Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Arizona
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Palominas 32.6% 0.99% (+31.7)#1 1.2% (+31.5)#23
2. Valentine 30.8% 0.99% (+29.8)#2 1.2% (+29.6)#25
3. Lazy Y U 9.2% 0.99% (+8.26)#3 1.2% (+8.06)#260
4. Elephant Head 7.4% 0.99% (+6.45)#4 1.2% (+6.25)#386
5. Deer Creek 7.0% 0.99% (+6.03)#5 1.2% (+5.83)#440
6. Paradise Valley 6.6% 0.99% (+5.61)#6 1.2% (+5.41)#493
7. Sacaton 5.0% 0.99% (+4.00)#7 1.2% (+3.80)#845
8. Golden Valley 5.0% 0.99% (+3.99)#8 1.2% (+3.80)#847
9. Tubac 3.8% 0.99% (+2.80)#9 1.2% (+2.60)#1,328
10. Timberline-Fernwood 3.8% 0.99% (+2.77)#10 1.2% (+2.57)#1,346
11. Window Rock 3.7% 0.99% (+2.74)#11 1.2% (+2.55)#1,372
12. Mcnary 3.3% 0.99% (+2.27)#12 1.2% (+2.08)#1,708
13. New River 3.0% 0.99% (+2.02)#13 1.2% (+1.82)#1,927
14. Komatke 2.9% 0.99% (+1.91)#14 1.2% (+1.71)#2,036
15. Fredonia 2.7% 0.99% (+1.75)#15 1.2% (+1.56)#2,196
16. Kingman 2.7% 0.99% (+1.72)#16 1.2% (+1.53)#2,229
17. Prescott 2.6% 0.99% (+1.57)#17 1.2% (+1.37)#2,393
18. Wagon Wheel 2.5% 0.99% (+1.47)#18 1.2% (+1.27)#2,499
19. Eagar 2.4% 0.99% (+1.46)#19 1.2% (+1.26)#2,508
20. Doney Park 2.4% 0.99% (+1.44)#20 1.2% (+1.24)#2,548
21. Superior 2.3% 0.99% (+1.30)#21 1.2% (+1.10)#2,738
22. Catalina Foothills 2.3% 0.99% (+1.27)#22 1.2% (+1.07)#2,782
23. Tombstone 2.2% 0.99% (+1.24)#23 1.2% (+1.04)#2,841
24. Williamson 2.2% 0.99% (+1.23)#24 1.2% (+1.03)#2,854
25. Rio Verde 2.2% 0.99% (+1.21)#25 1.2% (+1.01)#2,878
26. Tanque Verde 2.1% 0.99% (+1.12)#26 1.2% (+0.917)#3,037
27. Sedona 2.1% 0.99% (+1.08)#27 1.2% (+0.885)#3,090
28. Scottsdale 2.1% 0.99% (+1.07)#28 1.2% (+0.874)#3,114
29. Lukachukai 2.0% 0.99% (+0.969)#29 1.2% (+0.771)#3,299
30. Summit 1.9% 0.99% (+0.938)#30 1.2% (+0.740)#3,352
31. Anthem 1.9% 0.99% (+0.916)#31 1.2% (+0.718)#3,399
32. Tucson Mountains 1.9% 0.99% (+0.896)#32 1.2% (+0.698)#3,445
33. Central 1.8% 0.99% (+0.800)#33 1.2% (+0.602)#3,674
34. Clifton 1.8% 0.99% (+0.793)#34 1.2% (+0.595)#3,686
35. Village Of Oak Creek Big Park 1.7% 0.99% (+0.736)#35 1.2% (+0.538)#3,827
36. Dilkon 1.7% 0.99% (+0.730)#36 1.2% (+0.532)#3,841
37. Sun City West 1.7% 0.99% (+0.705)#37 1.2% (+0.507)#3,914
38. Queen Creek 1.6% 0.99% (+0.656)#38 1.2% (+0.459)#4,020
39. Ajo 1.6% 0.99% (+0.647)#39 1.2% (+0.450)#4,044
40. Litchfield Park 1.6% 0.99% (+0.605)#40 1.2% (+0.407)#4,142
41. Picture Rocks 1.5% 0.99% (+0.546)#41 1.2% (+0.349)#4,307
42. Sun Lakes 1.5% 0.99% (+0.522)#42 1.2% (+0.325)#4,383
43. Corona De Tucson 1.5% 0.99% (+0.498)#43 1.2% (+0.300)#4,462
44. Tucson Estates 1.5% 0.99% (+0.494)#44 1.2% (+0.296)#4,481
45. Desert Hills 1.5% 0.99% (+0.468)#45 1.2% (+0.271)#4,561
46. Casas Adobes 1.4% 0.99% (+0.437)#46 1.2% (+0.239)#4,665
47. Florence 1.4% 0.99% (+0.389)#47 1.2% (+0.191)#4,825
48. Oro Valley 1.4% 0.99% (+0.373)#48 1.2% (+0.176)#4,869
49. Lake Of The Woods 1.4% 0.99% (+0.369)#49 1.2% (+0.171)#4,882
50. Wickenburg 1.3% 0.99% (+0.320)#50 1.2% (+0.122)#5,042
51. Cornville 1.3% 0.99% (+0.300)#51 1.2% (+0.103)#5,106
52. Star Valley 1.3% 0.99% (+0.293)#52 1.2% (+0.095)#5,129
53. Gold Canyon 1.3% 0.99% (+0.281)#53 1.2% (+0.084)#5,173
