Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Caesars Head 46.2% 0.97% (+45.2)#1 1.2% (+45.0)#11
2. Folly Beach 19.2% 0.97% (+18.2)#2 1.2% (+18.0)#63
3. Ehrhardt 13.3% 0.97% (+12.3)#3 1.2% (+12.1)#137
4. Sullivan S Island 11.1% 0.97% (+10.2)#4 1.2% (+9.96)#179
5. Kingstree 8.1% 0.97% (+7.17)#5 1.2% (+6.96)#332
6. Debordieu Colony 8.0% 0.97% (+7.04)#6 1.2% (+6.84)#341
7. Livingston 7.8% 0.97% (+6.87)#7 1.2% (+6.66)#347
8. Joanna 7.0% 0.97% (+6.04)#8 1.2% (+5.83)#438
9. Blenheim 6.9% 0.97% (+5.92)#9 1.2% (+5.71)#451
10. Kiawah Island 6.8% 0.97% (+5.82)#10 1.2% (+5.61)#461
11. Briarcliffe Acres 6.0% 0.97% (+5.03)#11 1.2% (+4.82)#601
12. Mcclellanville 5.6% 0.97% (+4.60)#12 1.2% (+4.39)#693
13. Cane Savannah 5.3% 0.97% (+4.37)#13 1.2% (+4.16)#747
14. Pinopolis 5.3% 0.97% (+4.36)#14 1.2% (+4.15)#749
15. Branchville 5.1% 0.97% (+4.09)#15 1.2% (+3.88)#823
16. Arcadia Lakes 4.7% 0.97% (+3.68)#16 1.2% (+3.47)#964
17. Edisto Beach 4.5% 0.97% (+3.53)#17 1.2% (+3.32)#1,012
18. Isle Of Palms 4.3% 0.97% (+3.34)#18 1.2% (+3.13)#1,084
19. Forest Acres 3.9% 0.97% (+2.97)#19 1.2% (+2.76)#1,260
20. Litchfield Beach 3.6% 0.97% (+2.62)#20 1.2% (+2.41)#1,466
21. East Camden 3.6% 0.97% (+2.58)#21 1.2% (+2.37)#1,498
22. Mount Pleasant 3.1% 0.97% (+2.12)#22 1.2% (+1.91)#1,839
23. Mount Croghan 3.0% 0.97% (+2.06)#23 1.2% (+1.85)#1,897
24. Greenville 2.9% 0.97% (+1.92)#24 1.2% (+1.71)#2,031
25. East Gaffney 2.8% 0.97% (+1.87)#25 1.2% (+1.66)#2,081
26. Beaufort 2.7% 0.97% (+1.76)#26 1.2% (+1.55)#2,209
27. Seabrook Island 2.7% 0.97% (+1.74)#27 1.2% (+1.54)#2,223
28. Chesterfield 2.7% 0.97% (+1.70)#28 1.2% (+1.49)#2,265
29. Jackson 2.7% 0.97% (+1.68)#29 1.2% (+1.47)#2,281
30. Walterboro 2.6% 0.97% (+1.65)#30 1.2% (+1.44)#2,314
31. Piedmont 2.6% 0.97% (+1.63)#31 1.2% (+1.42)#2,340
32. Greer 2.4% 0.97% (+1.45)#32 1.2% (+1.25)#2,537
33. Ladson 2.4% 0.97% (+1.41)#33 1.2% (+1.20)#2,601
34. Ridgeville 2.3% 0.97% (+1.36)#34 1.2% (+1.16)#2,670
35. Ridgeway 2.3% 0.97% (+1.35)#35 1.2% (+1.14)#2,687
36. Campobello 2.3% 0.97% (+1.32)#36 1.2% (+1.12)#2,721
37. Columbia 2.3% 0.97% (+1.30)#37 1.2% (+1.09)#2,765
38. Walhalla 2.2% 0.97% (+1.26)#38 1.2% (+1.05)#2,814
39. Garden City 2.2% 0.97% (+1.21)#39 1.2% (+1.00)#2,890
40. Oak Grove 2.1% 0.97% (+1.16)#40 1.2% (+0.947)#2,986
41. Hickory Grove 2.1% 0.97% (+1.14)#41 1.2% (+0.935)#3,002
42. Barnwell 2.0% 0.97% (+0.990)#42 1.2% (+0.780)#3,278
43. James Island 2.0% 0.97% (+0.984)#43 1.2% (+0.775)#3,295
44. Charleston 2.0% 0.97% (+0.978)#44 1.2% (+0.769)#3,308
45. Wade Hampton 1.9% 0.97% (+0.916)#45 1.2% (+0.707)#3,427
46. Little Mountain 1.9% 0.97% (+0.877)#46 1.2% (+0.668)#3,509
47. Chesnee 1.8% 0.97% (+0.849)#47 1.2% (+0.640)#3,586
48. Ninety Six 1.8% 0.97% (+0.847)#48 1.2% (+0.638)#3,591
49. Pamplico 1.8% 0.97% (+0.807)#49 1.2% (+0.598)#3,678
50. Atlantic Beach 1.7% 0.97% (+0.770)#50 1.2% (+0.560)#3,765
51. Aiken 1.7% 0.97% (+0.716)#51 1.2% (+0.507)#3,916
52. Awendaw 1.7% 0.97% (+0.707)#52 1.2% (+0.498)#3,933
53. Norris 1.7% 0.97% (+0.698)#53 1.2% (+0.488)#3,957
