Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan

0.0%
30.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Carp Lake29.8%4.2%(+25.6)#13.8%(+25.9)#312
2.Haring28.2%4.2%(+24.1)#23.8%(+24.4)#349
3.Hurontown20.5%4.2%(+16.4)#33.8%(+16.7)#692
4.Baldwin19.6%4.2%(+15.4)#43.8%(+15.8)#755
5.Kaleva18.8%4.2%(+14.7)#53.8%(+15.0)#815
6.Omer18.8%4.2%(+14.6)#63.8%(+14.9)#819
7.Brownlee Park17.1%4.2%(+12.9)#73.8%(+13.3)#1,030
8.Atlantic Mine16.3%4.2%(+12.2)#83.8%(+12.5)#1,136
9.Carney16.3%4.2%(+12.2)#93.8%(+12.5)#1,144
10.Port Austin16.3%4.2%(+12.1)#103.8%(+12.4)#1,148
11.Montgomery15.7%4.2%(+11.5)#113.8%(+11.8)#1,250
12.Stockbridge15.6%4.2%(+11.5)#123.8%(+11.8)#1,256
13.Kent City15.6%4.2%(+11.5)#133.8%(+11.8)#1,257
14.Norway15.3%4.2%(+11.2)#143.8%(+11.5)#1,320
15.Pinconning14.8%4.2%(+10.7)#153.8%(+11.0)#1,407
16.Saranac14.8%4.2%(+10.6)#163.8%(+11.0)#1,421
17.Beulah14.3%4.2%(+10.1)#173.8%(+10.5)#1,534
18.Rapid River14.1%4.2%(+9.93)#183.8%(+10.3)#1,587
19.Montrose13.8%4.2%(+9.68)#193.8%(+10.0)#1,660
20.Hubbell13.8%4.2%(+9.62)#203.8%(+9.95)#1,674
21.Crystal Falls13.7%4.2%(+9.53)#213.8%(+9.85)#1,708
22.White Pigeon13.6%4.2%(+9.43)#223.8%(+9.75)#1,739
23.Alba13.3%4.2%(+9.18)#233.8%(+9.50)#1,805
24.Walkerville13.3%4.2%(+9.18)#243.8%(+9.50)#1,811
25.Hanover13.2%4.2%(+9.05)#253.8%(+9.37)#1,855
26.Akron13.0%4.2%(+8.87)#263.8%(+9.19)#1,919
27.Cassopolis13.0%4.2%(+8.82)#273.8%(+9.14)#1,934
28.Jennings12.9%4.2%(+8.79)#283.8%(+9.11)#1,947
29.Barryton12.9%4.2%(+8.73)#293.8%(+9.05)#1,969
30.Shelby12.6%4.2%(+8.41)#303.8%(+8.74)#2,080
31.Turner12.5%4.2%(+8.35)#313.8%(+8.67)#2,113
32.Mecosta12.4%4.2%(+8.28)#323.8%(+8.61)#2,131
33.Owendale12.2%4.2%(+8.02)#333.8%(+8.34)#2,229
34.Carsonville11.9%4.2%(+7.78)#343.8%(+8.10)#2,315
35.Rockwood11.9%4.2%(+7.72)#353.8%(+8.04)#2,339
36.Greenland11.8%4.2%(+7.69)#363.8%(+8.01)#2,353
37.Coldwater11.8%4.2%(+7.66)#373.8%(+7.98)#2,364
38.Reading11.8%4.2%(+7.64)#383.8%(+7.96)#2,374
39.White Cloud11.8%4.2%(+7.61)#393.8%(+7.93)#2,383
40.Morenci11.6%4.2%(+7.44)#403.8%(+7.76)#2,461
41.Minden City11.5%4.2%(+7.31)#413.8%(+7.63)#2,514
42.Stronach11.5%4.2%(+7.31)#423.8%(+7.63)#2,515
43.Oak Hill11.3%4.2%(+7.18)#433.8%(+7.51)#2,566
44.Dundee11.2%4.2%(+7.02)#443.8%(+7.34)#2,641
45.Fruitport11.0%4.2%(+6.80)#453.8%(+7.12)#2,757
46.Cannonsburg10.7%4.2%(+6.53)#463.8%(+6.85)#2,883
47.Harbor Beach10.6%4.2%(+6.49)#473.8%(+6.81)#2,909
48.Alpha10.6%4.2%(+6.49)#483.8%(+6.81)#2,912
49.Lupton10.6%4.2%(+6.44)#493.8%(+6.76)#2,930
50.Waldron10.6%4.2%(+6.41)#503.8%(+6.73)#2,946
51.Atlanta10.5%4.2%(+6.34)#513.8%(+6.67)#2,987
52.Edmore10.4%4.2%(+6.27)#523.8%(+6.59)#3,028
53.Tustin10.3%4.2%(+6.13)#533.8%(+6.45)#3,116
