Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Blacktail100.0%3.5%(+96.5)#13.8%(+96.2)#7
2.Amidon50.0%3.5%(+46.5)#23.8%(+46.2)#104
3.Cathay50.0%3.5%(+46.5)#33.8%(+46.2)#106
4.Jessie40.0%3.5%(+36.5)#43.8%(+36.2)#167
5.Gascoyne33.3%3.5%(+29.9)#53.8%(+29.5)#249
6.Fairdale33.3%3.5%(+29.9)#63.8%(+29.5)#250
7.Conway30.8%3.5%(+27.3)#73.8%(+26.9)#295
8.Selz24.2%3.5%(+20.7)#83.8%(+20.4)#482
9.Leith23.8%3.5%(+20.3)#93.8%(+20.0)#500
10.Dahlen23.8%3.5%(+20.3)#103.8%(+20.0)#501
11.Ardoch23.1%3.5%(+19.6)#113.8%(+19.2)#534
12.Ludden22.2%3.5%(+18.7)#123.8%(+18.4)#583
13.Alsen21.4%3.5%(+17.9)#133.8%(+17.6)#629
14.Killdeer20.1%3.5%(+16.6)#143.8%(+16.2)#717
15.South Heart19.4%3.5%(+15.9)#153.8%(+15.6)#768
16.Courtenay17.6%3.5%(+14.2)#163.8%(+13.8)#950
17.Great Bend17.4%3.5%(+13.9)#173.8%(+13.6)#993
18.Crary16.4%3.5%(+12.9)#183.8%(+12.5)#1,133
19.Bathgate16.0%3.5%(+12.5)#193.8%(+12.2)#1,193
20.Portal15.2%3.5%(+11.7)#203.8%(+11.3)#1,346
21.Menoken14.7%3.5%(+11.2)#213.8%(+10.9)#1,441
22.Hamberg14.3%3.5%(+10.8)#223.8%(+10.5)#1,555
23.Marmarth13.5%3.5%(+10.0)#233.8%(+9.68)#1,764
24.Karlsruhe13.0%3.5%(+9.56)#243.8%(+9.21)#1,915
25.Tolna12.7%3.5%(+9.25)#253.8%(+8.90)#2,020
26.Ryder12.2%3.5%(+8.71)#263.8%(+8.36)#2,224
27.Fullerton11.4%3.5%(+7.95)#273.8%(+7.60)#2,530
28.Noonan11.3%3.5%(+7.81)#283.8%(+7.46)#2,589
29.Palermo11.3%3.5%(+7.81)#293.8%(+7.46)#2,590
30.Gardena11.1%3.5%(+7.63)#303.8%(+7.28)#2,690
31.Berlin10.7%3.5%(+7.23)#313.8%(+6.88)#2,868
32.Verona10.3%3.5%(+6.81)#323.8%(+6.46)#3,106
33.Tioga10.1%3.5%(+6.62)#333.8%(+6.27)#3,223
34.Stanton10.0%3.5%(+6.52)#343.8%(+6.17)#3,288
35.Glenfield9.8%3.5%(+6.32)#353.8%(+5.97)#3,434
36.Maxbass9.4%3.5%(+5.95)#363.8%(+5.60)#3,730
37.New Leipzig9.4%3.5%(+5.93)#373.8%(+5.58)#3,746
38.Mott9.4%3.5%(+5.87)#383.8%(+5.52)#3,791
39.Velva9.2%3.5%(+5.70)#393.8%(+5.35)#3,907
40.Hoople9.1%3.5%(+5.61)#403.8%(+5.26)#4,004
41.Steele8.8%3.5%(+5.33)#413.8%(+4.98)#4,227
42.Turtle Lake8.8%3.5%(+5.29)#423.8%(+4.94)#4,256
43.Apple Valley8.7%3.5%(+5.25)#433.8%(+4.90)#4,291
44.Fort Ransom8.5%3.5%(+5.03)#443.8%(+4.68)#4,496
45.Benedict8.3%3.5%(+4.85)#453.8%(+4.50)#4,673
46.Arnegard8.2%3.5%(+4.75)#463.8%(+4.41)#4,784
47.St Thomas8.2%3.5%(+4.68)#473.8%(+4.33)#4,858
48.Lakota8.2%3.5%(+4.67)#483.8%(+4.33)#4,866
49.Davenport8.1%3.5%(+4.64)#493.8%(+4.29)#4,903
50.Christine7.8%3.5%(+4.29)#503.8%(+3.94)#5,351
51.Bisbee7.7%3.5%(+4.21)#513.8%(+3.86)#5,443
52.York7.7%3.5%(+4.21)#523.8%(+3.86)#5,448
53.Granville7.6%3.5%(+4.16)#533.8%(+3.81)#5,500
54.Fairmount7.5%3.5%(+4.05)#543.8%(+3.70)#5,637
