Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Devola 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#105
2. Rosemount 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#155
3. Morgandale 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#263
4. Reno 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#288
5. Wolfhurst 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#290
6. Cinnamon Lake 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#386
7. South Canal 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#394
8. Highland Holiday 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#435
9. Albany 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#500
10. Kinsman Center 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#515
11. Sciotodale 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#519
12. Pigeon Creek 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#521
13. Nevada 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#559
14. La Rue 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#592
15. Rocky Fork Point 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#596
16. Little Hocking 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#664
17. Hayesville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#699
18. Hooven 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#707
19. Laurelville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#714
20. Kirkersville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#737
21. Miller 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#766
22. Madison Place 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#782
23. Felicity 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#810
24. Old Washington 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#832
25. Bowerston 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#846
26. Portage 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#876
27. Murray City 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#907
28. Trimble 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#914
29. Amsterdam 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#926
30. Gloria Glens Park 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#927
31. Buchtel 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#934
32. Shawnee 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#935
33. Fort Jennings 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#946
34. Coalton 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#947
35. Bourneville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#958
36. Wharton 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#984
37. Mcguffey 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#987
38. Brownsville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#990
39. Haydenville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#998
40. Marne 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,033
41. Adamsville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,036
42. Petersburg 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#1,061
43. Cumberland 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#44 33.1% (+66.9)#1,086
44. Stewart 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#45 33.1% (+66.9)#1,092
45. Chesterhill 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#46 33.1% (+66.9)#1,093
46. Burbank 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#47 33.1% (+66.9)#1,116
47. Nellie 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#48 33.1% (+66.9)#1,142
48. Flat Rock 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#49 33.1% (+66.9)#1,147
49. Plumwood 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#50 33.1% (+66.9)#1,191
50. Catawba 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#51 33.1% (+66.9)#1,250
51. Tedrow 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#52 33.1% (+66.9)#1,271
52. Chatfield 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#53 33.1% (+66.9)#1,292
53. Hollansburg 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#54 33.1% (+66.9)#1,318
54. Summitville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#55 33.1% (+66.9)#1,320
55. Empire 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#56 33.1% (+66.9)#1,334
56. South Salem 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#57 33.1% (+66.9)#1,449
57. Lewisville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#58 33.1% (+66.9)#1,504
58. Moscow 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#59 33.1% (+66.9)#1,551
59. Rochester 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#60 33.1% (+66.9)#1,575
60. Harrisville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#61 33.1% (+66.9)#1,584
61. Clifton 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#62 33.1% (+66.9)#1,616
62. Fultonham 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#63 33.1% (+66.9)#1,625
63. Cecil 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#64 33.1% (+66.9)#1,636
64. Highland 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#65 33.1% (+66.9)#1,653
65. Castine 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#66 33.1% (+66.9)#1,687
66. Lower Salem 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#67 33.1% (+66.9)#1,702
67. Congress 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#68 33.1% (+66.9)#1,732
68. Connorville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#69 33.1% (+66.9)#1,733
69. Sarahsville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#70 33.1% (+66.9)#1,740
70. Graysville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#71 33.1% (+66.9)#1,831
71. Miltonsburg 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#72 33.1% (+66.9)#1,873
72. Rendville 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#73 33.1% (+66.9)#1,895
73. Antioch 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#74 33.1% (+66.9)#1,919
74. Fairview 100.0% 38.7% (+61.3)#75 33.1% (+66.9)#1,928
75. Mifflin 95.7% 38.7% (+57.0)#76 33.1% (+62.5)#1,998
76. Newburgh Heights 93.6% 38.7% (+54.9)#77 33.1% (+60.5)#2,041
77. Shelby 93.3% 38.7% (+54.6)#78 33.1% (+60.2)#2,051
78. Scio 91.7% 38.7% (+53.0)#79 33.1% (+58.5)#2,106
79. Pomeroy 91.5% 38.7% (+52.8)#80 33.1% (+58.4)#2,115
80. Owensville 91.2% 38.7% (+52.5)#81 33.1% (+58.1)#2,129
81. Twinsburg Heights 90.0% 38.7% (+51.3)#82 33.1% (+56.9)#2,164
82. Cygnet 90.0% 38.7% (+51.3)#83 33.1% (+56.9)#2,168
83. Stony Prairie 89.8% 38.7% (+51.1)#84 33.1% (+56.7)#2,176
84. Clay Center 88.9% 38.7% (+50.2)#85 33.1% (+55.8)#2,216
85. Malinta 88.9% 38.7% (+50.2)#86 33.1% (+55.8)#2,220
86. New Bloomington 88.6% 38.7% (+49.9)#87 33.1% (+55.5)#2,237
87. Carrollton 87.7% 38.7% (+49.0)#88 33.1% (+54.5)#2,269
88. Potsdam 87.5% 38.7% (+48.8)#89 33.1% (+54.4)#2,290
89. Irondale 86.7% 38.7% (+48.0)#90 33.1% (+53.5)#2,327
90. Manchester 86.2% 38.7% (+47.5)#91 33.1% (+53.0)#2,346
91. Valleyview 86.1% 38.7% (+47.4)#92 33.1% (+53.0)#2,350
92. Lyons 85.7% 38.7% (+47.0)#93 33.1% (+52.6)#2,372
93. West Leipsic 85.7% 38.7% (+47.0)#94 33.1% (+52.6)#2,398
94. Williamsburg 85.1% 38.7% (+46.4)#95 33.1% (+52.0)#2,426
95. West Elkton 85.0% 38.7% (+46.3)#96 33.1% (+51.9)#2,437
96. Crooksville 84.7% 38.7% (+46.0)#97 33.1% (+51.6)#2,446
97. Oakwood Village Cuyahoga County 84.6% 38.7% (+45.9)#98 33.1% (+51.5)#2,449
98. Dillonvale 84.6% 38.7% (+45.9)#99 33.1% (+51.5)#2,456
99. Mantua 84.2% 38.7% (+45.5)#100 33.1% (+51.1)#2,479
100. Mcarthur 84.0% 38.7% (+45.4)#101 33.1% (+50.9)#2,485

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio?
Devola has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Ohio?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Ohio is 38.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.