54.Millersburg10.2%4.2%(+6.05)#543.8%(+6.37)#3,151
55.Three Rivers10.1%4.2%(+5.99)#553.8%(+6.31)#3,193
56.Lincoln Park10.0%4.2%(+5.89)#563.8%(+6.21)#3,264
57.Allen10.0%4.2%(+5.85)#573.8%(+6.17)#3,298
58.Potterville9.9%4.2%(+5.78)#583.8%(+6.11)#3,338
59.Quincy9.9%4.2%(+5.78)#593.8%(+6.10)#3,339
60.Millburg9.7%4.2%(+5.51)#603.8%(+5.84)#3,531
61.Manistique9.6%4.2%(+5.50)#613.8%(+5.82)#3,540
62.Fowlerville9.5%4.2%(+5.38)#623.8%(+5.70)#3,615
63.Morrice9.5%4.2%(+5.37)#633.8%(+5.69)#3,639
64.Fairgrove9.4%4.2%(+5.29)#643.8%(+5.61)#3,709
65.Hart9.4%4.2%(+5.26)#653.8%(+5.58)#3,747
66.Metamora9.3%4.2%(+5.11)#663.8%(+5.43)#3,849
67.Lake Leann9.3%4.2%(+5.10)#673.8%(+5.42)#3,853
68.Athens9.3%4.2%(+5.10)#683.8%(+5.42)#3,854
69.Skidway Lake9.1%4.2%(+4.90)#693.8%(+5.22)#4,032
70.Springfield9.0%4.2%(+4.83)#703.8%(+5.15)#4,094
71.Watervliet9.0%4.2%(+4.82)#713.8%(+5.14)#4,105
72.Zeba8.9%4.2%(+4.78)#723.8%(+5.10)#4,129
73.Sturgis8.9%4.2%(+4.76)#733.8%(+5.08)#4,137
74.Detroit Beach8.9%4.2%(+4.73)#743.8%(+5.05)#4,166
75.Ecorse8.9%4.2%(+4.71)#753.8%(+5.03)#4,178
76.Whittemore8.8%4.2%(+4.65)#763.8%(+4.97)#4,233
77.Level Park Oak Park8.8%4.2%(+4.63)#773.8%(+4.96)#4,244
78.Peck8.7%4.2%(+4.59)#783.8%(+4.91)#4,280
79.Sanford8.7%4.2%(+4.56)#793.8%(+4.89)#4,299
80.Charlevoix8.7%4.2%(+4.50)#803.8%(+4.82)#4,354
81.Powers8.6%4.2%(+4.45)#813.8%(+4.77)#4,413
82.Munising8.6%4.2%(+4.42)#823.8%(+4.74)#4,450
83.Emmett8.5%4.2%(+4.31)#833.8%(+4.63)#4,539
84.Michigamme8.5%4.2%(+4.30)#843.8%(+4.62)#4,554
85.Benton Heights8.4%4.2%(+4.23)#853.8%(+4.55)#4,626
86.Charlotte8.4%4.2%(+4.22)#863.8%(+4.55)#4,629
87.Milan8.3%4.2%(+4.11)#873.8%(+4.43)#4,754
88.Imlay City8.3%4.2%(+4.10)#883.8%(+4.43)#4,759
89.Niles8.2%4.2%(+4.08)#893.8%(+4.40)#4,790
90.Marine City8.2%4.2%(+4.03)#903.8%(+4.35)#4,849
91.Pittsford8.2%4.2%(+4.02)#913.8%(+4.34)#4,853
92.Middletown8.2%4.2%(+4.00)#923.8%(+4.32)#4,870
93.Pigeon8.1%4.2%(+3.99)#933.8%(+4.31)#4,876
94.Flint8.1%4.2%(+3.97)#943.8%(+4.30)#4,900
95.Fountain8.1%4.2%(+3.96)#953.8%(+4.28)#4,925
96.Constantine8.1%4.2%(+3.94)#963.8%(+4.26)#4,941
97.Eagle8.1%4.2%(+3.91)#973.8%(+4.23)#4,978
98.Lexington8.1%4.2%(+3.91)#983.8%(+4.23)#4,981
99.Vandercook Lake8.0%4.2%(+3.86)#993.8%(+4.18)#5,019
100.Cutlerville7.9%4.2%(+3.79)#1003.8%(+4.11)#5,104

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan are:
#1
29.8%
#2
28.2%
#3
19.6%
#4
18.8%
#5
18.8%
#6
17.1%
#7
16.3%
#8
16.3%
#9
15.7%
#10
15.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan?
Carp Lake has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan with 29.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Michigan is 4.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.