Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Vaughnsville 82.5% 4.1% (+78.3)#1 5.0% (+77.5)#45
2. Tippecanoe 73.3% 4.1% (+69.2)#2 5.0% (+68.3)#60
3. Rudolph 44.0% 4.1% (+39.9)#3 5.0% (+39.1)#229
4. Mcdermott 41.3% 4.1% (+37.2)#4 5.0% (+36.3)#262
5. New Haven Cdp Hamilton County 39.4% 4.1% (+35.3)#5 5.0% (+34.4)#290
6. Venedocia 36.5% 4.1% (+32.4)#6 5.0% (+31.5)#352
7. Bannock 34.0% 4.1% (+29.9)#7 5.0% (+29.0)#403
8. Bourneville 33.6% 4.1% (+29.5)#8 5.0% (+28.7)#409
9. Glencoe 31.7% 4.1% (+27.6)#9 5.0% (+26.7)#484
10. Buford 30.7% 4.1% (+26.6)#10 5.0% (+25.7)#514
11. Miamiville 30.2% 4.1% (+26.0)#11 5.0% (+25.2)#542
12. Homeworth 29.6% 4.1% (+25.5)#12 5.0% (+24.6)#562
13. Trimble 29.1% 4.1% (+25.0)#13 5.0% (+24.1)#583
14. Williston 28.3% 4.1% (+24.2)#14 5.0% (+23.3)#628
15. Yankee Lake 27.3% 4.1% (+23.2)#15 5.0% (+22.3)#688
16. Holloway 27.2% 4.1% (+23.0)#16 5.0% (+22.2)#700
17. East Rochester 26.3% 4.1% (+22.2)#17 5.0% (+21.3)#756
18. Bolton 26.0% 4.1% (+21.8)#18 5.0% (+21.0)#773
19. Batesville 23.5% 4.1% (+19.4)#19 5.0% (+18.5)#962
20. Vickery 23.5% 4.1% (+19.4)#20 5.0% (+18.5)#967
21. Lafayette 23.3% 4.1% (+19.2)#21 5.0% (+18.3)#984
22. West Farmington 23.1% 4.1% (+19.0)#22 5.0% (+18.1)#996
23. Hemlock 21.7% 4.1% (+17.6)#23 5.0% (+16.7)#1,154
24. Neville 21.7% 4.1% (+17.6)#24 5.0% (+16.7)#1,160
25. Lloydsville 21.7% 4.1% (+17.6)#25 5.0% (+16.7)#1,166
26. Milledgeville 21.2% 4.1% (+17.0)#26 5.0% (+16.2)#1,221
27. Gomer 21.0% 4.1% (+16.8)#27 5.0% (+16.0)#1,248
28. Gratis 20.9% 4.1% (+16.8)#28 5.0% (+15.9)#1,253
29. Conesville 20.2% 4.1% (+16.1)#29 5.0% (+15.2)#1,340
30. Suffield 19.9% 4.1% (+15.8)#30 5.0% (+14.9)#1,389
31. Derby 19.8% 4.1% (+15.7)#31 5.0% (+14.8)#1,397
32. Camden 19.8% 4.1% (+15.7)#32 5.0% (+14.8)#1,398
33. Magnetic Springs 19.4% 4.1% (+15.3)#33 5.0% (+14.4)#1,474
34. Fairfield Beach 19.0% 4.1% (+14.9)#34 5.0% (+14.0)#1,537
35. Bascom 18.9% 4.1% (+14.7)#35 5.0% (+13.9)#1,560
36. Sharon Center 18.8% 4.1% (+14.7)#36 5.0% (+13.8)#1,571
37. Freeport 18.6% 4.1% (+14.5)#37 5.0% (+13.6)#1,599
38. Elgin 18.6% 4.1% (+14.5)#38 5.0% (+13.6)#1,612
39. Jacksontown 18.5% 4.1% (+14.4)#39 5.0% (+13.5)#1,632
40. Florida 18.3% 4.1% (+14.2)#40 5.0% (+13.3)#1,659
41. Corning 18.2% 4.1% (+14.1)#41 5.0% (+13.2)#1,671
42. Beallsville 18.2% 4.1% (+14.1)#42 5.0% (+13.2)#1,672
43. Octa 18.2% 4.1% (+14.1)#43 5.0% (+13.2)#1,695
44. Five Points 18.1% 4.1% (+14.0)#44 5.0% (+13.1)#1,706
45. Maple Ridge 18.1% 4.1% (+14.0)#45 5.0% (+13.1)#1,714
46. Lewisville 18.0% 4.1% (+13.9)#46 5.0% (+13.0)#1,743
47. Bowersville 17.8% 4.1% (+13.7)#47 5.0% (+12.8)#1,790
48. Eldorado 17.5% 4.1% (+13.4)#48 5.0% (+12.5)#1,833
49. Gilboa 17.5% 4.1% (+13.4)#49 5.0% (+12.5)#1,849
50. Laura 17.4% 4.1% (+13.3)#50 5.0% (+12.4)#1,864
51. Bradner 17.4% 4.1% (+13.3)#51 5.0% (+12.4)#1,866
52. Grandview 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#52 5.0% (+12.0)#1,956
53. Caledonia 17.0% 4.1% (+12.9)#53 5.0% (+12.0)#1,962
54. Hide A Way Hills 16.8% 4.1% (+12.6)#54 5.0% (+11.8)#2,011
55. Tarlton 16.7% 4.1% (+12.6)#55 5.0% (+11.7)#2,043