54. Port Royal 1.7% 0.97% (+0.683)#54 1.2% (+0.473)#3,986
55. Florence 1.6% 0.97% (+0.669)#55 1.2% (+0.460)#4,016
56. Fort Mill 1.6% 0.97% (+0.668)#56 1.2% (+0.458)#4,022
57. Dentsville 1.6% 0.97% (+0.631)#57 1.2% (+0.422)#4,108
58. Forestbrook 1.6% 0.97% (+0.624)#58 1.2% (+0.415)#4,127
59. Burnettown 1.6% 0.97% (+0.591)#59 1.2% (+0.382)#4,210
60. Cayce 1.5% 0.97% (+0.574)#60 1.2% (+0.365)#4,257
61. Lake Wylie 1.5% 0.97% (+0.573)#61 1.2% (+0.364)#4,262
62. Travelers Rest 1.5% 0.97% (+0.556)#62 1.2% (+0.346)#4,321
63. Snelling 1.5% 0.97% (+0.529)#63 1.2% (+0.320)#4,399
64. Loris 1.5% 0.97% (+0.525)#64 1.2% (+0.316)#4,410
65. Johnsonville 1.5% 0.97% (+0.503)#65 1.2% (+0.294)#4,486
66. Arkwright 1.5% 0.97% (+0.493)#66 1.2% (+0.284)#4,525
67. Saxon 1.5% 0.97% (+0.488)#67 1.2% (+0.278)#4,541
68. Blacksburg 1.5% 0.97% (+0.486)#68 1.2% (+0.277)#4,543
69. Cottageville 1.5% 0.97% (+0.477)#69 1.2% (+0.268)#4,568
70. Hilton Head Island 1.4% 0.97% (+0.449)#70 1.2% (+0.240)#4,664
71. Marion 1.4% 0.97% (+0.435)#71 1.2% (+0.225)#4,714
72. Irmo 1.4% 0.97% (+0.397)#72 1.2% (+0.188)#4,832
73. Ridgeland 1.3% 0.97% (+0.359)#73 1.2% (+0.150)#4,953
74. Stateburg 1.3% 0.97% (+0.346)#74 1.2% (+0.137)#5,003
75. Keowee Key 1.3% 0.97% (+0.328)#75 1.2% (+0.118)#5,053
76. Gantt 1.3% 0.97% (+0.295)#76 1.2% (+0.086)#5,166
77. West Columbia 1.2% 0.97% (+0.265)#77 1.2% (+0.056)#5,289
78. Lexington 1.2% 0.97% (+0.184)#78 1.2% (-0.025)#5,616
79. Rock Hill 1.2% 0.97% (+0.176)#79 1.2% (-0.033)#5,642
80. Kershaw 1.1% 0.97% (+0.161)#80 1.2% (-0.049)#5,709
81. Dunean 1.1% 0.97% (+0.156)#81 1.2% (-0.053)#5,728
82. Five Forks 1.1% 0.97% (+0.136)#82 1.2% (-0.073)#5,827
83. Lake Murray Of Richland 1.1% 0.97% (+0.127)#83 1.2% (-0.082)#5,865
84. Northlake 1.1% 0.97% (+0.118)#84 1.2% (-0.091)#5,911
85. Woodfield 1.1% 0.97% (+0.113)#85 1.2% (-0.096)#5,925
86. Wyboo 1.0% 0.97% (+0.065)#86 1.2% (-0.144)#6,169
87. Pageland 1.0% 0.97% (+0.065)#87 1.2% (-0.144)#6,170
88. Meggett 1.0% 0.97% (+0.028)#88 1.2% (-0.181)#6,359
89. Little River 1.0% 0.97% (+0.028)#89 1.2% (-0.182)#6,362
90. Bluffton 1.00% 0.97% (+0.024)#90 1.2% (-0.185)#6,376
91. Summerville 0.97% 0.97% (-0.004)#91 1.2% (-0.214)#6,509
92. Tega Cay 0.97% 0.97% (-0.008)#92 1.2% (-0.217)#6,527
93. Surfside Beach 0.96% 0.97% (-0.015)#93 1.2% (-0.225)#6,568
94. Conway 0.96% 0.97% (-0.017)#94 1.2% (-0.227)#6,585
95. Graniteville 0.95% 0.97% (-0.024)#95 1.2% (-0.234)#6,622
96. Goose Creek 0.94% 0.97% (-0.038)#96 1.2% (-0.247)#6,694
97. Wedgefield 0.92% 0.97% (-0.057)#97 1.2% (-0.266)#6,790
98. Prosperity 0.92% 0.97% (-0.059)#98 1.2% (-0.268)#6,802
99. Murphys Estates 0.91% 0.97% (-0.060)#99 1.2% (-0.269)#6,812
100. Belvedere 0.91% 0.97% (-0.067)#100 1.2% (-0.276)#6,845

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina?
Folly Beach has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina with 19.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in South Carolina is 0.97%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.