Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin

0.0%
20.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Angelica 19.2% 0.72% (+18.5)#1 1.2% (+18.0)#62
2. Thiensville 9.7% 0.72% (+9.02)#2 1.2% (+8.56)#241
3. Grand View 9.4% 0.72% (+8.66)#3 1.2% (+8.19)#257
4. St Croix Falls 6.7% 0.72% (+5.94)#4 1.2% (+5.47)#483
5. Ellison Bay 6.6% 0.72% (+5.86)#5 1.2% (+5.40)#494
6. New Holstein 5.6% 0.72% (+4.89)#6 1.2% (+4.42)#683
7. Mequon 5.4% 0.72% (+4.65)#7 1.2% (+4.19)#738
8. River Hills 4.9% 0.72% (+4.20)#8 1.2% (+3.73)#860
9. North Bay 4.8% 0.72% (+4.10)#9 1.2% (+3.64)#900
10. Chenequa 4.8% 0.72% (+4.06)#10 1.2% (+3.60)#918
11. Oconomowoc Lake 4.6% 0.72% (+3.86)#11 1.2% (+3.39)#993
12. Shorewood 4.3% 0.72% (+3.63)#12 1.2% (+3.17)#1,066
13. Twin Lakes 4.2% 0.72% (+3.44)#13 1.2% (+2.97)#1,154
14. Legend Lake 4.0% 0.72% (+3.31)#14 1.2% (+2.84)#1,218
15. Lily Lake 4.0% 0.72% (+3.24)#15 1.2% (+2.77)#1,255
16. North Hudson 4.0% 0.72% (+3.23)#16 1.2% (+2.77)#1,257
17. Maple Bluff 3.9% 0.72% (+3.22)#17 1.2% (+2.75)#1,267
18. Delavan Lake 3.8% 0.72% (+3.06)#18 1.2% (+2.59)#1,334
19. Sayner 3.7% 0.72% (+2.94)#19 1.2% (+2.47)#1,426
20. Maiden Rock 3.6% 0.72% (+2.92)#20 1.2% (+2.45)#1,438
21. Ephraim 3.4% 0.72% (+2.71)#21 1.2% (+2.24)#1,595
22. Fontana On Geneva Lake 3.4% 0.72% (+2.68)#22 1.2% (+2.21)#1,613
23. Gotham 3.4% 0.72% (+2.65)#23 1.2% (+2.19)#1,627
24. Lake Nebagamon 3.3% 0.72% (+2.58)#24 1.2% (+2.12)#1,683
25. Fremont 3.2% 0.72% (+2.48)#25 1.2% (+2.01)#1,761
26. Butte Des Morts 3.2% 0.72% (+2.44)#26 1.2% (+1.98)#1,794
27. Clintonville 3.1% 0.72% (+2.36)#27 1.2% (+1.89)#1,860
28. Fox Point 3.0% 0.72% (+2.33)#28 1.2% (+1.86)#1,879
29. St Peter 2.9% 0.72% (+2.18)#29 1.2% (+1.71)#2,029
30. Montreal 2.8% 0.72% (+2.13)#30 1.2% (+1.67)#2,070
31. Elkhart Lake 2.7% 0.72% (+1.97)#31 1.2% (+1.50)#2,253
32. Glenbeulah 2.6% 0.72% (+1.88)#32 1.2% (+1.42)#2,348
33. Wauwatosa 2.6% 0.72% (+1.87)#33 1.2% (+1.40)#2,363
34. Kohler 2.6% 0.72% (+1.87)#34 1.2% (+1.40)#2,366
35. Bayside 2.5% 0.72% (+1.81)#35 1.2% (+1.34)#2,424
36. Whitefish Bay 2.5% 0.72% (+1.76)#36 1.2% (+1.29)#2,471
37. Green Lake 2.4% 0.72% (+1.68)#37 1.2% (+1.22)#2,578
38. Summit 2.3% 0.72% (+1.63)#38 1.2% (+1.16)#2,659
39. Mcfarland 2.3% 0.72% (+1.60)#39 1.2% (+1.14)#2,692
40. Peshtigo 2.2% 0.72% (+1.53)#40 1.2% (+1.06)#2,795
41. Ashwaubenon 2.2% 0.72% (+1.46)#41 1.2% (+0.997)#2,901
42. Franklin 2.1% 0.72% (+1.37)#42 1.2% (+0.905)#3,058
43. Elm Grove 2.1% 0.72% (+1.35)#43 1.2% (+0.884)#3,096
44. Shorewood Hills 2.0% 0.72% (+1.30)#44 1.2% (+0.837)#3,170
45. Ogdensburg 2.0% 0.72% (+1.30)#45 1.2% (+0.836)#3,175
46. White Lake 2.0% 0.72% (+1.26)#46 1.2% (+0.796)#3,257
47. Bayfield 1.9% 0.72% (+1.21)#47 1.2% (+0.747)#3,343
48. Random Lake 1.9% 0.72% (+1.19)#48 1.2% (+0.722)#3,392
49. Middleton 1.9% 0.72% (+1.18)#49 1.2% (+0.716)#3,405
50. Bluffview 1.9% 0.72% (+1.16)#50 1.2% (+0.696)#3,459
51. Gibbsville 1.8% 0.72% (+1.12)#51 1.2% (+0.651)#3,548
52. Deforest 1.8% 0.72% (+1.12)#52 1.2% (+0.651)#3,553
