Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Legal Services & Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan

0.0%
30.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Michiana 25.8% 0.89% (+24.9)#1 1.2% (+24.6)#32
2. Mears 9.0% 0.89% (+8.14)#2 1.2% (+7.84)#271
3. Chatham 8.9% 0.89% (+8.00)#3 1.2% (+7.71)#280
4. Franklin 8.7% 0.89% (+7.81)#4 1.2% (+7.51)#293
5. Birmingham 8.0% 0.89% (+7.08)#5 1.2% (+6.78)#344
6. Lake Michigan Beach 7.6% 0.89% (+6.70)#6 1.2% (+6.40)#368
7. Beverly Hills 7.2% 0.89% (+6.33)#7 1.2% (+6.03)#415
8. Orchard Lake Village 6.6% 0.89% (+5.76)#8 1.2% (+5.46)#484
9. Hanover 6.6% 0.89% (+5.71)#9 1.2% (+5.42)#489
10. Grosse Pointe Farms 6.5% 0.89% (+5.58)#10 1.2% (+5.28)#518
11. Bloomfield Hills 6.1% 0.89% (+5.19)#11 1.2% (+4.89)#592
12. Lake Angelus 5.9% 0.89% (+5.04)#12 1.2% (+4.74)#619
13. Huntington Woods 5.9% 0.89% (+4.99)#13 1.2% (+4.69)#626
14. Village Of Clarkston 5.7% 0.89% (+4.83)#14 1.2% (+4.53)#659
15. Kent City 5.6% 0.89% (+4.68)#15 1.2% (+4.38)#698
16. Norwood 5.6% 0.89% (+4.67)#16 1.2% (+4.37)#702
17. Mio 5.2% 0.89% (+4.31)#17 1.2% (+4.01)#789
18. Ironton 5.1% 0.89% (+4.24)#18 1.2% (+3.94)#815
19. Fairgrove 5.0% 0.89% (+4.11)#19 1.2% (+3.82)#839
20. Eastport 4.7% 0.89% (+3.83)#20 1.2% (+3.53)#941
21. Grosse Pointe Park 4.6% 0.89% (+3.70)#21 1.2% (+3.40)#989
22. Sylvan Lake 4.4% 0.89% (+3.56)#22 1.2% (+3.27)#1,031
23. Grosse Pointe Woods 4.2% 0.89% (+3.36)#23 1.2% (+3.06)#1,113
24. Barton Hills 4.2% 0.89% (+3.33)#24 1.2% (+3.03)#1,127
25. Grosse Pointe 4.2% 0.89% (+3.31)#25 1.2% (+3.01)#1,138
26. West Ishpeming 4.0% 0.89% (+3.09)#26 1.2% (+2.80)#1,239
27. Pleasant Ridge 3.9% 0.89% (+3.04)#27 1.2% (+2.74)#1,270
28. Village Of Grosse Pointe Shores 3.7% 0.89% (+2.85)#28 1.2% (+2.55)#1,371
29. Mcbride 3.7% 0.89% (+2.82)#29 1.2% (+2.52)#1,391
30. Lake Victoria 3.6% 0.89% (+2.73)#30 1.2% (+2.43)#1,454
31. Detroit Beach 3.4% 0.89% (+2.52)#31 1.2% (+2.22)#1,607
32. East Grand Rapids 3.3% 0.89% (+2.37)#32 1.2% (+2.07)#1,715
33. Level Park Oak Park 3.2% 0.89% (+2.28)#33 1.2% (+1.98)#1,791
34. Twin Lake 3.1% 0.89% (+2.20)#34 1.2% (+1.91)#1,843
35. Dowling 2.9% 0.89% (+2.03)#35 1.2% (+1.74)#2,017
36. Royal Oak 2.7% 0.89% (+1.86)#36 1.2% (+1.57)#2,187
37. Berkley 2.7% 0.89% (+1.84)#37 1.2% (+1.54)#2,211
38. Saugatuck 2.7% 0.89% (+1.77)#38 1.2% (+1.47)#2,279
39. Presque Isle Harbor 2.6% 0.89% (+1.76)#39 1.2% (+1.46)#2,289
40. Frankenmuth 2.6% 0.89% (+1.74)#40 1.2% (+1.44)#2,309
41. Rochester 2.6% 0.89% (+1.72)#41 1.2% (+1.42)#2,346
42. Ironwood 2.5% 0.89% (+1.65)#42 1.2% (+1.36)#2,409
43. Okemos 2.5% 0.89% (+1.62)#43 1.2% (+1.32)#2,436
44. Bay Shore 2.4% 0.89% (+1.47)#44 1.2% (+1.17)#2,642
45. Mason 2.3% 0.89% (+1.44)#45 1.2% (+1.14)#2,693
46. Woodland 2.3% 0.89% (+1.43)#46 1.2% (+1.13)#2,700
47. Ferndale 2.3% 0.89% (+1.36)#47 1.2% (+1.07)#2,789
48. Petoskey 2.1% 0.89% (+1.23)#48 1.2% (+0.929)#3,010
49. Forest Hills 2.1% 0.89% (+1.20)#49 1.2% (+0.897)#3,075
50. Bingham Farms 2.1% 0.89% (+1.18)#50 1.2% (+0.882)#3,099
51. Three Lakes 2.0% 0.89% (+1.13)#51 1.2% (+0.836)#3,174
52. Wixom 2.0% 0.89% (+1.12)#52 1.2% (+0.826)#3,197
