Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Whatley 69.7% 4.6% (+65.1)#1 3.8% (+65.9)#49
2. Bristow Cove 63.6% 4.6% (+59.0)#2 3.8% (+59.8)#56
3. Natural Bridge 40.0% 4.6% (+35.4)#3 3.8% (+36.2)#169
4. Weogufka 36.1% 4.6% (+31.5)#4 3.8% (+32.3)#202
5. Fruitdale 35.7% 4.6% (+31.1)#5 3.8% (+31.9)#211
6. Midway 32.4% 4.6% (+27.7)#6 3.8% (+28.5)#262
7. Vredenburgh 31.6% 4.6% (+27.0)#7 3.8% (+27.7)#274
8. Mount Olive Cdp Coosa County 30.6% 4.6% (+26.0)#8 3.8% (+26.8)#297
9. Rock Mills 25.8% 4.6% (+21.2)#9 3.8% (+22.0)#418
10. Double Springs 22.2% 4.6% (+17.6)#10 3.8% (+18.4)#586
11. Joppa 21.9% 4.6% (+17.3)#11 3.8% (+18.1)#597
12. Pine Ridge 21.9% 4.6% (+17.2)#12 3.8% (+18.0)#603
13. Pickensville 21.4% 4.6% (+16.7)#13 3.8% (+17.5)#635
14. Gainesville 21.2% 4.6% (+16.6)#14 3.8% (+17.4)#641
15. Axis 21.2% 4.6% (+16.5)#15 3.8% (+17.3)#647
16. Hurtsboro 20.7% 4.6% (+16.1)#16 3.8% (+16.9)#674
17. Detroit 20.7% 4.6% (+16.0)#17 3.8% (+16.8)#680
18. Twin 19.2% 4.6% (+14.6)#18 3.8% (+15.4)#779
19. Tarrant 18.9% 4.6% (+14.3)#19 3.8% (+15.1)#809
20. North Courtland 18.5% 4.6% (+13.9)#20 3.8% (+14.6)#854
21. Sweet Water 18.4% 4.6% (+13.8)#21 3.8% (+14.6)#858
22. Tallassee 18.3% 4.6% (+13.7)#22 3.8% (+14.5)#870
23. Clayton 17.7% 4.6% (+13.1)#23 3.8% (+13.9)#934
24. Dayton 17.6% 4.6% (+13.0)#24 3.8% (+13.8)#948
25. Fayette 17.6% 4.6% (+13.0)#25 3.8% (+13.7)#963
26. Fort Deposit 17.2% 4.6% (+12.6)#26 3.8% (+13.3)#1,015
27. Vina 16.7% 4.6% (+12.1)#27 3.8% (+12.8)#1,073
28. Mckenzie 16.4% 4.6% (+11.8)#28 3.8% (+12.6)#1,128
29. Macedonia 16.4% 4.6% (+11.8)#29 3.8% (+12.5)#1,129
30. Sipsey 16.1% 4.6% (+11.5)#30 3.8% (+12.3)#1,173
31. Lanett 15.5% 4.6% (+10.9)#31 3.8% (+11.7)#1,279
32. West Blocton 15.5% 4.6% (+10.8)#32 3.8% (+11.6)#1,286
33. Taylor 15.4% 4.6% (+10.8)#33 3.8% (+11.6)#1,292
34. Ivalee 15.4% 4.6% (+10.8)#34 3.8% (+11.6)#1,295
35. Glen Allen 15.3% 4.6% (+10.7)#35 3.8% (+11.5)#1,324
36. Fulton 15.1% 4.6% (+10.5)#36 3.8% (+11.3)#1,348
37. Mosses 15.1% 4.6% (+10.5)#37 3.8% (+11.3)#1,355
38. Langston 15.1% 4.6% (+10.4)#38 3.8% (+11.2)#1,369
39. Nixburg 14.8% 4.6% (+10.1)#39 3.8% (+10.9)#1,425
40. White Plains 14.8% 4.6% (+10.1)#40 3.8% (+10.9)#1,429
41. Grand Bay 14.7% 4.6% (+10.1)#41 3.8% (+10.9)#1,444
42. Jemison 14.7% 4.6% (+10.0)#42 3.8% (+10.8)#1,452
43. Bayou La Batre 14.6% 4.6% (+9.98)#43 3.8% (+10.8)#1,471
44. Hartford 14.5% 4.6% (+9.86)#44 3.8% (+10.6)#1,489
45. Bakerhill 14.4% 4.6% (+9.80)#45 3.8% (+10.6)#1,503
46. Ragland 14.3% 4.6% (+9.67)#46 3.8% (+10.5)#1,525
47. Orrville 14.3% 4.6% (+9.67)#47 3.8% (+10.5)#1,535
48. Geiger 14.1% 4.6% (+9.53)#48 3.8% (+10.3)#1,572
49. Parrish 14.1% 4.6% (+9.49)#49 3.8% (+10.3)#1,581
50. Point Clear 14.0% 4.6% (+9.37)#50 3.8% (+10.2)#1,615
51. Allgood 13.6% 4.6% (+8.98)#51 3.8% (+9.77)#1,735
52. Kellyton 13.5% 4.6% (+8.87)#52 3.8% (+9.65)#1,771
53. Cullomburg 13.2% 4.6% (+8.59)#53 3.8% (+9.38)#1,848
54. Lipscomb 12.9% 4.6% (+8.29)#54 3.8% (+9.08)#1,956