53. Greenfield 1.8% 0.72% (+1.10)#53 1.2% (+0.631)#3,603
54. Osceola 1.8% 0.72% (+1.06)#54 1.2% (+0.597)#3,683
55. Wild Rose 1.8% 0.72% (+1.04)#55 1.2% (+0.575)#3,732
56. Hales Corners 1.7% 0.72% (+1.00)#56 1.2% (+0.538)#3,825
57. Wind Point 1.7% 0.72% (+0.975)#57 1.2% (+0.509)#3,908
58. Fitchburg 1.7% 0.72% (+0.944)#58 1.2% (+0.478)#3,978
59. Merton 1.6% 0.72% (+0.895)#59 1.2% (+0.429)#4,078
60. Vernon 1.6% 0.72% (+0.895)#60 1.2% (+0.429)#4,086
61. Black River Falls 1.6% 0.72% (+0.889)#61 1.2% (+0.423)#4,106
62. Pleasant Prairie 1.6% 0.72% (+0.868)#62 1.2% (+0.402)#4,158
63. Strum 1.5% 0.72% (+0.820)#63 1.2% (+0.355)#4,290
64. Kingston 1.5% 0.72% (+0.820)#64 1.2% (+0.355)#4,292
65. Lake Wissota 1.5% 0.72% (+0.817)#65 1.2% (+0.351)#4,299
66. Dodgeville 1.5% 0.72% (+0.814)#66 1.2% (+0.348)#4,310
67. New Richmond 1.5% 0.72% (+0.790)#67 1.2% (+0.324)#4,384
68. Lac La Belle 1.5% 0.72% (+0.775)#68 1.2% (+0.309)#4,431
69. Hartland 1.5% 0.72% (+0.754)#69 1.2% (+0.288)#4,509
70. Greendale 1.5% 0.72% (+0.753)#70 1.2% (+0.287)#4,511
71. Lyndon Station 1.4% 0.72% (+0.702)#71 1.2% (+0.237)#4,681
72. Prairie Du Chien 1.4% 0.72% (+0.658)#72 1.2% (+0.192)#4,821
73. Grafton 1.3% 0.72% (+0.627)#73 1.2% (+0.161)#4,914
74. Sturgeon Bay 1.3% 0.72% (+0.618)#74 1.2% (+0.152)#4,946
75. Fennimore 1.3% 0.72% (+0.615)#75 1.2% (+0.150)#4,955
76. Portage 1.3% 0.72% (+0.596)#76 1.2% (+0.131)#5,018
77. Baldwin 1.3% 0.72% (+0.592)#77 1.2% (+0.126)#5,031
78. Ashippun 1.3% 0.72% (+0.583)#78 1.2% (+0.117)#5,056
79. Williams Bay 1.3% 0.72% (+0.577)#79 1.2% (+0.111)#5,084
80. Madison 1.3% 0.72% (+0.575)#80 1.2% (+0.109)#5,088
81. Rice Lake 1.3% 0.72% (+0.573)#81 1.2% (+0.107)#5,093
82. Brookfield 1.3% 0.72% (+0.569)#82 1.2% (+0.103)#5,105
83. Altoona 1.3% 0.72% (+0.562)#83 1.2% (+0.096)#5,126
84. Haugen 1.3% 0.72% (+0.556)#84 1.2% (+0.090)#5,148
85. Waubeka 1.3% 0.72% (+0.540)#85 1.2% (+0.074)#5,220
86. Glendale 1.3% 0.72% (+0.533)#86 1.2% (+0.067)#5,254
87. Port Edwards 1.2% 0.72% (+0.525)#87 1.2% (+0.059)#5,279
88. Cottage Grove 1.2% 0.72% (+0.515)#88 1.2% (+0.049)#5,315
89. Park Falls 1.2% 0.72% (+0.514)#89 1.2% (+0.048)#5,324
90. Eagle 1.2% 0.72% (+0.506)#90 1.2% (+0.040)#5,359
91. New Berlin 1.2% 0.72% (+0.504)#91 1.2% (+0.038)#5,366
92. Somerset 1.2% 0.72% (+0.469)#92 1.2% (+0.003)#5,509
93. Westby 1.2% 0.72% (+0.461)#93 1.2% (-0.004)#5,531
94. Kimberly 1.2% 0.72% (+0.453)#94 1.2% (-0.013)#5,567
95. Tainter Lake 1.2% 0.72% (+0.446)#95 1.2% (-0.020)#5,589
96. Holmen 1.1% 0.72% (+0.431)#96 1.2% (-0.034)#5,646
97. St Francis 1.1% 0.72% (+0.426)#97 1.2% (-0.039)#5,668
98. Hixton 1.1% 0.72% (+0.423)#98 1.2% (-0.043)#5,686
99. Howard 1.1% 0.72% (+0.419)#99 1.2% (-0.047)#5,701
100. Lake Ripley 1.1% 0.72% (+0.412)#100 1.2% (-0.054)#5,735

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin?
Angelica has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin with 19.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Wisconsin is 0.72%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.