Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Texas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Havana 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#1 3.8% (+96.2)#2
2. Harwood 100.0% 3.9% (+96.1)#2 3.8% (+96.2)#19
3. Seven Oaks 90.0% 3.9% (+86.1)#3 3.8% (+86.2)#33
4. Ratamosa 63.3% 3.9% (+59.5)#4 3.8% (+59.5)#58
5. Dayton Lakes 62.5% 3.9% (+58.6)#5 3.8% (+58.7)#60
6. La Esperanza 53.3% 3.9% (+49.5)#6 3.8% (+49.5)#88
7. Hull 46.7% 3.9% (+42.9)#7 3.8% (+42.9)#117
8. La Paloma Addition 44.3% 3.9% (+40.4)#8 3.8% (+40.5)#128
9. Mentone 41.7% 3.9% (+37.8)#9 3.8% (+37.8)#152
10. Fabrica 41.1% 3.9% (+37.2)#10 3.8% (+37.2)#158
11. Coyanosa 40.0% 3.9% (+36.1)#11 3.8% (+36.2)#166
12. Yancey 37.9% 3.9% (+34.0)#12 3.8% (+34.0)#185
13. Winfield 36.2% 3.9% (+32.3)#13 3.8% (+32.4)#200
14. St Paul 35.3% 3.9% (+31.4)#14 3.8% (+31.4)#216
15. Rosebud 34.4% 3.9% (+30.6)#15 3.8% (+30.6)#227
16. Port Mansfield 33.3% 3.9% (+29.5)#16 3.8% (+29.5)#242
17. South Toledo Bend 33.0% 3.9% (+29.1)#17 3.8% (+29.2)#254
18. La Rosita 32.9% 3.9% (+29.0)#18 3.8% (+29.0)#256
19. Milano 32.7% 3.9% (+28.8)#19 3.8% (+28.8)#260
20. Tradewinds 31.9% 3.9% (+28.0)#20 3.8% (+28.1)#268
21. Green Valley Farms 31.5% 3.9% (+27.7)#21 3.8% (+27.7)#277
22. Kingsbury 30.9% 3.9% (+27.0)#22 3.8% (+27.1)#290
23. Waka 30.6% 3.9% (+26.7)#23 3.8% (+26.7)#299
24. Oak Trail Shores 28.4% 3.9% (+24.6)#24 3.8% (+24.6)#343
25. Ropesville 27.0% 3.9% (+23.2)#25 3.8% (+23.2)#380
26. Forsan 26.4% 3.9% (+22.5)#26 3.8% (+22.6)#396
27. Lake Colorado City 26.0% 3.9% (+22.1)#27 3.8% (+22.2)#405
28. The Homesteads 25.3% 3.9% (+21.4)#28 3.8% (+21.5)#431
29. Chaparrito 24.7% 3.9% (+20.9)#29 3.8% (+20.9)#459
30. Santa Cruz 24.2% 3.9% (+20.4)#30 3.8% (+20.4)#477
31. Ranchitos East 24.2% 3.9% (+20.3)#31 3.8% (+20.4)#481
32. Dodd City 24.1% 3.9% (+20.2)#32 3.8% (+20.3)#485
33. Cedar Point 23.6% 3.9% (+19.8)#33 3.8% (+19.8)#504
34. Allison 23.3% 3.9% (+19.4)#34 3.8% (+19.4)#526
35. Ranchitos Las Lomas 23.0% 3.9% (+19.1)#35 3.8% (+19.1)#538
36. Gause 22.8% 3.9% (+19.0)#36 3.8% (+19.0)#548
37. Buckholts 22.8% 3.9% (+18.9)#37 3.8% (+19.0)#550
38. La Victoria 22.7% 3.9% (+18.8)#38 3.8% (+18.9)#555
39. Coyote Flats 22.5% 3.9% (+18.6)#39 3.8% (+18.7)#567
40. Cleburne 22.3% 3.9% (+18.4)#40 3.8% (+18.5)#576
41. Huxley 22.0% 3.9% (+18.1)#41 3.8% (+18.2)#590
42. North San Pedro 21.9% 3.9% (+18.0)#42 3.8% (+18.1)#598
43. Seco Mines 21.8% 3.9% (+18.0)#43 3.8% (+18.0)#605
44. Villa Del Sol 21.7% 3.9% (+17.8)#44 3.8% (+17.9)#611
45. Mound 21.7% 3.9% (+17.8)#45 3.8% (+17.9)#612
46. Morgan 21.7% 3.9% (+17.8)#46 3.8% (+17.8)#615
47. Blum 20.5% 3.9% (+16.6)#47 3.8% (+16.7)#694
48. Milford 20.4% 3.9% (+16.5)#48 3.8% (+16.6)#701
49. Maypearl 20.3% 3.9% (+16.4)#49 3.8% (+16.4)#709
50. Muleshoe 20.0% 3.9% (+16.2)#50 3.8% (+16.2)#718
51. Avinger 19.9% 3.9% (+16.0)#51 3.8% (+16.0)#735
52. Grandview 19.7% 3.9% (+15.9)#52 3.8% (+15.9)#743
53. Tioga 19.7% 3.9% (+15.8)#53 3.8% (+15.9)#749
