Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New York
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. New Square 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#4
2. Carmel 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#7
3. Sidney 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#43
4. Bedford Hills 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#135
5. Laurel Hollow 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#154
6. Melrose Park 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#157
7. Stone Ridge 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#166
8. Milton Cdp Ulster County 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#177
9. Northville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#178
10. Kensington 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#248
11. Saddle Rock 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#318
12. Ruby 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#403
13. Palenville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#449
14. Friendship 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#509
15. Durhamville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#552
16. Tuxedo Park 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#600
17. Unionville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#621
18. Smallwood 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#623
19. Altona 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#634
20. Asharoken 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#640
21. Quogue 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#652
22. Wainscott 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#712
23. Machias 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#723
24. Mooers 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#784
25. Bliss 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#877
26. East Nassau 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#878
27. Burdett 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#929
28. Mclean 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#972
29. Pierrepont Manor 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,009
30. Swan Lake 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,274
31. West Danby 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,364
32. Westernville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,450
33. Greigsville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,529
34. Pottersville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,588
35. Wadsworth 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,593
36. Hankins 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,644
37. Lorraine 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,708
38. Mount Vision 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,721
39. Prattsville 100.0% 32.6% (+67.4)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,761
40. Franklin 94.1% 32.6% (+61.6)#40 33.1% (+61.0)#2,025
41. La Fargeville 92.5% 32.6% (+60.0)#41 33.1% (+59.4)#2,076
42. Yorkshire 92.3% 32.6% (+59.7)#42 33.1% (+59.2)#2,082
43. Cherry Valley 91.7% 32.6% (+59.1)#43 33.1% (+58.5)#2,108
44. Katonah 91.3% 32.6% (+58.7)#44 33.1% (+58.1)#2,127
45. Monsey 90.9% 32.6% (+58.3)#45 33.1% (+57.8)#2,131
46. Parishville 90.0% 32.6% (+57.4)#46 33.1% (+56.9)#2,165
47. Brewerton 89.5% 32.6% (+57.0)#47 33.1% (+56.4)#2,181
48. Akwesasne 89.2% 32.6% (+56.6)#48 33.1% (+56.0)#2,201
49. Deposit 87.7% 32.6% (+55.1)#49 33.1% (+54.5)#2,270
50. Plandome 87.5% 32.6% (+54.9)#50 33.1% (+54.4)#2,275
51. Westhampton Beach 86.7% 32.6% (+54.1)#51 33.1% (+53.5)#2,313
52. Delevan 85.7% 32.6% (+53.2)#52 33.1% (+52.6)#2,366
53. Nunda 85.7% 32.6% (+53.2)#53 33.1% (+52.6)#2,368
54. East Randolph 85.7% 32.6% (+53.2)#54 33.1% (+52.6)#2,377
55. Almond 85.7% 32.6% (+53.2)#55 33.1% (+52.6)#2,385
56. Romulus 85.7% 32.6% (+53.2)#56 33.1% (+52.6)#2,389
57. Riverhead 83.3% 32.6% (+50.8)#57 33.1% (+50.2)#2,508
58. Leicester 83.3% 32.6% (+50.8)#58 33.1% (+50.2)#2,522
59. Whitney Point 82.4% 32.6% (+49.8)#59 33.1% (+49.2)#2,595
60. Madison 81.8% 32.6% (+49.3)#60 33.1% (+48.7)#2,642
61. Dryden 81.2% 32.6% (+48.7)#61 33.1% (+48.1)#2,676
62. Rushford 81.2% 32.6% (+48.7)#62 33.1% (+48.1)#2,679
63. Jefferson Heights 80.5% 32.6% (+47.9)#63 33.1% (+47.4)#2,723
64. Great Bend 79.9% 32.6% (+47.3)#64 33.1% (+46.7)#2,797
65. Lansing 79.7% 32.6% (+47.1)#65 33.1% (+46.6)#2,806
66. Dover Plains 79.5% 32.6% (+47.0)#66 33.1% (+46.4)#2,819
67. Geneseo 78.9% 32.6% (+46.4)#67 33.1% (+45.8)#2,847
68. New Hamburg 78.9% 32.6% (+46.4)#68 33.1% (+45.8)#2,852
69. Edmeston 78.6% 32.6% (+46.0)#69 33.1% (+45.4)#2,882
70. Springs 78.4% 32.6% (+45.9)#70 33.1% (+45.3)#2,891
71. Argyle 77.8% 32.6% (+45.2)#71 33.1% (+44.6)#2,940
72. Henderson 77.8% 32.6% (+45.2)#72 33.1% (+44.6)#2,950
73. Hudson Falls 77.6% 32.6% (+45.1)#73 33.1% (+44.5)#2,959
74. Granville 77.5% 32.6% (+44.9)#74 33.1% (+44.3)#2,974
75. Stamford 77.3% 32.6% (+44.7)#75 33.1% (+44.1)#2,987
76. Northeast Ithaca 76.9% 32.6% (+44.4)#76 33.1% (+43.8)#3,009
77. Long Lake 76.9% 32.6% (+44.4)#77 33.1% (+43.8)#3,016
78. Copenhagen 76.5% 32.6% (+43.9)#78 33.1% (+43.3)#3,055
79. North Hornell 76.1% 32.6% (+43.5)#79 33.1% (+43.0)#3,090
80. Monticello 75.8% 32.6% (+43.2)#80 33.1% (+42.7)#3,108
81. Chenango Bridge 75.0% 32.6% (+42.4)#81 33.1% (+41.9)#3,153
82. Limestone 75.0% 32.6% (+42.4)#82 33.1% (+41.9)#3,201
83. Hudson 74.5% 32.6% (+41.9)#83 33.1% (+41.4)#3,264
84. Munsey Park 73.9% 32.6% (+41.4)#84 33.1% (+40.8)#3,303
85. Theresa 73.3% 32.6% (+40.8)#85 33.1% (+40.2)#3,365
86. Phoenix 72.4% 32.6% (+39.8)#86 33.1% (+39.2)#3,481
87. Weston Mills 72.1% 32.6% (+39.5)#87 33.1% (+39.0)#3,511
88. Gang Mills 71.9% 32.6% (+39.3)#88 33.1% (+38.7)#3,524
89. Earlville 71.4% 32.6% (+38.9)#89 33.1% (+38.3)#3,573
90. Ovid 71.4% 32.6% (+38.9)#90 33.1% (+38.3)#3,579
91. Malone 71.4% 32.6% (+38.8)#91 33.1% (+38.2)#3,615
92. Belmont 70.6% 32.6% (+38.0)#92 33.1% (+37.5)#3,679
93. Fort Drum 70.5% 32.6% (+37.9)#93 33.1% (+37.3)#3,688
94. Sand Ridge 70.5% 32.6% (+37.9)#94 33.1% (+37.3)#3,689
95. East Durham 69.1% 32.6% (+36.6)#95 33.1% (+36.0)#3,837
96. Village Of The Branch 68.4% 32.6% (+35.9)#96 33.1% (+35.3)#3,899
97. Wellsburg 68.4% 32.6% (+35.9)#97 33.1% (+35.3)#3,906
98. Voorheesville 68.3% 32.6% (+35.8)#98 33.1% (+35.2)#3,912
99. Glen Park 68.1% 32.6% (+35.5)#99 33.1% (+34.9)#3,944
100. Keeseville 67.6% 32.6% (+35.0)#100 33.1% (+34.5)#3,984

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York?
New Square has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of New York?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in New York is 32.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.