Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Dodge95.7%4.1%(+91.6)#13.8%(+91.8)#32
2.Mehan70.0%4.1%(+65.9)#23.8%(+66.2)#47
3.Nelagoney66.7%4.1%(+62.6)#33.8%(+62.8)#51
4.Little61.5%4.1%(+57.5)#43.8%(+57.7)#63
5.Hoyt58.3%4.1%(+54.2)#53.8%(+54.5)#71
6.Connerville52.4%4.1%(+48.3)#63.8%(+48.6)#92
7.Webb City45.5%4.1%(+41.4)#73.8%(+41.6)#121
8.Bunch41.7%4.1%(+37.6)#83.8%(+37.8)#150
9.Summit40.0%4.1%(+35.9)#93.8%(+36.2)#165
10.Blanco36.4%4.1%(+32.3)#103.8%(+32.5)#199
11.Tatums34.1%4.1%(+30.1)#113.8%(+30.3)#232
12.Lebanon33.3%4.1%(+29.2)#123.8%(+29.5)#241
13.Hallett32.1%4.1%(+28.1)#133.8%(+28.3)#265
14.Clearview32.0%4.1%(+27.9)#143.8%(+28.2)#267
15.Rocky Ford31.6%4.1%(+27.5)#153.8%(+27.7)#273
16.Whippoorwill30.8%4.1%(+26.7)#163.8%(+26.9)#293
17.Amorita30.8%4.1%(+26.7)#173.8%(+26.9)#294
18.Elm Grove29.3%4.1%(+25.2)#183.8%(+25.4)#326
19.Kemp27.8%4.1%(+23.8)#193.8%(+24.0)#354
20.Nescatunga27.5%4.1%(+23.4)#203.8%(+23.7)#369
21.Caney Ridge25.6%4.1%(+21.6)#213.8%(+21.8)#422
22.Ravia25.3%4.1%(+21.2)#223.8%(+21.4)#432
23.Mulberry25.0%4.1%(+20.9)#233.8%(+21.2)#444
24.Johnson Prairie24.3%4.1%(+20.2)#243.8%(+20.5)#473
25.Velma22.5%4.1%(+18.5)#253.8%(+18.7)#564
26.Kendrick22.5%4.1%(+18.4)#263.8%(+18.7)#568
27.Bromide20.9%4.1%(+16.8)#273.8%(+17.1)#660
28.Baker20.9%4.1%(+16.8)#283.8%(+17.1)#663
29.Hodgen20.8%4.1%(+16.7)#293.8%(+17.0)#668
30.Wickliffe20.8%4.1%(+16.7)#303.8%(+17.0)#670
31.Hoffman20.7%4.1%(+16.6)#313.8%(+16.9)#677
32.Canton20.0%4.1%(+15.9)#323.8%(+16.2)#720
33.Pensacola19.6%4.1%(+15.5)#333.8%(+15.7)#758
34.Kenefic19.4%4.1%(+15.3)#343.8%(+15.5)#771
35.Oak Hill-Piney19.4%4.1%(+15.3)#353.8%(+15.5)#772
36.Stuart19.2%4.1%(+15.1)#363.8%(+15.4)#776
37.Cowlington19.0%4.1%(+15.0)#373.8%(+15.2)#800
38.Optima18.6%4.1%(+14.6)#383.8%(+14.8)#834
39.Golden18.2%4.1%(+14.1)#393.8%(+14.4)#894
40.Foraker18.2%4.1%(+14.1)#403.8%(+14.4)#896
41.Cement17.6%4.1%(+13.5)#413.8%(+13.8)#952
42.Tullahassee17.0%4.1%(+13.0)#423.8%(+13.2)#1,034
43.Rosedale16.7%4.1%(+12.6)#433.8%(+12.8)#1,095
44.Milburn16.2%4.1%(+12.1)#443.8%(+12.4)#1,162
45.Grant15.8%4.1%(+11.7)#453.8%(+12.0)#1,225
46.Bentley15.8%4.1%(+11.7)#463.8%(+12.0)#1,229
47.Hendrix15.4%4.1%(+11.3)#473.8%(+11.6)#1,310
48.Tiawah15.2%4.1%(+11.1)#483.8%(+11.4)#1,333
49.Mannsville15.1%4.1%(+11.0)#493.8%(+11.3)#1,350
50.Haywood14.8%4.1%(+10.7)#503.8%(+11.0)#1,417
51.Madill14.7%4.1%(+10.6)#513.8%(+10.9)#1,435
52.Carter14.6%4.1%(+10.5)#523.8%(+10.8)#1,457
53.Hennepin14.6%4.1%(+10.5)#533.8%(+10.8)#1,458
54.Wright City14.6%4.1%(+10.5)#543.8%(+10.8)#1,463
55.Martha14.5%4.1%(+10.5)#553.8%(+10.7)#1,479
