Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New York
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Wells Bridge 41.5% 2.5% (+39.0)#1 3.8% (+37.6)#154
2. South Fallsburg 35.9% 2.5% (+33.4)#2 3.8% (+32.0)#207
3. East Durham 33.9% 2.5% (+31.4)#3 3.8% (+30.1)#235
4. Bridgewater 31.2% 2.5% (+28.7)#4 3.8% (+27.4)#285
5. North Blenheim 31.0% 2.5% (+28.5)#5 3.8% (+27.1)#288
6. Depauville 27.8% 2.5% (+25.3)#6 3.8% (+24.0)#355
7. Springfield Center 24.4% 2.5% (+21.9)#7 3.8% (+20.6)#470
8. Perrysburg 23.3% 2.5% (+20.8)#8 3.8% (+19.4)#525
9. Three Mile Bay 21.1% 2.5% (+18.6)#9 3.8% (+17.2)#656
10. Herrings 21.1% 2.5% (+18.6)#10 3.8% (+17.2)#658
11. Andes 19.6% 2.5% (+17.1)#11 3.8% (+15.8)#754
12. Rosendale 18.9% 2.5% (+16.4)#12 3.8% (+15.1)#811
13. East Worcester 18.1% 2.5% (+15.6)#13 3.8% (+14.3)#900
14. Nelliston 17.8% 2.5% (+15.3)#14 3.8% (+14.0)#929
15. Macedon 16.9% 2.5% (+14.4)#15 3.8% (+13.1)#1,051
16. Loch Sheldrake 16.5% 2.5% (+14.0)#16 3.8% (+12.6)#1,119
17. Chazy 15.5% 2.5% (+13.0)#17 3.8% (+11.7)#1,280
18. South Edmeston 15.2% 2.5% (+12.7)#18 3.8% (+11.4)#1,334
19. Jamesport 15.0% 2.5% (+12.5)#19 3.8% (+11.2)#1,374
20. Lorraine 15.0% 2.5% (+12.5)#20 3.8% (+11.2)#1,382
21. Kiamesha Lake 15.0% 2.5% (+12.5)#21 3.8% (+11.1)#1,384
22. Rushville 14.8% 2.5% (+12.3)#22 3.8% (+10.9)#1,424
23. Dannemora 14.7% 2.5% (+12.2)#23 3.8% (+10.8)#1,450
24. Spencer 14.4% 2.5% (+11.9)#24 3.8% (+10.6)#1,505
25. Cairo 14.3% 2.5% (+11.8)#25 3.8% (+10.5)#1,526
26. Frewsburg 14.2% 2.5% (+11.8)#26 3.8% (+10.4)#1,560
27. Hankins 14.1% 2.5% (+11.6)#27 3.8% (+10.2)#1,597
28. Guilford 13.9% 2.5% (+11.4)#28 3.8% (+10.1)#1,633
29. Fonda 13.8% 2.5% (+11.3)#29 3.8% (+9.94)#1,679
30. Smyrna 13.8% 2.5% (+11.3)#30 3.8% (+9.92)#1,685
31. Marcy 13.7% 2.5% (+11.2)#31 3.8% (+9.86)#1,703
32. Worcester 13.6% 2.5% (+11.1)#32 3.8% (+9.79)#1,729
33. Winthrop 13.6% 2.5% (+11.1)#33 3.8% (+9.77)#1,734
34. Tuscarora 13.5% 2.5% (+11.0)#34 3.8% (+9.63)#1,779
35. Hailesboro 13.4% 2.5% (+11.0)#35 3.8% (+9.60)#1,784
36. Westfield 13.4% 2.5% (+10.9)#36 3.8% (+9.53)#1,798
37. Ghent 13.3% 2.5% (+10.8)#37 3.8% (+9.48)#1,823
38. New Berlin 13.2% 2.5% (+10.8)#38 3.8% (+9.40)#1,839
39. Brushton 13.2% 2.5% (+10.7)#39 3.8% (+9.37)#1,853
40. Fort Plain 13.1% 2.5% (+10.6)#40 3.8% (+9.27)#1,888
41. Schuyler Lake 13.0% 2.5% (+10.6)#41 3.8% (+9.21)#1,913
42. East Herkimer 12.7% 2.5% (+10.3)#42 3.8% (+8.90)#2,019
43. Brasher Falls 12.4% 2.5% (+9.95)#43 3.8% (+8.60)#2,133
44. Mclean 12.4% 2.5% (+9.90)#44 3.8% (+8.55)#2,151
45. Almond 12.0% 2.5% (+9.54)#45 3.8% (+8.19)#2,282
46. Carthage 11.9% 2.5% (+9.44)#46 3.8% (+8.09)#2,318
47. Fair Haven 11.8% 2.5% (+9.35)#47 3.8% (+8.00)#2,355
48. Romulus 11.8% 2.5% (+9.29)#48 3.8% (+7.93)#2,388
49. Dolgeville 11.6% 2.5% (+9.09)#49 3.8% (+7.74)#2,474
50. Belfast 11.4% 2.5% (+8.93)#50 3.8% (+7.58)#2,537
51. Chenango Bridge 11.2% 2.5% (+8.68)#51 3.8% (+7.33)#2,648
52. Ellisburg 11.1% 2.5% (+8.63)#52 3.8% (+7.28)#2,680
53. West Hampton Dunes 11.1% 2.5% (+8.63)#53 3.8% (+7.28)#2,684
