Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Crystal Rock 100.0% 4.9% (+95.1)#1 4.3% (+95.7)#3
2. Sandyville 48.7% 4.9% (+43.9)#2 4.3% (+44.4)#48
3. New Hampshire 39.4% 4.9% (+34.5)#3 4.3% (+35.1)#77
4. Pulaski 37.2% 4.9% (+32.4)#4 4.3% (+32.9)#88
5. Nettle Lake 31.2% 4.9% (+26.4)#5 4.3% (+26.9)#146
6. East Springfield 30.0% 4.9% (+25.1)#6 4.3% (+25.7)#155
7. Grandview 24.3% 4.9% (+19.4)#7 4.3% (+20.0)#235
8. Sulphur Springs 24.1% 4.9% (+19.3)#8 4.3% (+19.9)#240
9. The Village Of Indian Hill 24.0% 4.9% (+19.1)#9 4.3% (+19.7)#246
10. Coldstream 22.6% 4.9% (+17.8)#10 4.3% (+18.3)#280
11. Vickery 22.6% 4.9% (+17.8)#11 4.3% (+18.3)#281
12. Pepper Pike 22.5% 4.9% (+17.6)#12 4.3% (+18.2)#284
13. Celeryville 21.7% 4.9% (+16.9)#13 4.3% (+17.5)#302
14. Lansing 21.7% 4.9% (+16.8)#14 4.3% (+17.4)#304
15. Morristown 20.6% 4.9% (+15.7)#15 4.3% (+16.3)#341
16. Blue Jay 19.4% 4.9% (+14.5)#16 4.3% (+15.1)#389
17. Stewart 19.3% 4.9% (+14.4)#17 4.3% (+15.0)#398
18. Birmingham 18.9% 4.9% (+14.1)#18 4.3% (+14.6)#418
19. Marble Cliff 18.5% 4.9% (+13.7)#19 4.3% (+14.3)#446
20. Hamburg 18.5% 4.9% (+13.6)#20 4.3% (+14.2)#452
21. Minford 17.0% 4.9% (+12.1)#21 4.3% (+12.7)#519
22. Bratenahl 16.8% 4.9% (+11.9)#22 4.3% (+12.5)#538
23. Brecon 16.7% 4.9% (+11.8)#23 4.3% (+12.4)#544
24. Dunlap 16.6% 4.9% (+11.8)#24 4.3% (+12.4)#554
25. Chatfield 16.4% 4.9% (+11.5)#25 4.3% (+12.1)#566
26. Ottawa Hills 16.2% 4.9% (+11.3)#26 4.3% (+11.9)#589
27. Oceola 15.5% 4.9% (+10.6)#27 4.3% (+11.2)#642
28. Beachwood 15.0% 4.9% (+10.2)#28 4.3% (+10.7)#686
29. Massieville 15.0% 4.9% (+10.1)#29 4.3% (+10.7)#688
30. Hessville 14.6% 4.9% (+9.78)#30 4.3% (+10.3)#736
31. Sardis 14.6% 4.9% (+9.75)#31 4.3% (+10.3)#741
32. Hills And Dales 14.6% 4.9% (+9.73)#32 4.3% (+10.3)#743
33. Howard 14.5% 4.9% (+9.67)#33 4.3% (+10.2)#750
34. Franklin Furnace 14.5% 4.9% (+9.65)#34 4.3% (+10.2)#753
35. New Albany 14.2% 4.9% (+9.33)#35 4.3% (+9.90)#788
36. Orange 14.2% 4.9% (+9.32)#36 4.3% (+9.89)#791
37. Rosemount 14.1% 4.9% (+9.29)#37 4.3% (+9.86)#794
38. Gates Mills 14.1% 4.9% (+9.28)#38 4.3% (+9.84)#799
39. Williston 14.1% 4.9% (+9.28)#39 4.3% (+9.84)#800
40. Evendale 13.9% 4.9% (+9.06)#40 4.3% (+9.62)#826
41. St Martin 13.8% 4.9% (+8.90)#41 4.3% (+9.46)#848
42. Bentleyville 13.7% 4.9% (+8.87)#42 4.3% (+9.44)#852
43. Dry Ridge 13.6% 4.9% (+8.79)#43 4.3% (+9.36)#870
44. Kirtland Hills 13.5% 4.9% (+8.64)#44 4.3% (+9.21)#898
45. Grandview Heights 13.5% 4.9% (+8.64)#45 4.3% (+9.21)#899
46. Moreland Hills 13.0% 4.9% (+8.15)#46 4.3% (+8.72)#976
47. Choctaw Lake 12.5% 4.9% (+7.67)#47 4.3% (+8.23)#1,065
48. Shaker Heights 12.3% 4.9% (+7.48)#48 4.3% (+8.05)#1,116
49. Continental 12.2% 4.9% (+7.39)#49 4.3% (+7.95)#1,133
50. Morral 12.2% 4.9% (+7.34)#50 4.3% (+7.91)#1,136
51. Fort Jennings 12.2% 4.9% (+7.32)#51 4.3% (+7.89)#1,147
52. Stone Creek 12.2% 4.9% (+7.31)#52 4.3% (+7.88)#1,151