56.Oakwood14.3%4.1%(+10.2)#563.8%(+10.5)#1,545
57.Old Eucha14.3%4.1%(+10.2)#573.8%(+10.5)#1,554
58.Olustee14.0%4.1%(+9.93)#583.8%(+10.2)#1,612
59.Fair Oaks13.6%4.1%(+9.55)#593.8%(+9.81)#1,724
60.Big Cabin13.6%4.1%(+9.50)#603.8%(+9.75)#1,742
61.Millerton13.5%4.1%(+9.40)#613.8%(+9.65)#1,770
62.Chester13.3%4.1%(+9.25)#623.8%(+9.50)#1,820
63.Redbird13.2%4.1%(+9.12)#633.8%(+9.38)#1,852
64.Turpin13.1%4.1%(+9.05)#643.8%(+9.31)#1,880
65.Haileyville12.9%4.1%(+8.85)#653.8%(+9.10)#1,950
66.Scipio12.9%4.1%(+8.82)#663.8%(+9.07)#1,965
67.Wapanucka12.8%4.1%(+8.72)#673.8%(+8.97)#2,000
68.Wakita12.7%4.1%(+8.66)#683.8%(+8.91)#2,017
69.Leonard12.7%4.1%(+8.61)#693.8%(+8.87)#2,028
70.Colcord12.6%4.1%(+8.49)#703.8%(+8.75)#2,074
71.Rattan12.5%4.1%(+8.42)#713.8%(+8.67)#2,098
72.Atwood12.5%4.1%(+8.42)#723.8%(+8.67)#2,111
73.Boise City12.3%4.1%(+8.19)#733.8%(+8.44)#2,191
74.Le Flore12.2%4.1%(+8.16)#743.8%(+8.41)#2,201
75.Stratford12.1%4.1%(+8.04)#753.8%(+8.30)#2,244
76.Baron12.1%4.1%(+8.04)#763.8%(+8.29)#2,247
77.Fox12.0%4.1%(+7.92)#773.8%(+8.17)#2,295
78.Gene Autry11.8%4.1%(+7.74)#783.8%(+8.00)#2,356
79.Valley Brook11.8%4.1%(+7.73)#793.8%(+7.99)#2,363
80.Heavener11.8%4.1%(+7.71)#803.8%(+7.96)#2,373
81.Pumpkin Hollow11.5%4.1%(+7.45)#813.8%(+7.71)#2,487
82.Kenwood11.4%4.1%(+7.34)#823.8%(+7.59)#2,533
83.Eldorado11.3%4.1%(+7.19)#833.8%(+7.44)#2,596
84.Arkoma11.3%4.1%(+7.18)#843.8%(+7.43)#2,602
85.Arnett11.2%4.1%(+7.07)#853.8%(+7.33)#2,651
86.Springer11.1%4.1%(+7.07)#863.8%(+7.32)#2,655
87.Tipton11.1%4.1%(+7.03)#873.8%(+7.28)#2,666
88.Fargo11.0%4.1%(+6.88)#883.8%(+7.14)#2,745
89.Foyil10.9%4.1%(+6.80)#893.8%(+7.06)#2,786
90.Pauls Valley10.9%4.1%(+6.79)#903.8%(+7.05)#2,791
91.Toppers10.8%4.1%(+6.71)#913.8%(+6.97)#2,826
92.Enterprise10.7%4.1%(+6.63)#923.8%(+6.88)#2,866
93.Dougherty10.5%4.1%(+6.44)#933.8%(+6.70)#2,973
94.Lindsay10.1%4.1%(+5.97)#943.8%(+6.22)#3,258
95.Keyes10.0%4.1%(+5.92)#953.8%(+6.17)#3,301
96.Hickory10.0%4.1%(+5.92)#963.8%(+6.17)#3,305
97.Burbank10.0%4.1%(+5.92)#973.8%(+6.17)#3,306
98.Sasakwa10.0%4.1%(+5.92)#983.8%(+6.17)#3,313
99.Oakland9.9%4.1%(+5.81)#993.8%(+6.06)#3,370
100.Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County9.8%4.1%(+5.72)#1003.8%(+5.97)#3,425

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma are:
#1
95.7%
#2
52.4%
#3
45.5%
#4
40.0%
#5
36.4%
#6
34.1%
#7
33.3%
#8
32.1%
#9
32.0%
#10
31.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma?
Dodge has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma with 95.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Oklahoma is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.