Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Coronaca100.0%4.1%(+95.9)#13.8%(+96.2)#24
2.Gifford47.7%4.1%(+43.6)#23.8%(+43.8)#114
3.Clifton40.3%4.1%(+36.2)#33.8%(+36.5)#160
4.Inman Mills31.5%4.1%(+27.4)#43.8%(+27.7)#276
5.Ruby31.3%4.1%(+27.2)#53.8%(+27.5)#282
6.Patrick29.7%4.1%(+25.6)#63.8%(+25.9)#313
7.Edmund28.4%4.1%(+24.3)#73.8%(+24.6)#344
8.Lobeco23.0%4.1%(+18.9)#83.8%(+19.2)#537
9.Fort Lawn22.8%4.1%(+18.7)#93.8%(+18.9)#553
10.Startex21.8%4.1%(+17.7)#103.8%(+18.0)#604
11.Andrews20.2%4.1%(+16.1)#113.8%(+16.4)#711
12.Bamberg18.3%4.1%(+14.2)#123.8%(+14.4)#875
13.Cheraw17.9%4.1%(+13.8)#133.8%(+14.0)#921
14.Mcbee17.8%4.1%(+13.7)#143.8%(+14.0)#930
15.Zion17.2%4.1%(+13.1)#153.8%(+13.4)#1,005
16.Central Pacolet16.9%4.1%(+12.8)#163.8%(+13.1)#1,050
17.Beech Island16.9%4.1%(+12.8)#173.8%(+13.0)#1,058
18.Whitney16.6%4.1%(+12.5)#183.8%(+12.8)#1,106
19.Vance15.7%4.1%(+11.6)#193.8%(+11.9)#1,248
20.Lockhart15.6%4.1%(+11.5)#203.8%(+11.8)#1,258
21.Newtown15.2%4.1%(+11.1)#213.8%(+11.4)#1,337
22.Eureka Mill15.1%4.1%(+11.0)#223.8%(+11.3)#1,351
23.Hilltop15.1%4.1%(+11.0)#233.8%(+11.2)#1,363
24.Whitmire15.0%4.1%(+10.8)#243.8%(+11.1)#1,385
25.Darlington14.9%4.1%(+10.8)#253.8%(+11.0)#1,401
26.Irwin14.8%4.1%(+10.7)#263.8%(+11.0)#1,410
27.Eastover14.8%4.1%(+10.7)#273.8%(+11.0)#1,411
28.Carlisle14.5%4.1%(+10.3)#283.8%(+10.6)#1,495
29.Catawba14.4%4.1%(+10.2)#293.8%(+10.5)#1,510
30.North Hartsville14.3%4.1%(+10.2)#303.8%(+10.5)#1,522
31.Chester14.1%4.1%(+10.0)#313.8%(+10.3)#1,577
32.East Gaffney13.7%4.1%(+9.57)#323.8%(+9.86)#1,704
33.Drayton13.6%4.1%(+9.44)#333.8%(+9.73)#1,749
34.Silverstreet13.6%4.1%(+9.44)#343.8%(+9.73)#1,751
35.Grover13.4%4.1%(+9.26)#353.8%(+9.55)#1,789
36.Gray Court13.3%4.1%(+9.16)#363.8%(+9.44)#1,830
37.West Pelzer13.0%4.1%(+8.90)#373.8%(+9.19)#1,918
38.Latta13.0%4.1%(+8.90)#383.8%(+9.18)#1,920
39.Williams13.0%4.1%(+8.84)#393.8%(+9.13)#1,937
40.Fairfax12.6%4.1%(+8.51)#403.8%(+8.80)#2,051
41.Heath Springs12.6%4.1%(+8.46)#413.8%(+8.75)#2,075
42.Fairforest12.6%4.1%(+8.45)#423.8%(+8.74)#2,079
43.Pacolet12.4%4.1%(+8.24)#433.8%(+8.52)#2,155
44.Timmonsville12.1%4.1%(+7.97)#443.8%(+8.26)#2,257
45.Gadsden12.1%4.1%(+7.96)#453.8%(+8.25)#2,266
46.Eutawville11.9%4.1%(+7.81)#463.8%(+8.10)#2,316
47.Calhoun Falls11.6%4.1%(+7.49)#473.8%(+7.78)#2,451
48.Sellers11.1%4.1%(+6.99)#483.8%(+7.28)#2,683
49.Richburg10.9%4.1%(+6.83)#493.8%(+7.12)#2,758
50.Union10.9%4.1%(+6.78)#503.8%(+7.07)#2,780
51.Bishopville10.7%4.1%(+6.58)#513.8%(+6.86)#2,875
52.Homeland Park10.7%4.1%(+6.54)#523.8%(+6.83)#2,896
53.Dillon10.6%4.1%(+6.50)#533.8%(+6.78)#2,919
