Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. Kidron 80.1% 44.6% (+35.5)#1 44.0% (+36.1)#19
2. Kenton 72.2% 44.6% (+27.6)#2 44.0% (+28.2)#95
3. Lisbon 71.0% 44.6% (+26.4)#3 44.0% (+27.0)#127
4. Mineral Ridge 70.0% 44.6% (+25.4)#4 44.0% (+26.0)#166
5. Plymouth 69.2% 44.6% (+24.6)#5 44.0% (+25.2)#197
6. Mitiwanga 68.8% 44.6% (+24.2)#6 44.0% (+24.8)#224
7. Pleasant Grove 68.7% 44.6% (+24.1)#7 44.0% (+24.7)#225
8. Gates Mills 68.3% 44.6% (+23.7)#8 44.0% (+24.3)#241
9. Adena 67.5% 44.6% (+22.9)#9 44.0% (+23.5)#291
10. Port Washington 67.3% 44.6% (+22.7)#10 44.0% (+23.3)#300
11. Convoy 66.4% 44.6% (+21.8)#11 44.0% (+22.4)#357
12. Tremont City 65.5% 44.6% (+20.9)#12 44.0% (+21.5)#435
13. Sixteen Mile Stand 65.2% 44.6% (+20.6)#13 44.0% (+21.2)#477
14. Ballville 64.5% 44.6% (+19.9)#14 44.0% (+20.5)#542
15. Clarktown 64.4% 44.6% (+19.8)#15 44.0% (+20.4)#568
16. Alger 64.3% 44.6% (+19.7)#16 44.0% (+20.3)#585
17. Mulberry 64.1% 44.6% (+19.5)#17 44.0% (+20.1)#612
18. Liberty Center 63.2% 44.6% (+18.6)#18 44.0% (+19.2)#763
19. Buchtel 63.2% 44.6% (+18.6)#19 44.0% (+19.2)#768
20. Walton Hills 63.1% 44.6% (+18.5)#20 44.0% (+19.1)#779
21. Peninsula 63.0% 44.6% (+18.4)#21 44.0% (+19.0)#803
22. Mowrystown 62.2% 44.6% (+17.6)#22 44.0% (+18.2)#947
23. Darrtown 61.8% 44.6% (+17.2)#23 44.0% (+17.8)#1,019
24. Fayette 61.5% 44.6% (+16.9)#24 44.0% (+17.5)#1,077
25. Spencer 61.5% 44.6% (+16.9)#25 44.0% (+17.5)#1,087
26. Dunlap 61.4% 44.6% (+16.8)#26 44.0% (+17.4)#1,104
27. Meyers Lake 61.1% 44.6% (+16.5)#27 44.0% (+17.1)#1,204
28. Kelleys Island 61.1% 44.6% (+16.5)#28 44.0% (+17.1)#1,215
29. Curtice 61.0% 44.6% (+16.4)#29 44.0% (+17.0)#1,227
30. Castalia 60.7% 44.6% (+16.1)#30 44.0% (+16.7)#1,282
31. De Graff 60.5% 44.6% (+15.9)#31 44.0% (+16.5)#1,309
32. Vinton 60.5% 44.6% (+15.9)#32 44.0% (+16.5)#1,328
33. Magnolia 60.3% 44.6% (+15.7)#33 44.0% (+16.3)#1,388
34. Pleasant Plain 60.3% 44.6% (+15.7)#34 44.0% (+16.3)#1,405
35. Zaleski 60.2% 44.6% (+15.6)#35 44.0% (+16.2)#1,431
36. Wilmington 60.1% 44.6% (+15.5)#36 44.0% (+16.1)#1,441
37. Blacklick Estates 60.0% 44.6% (+15.4)#37 44.0% (+16.0)#1,469
38. Ontario 60.0% 44.6% (+15.4)#38 44.0% (+16.0)#1,470
39. Marblehead 59.6% 44.6% (+15.0)#39 44.0% (+15.6)#1,552
40. Bratenahl 59.5% 44.6% (+14.9)#40 44.0% (+15.5)#1,583
41. North Randall 59.5% 44.6% (+14.9)#41 44.0% (+15.5)#1,591
42. Thornport 59.5% 44.6% (+14.9)#42 44.0% (+15.5)#1,593
43. Mendon 59.5% 44.6% (+14.9)#43 44.0% (+15.5)#1,603
44. Chesapeake 59.2% 44.6% (+14.6)#44 44.0% (+15.2)#1,712
45. Fort Shawnee 59.1% 44.6% (+14.5)#45 44.0% (+15.1)#1,731
46. Mayfield 58.3% 44.6% (+13.7)#46 44.0% (+14.3)#1,953
47. Alexandria 58.3% 44.6% (+13.7)#47 44.0% (+14.3)#1,979
48. Ohio City 58.2% 44.6% (+13.6)#48 44.0% (+14.2)#2,022
49. Lowellville 58.1% 44.6% (+13.5)#49 44.0% (+14.1)#2,058
50. Tiltonsville 58.0% 44.6% (+13.4)#50 44.0% (+14.0)#2,092
51. Beloit 58.0% 44.6% (+13.4)#51 44.0% (+14.0)#2,093
52. Holiday Valley 57.7% 44.6% (+13.1)#52 44.0% (+13.7)#2,163
53. Chesterland 57.6% 44.6% (+13.0)#53 44.0% (+13.6)#2,173
54. Walbridge 57.5% 44.6% (+12.9)#54 44.0% (+13.5)#2,210