54. Hale Center 19.0% 3.9% (+15.1)#54 3.8% (+15.1)#804
55. Dorchester 18.2% 3.9% (+14.3)#55 3.8% (+14.4)#895
56. Lackland Afb 17.9% 3.9% (+14.1)#56 3.8% (+14.1)#917
57. Rio Vista 17.8% 3.9% (+13.9)#57 3.8% (+13.9)#933
58. Goldsmith 17.4% 3.9% (+13.6)#58 3.8% (+13.6)#984
59. Goree 17.2% 3.9% (+13.3)#59 3.8% (+13.4)#1,011
60. Kendleton 17.0% 3.9% (+13.1)#60 3.8% (+13.2)#1,037
61. Carlsbad 16.8% 3.9% (+12.9)#61 3.8% (+12.9)#1,067
62. Myrtle Springs 16.4% 3.9% (+12.6)#62 3.8% (+12.6)#1,121
63. Skellytown 16.4% 3.9% (+12.5)#63 3.8% (+12.6)#1,122
64. East Columbia 16.4% 3.9% (+12.5)#64 3.8% (+12.5)#1,132
65. Calvert 16.3% 3.9% (+12.5)#65 3.8% (+12.5)#1,134
66. Beckville 16.3% 3.9% (+12.4)#66 3.8% (+12.5)#1,139
67. Bangs 16.2% 3.9% (+12.4)#67 3.8% (+12.4)#1,154
68. Lometa 16.2% 3.9% (+12.3)#68 3.8% (+12.3)#1,164
69. Moore Station 16.2% 3.9% (+12.3)#69 3.8% (+12.3)#1,165
70. Seth Ward 16.0% 3.9% (+12.1)#70 3.8% (+12.2)#1,194
71. Ganado 15.6% 3.9% (+11.7)#71 3.8% (+11.7)#1,263
72. Eagle Lake 15.5% 3.9% (+11.6)#72 3.8% (+11.7)#1,277
73. Glidden 15.5% 3.9% (+11.6)#73 3.8% (+11.6)#1,287
74. Barrett 15.3% 3.9% (+11.4)#74 3.8% (+11.5)#1,323
75. Redwood 15.3% 3.9% (+11.4)#75 3.8% (+11.4)#1,327
76. Cresson 15.1% 3.9% (+11.2)#76 3.8% (+11.3)#1,352
77. O Brien 14.8% 3.9% (+10.9)#77 3.8% (+11.0)#1,419
78. Keene 14.8% 3.9% (+10.9)#78 3.8% (+10.9)#1,426
79. Bellevue 14.7% 3.9% (+10.8)#79 3.8% (+10.8)#1,448
80. Estelline 14.6% 3.9% (+10.8)#80 3.8% (+10.8)#1,460
81. Hutchins 14.5% 3.9% (+10.6)#81 3.8% (+10.7)#1,486
82. Joshua 14.3% 3.9% (+10.4)#82 3.8% (+10.5)#1,519
83. Godley 14.1% 3.9% (+10.2)#83 3.8% (+10.2)#1,593
84. Shelbyville 14.0% 3.9% (+10.1)#84 3.8% (+10.1)#1,621
85. Mabank 13.8% 3.9% (+9.96)#85 3.8% (+10.0)#1,659
86. Tynan 13.7% 3.9% (+9.80)#86 3.8% (+9.84)#1,710
87. Kerens 13.7% 3.9% (+9.79)#87 3.8% (+9.84)#1,711
88. Trinity 13.6% 3.9% (+9.68)#88 3.8% (+9.72)#1,752
89. Patton Village 13.6% 3.9% (+9.67)#89 3.8% (+9.72)#1,754
90. Sealy 13.5% 3.9% (+9.64)#90 3.8% (+9.69)#1,762
91. Itasca 13.5% 3.9% (+9.58)#91 3.8% (+9.63)#1,777
92. Ricardo 13.4% 3.9% (+9.49)#92 3.8% (+9.54)#1,794
93. Hico 13.2% 3.9% (+9.34)#93 3.8% (+9.39)#1,844
94. Edmonson 13.2% 3.9% (+9.33)#94 3.8% (+9.38)#1,851
95. Flatonia 13.1% 3.9% (+9.27)#95 3.8% (+9.32)#1,877
96. Coahoma 13.1% 3.9% (+9.22)#96 3.8% (+9.27)#1,891
97. Liberty Hill 13.1% 3.9% (+9.18)#97 3.8% (+9.23)#1,899
98. Briaroaks 13.0% 3.9% (+9.16)#98 3.8% (+9.21)#1,902
99. La Pryor 12.8% 3.9% (+8.96)#99 3.8% (+9.01)#1,984
100. Linn 12.8% 3.9% (+8.91)#100 3.8% (+8.95)#2,003

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas are:
#1
100.0%
#2
90.0%
#3
63.3%
#4
62.5%
#5
53.3%
#6
46.7%
#7
44.3%
#8
41.7%
#9
41.1%
#10
40.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas?
Havana has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Texas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Texas is 3.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.