54.Hamer10.6%4.1%(+6.47)#543.8%(+6.76)#2,929
55.Oakland10.5%4.1%(+6.35)#553.8%(+6.64)#2,997
56.Gayle Mill10.4%4.1%(+6.30)#563.8%(+6.59)#3,029
57.Pickens10.2%4.1%(+6.04)#573.8%(+6.33)#3,181
58.Jonesville10.1%4.1%(+5.98)#583.8%(+6.26)#3,231
59.Prosperity10.1%4.1%(+5.95)#593.8%(+6.24)#3,247
60.Mount Carmel10.1%4.1%(+5.94)#603.8%(+6.23)#3,252
61.Smyrna10.0%4.1%(+5.88)#613.8%(+6.17)#3,316
62.Edgefield9.9%4.1%(+5.82)#623.8%(+6.11)#3,337
63.Norway9.9%4.1%(+5.80)#633.8%(+6.09)#3,350
64.Blackville9.9%4.1%(+5.73)#643.8%(+6.02)#3,396
65.Salem9.8%4.1%(+5.69)#653.8%(+5.97)#3,431
66.Lamar9.7%4.1%(+5.57)#663.8%(+5.86)#3,518
67.Cross Hill9.7%4.1%(+5.56)#673.8%(+5.85)#3,522
68.Laurens9.7%4.1%(+5.55)#683.8%(+5.84)#3,529
69.Gantt9.6%4.1%(+5.53)#693.8%(+5.81)#3,543
70.Mullins9.6%4.1%(+5.43)#703.8%(+5.72)#3,607
71.Danwood9.5%4.1%(+5.42)#713.8%(+5.71)#3,612
72.Ridgeville9.4%4.1%(+5.24)#723.8%(+5.53)#3,786
73.Seabrook9.3%4.1%(+5.21)#733.8%(+5.49)#3,804
74.Edisto9.3%4.1%(+5.19)#743.8%(+5.48)#3,816
75.Sangaree9.3%4.1%(+5.14)#753.8%(+5.43)#3,851
76.Joanna9.3%4.1%(+5.13)#763.8%(+5.42)#3,857
77.Summerton9.2%4.1%(+5.05)#773.8%(+5.34)#3,929
78.Honea Path8.9%4.1%(+4.79)#783.8%(+5.07)#4,146
79.Perry8.8%4.1%(+4.73)#793.8%(+5.02)#4,190
80.Folly Beach8.8%4.1%(+4.66)#803.8%(+4.95)#4,252
81.Harleyville8.8%4.1%(+4.65)#813.8%(+4.94)#4,254
82.Sycamore8.7%4.1%(+4.58)#823.8%(+4.87)#4,326
83.Newberry8.7%4.1%(+4.56)#833.8%(+4.85)#4,340
84.Luray8.7%4.1%(+4.54)#843.8%(+4.82)#4,356
85.Reevesville8.6%4.1%(+4.50)#853.8%(+4.79)#4,393
86.Kline8.6%4.1%(+4.45)#863.8%(+4.74)#4,443
87.Capitol View8.6%4.1%(+4.45)#873.8%(+4.74)#4,454
88.Allendale8.3%4.1%(+4.23)#883.8%(+4.51)#4,660
89.Clinton8.3%4.1%(+4.22)#893.8%(+4.51)#4,661
90.Trenton8.3%4.1%(+4.21)#903.8%(+4.50)#4,669
91.Parker8.3%4.1%(+4.18)#913.8%(+4.47)#4,711
92.Gaston8.3%4.1%(+4.14)#923.8%(+4.43)#4,756
93.Gaffney8.2%4.1%(+4.08)#933.8%(+4.37)#4,833
94.Camp Croft8.2%4.1%(+4.07)#943.8%(+4.36)#4,839
95.Clio8.1%4.1%(+4.00)#953.8%(+4.29)#4,908
96.Salley8.1%4.1%(+3.99)#963.8%(+4.28)#4,923
97.York7.8%4.1%(+3.72)#973.8%(+4.01)#5,256
98.Williamston7.8%4.1%(+3.65)#983.8%(+3.93)#5,353
99.Van Wyck7.6%4.1%(+3.49)#993.8%(+3.78)#5,538
100.Langley7.6%4.1%(+3.45)#1003.8%(+3.74)#5,586

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
47.7%
#3
40.3%
#4
31.5%
#5
31.3%
#6
29.7%
#7
22.8%
#8
21.8%
#9
20.2%
#10
18.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina?
Coronaca has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of South Carolina?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in South Carolina is 4.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.