Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Work from Home
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
New York
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York

City % Work from Home vs State vs National
1. Copake Lake 77.4% 42.4% (+35.0)#1 44.0% (+33.4)#29
2. Marlboro 76.1% 42.4% (+33.7)#2 44.0% (+32.1)#39
3. Claverack Red Mills 76.0% 42.4% (+33.6)#3 44.0% (+32.0)#43
4. Cove Neck 74.5% 42.4% (+32.1)#4 44.0% (+30.5)#58
5. Lyons 73.2% 42.4% (+30.8)#5 44.0% (+29.2)#69
6. Cherry Valley 73.2% 42.4% (+30.8)#6 44.0% (+29.2)#72
7. Hunter 73.2% 42.4% (+30.8)#7 44.0% (+29.2)#73
8. Sharon Springs 72.7% 42.4% (+30.3)#8 44.0% (+28.7)#78
9. Whitney Point 71.0% 42.4% (+28.6)#9 44.0% (+27.0)#129
10. Waterford 70.1% 42.4% (+27.7)#10 44.0% (+26.1)#159
11. Willsboro Point 70.1% 42.4% (+27.7)#11 44.0% (+26.1)#164
12. Holland Patent 69.9% 42.4% (+27.5)#12 44.0% (+25.9)#172
13. Rosendale 67.8% 42.4% (+25.4)#13 44.0% (+23.8)#280
14. Cooperstown 65.9% 42.4% (+23.5)#14 44.0% (+21.9)#406
15. Roslyn 65.5% 42.4% (+23.1)#15 44.0% (+21.5)#425
16. New Hamburg 65.4% 42.4% (+23.0)#16 44.0% (+21.4)#450
17. Keeseville 65.3% 42.4% (+22.9)#17 44.0% (+21.3)#461
18. Crompond 65.3% 42.4% (+22.9)#18 44.0% (+21.3)#462
19. Salisbury Center 65.2% 42.4% (+22.8)#19 44.0% (+21.2)#485
20. Hartwick 65.0% 42.4% (+22.6)#20 44.0% (+21.0)#508
21. Stottville 64.8% 42.4% (+22.4)#21 44.0% (+20.8)#516
22. Southampton 64.3% 42.4% (+21.9)#22 44.0% (+20.3)#573
23. Northville 64.2% 42.4% (+21.8)#23 44.0% (+20.2)#601
24. Shelter Island Heights 64.2% 42.4% (+21.8)#24 44.0% (+20.2)#603
25. Ghent 64.2% 42.4% (+21.8)#25 44.0% (+20.2)#606
26. Huntington Bay 64.1% 42.4% (+21.7)#26 44.0% (+20.1)#615
27. Greene 63.8% 42.4% (+21.4)#27 44.0% (+19.8)#648
28. Dexter 63.8% 42.4% (+21.4)#28 44.0% (+19.8)#653
29. Milford 63.8% 42.4% (+21.4)#29 44.0% (+19.8)#658
30. Shorehaven 63.8% 42.4% (+21.4)#30 44.0% (+19.8)#659
31. Quogue 63.7% 42.4% (+21.3)#31 44.0% (+19.7)#673
32. South Dayton 63.6% 42.4% (+21.2)#32 44.0% (+19.6)#683
33. Saranac Lake 63.3% 42.4% (+20.9)#33 44.0% (+19.3)#727
34. Clayville 63.2% 42.4% (+20.8)#34 44.0% (+19.2)#773
35. Warsaw 63.1% 42.4% (+20.7)#35 44.0% (+19.1)#778
36. Hornell 63.0% 42.4% (+20.6)#36 44.0% (+19.0)#793
37. Westfield 63.0% 42.4% (+20.6)#37 44.0% (+19.0)#795
38. Greenport 62.5% 42.4% (+20.1)#38 44.0% (+18.5)#859
39. Delanson 62.5% 42.4% (+20.1)#39 44.0% (+18.5)#879
40. Milton Cdp Ulster County 62.4% 42.4% (+20.0)#40 44.0% (+18.4)#894
41. East Quogue 62.2% 42.4% (+19.8)#41 44.0% (+18.2)#934
42. Springs 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#42 44.0% (+18.1)#950
43. Le Roy 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#43 44.0% (+18.1)#955
44. Rock Hill 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#44 44.0% (+18.1)#960
45. Dryden 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#45 44.0% (+18.1)#961
46. Jacksonville 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#46 44.0% (+18.1)#970
47. Franklin 62.1% 42.4% (+19.7)#47 44.0% (+18.1)#974
48. Forest Home 62.0% 42.4% (+19.6)#48 44.0% (+18.0)#985
49. North Hills 61.9% 42.4% (+19.5)#49 44.0% (+17.9)#997
50. Averill Park 61.7% 42.4% (+19.3)#50 44.0% (+17.7)#1,034
51. Belfast 61.5% 42.4% (+19.1)#51 44.0% (+17.5)#1,082