55. Glandorf 57.5% 44.6% (+12.9)#55 44.0% (+13.5)#2,224
56. Apple Valley 57.3% 44.6% (+12.7)#56 44.0% (+13.3)#2,296
57. Mingo Junction 57.3% 44.6% (+12.7)#57 44.0% (+13.3)#2,302
58. West Mansfield 57.3% 44.6% (+12.7)#58 44.0% (+13.3)#2,325
59. Hunting Valley 57.1% 44.6% (+12.5)#59 44.0% (+13.1)#2,426
60. Sidney 57.0% 44.6% (+12.4)#60 44.0% (+13.0)#2,435
61. New Knoxville 57.0% 44.6% (+12.4)#61 44.0% (+13.0)#2,458
62. Sheffield 56.9% 44.6% (+12.3)#62 44.0% (+12.9)#2,470
63. Green Meadows 56.8% 44.6% (+12.2)#63 44.0% (+12.8)#2,501
64. Hartford Croton 56.8% 44.6% (+12.2)#64 44.0% (+12.8)#2,514
65. Beachwood 56.7% 44.6% (+12.1)#65 44.0% (+12.7)#2,521
66. Wintersville 56.4% 44.6% (+11.8)#66 44.0% (+12.4)#2,655
67. Mcarthur 56.4% 44.6% (+11.8)#67 44.0% (+12.4)#2,661
68. Pioneer 56.4% 44.6% (+11.8)#68 44.0% (+12.4)#2,670
69. North Bend 56.4% 44.6% (+11.8)#69 44.0% (+12.4)#2,676
70. Albany 56.3% 44.6% (+11.7)#70 44.0% (+12.3)#2,717
71. Cuyahoga Heights 56.3% 44.6% (+11.7)#71 44.0% (+12.3)#2,723
72. New Miami 56.2% 44.6% (+11.6)#72 44.0% (+12.2)#2,752
73. Bradford 56.2% 44.6% (+11.6)#73 44.0% (+12.2)#2,756
74. Antwerp 56.2% 44.6% (+11.6)#74 44.0% (+12.2)#2,757
75. The Village Of Indian Hill 56.1% 44.6% (+11.5)#75 44.0% (+12.1)#2,782
76. Bellevue 56.0% 44.6% (+11.4)#76 44.0% (+12.0)#2,818
77. Fairlawn 55.9% 44.6% (+11.3)#77 44.0% (+11.9)#2,852
78. Loveland Park 55.5% 44.6% (+10.9)#78 44.0% (+11.5)#2,999
79. North Perry 55.5% 44.6% (+10.9)#79 44.0% (+11.5)#3,015
80. Port William 55.5% 44.6% (+10.9)#80 44.0% (+11.5)#3,037
81. Kirkersville 55.4% 44.6% (+10.8)#81 44.0% (+11.4)#3,080
82. Oregon 55.3% 44.6% (+10.7)#82 44.0% (+11.3)#3,087
83. Woodville 55.3% 44.6% (+10.7)#83 44.0% (+11.3)#3,106
84. Butler 55.3% 44.6% (+10.7)#84 44.0% (+11.3)#3,112
85. Germantown 55.2% 44.6% (+10.6)#85 44.0% (+11.2)#3,143
86. Grand Rapids 55.2% 44.6% (+10.6)#86 44.0% (+11.2)#3,166
87. South Vienna 54.8% 44.6% (+10.2)#87 44.0% (+10.8)#3,315
88. Orwell 54.6% 44.6% (+10.0)#88 44.0% (+10.6)#3,384
89. Ridgewood 54.5% 44.6% (+9.90)#89 44.0% (+10.5)#3,444
90. Genoa 54.4% 44.6% (+9.80)#90 44.0% (+10.4)#3,488
91. Hide A Way Hills 54.4% 44.6% (+9.80)#91 44.0% (+10.4)#3,500
92. Leesburg 54.3% 44.6% (+9.70)#92 44.0% (+10.3)#3,548
93. Uhrichsville 54.1% 44.6% (+9.50)#93 44.0% (+10.1)#3,627
94. Sebring 54.1% 44.6% (+9.50)#94 44.0% (+10.1)#3,631
95. Burton 54.1% 44.6% (+9.50)#95 44.0% (+10.1)#3,643
96. Yellow Springs 54.0% 44.6% (+9.40)#96 44.0% (+10.0)#3,666
97. Wickliffe 53.9% 44.6% (+9.30)#97 44.0% (+9.90)#3,699
98. Bethel 53.7% 44.6% (+9.10)#98 44.0% (+9.70)#3,775
99. Sugarcreek 53.7% 44.6% (+9.10)#99 44.0% (+9.70)#3,776
100. Attica 53.7% 44.6% (+9.10)#100 44.0% (+9.70)#3,787

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio are:
#1
80.1%
#2
72.2%
#3
71.0%
#4
70.0%
#5
69.2%
#6
68.8%
#7
68.7%
#8
68.3%
#9
67.5%
#10
67.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio?
Kidron has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio with 80.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in Ohio is 44.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.