Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Dodge 95.7% 4.1% (+91.6)#1 3.8% (+91.8)#32
2. Mehan 70.0% 4.1% (+65.9)#2 3.8% (+66.2)#47
3. Nelagoney 66.7% 4.1% (+62.6)#3 3.8% (+62.8)#51
4. Little 61.5% 4.1% (+57.5)#4 3.8% (+57.7)#63
5. Hoyt 58.3% 4.1% (+54.2)#5 3.8% (+54.5)#71
6. Connerville 52.4% 4.1% (+48.3)#6 3.8% (+48.6)#92
7. Webb City 45.5% 4.1% (+41.4)#7 3.8% (+41.6)#121
8. Bunch 41.7% 4.1% (+37.6)#8 3.8% (+37.8)#150
9. Summit 40.0% 4.1% (+35.9)#9 3.8% (+36.2)#165
10. Blanco 36.4% 4.1% (+32.3)#10 3.8% (+32.5)#199
11. Tatums 34.1% 4.1% (+30.1)#11 3.8% (+30.3)#232
12. Lebanon 33.3% 4.1% (+29.2)#12 3.8% (+29.5)#241
13. Hallett 32.1% 4.1% (+28.1)#13 3.8% (+28.3)#265
14. Clearview 32.0% 4.1% (+27.9)#14 3.8% (+28.2)#267
15. Rocky Ford 31.6% 4.1% (+27.5)#15 3.8% (+27.7)#273
16. Whippoorwill 30.8% 4.1% (+26.7)#16 3.8% (+26.9)#293
17. Amorita 30.8% 4.1% (+26.7)#17 3.8% (+26.9)#294
18. Elm Grove 29.3% 4.1% (+25.2)#18 3.8% (+25.4)#326
19. Kemp 27.8% 4.1% (+23.8)#19 3.8% (+24.0)#354
20. Nescatunga 27.5% 4.1% (+23.4)#20 3.8% (+23.7)#369
21. Caney Ridge 25.6% 4.1% (+21.6)#21 3.8% (+21.8)#422
22. Ravia 25.3% 4.1% (+21.2)#22 3.8% (+21.4)#432
23. Mulberry 25.0% 4.1% (+20.9)#23 3.8% (+21.2)#444
24. Johnson Prairie 24.3% 4.1% (+20.2)#24 3.8% (+20.5)#473
25. Velma 22.5% 4.1% (+18.5)#25 3.8% (+18.7)#564
26. Kendrick 22.5% 4.1% (+18.4)#26 3.8% (+18.7)#568
27. Bromide 20.9% 4.1% (+16.8)#27 3.8% (+17.1)#660
28. Baker 20.9% 4.1% (+16.8)#28 3.8% (+17.1)#663
29. Hodgen 20.8% 4.1% (+16.7)#29 3.8% (+17.0)#668
30. Wickliffe 20.8% 4.1% (+16.7)#30 3.8% (+17.0)#670
31. Hoffman 20.7% 4.1% (+16.6)#31 3.8% (+16.9)#677
32. Canton 20.0% 4.1% (+15.9)#32 3.8% (+16.2)#720
33. Pensacola 19.6% 4.1% (+15.5)#33 3.8% (+15.7)#758
34. Kenefic 19.4% 4.1% (+15.3)#34 3.8% (+15.5)#771
35. Oak Hill-Piney 19.4% 4.1% (+15.3)#35 3.8% (+15.5)#772
36. Stuart 19.2% 4.1% (+15.1)#36 3.8% (+15.4)#776
37. Cowlington 19.0% 4.1% (+15.0)#37 3.8% (+15.2)#800
38. Optima 18.6% 4.1% (+14.6)#38 3.8% (+14.8)#834
39. Golden 18.2% 4.1% (+14.1)#39 3.8% (+14.4)#894
40. Foraker 18.2% 4.1% (+14.1)#40 3.8% (+14.4)#896
41. Cement 17.6% 4.1% (+13.5)#41 3.8% (+13.8)#952
42. Tullahassee 17.0% 4.1% (+13.0)#42 3.8% (+13.2)#1,034
43. Rosedale 16.7% 4.1% (+12.6)#43 3.8% (+12.8)#1,095
44. Milburn 16.2% 4.1% (+12.1)#44 3.8% (+12.4)#1,162
45. Grant 15.8% 4.1% (+11.7)#45 3.8% (+12.0)#1,225
46. Bentley 15.8% 4.1% (+11.7)#46 3.8% (+12.0)#1,229
47. Hendrix 15.4% 4.1% (+11.3)#47 3.8% (+11.6)#1,310
48. Tiawah 15.2% 4.1% (+11.1)#48 3.8% (+11.4)#1,333
49. Mannsville 15.1% 4.1% (+11.0)#49 3.8% (+11.3)#1,350
50. Haywood 14.8% 4.1% (+10.7)#50 3.8% (+11.0)#1,417
51. Madill 14.7% 4.1% (+10.6)#51 3.8% (+10.9)#1,435
52. Carter 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#52 3.8% (+10.8)#1,457
53. Hennepin 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#53 3.8% (+10.8)#1,458
