1.26)#2,523
81. New Albany 2.4% 0.92% (+1.51)#81 1.2% (+1.25)#2,527
82. Avon Lake 2.4% 0.92% (+1.49)#82 1.2% (+1.23)#2,569
83. Westerville 2.4% 0.92% (+1.43)#83 1.2% (+1.17)#2,652
84. Madeira 2.3% 0.92% (+1.41)#84 1.2% (+1.15)#2,671
85. University Heights 2.2% 0.92% (+1.32)#85 1.2% (+1.06)#2,803
86. Elmore 2.2% 0.92% (+1.31)#86 1.2% (+1.05)#2,824
87. The Village Of Indian Hill 2.2% 0.92% (+1.25)#87 1.2% (+0.994)#2,907
88. Waterville 2.1% 0.92% (+1.21)#88 1.2% (+0.948)#2,984
89. Willoughby Hills 2.1% 0.92% (+1.17)#89 1.2% (+0.913)#3,044
90. Malinta 2.1% 0.92% (+1.14)#90 1.2% (+0.885)#3,093
91. Dry Run 2.1% 0.92% (+1.14)#91 1.2% (+0.878)#3,105
92. Cleveland Heights 2.1% 0.92% (+1.14)#92 1.2% (+0.878)#3,108
93. Alexandria 2.0% 0.92% (+1.11)#93 1.2% (+0.850)#3,151
94. Obetz 2.0% 0.92% (+1.11)#94 1.2% (+0.849)#3,154
95. Oakwood Village Paulding County 2.0% 0.92% (+1.11)#95 1.2% (+0.847)#3,160
96. Montgomery 2.0% 0.92% (+1.10)#96 1.2% (+0.844)#3,164
97. Sheffield 2.0% 0.92% (+1.09)#97 1.2% (+0.833)#3,177
98. Parma Heights 2.0% 0.92% (+1.09)#98 1.2% (+0.832)#3,183
99. Clinton 2.0% 0.92% (+1.09)#99 1.2% (+0.832)#3,184
100. Twinsburg 2.0% 0.92% (+1.07)#100 1.2% (+0.809)#3,227

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio?
Lewistown has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio with 48.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Ohio is 0.92%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.