55. Edwardsville 12.9% 4.6% (+8.29)#55 3.8% (+9.07)#1,959
56. Elberta 12.9% 4.6% (+8.24)#56 3.8% (+9.02)#1,980
57. Mcdonald Chapel 12.6% 4.6% (+7.98)#57 3.8% (+8.77)#2,066
58. Smoke Rise 12.4% 4.6% (+7.80)#58 3.8% (+8.58)#2,140
59. Union Springs 12.4% 4.6% (+7.77)#59 3.8% (+8.55)#2,149
60. Colony 12.3% 4.6% (+7.68)#60 3.8% (+8.46)#2,179
61. Haleyville 12.2% 4.6% (+7.55)#61 3.8% (+8.33)#2,233
62. West End Cobb Town 12.0% 4.6% (+7.38)#62 3.8% (+8.16)#2,296
63. Trafford 11.9% 4.6% (+7.25)#63 3.8% (+8.03)#2,343
64. Bay Minette 11.9% 4.6% (+7.24)#64 3.8% (+8.02)#2,348
65. Red Bay 11.9% 4.6% (+7.24)#65 3.8% (+8.02)#2,350
66. Kinsey 11.8% 4.6% (+7.20)#66 3.8% (+7.98)#2,365
67. Ariton 11.7% 4.6% (+7.11)#67 3.8% (+7.89)#2,413
68. Sumiton 11.6% 4.6% (+7.01)#68 3.8% (+7.80)#2,446
69. Broomtown 11.4% 4.6% (+6.81)#69 3.8% (+7.60)#2,526
70. Leroy 11.4% 4.6% (+6.78)#70 3.8% (+7.57)#2,539
71. Summerdale 11.2% 4.6% (+6.60)#71 3.8% (+7.39)#2,622
72. Hayneville 11.1% 4.6% (+6.53)#72 3.8% (+7.32)#2,657
73. Hackleburg 11.0% 4.6% (+6.37)#73 3.8% (+7.15)#2,737
74. Faunsdale 10.9% 4.6% (+6.29)#74 3.8% (+7.08)#2,777
75. Fayetteville 10.9% 4.6% (+6.28)#75 3.8% (+7.06)#2,784
76. Susan Moore 10.8% 4.6% (+6.20)#76 3.8% (+6.98)#2,817
77. Evergreen 10.8% 4.6% (+6.16)#77 3.8% (+6.94)#2,832
78. Midfield 10.6% 4.6% (+6.03)#78 3.8% (+6.82)#2,907
79. Bessemer 10.6% 4.6% (+5.99)#79 3.8% (+6.77)#2,923
80. New Union 10.6% 4.6% (+5.94)#80 3.8% (+6.73)#2,952
81. Cordova 10.4% 4.6% (+5.79)#81 3.8% (+6.57)#3,045
82. Gallant 10.4% 4.6% (+5.76)#82 3.8% (+6.54)#3,059
83. Louisville 10.4% 4.6% (+5.74)#83 3.8% (+6.52)#3,073
84. Smiths Station 10.3% 4.6% (+5.65)#84 3.8% (+6.43)#3,128
85. La Fayette 10.2% 4.6% (+5.59)#85 3.8% (+6.37)#3,154
86. Libertyville 10.2% 4.6% (+5.55)#86 3.8% (+6.34)#3,176
87. Mount Vernon 10.1% 4.6% (+5.47)#87 3.8% (+6.25)#3,242
88. Roanoke 10.1% 4.6% (+5.43)#88 3.8% (+6.22)#3,260
89. White Hall 9.9% 4.6% (+5.31)#89 3.8% (+6.10)#3,346
90. Centreville 9.9% 4.6% (+5.30)#90 3.8% (+6.08)#3,358
91. Douglas 9.9% 4.6% (+5.27)#91 3.8% (+6.06)#3,371
92. Whitesboro 9.9% 4.6% (+5.27)#92 3.8% (+6.06)#3,374
93. Loxley 9.7% 4.6% (+5.11)#93 3.8% (+5.90)#3,490
94. Prichard 9.7% 4.6% (+5.07)#94 3.8% (+5.86)#3,517
95. Clio 9.6% 4.6% (+5.01)#95 3.8% (+5.79)#3,562
96. Brookwood 9.6% 4.6% (+4.99)#96 3.8% (+5.77)#3,577
97. Priceville 9.6% 4.6% (+4.97)#97 3.8% (+5.76)#3,585
98. Midland City 9.5% 4.6% (+4.91)#98 3.8% (+5.69)#3,621
99. Eclectic 9.5% 4.6% (+4.91)#99 3.8% (+5.69)#3,622
100. Holt 9.5% 4.6% (+4.87)#100 3.8% (+5.65)#3,667

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama are:
#1
69.7%
#2
63.6%
#3
40.0%
#4
36.1%
#5
35.7%
#6
32.4%
#7
31.6%
#8
25.8%
#9
22.2%
#10
21.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama?
Whatley has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama with 69.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Alabama is 4.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.