52. Long Lake 61.4% 42.4% (+19.0)#52 44.0% (+17.4)#1,109
53. Woodridge 61.3% 42.4% (+18.9)#53 44.0% (+17.3)#1,138
54. Colton 61.2% 42.4% (+18.8)#54 44.0% (+17.2)#1,181
55. Croghan 61.1% 42.4% (+18.7)#55 44.0% (+17.1)#1,208
56. Northport 61.0% 42.4% (+18.6)#56 44.0% (+17.0)#1,216
57. Apalachin 61.0% 42.4% (+18.6)#57 44.0% (+17.0)#1,220
58. Sag Harbor 60.9% 42.4% (+18.5)#58 44.0% (+16.9)#1,241
59. Centre Island 60.9% 42.4% (+18.5)#59 44.0% (+16.9)#1,248
60. Ellenville 60.8% 42.4% (+18.4)#60 44.0% (+16.8)#1,253
61. Baiting Hollow 60.8% 42.4% (+18.4)#61 44.0% (+16.8)#1,256
62. Gates 60.7% 42.4% (+18.3)#62 44.0% (+16.7)#1,272
63. Hillside Lake 60.7% 42.4% (+18.3)#63 44.0% (+16.7)#1,279
64. North Haven 60.7% 42.4% (+18.3)#64 44.0% (+16.7)#1,284
65. Port Ewen 60.4% 42.4% (+18.0)#65 44.0% (+16.4)#1,341
66. Caledonia 60.4% 42.4% (+18.0)#66 44.0% (+16.4)#1,346
67. Hudson Falls 60.3% 42.4% (+17.9)#67 44.0% (+16.3)#1,367
68. Kerhonkson 60.3% 42.4% (+17.9)#68 44.0% (+16.3)#1,380
69. Lodi 60.3% 42.4% (+17.9)#69 44.0% (+16.3)#1,404
70. Richburg 60.2% 42.4% (+17.8)#70 44.0% (+16.2)#1,426
71. Mountain Dale 60.2% 42.4% (+17.8)#71 44.0% (+16.2)#1,434
72. Laurel 60.1% 42.4% (+17.7)#72 44.0% (+16.1)#1,457
73. Otego 60.1% 42.4% (+17.7)#73 44.0% (+16.1)#1,459
74. Canastota 60.0% 42.4% (+17.6)#74 44.0% (+16.0)#1,475
75. Crown Heights 60.0% 42.4% (+17.6)#75 44.0% (+16.0)#1,477
76. Fair Haven 60.0% 42.4% (+17.6)#76 44.0% (+16.0)#1,484
77. Panama 60.0% 42.4% (+17.6)#77 44.0% (+16.0)#1,489
78. Horseheads North 59.9% 42.4% (+17.5)#78 44.0% (+15.9)#1,502
79. Stamford 59.8% 42.4% (+17.4)#79 44.0% (+15.8)#1,514
80. Shoreham 59.8% 42.4% (+17.4)#80 44.0% (+15.8)#1,520
81. Liberty 59.5% 42.4% (+17.1)#81 44.0% (+15.5)#1,566
82. Lake Delta 59.5% 42.4% (+17.1)#82 44.0% (+15.5)#1,571
83. Cortland West 59.5% 42.4% (+17.1)#83 44.0% (+15.5)#1,589
84. Bemus Point 59.5% 42.4% (+17.1)#84 44.0% (+15.5)#1,620
85. Marcellus 59.4% 42.4% (+17.0)#85 44.0% (+15.4)#1,640
86. Sagaponack 59.3% 42.4% (+16.9)#86 44.0% (+15.3)#1,682
87. Dansville 59.2% 42.4% (+16.8)#87 44.0% (+15.2)#1,693
88. Wainscott 59.1% 42.4% (+16.7)#88 44.0% (+15.1)#1,752
89. Eatons Neck 59.0% 42.4% (+16.6)#89 44.0% (+15.0)#1,774
90. Cattaraugus 59.0% 42.4% (+16.6)#90 44.0% (+15.0)#1,777
91. Valley Falls 59.0% 42.4% (+16.6)#91 44.0% (+15.0)#1,783
92. Myers Corner 58.9% 42.4% (+16.5)#92 44.0% (+14.9)#1,795
93. Titusville 58.7% 42.4% (+16.3)#93 44.0% (+14.7)#1,851
94. Mcgraw 58.6% 42.4% (+16.2)#94 44.0% (+14.6)#1,865
95. Great Neck Gardens 58.6% 42.4% (+16.2)#95 44.0% (+14.6)#1,867
96. Owego 58.5% 42.4% (+16.1)#96 44.0% (+14.5)#1,884
97. Nichols 58.5% 42.4% (+16.1)#97 44.0% (+14.5)#1,906
98. Cape Vincent 58.5% 42.4% (+16.1)#98 44.0% (+14.5)#1,908
99. Fort Ann 58.5% 42.4% (+16.1)#99 44.0% (+14.5)#1,910
100. Dundee 58.4% 42.4% (+16.0)#100 44.0% (+14.4)#1,933

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York?
Copake Lake has the Highest Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York with 77.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the State of New York?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in New York is 42.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States?
Percentage of Population Working from Home in the United States is 44.0%.