53. Frankfort 12.1% 4.9% (+7.29)#53 4.3% (+7.85)#1,156
54. Vinton 12.1% 4.9% (+7.24)#54 4.3% (+7.81)#1,167
55. Dillonvale 12.1% 4.9% (+7.21)#55 4.3% (+7.78)#1,173
56. Northwood 12.0% 4.9% (+7.20)#56 4.3% (+7.76)#1,174
57. Wyoming 12.0% 4.9% (+7.17)#57 4.3% (+7.74)#1,177
58. Summerside 12.0% 4.9% (+7.12)#58 4.3% (+7.69)#1,189
59. Solon 12.0% 4.9% (+7.10)#59 4.3% (+7.66)#1,197
60. Amberley 11.9% 4.9% (+7.04)#60 4.3% (+7.60)#1,217
61. Sixteen Mile Stand 11.8% 4.9% (+6.95)#61 4.3% (+7.51)#1,240
62. Waverly 11.8% 4.9% (+6.92)#62 4.3% (+7.49)#1,242
63. Bloomingdale 11.6% 4.9% (+6.78)#63 4.3% (+7.34)#1,278
64. Wetherington 11.6% 4.9% (+6.75)#64 4.3% (+7.31)#1,286
65. Westminster 11.6% 4.9% (+6.73)#65 4.3% (+7.30)#1,292
66. Riverlea 11.5% 4.9% (+6.69)#66 4.3% (+7.25)#1,305
67. Mariemont 11.4% 4.9% (+6.54)#67 4.3% (+7.11)#1,353
68. Peninsula 11.3% 4.9% (+6.41)#68 4.3% (+6.98)#1,387
69. Montgomery 11.0% 4.9% (+6.11)#69 4.3% (+6.68)#1,465
70. Leesville 10.9% 4.9% (+6.09)#70 4.3% (+6.65)#1,472
71. Georgetown 10.9% 4.9% (+6.06)#71 4.3% (+6.62)#1,482
72. Westlake 10.8% 4.9% (+5.99)#72 4.3% (+6.55)#1,504
73. Risingsun 10.7% 4.9% (+5.86)#73 4.3% (+6.43)#1,532
74. Glenford 10.6% 4.9% (+5.77)#74 4.3% (+6.34)#1,564
75. Richmond 10.6% 4.9% (+5.72)#75 4.3% (+6.28)#1,591
76. Lucasville 10.5% 4.9% (+5.69)#76 4.3% (+6.25)#1,594
77. Woodmere 10.5% 4.9% (+5.67)#77 4.3% (+6.24)#1,596
78. Fruit Hill 10.5% 4.9% (+5.63)#78 4.3% (+6.20)#1,613
79. Brecksville 10.4% 4.9% (+5.51)#79 4.3% (+6.08)#1,653
80. Upper Arlington 10.4% 4.9% (+5.51)#80 4.3% (+6.07)#1,656
81. Fort Recovery 10.3% 4.9% (+5.48)#81 4.3% (+6.04)#1,670
82. New Athens 10.3% 4.9% (+5.44)#82 4.3% (+6.01)#1,681
83. Apple Valley 10.2% 4.9% (+5.32)#83 4.3% (+5.88)#1,724
84. Bexley 10.1% 4.9% (+5.25)#84 4.3% (+5.81)#1,748
85. Broadview Heights 10.1% 4.9% (+5.21)#85 4.3% (+5.78)#1,760
86. Newtown 10.0% 4.9% (+5.18)#86 4.3% (+5.75)#1,765
87. Columbus Grove 10.0% 4.9% (+5.16)#87 4.3% (+5.73)#1,772
88. Belle Valley 10.0% 4.9% (+5.15)#88 4.3% (+5.71)#1,792
89. Lake Lakengren 9.9% 4.9% (+5.06)#89 4.3% (+5.62)#1,827
90. Kanauga 9.9% 4.9% (+5.01)#90 4.3% (+5.57)#1,848
91. Perrysburg 9.8% 4.9% (+4.98)#91 4.3% (+5.54)#1,862
92. Rayland 9.8% 4.9% (+4.95)#92 4.3% (+5.52)#1,869
93. Dublin 9.8% 4.9% (+4.92)#93 4.3% (+5.49)#1,890
94. Monfort Heights 9.7% 4.9% (+4.87)#94 4.3% (+5.44)#1,912
95. Bidwell 9.7% 4.9% (+4.86)#95 4.3% (+5.43)#1,914
96. Berlin Heights 9.7% 4.9% (+4.84)#96 4.3% (+5.40)#1,921
97. Timberlake 9.7% 4.9% (+4.81)#97 4.3% (+5.37)#1,933
98. Burlington 9.6% 4.9% (+4.79)#98 4.3% (+5.35)#1,938
99. Crown City 9.6% 4.9% (+4.70)#99 4.3% (+5.27)#1,986
100. Four Bridges 9.5% 4.9% (+4.68)#100 4.3% (+5.25)#1,995

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio?
Crystal Rock has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Ohio is 4.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.