54. Calcium 11.1% 2.5% (+8.61)#54 3.8% (+7.26)#2,695
55. Wellsville 11.0% 2.5% (+8.51)#55 3.8% (+7.15)#2,739
56. Red Creek 11.0% 2.5% (+8.47)#56 3.8% (+7.12)#2,754
57. Nichols 10.9% 2.5% (+8.41)#57 3.8% (+7.06)#2,785
58. Chateaugay 10.7% 2.5% (+8.26)#58 3.8% (+6.91)#2,853
59. Ellenville 10.6% 2.5% (+8.07)#59 3.8% (+6.72)#2,956
60. Dexter 10.4% 2.5% (+7.89)#60 3.8% (+6.54)#3,066
61. Wurtsboro 10.4% 2.5% (+7.89)#61 3.8% (+6.53)#3,070
62. Woodsville 10.3% 2.5% (+7.87)#62 3.8% (+6.51)#3,081
63. Little Falls 10.3% 2.5% (+7.83)#63 3.8% (+6.48)#3,101
64. Edwards 10.0% 2.5% (+7.52)#64 3.8% (+6.17)#3,290
65. Plattsburgh West 9.9% 2.5% (+7.39)#65 3.8% (+6.04)#3,381
66. Hadley 9.7% 2.5% (+7.24)#66 3.8% (+5.89)#3,493
67. Whitehall 9.7% 2.5% (+7.18)#67 3.8% (+5.83)#3,533
68. Hannibal 9.6% 2.5% (+7.09)#68 3.8% (+5.73)#3,600
69. Unadilla 9.5% 2.5% (+7.06)#69 3.8% (+5.70)#3,616
70. Ransomville 9.3% 2.5% (+6.87)#70 3.8% (+5.52)#3,795
71. South Lima 9.3% 2.5% (+6.82)#71 3.8% (+5.47)#3,822
72. Fort Covington 9.3% 2.5% (+6.81)#72 3.8% (+5.46)#3,832
73. Edmeston 9.2% 2.5% (+6.72)#73 3.8% (+5.37)#3,892
74. Norfolk 9.2% 2.5% (+6.72)#74 3.8% (+5.37)#3,893
75. Waterford 9.2% 2.5% (+6.69)#75 3.8% (+5.34)#3,934
76. Wampsville 9.2% 2.5% (+6.68)#76 3.8% (+5.33)#3,937
77. Gloversville 9.1% 2.5% (+6.66)#77 3.8% (+5.31)#3,960
78. Albion 9.1% 2.5% (+6.62)#78 3.8% (+5.27)#3,981
79. East Nassau 9.1% 2.5% (+6.57)#79 3.8% (+5.22)#4,034
80. Afton 9.0% 2.5% (+6.54)#80 3.8% (+5.19)#4,063
81. Keuka Park 9.0% 2.5% (+6.52)#81 3.8% (+5.17)#4,085
82. Union Springs 8.9% 2.5% (+6.37)#82 3.8% (+5.02)#4,188
83. Cattaraugus 8.8% 2.5% (+6.30)#83 3.8% (+4.95)#4,247
84. Hammond 8.7% 2.5% (+6.22)#84 3.8% (+4.87)#4,315
85. Balmville 8.6% 2.5% (+6.15)#85 3.8% (+4.80)#4,377
86. Walton 8.6% 2.5% (+6.15)#86 3.8% (+4.80)#4,383
87. Prattsburgh 8.6% 2.5% (+6.12)#87 3.8% (+4.77)#4,422
88. Victory 8.6% 2.5% (+6.11)#88 3.8% (+4.76)#4,426
89. Niagara University 8.6% 2.5% (+6.09)#89 3.8% (+4.74)#4,437
90. Cuba 8.5% 2.5% (+6.00)#90 3.8% (+4.65)#4,520
91. Sanborn 8.5% 2.5% (+5.99)#91 3.8% (+4.64)#4,528
92. Pine Valley 8.4% 2.5% (+5.95)#92 3.8% (+4.59)#4,578
93. Millbrook 8.4% 2.5% (+5.88)#93 3.8% (+4.53)#4,654
94. Elmira 8.4% 2.5% (+5.87)#94 3.8% (+4.52)#4,658
95. West Point 8.3% 2.5% (+5.86)#95 3.8% (+4.51)#4,662
96. Lakeland 8.3% 2.5% (+5.85)#96 3.8% (+4.50)#4,663
97. Mannsville 8.3% 2.5% (+5.85)#97 3.8% (+4.50)#4,667
98. Lorenz Park 8.3% 2.5% (+5.82)#98 3.8% (+4.47)#4,708
99. Canajoharie 8.3% 2.5% (+5.77)#99 3.8% (+4.42)#4,762
100. Altona 8.2% 2.5% (+5.74)#100 3.8% (+4.39)#4,798

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York are:
#1
35.9%
#2
31.2%
#3
27.8%
#4
23.3%
#5
21.1%
#6
21.1%
#7
19.6%
#8
17.8%
#9
16.9%
#10
16.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York?
South Fallsburg has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York with 35.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of New York?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in New York is 2.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.