55.Hebron7.2%3.5%(+3.73)#553.8%(+3.38)#6,070
56.Barney7.1%3.5%(+3.66)#563.8%(+3.31)#6,195
57.Forman7.1%3.5%(+3.59)#573.8%(+3.24)#6,263
58.Lansford7.0%3.5%(+3.52)#583.8%(+3.17)#6,384
59.Walhalla6.8%3.5%(+3.32)#593.8%(+2.97)#6,688
60.Buxton6.7%3.5%(+3.26)#603.8%(+2.91)#6,779
61.Garrison6.6%3.5%(+3.10)#613.8%(+2.75)#7,059
62.Minnewaukan6.4%3.5%(+2.94)#623.8%(+2.59)#7,300
63.Bowman6.4%3.5%(+2.92)#633.8%(+2.57)#7,335
64.Ray6.3%3.5%(+2.79)#643.8%(+2.44)#7,546
65.Riverdale6.2%3.5%(+2.77)#653.8%(+2.42)#7,588
66.Inkster6.2%3.5%(+2.77)#663.8%(+2.42)#7,600
67.Gladstone6.2%3.5%(+2.68)#673.8%(+2.33)#7,731
68.Willow City6.1%3.5%(+2.64)#683.8%(+2.29)#7,807
69.Dickinson6.0%3.5%(+2.50)#693.8%(+2.15)#8,081
70.Sheyenne6.0%3.5%(+2.47)#703.8%(+2.12)#8,137
71.Wyndmere5.8%3.5%(+2.36)#713.8%(+2.01)#8,358
72.Ross5.8%3.5%(+2.29)#723.8%(+1.94)#8,482
73.Rocklake5.7%3.5%(+2.20)#733.8%(+1.85)#8,687
74.Washburn5.6%3.5%(+2.12)#743.8%(+1.77)#8,859
75.Berthold5.5%3.5%(+2.05)#753.8%(+1.70)#9,008
76.Westhope5.5%3.5%(+2.01)#763.8%(+1.66)#9,070
77.Lincoln5.3%3.5%(+1.87)#773.8%(+1.52)#9,370
78.Lidgerwood5.3%3.5%(+1.83)#783.8%(+1.48)#9,458
79.Enderlin5.3%3.5%(+1.79)#793.8%(+1.44)#9,530
80.Munich5.3%3.5%(+1.78)#803.8%(+1.43)#9,557
81.Golva5.2%3.5%(+1.73)#813.8%(+1.38)#9,700
82.Milnor5.2%3.5%(+1.68)#823.8%(+1.33)#9,797
83.Arthur5.2%3.5%(+1.68)#833.8%(+1.33)#9,809
84.Mohall5.1%3.5%(+1.66)#843.8%(+1.31)#9,853
85.Sanborn5.1%3.5%(+1.65)#853.8%(+1.30)#9,878
86.Shell Valley5.1%3.5%(+1.60)#863.8%(+1.25)#9,984
87.Crosby5.0%3.5%(+1.48)#873.8%(+1.13)#10,242
88.Zap4.9%3.5%(+1.44)#883.8%(+1.09)#10,339
89.New Salem4.8%3.5%(+1.35)#893.8%(+1.00)#10,554
90.Bowbells4.8%3.5%(+1.33)#903.8%(+0.983)#10,607
91.Wahpeton4.8%3.5%(+1.29)#913.8%(+0.939)#10,728
92.Crystal4.8%3.5%(+1.28)#923.8%(+0.932)#10,766
93.Hamilton4.8%3.5%(+1.28)#933.8%(+0.932)#10,774
94.Williston4.7%3.5%(+1.21)#943.8%(+0.860)#10,949
95.Medina4.7%3.5%(+1.21)#953.8%(+0.857)#10,960
96.Linton4.7%3.5%(+1.20)#963.8%(+0.854)#10,971
97.Sawyer4.7%3.5%(+1.19)#973.8%(+0.836)#11,012
98.Bowdon4.7%3.5%(+1.17)#983.8%(+0.821)#11,067
99.Pick City4.7%3.5%(+1.17)#993.8%(+0.821)#11,074
100.Galesburg4.7%3.5%(+1.17)#1003.8%(+0.821)#11,076

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota are:
#1
50.0%
#2
50.0%
#3
40.0%
#4
33.3%
#5
33.3%
#6
30.8%
#7
24.2%
#8
23.8%
#9
23.8%
#10
23.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota?
Amidon has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota with 50.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in North Dakota is 3.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.