56. Morgandale 16.6% 4.1% (+12.5)#56 5.0% (+11.6)#2,077
57. Belmont 16.4% 4.1% (+12.3)#57 5.0% (+11.4)#2,115
58. Ithaca 16.4% 4.1% (+12.3)#58 5.0% (+11.4)#2,116
59. Martinsburg 16.4% 4.1% (+12.3)#59 5.0% (+11.4)#2,122
60. Roswell 16.4% 4.1% (+12.3)#60 5.0% (+11.4)#2,132
61. Millersport 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#61 5.0% (+11.3)#2,140
62. Coolville 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#62 5.0% (+11.3)#2,141
63. Marlboro 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#63 5.0% (+11.3)#2,152
64. Mount Eaton 16.3% 4.1% (+12.2)#64 5.0% (+11.3)#2,156
65. Chesterhill 16.2% 4.1% (+12.1)#65 5.0% (+11.2)#2,173
66. Stone Creek 16.2% 4.1% (+12.1)#66 5.0% (+11.2)#2,176
67. Port Washington 16.2% 4.1% (+12.1)#67 5.0% (+11.2)#2,186
68. Mount Pleasant 16.2% 4.1% (+12.0)#68 5.0% (+11.2)#2,195
69. Otway 16.0% 4.1% (+11.9)#69 5.0% (+11.0)#2,235
70. Sullivan 16.0% 4.1% (+11.9)#70 5.0% (+11.0)#2,238
71. Beaverdam 15.9% 4.1% (+11.8)#71 5.0% (+10.9)#2,251
72. Wilson 15.9% 4.1% (+11.8)#72 5.0% (+10.9)#2,265
73. Addyston 15.8% 4.1% (+11.7)#73 5.0% (+10.8)#2,289
74. Rock Creek 15.8% 4.1% (+11.7)#74 5.0% (+10.8)#2,298
75. Wharton 15.8% 4.1% (+11.7)#75 5.0% (+10.8)#2,315
76. Pekin 15.7% 4.1% (+11.6)#76 5.0% (+10.7)#2,338
77. Atwater 15.5% 4.1% (+11.4)#77 5.0% (+10.5)#2,382
78. Port Jefferson 15.3% 4.1% (+11.2)#78 5.0% (+10.3)#2,432
79. Collins 15.3% 4.1% (+11.2)#79 5.0% (+10.3)#2,438
80. Brecon 15.2% 4.1% (+11.1)#80 5.0% (+10.2)#2,474
81. Celeryville 15.2% 4.1% (+11.1)#81 5.0% (+10.2)#2,477
82. Trinway 15.2% 4.1% (+11.1)#82 5.0% (+10.2)#2,486
83. Sardis 15.2% 4.1% (+11.1)#83 5.0% (+10.2)#2,496
84. Roseville 15.1% 4.1% (+11.0)#84 5.0% (+10.1)#2,509
85. Valley Hi 14.9% 4.1% (+10.8)#85 5.0% (+9.95)#2,571
86. Kidron 14.9% 4.1% (+10.7)#86 5.0% (+9.86)#2,596
87. Vincent 14.9% 4.1% (+10.7)#87 5.0% (+9.86)#2,602
88. Salesville 14.8% 4.1% (+10.7)#88 5.0% (+9.82)#2,623
89. Tuppers Plains 14.8% 4.1% (+10.7)#89 5.0% (+9.78)#2,638
90. St Louisville 14.7% 4.1% (+10.6)#90 5.0% (+9.71)#2,664
91. Westminster 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#91 5.0% (+9.64)#2,695
92. Macksburg 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#92 5.0% (+9.59)#2,715
93. Baltimore 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#93 5.0% (+9.57)#2,726
94. Plainfield 14.5% 4.1% (+10.4)#94 5.0% (+9.52)#2,742
95. Mount Hope 14.4% 4.1% (+10.3)#95 5.0% (+9.43)#2,767
96. Wellsville 13.9% 4.1% (+9.83)#96 5.0% (+8.94)#2,950
97. Port William 13.9% 4.1% (+9.75)#97 5.0% (+8.87)#2,990
98. Reno 13.9% 4.1% (+9.74)#98 5.0% (+8.86)#2,993
99. Adena 13.8% 4.1% (+9.72)#99 5.0% (+8.83)#3,005
100. St Bernard 13.8% 4.1% (+9.69)#100 5.0% (+8.80)#3,013

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio are:
#1
82.5%
#2
73.3%
#3
44.0%
#4
41.3%
#5
36.5%
#6
34.0%
#7
33.6%
#8
31.7%
#9
30.7%
#10
30.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio?
Vaughnsville has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio with 82.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Ohio is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.