54. Bisbee 1.3% 0.99% (+0.278)#54 1.2% (+0.080)#5,195
55. Red Lake 1.3% 0.99% (+0.272)#55 1.2% (+0.074)#5,219
56. Phoenix 1.2% 0.99% (+0.244)#56 1.2% (+0.047)#5,327
57. Tempe 1.2% 0.99% (+0.240)#57 1.2% (+0.042)#5,348
58. Benson 1.1% 0.99% (+0.155)#58 1.2% (-0.043)#5,684
59. Peoria 1.1% 0.99% (+0.130)#59 1.2% (-0.068)#5,787
60. Cameron 1.1% 0.99% (+0.082)#60 1.2% (-0.116)#6,024
61. Flagstaff 1.1% 0.99% (+0.074)#61 1.2% (-0.124)#6,060
62. Snowflake 1.0% 0.99% (+0.054)#62 1.2% (-0.144)#6,167
63. Mammoth 1.0% 0.99% (+0.038)#63 1.2% (-0.160)#6,241
64. Surprise 1.0% 0.99% (+0.027)#64 1.2% (-0.171)#6,309
65. Green Valley 1.0% 0.99% (+0.026)#65 1.2% (-0.172)#6,313
66. Vail 0.96% 0.99% (-0.021)#66 1.2% (-0.219)#6,539
67. Thatcher 0.96% 0.99% (-0.029)#67 1.2% (-0.227)#6,586
68. Blue Ridge 0.95% 0.99% (-0.040)#68 1.2% (-0.237)#6,638
69. Gilbert 0.93% 0.99% (-0.059)#69 1.2% (-0.257)#6,745
70. Chandler 0.88% 0.99% (-0.109)#70 1.2% (-0.307)#7,000
71. Sierra Vista 0.87% 0.99% (-0.112)#71 1.2% (-0.310)#7,016
72. Lake Havasu City 0.86% 0.99% (-0.130)#72 1.2% (-0.327)#7,108
73. Verde Village 0.85% 0.99% (-0.133)#73 1.2% (-0.331)#7,135
74. Williams 0.83% 0.99% (-0.158)#74 1.2% (-0.356)#7,256
75. Sierra Vista Southeast 0.81% 0.99% (-0.180)#75 1.2% (-0.377)#7,381
76. Casa Blanca 0.81% 0.99% (-0.180)#76 1.2% (-0.377)#7,382
77. Fountain Hills 0.79% 0.99% (-0.200)#77 1.2% (-0.398)#7,506
78. Tucson 0.77% 0.99% (-0.211)#78 1.2% (-0.409)#7,585
79. Fortuna Foothills 0.76% 0.99% (-0.221)#79 1.2% (-0.419)#7,650
80. Avondale 0.76% 0.99% (-0.230)#80 1.2% (-0.428)#7,704
81. Mesa 0.75% 0.99% (-0.233)#81 1.2% (-0.430)#7,723
82. Apache Junction 0.74% 0.99% (-0.249)#82 1.2% (-0.447)#7,823
83. Goodyear 0.70% 0.99% (-0.287)#83 1.2% (-0.485)#8,081
84. Avra Valley 0.70% 0.99% (-0.290)#84 1.2% (-0.488)#8,102
85. Rincon Valley 0.66% 0.99% (-0.327)#85 1.2% (-0.525)#8,361
86. Saddlebrooke 0.64% 0.99% (-0.347)#86 1.2% (-0.545)#8,495
87. Sahuarita 0.64% 0.99% (-0.349)#87 1.2% (-0.547)#8,504
88. New Kingman Butler 0.62% 0.99% (-0.366)#88 1.2% (-0.563)#8,640
89. Glendale 0.60% 0.99% (-0.382)#89 1.2% (-0.580)#8,746
90. El Mirage 0.58% 0.99% (-0.402)#90 1.2% (-0.599)#8,906
91. Bullhead City 0.58% 0.99% (-0.407)#91 1.2% (-0.605)#8,948
92. Yuma 0.58% 0.99% (-0.410)#92 1.2% (-0.608)#8,973
93. Holbrook 0.56% 0.99% (-0.423)#93 1.2% (-0.621)#9,056
94. Globe 0.56% 0.99% (-0.430)#94 1.2% (-0.628)#9,112
95. San Tan Valley 0.52% 0.99% (-0.469)#95 1.2% (-0.667)#9,364
96. Rio Rico 0.52% 0.99% (-0.471)#96 1.2% (-0.668)#9,378
97. Chino Valley 0.49% 0.99% (-0.497)#97 1.2% (-0.695)#9,579
98. Paulden 0.48% 0.99% (-0.503)#98 1.2% (-0.701)#9,625
99. Somerton 0.48% 0.99% (-0.503)#99 1.2% (-0.701)#9,635
100. Show Low 0.45% 0.99% (-0.535)#100 1.2% (-0.733)#9,886

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona?
Palominas has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona with 32.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the State of Arizona?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Arizona is 0.99%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.