54. Wright City 14.6% 4.1% (+10.5)#54 3.8% (+10.8)#1,463
55. Martha 14.5% 4.1% (+10.5)#55 3.8% (+10.7)#1,479
56. Oakwood 14.3% 4.1% (+10.2)#56 3.8% (+10.5)#1,545
57. Old Eucha 14.3% 4.1% (+10.2)#57 3.8% (+10.5)#1,554
58. Olustee 14.0% 4.1% (+9.93)#58 3.8% (+10.2)#1,612
59. Fair Oaks 13.6% 4.1% (+9.55)#59 3.8% (+9.81)#1,724
60. Big Cabin 13.6% 4.1% (+9.50)#60 3.8% (+9.75)#1,742
61. Millerton 13.5% 4.1% (+9.40)#61 3.8% (+9.65)#1,770
62. Chester 13.3% 4.1% (+9.25)#62 3.8% (+9.50)#1,820
63. Redbird 13.2% 4.1% (+9.12)#63 3.8% (+9.38)#1,852
64. Turpin 13.1% 4.1% (+9.05)#64 3.8% (+9.31)#1,880
65. Haileyville 12.9% 4.1% (+8.85)#65 3.8% (+9.10)#1,950
66. Scipio 12.9% 4.1% (+8.82)#66 3.8% (+9.07)#1,965
67. Wapanucka 12.8% 4.1% (+8.72)#67 3.8% (+8.97)#2,000
68. Wakita 12.7% 4.1% (+8.66)#68 3.8% (+8.91)#2,017
69. Leonard 12.7% 4.1% (+8.61)#69 3.8% (+8.87)#2,028
70. Colcord 12.6% 4.1% (+8.49)#70 3.8% (+8.75)#2,074
71. Rattan 12.5% 4.1% (+8.42)#71 3.8% (+8.67)#2,098
72. Atwood 12.5% 4.1% (+8.42)#72 3.8% (+8.67)#2,111
73. Boise City 12.3% 4.1% (+8.19)#73 3.8% (+8.44)#2,191
74. Le Flore 12.2% 4.1% (+8.16)#74 3.8% (+8.41)#2,201
75. Stratford 12.1% 4.1% (+8.04)#75 3.8% (+8.30)#2,244
76. Baron 12.1% 4.1% (+8.04)#76 3.8% (+8.29)#2,247
77. Fox 12.0% 4.1% (+7.92)#77 3.8% (+8.17)#2,295
78. Gene Autry 11.8% 4.1% (+7.74)#78 3.8% (+8.00)#2,356
79. Valley Brook 11.8% 4.1% (+7.73)#79 3.8% (+7.99)#2,363
80. Heavener 11.8% 4.1% (+7.71)#80 3.8% (+7.96)#2,373
81. Pumpkin Hollow 11.5% 4.1% (+7.45)#81 3.8% (+7.71)#2,487
82. Kenwood 11.4% 4.1% (+7.34)#82 3.8% (+7.59)#2,533
83. Eldorado 11.3% 4.1% (+7.19)#83 3.8% (+7.44)#2,596
84. Arkoma 11.3% 4.1% (+7.18)#84 3.8% (+7.43)#2,602
85. Arnett 11.2% 4.1% (+7.07)#85 3.8% (+7.33)#2,651
86. Springer 11.1% 4.1% (+7.07)#86 3.8% (+7.32)#2,655
87. Tipton 11.1% 4.1% (+7.03)#87 3.8% (+7.28)#2,666
88. Fargo 11.0% 4.1% (+6.88)#88 3.8% (+7.14)#2,745
89. Foyil 10.9% 4.1% (+6.80)#89 3.8% (+7.06)#2,786
90. Pauls Valley 10.9% 4.1% (+6.79)#90 3.8% (+7.05)#2,791
91. Toppers 10.8% 4.1% (+6.71)#91 3.8% (+6.97)#2,826
92. Enterprise 10.7% 4.1% (+6.63)#92 3.8% (+6.88)#2,866
93. Dougherty 10.5% 4.1% (+6.44)#93 3.8% (+6.70)#2,973
94. Lindsay 10.1% 4.1% (+5.97)#94 3.8% (+6.22)#3,258
95. Keyes 10.0% 4.1% (+5.92)#95 3.8% (+6.17)#3,301
96. Hickory 10.0% 4.1% (+5.92)#96 3.8% (+6.17)#3,305
97. Burbank 10.0% 4.1% (+5.92)#97 3.8% (+6.17)#3,306
98. Sasakwa 10.0% 4.1% (+5.92)#98 3.8% (+6.17)#3,313
99. Oakland 9.9% 4.1% (+5.81)#99 3.8% (+6.06)#3,370
100. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 9.8% 4.1% (+5.72)#100 3.8% (+5.97)#3,425

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma are:
#1
95.7%
#2
52.4%
#3
45.5%
#4
40.0%
#5
36.4%
#6
34.1%
#7
33.3%
#8
32.1%
#9
32.0%
#10
31.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma?
Dodge has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma with 95.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.