53. Hubbard Lake 2.0% 0.89% (+1.10)#53 1.2% (+0.806)#3,232
54. Clawson 2.0% 0.89% (+1.08)#54 1.2% (+0.778)#3,286
55. Casnovia 1.9% 0.89% (+1.02)#55 1.2% (+0.721)#3,396
56. Holt 1.8% 0.89% (+0.947)#56 1.2% (+0.649)#3,559
57. Plymouth 1.8% 0.89% (+0.924)#57 1.2% (+0.626)#3,619
58. Rochester Hills 1.8% 0.89% (+0.909)#58 1.2% (+0.611)#3,660
59. St Clair Shores 1.7% 0.89% (+0.858)#59 1.2% (+0.559)#3,769
60. Blissfield 1.7% 0.89% (+0.855)#60 1.2% (+0.556)#3,776
61. Farmington Hills 1.7% 0.89% (+0.839)#61 1.2% (+0.540)#3,819
62. New Baltimore 1.7% 0.89% (+0.838)#62 1.2% (+0.539)#3,822
63. Paw Paw Lake 1.7% 0.89% (+0.828)#63 1.2% (+0.530)#3,848
64. Ithaca 1.7% 0.89% (+0.820)#64 1.2% (+0.522)#3,873
65. Grand Beach 1.7% 0.89% (+0.795)#65 1.2% (+0.497)#3,940
66. Center Line 1.7% 0.89% (+0.795)#66 1.2% (+0.496)#3,942
67. Oak Park 1.7% 0.89% (+0.792)#67 1.2% (+0.493)#3,949
68. Bad Axe 1.7% 0.89% (+0.770)#68 1.2% (+0.472)#3,989
69. Ossineke 1.6% 0.89% (+0.759)#69 1.2% (+0.460)#4,015
70. Northville 1.6% 0.89% (+0.740)#70 1.2% (+0.441)#4,057
71. Lake Linden 1.6% 0.89% (+0.736)#71 1.2% (+0.438)#4,061
72. Waverly 1.6% 0.89% (+0.694)#72 1.2% (+0.395)#4,169
73. New Buffalo 1.6% 0.89% (+0.671)#73 1.2% (+0.373)#4,234
74. Ferrysburg 1.5% 0.89% (+0.624)#74 1.2% (+0.326)#4,380
75. Southfield 1.5% 0.89% (+0.609)#75 1.2% (+0.311)#4,420
76. Haslett 1.5% 0.89% (+0.594)#76 1.2% (+0.295)#4,482
77. Argentine 1.5% 0.89% (+0.582)#77 1.2% (+0.284)#4,526
78. Belleville 1.4% 0.89% (+0.562)#78 1.2% (+0.263)#4,584
79. Ann Arbor 1.4% 0.89% (+0.542)#79 1.2% (+0.243)#4,651
80. Hubbell 1.4% 0.89% (+0.540)#80 1.2% (+0.241)#4,658
81. Whitmore Lake 1.4% 0.89% (+0.534)#81 1.2% (+0.235)#4,684
82. Novi 1.4% 0.89% (+0.525)#82 1.2% (+0.226)#4,710
83. Michigamme 1.4% 0.89% (+0.523)#83 1.2% (+0.225)#4,721
84. Saline 1.4% 0.89% (+0.508)#84 1.2% (+0.209)#4,767
85. Tecumseh 1.4% 0.89% (+0.499)#85 1.2% (+0.200)#4,793
86. Douglas 1.4% 0.89% (+0.493)#86 1.2% (+0.194)#4,814
87. Comstock Northwest 1.4% 0.89% (+0.492)#87 1.2% (+0.194)#4,815
88. St Joseph 1.4% 0.89% (+0.490)#88 1.2% (+0.191)#4,824
89. Grand Ledge 1.3% 0.89% (+0.462)#89 1.2% (+0.164)#4,907
90. Essexville 1.3% 0.89% (+0.455)#90 1.2% (+0.157)#4,932
91. Mount Clemens 1.3% 0.89% (+0.435)#91 1.2% (+0.137)#5,004
92. Lapeer 1.3% 0.89% (+0.424)#92 1.2% (+0.126)#5,032
93. North Muskegon 1.3% 0.89% (+0.420)#93 1.2% (+0.121)#5,045
94. Milford 1.3% 0.89% (+0.393)#94 1.2% (+0.095)#5,128
95. Portland 1.3% 0.89% (+0.386)#95 1.2% (+0.087)#5,159
96. Rapid City 1.3% 0.89% (+0.386)#96 1.2% (+0.087)#5,160
97. Negaunee 1.2% 0.89% (+0.361)#97 1.2% (+0.062)#5,271
98. Troy 1.2% 0.89% (+0.355)#98 1.2% (+0.057)#5,285
99. Warren 1.2% 0.89% (+0.345)#99 1.2% (+0.046)#5,329
100. Wakefield 1.2% 0.89% (+0.336)#100 1.2% (+0.038)#5,371

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan?
Michiana has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan with 25.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in Michigan is 0.89%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Legal Services & Support in the United States is 1.2%.