Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Rancho Mesa Verde, AZ100.0%3.6%(+96.4)#13.8%(+96.2)#1
2.Havana, TX100.0%3.9%(+96.1)#13.8%(+96.2)#2
3.Matheny, WV100.0%4.5%(+95.5)#13.8%(+96.2)#3
4.Alden, IL100.0%4.4%(+95.6)#13.8%(+96.2)#4
5.Canaan, IN100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#13.8%(+96.2)#5
6.Sweet Water Village, AZ100.0%3.6%(+96.4)#23.8%(+96.2)#6
7.Blacktail, ND100.0%3.5%(+96.5)#13.8%(+96.2)#7
8.Boxley, IN100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#23.8%(+96.2)#8
9.Cortland, IN100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#33.8%(+96.2)#9
10.Strayhorn, MS100.0%4.7%(+95.3)#13.8%(+96.2)#10
11.Long Creek, NC100.0%4.1%(+95.9)#13.8%(+96.2)#11
12.Evansville, AR100.0%4.7%(+95.3)#13.8%(+96.2)#12
13.Gloster, LA100.0%3.3%(+96.7)#13.8%(+96.2)#13
14.Watrous, NM100.0%3.2%(+96.8)#13.8%(+96.2)#14
15.Barrville, PA100.0%4.6%(+95.4)#13.8%(+96.2)#15
16.Eckerty, IN100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#43.8%(+96.2)#16
17.Dresser, IN100.0%5.4%(+94.6)#53.8%(+96.2)#17
18.Reader, AR100.0%4.7%(+95.3)#23.8%(+96.2)#18
19.Harwood, TX100.0%3.9%(+96.1)#23.8%(+96.2)#19
20.Hensley, AR100.0%4.7%(+95.3)#33.8%(+96.2)#20
21.Columbia, VA100.0%3.0%(+97.0)#13.8%(+96.2)#21
22.Prattville, CA100.0%3.8%(+96.2)#13.8%(+96.2)#22
23.Maryhill, WA100.0%3.7%(+96.3)#13.8%(+96.2)#23
24.Coronaca, SC100.0%4.1%(+95.9)#13.8%(+96.2)#24
25.Westervelt, IL100.0%4.4%(+95.6)#23.8%(+96.2)#25
26.Norristown, GA100.0%4.5%(+95.5)#13.8%(+96.2)#26
27.Big Spring, MD100.0%2.9%(+97.1)#13.8%(+96.2)#27
28.Hayfield, IA100.0%4.9%(+95.1)#13.8%(+96.2)#28
29.Attu Station, AK100.0%3.6%(+96.4)#13.8%(+96.2)#29
30.Four Mile Road, AK100.0%3.6%(+96.4)#23.8%(+96.2)#30
31.Goldcreek, MT100.0%3.2%(+96.8)#13.8%(+96.2)#31
32.Dodge, OK95.7%4.1%(+91.6)#13.8%(+91.8)#32
33.Seven Oaks, TX90.0%3.9%(+86.1)#33.8%(+86.2)#33
34.Elk City, ID89.1%3.6%(+85.5)#13.8%(+85.3)#34
35.Pendroy, MT85.7%3.2%(+82.6)#23.8%(+81.9)#35
36.Linn Grove, IN84.4%5.4%(+79.0)#63.8%(+80.6)#36
37.Mona, IA83.3%4.9%(+78.5)#23.8%(+79.5)#37
38.Novelty, MO82.5%4.3%(+78.2)#13.8%(+78.7)#38
39.Venice, LA80.6%3.3%(+77.4)#23.8%(+76.8)#39
40.Apple Grove, WV78.9%4.5%(+74.4)#23.8%(+75.0)#40
41.Ada, KS77.8%4.2%(+73.5)#13.8%(+73.9)#41
42.West Liberty, IL75.8%4.4%(+71.3)#33.8%(+71.9)#42
43.Cowiche, WA75.2%3.7%(+71.6)#23.8%(+71.4)#43
44.Loma, MT75.0%3.2%(+71.8)#33.8%(+71.2)#44
45.Franklin, AZ71.0%3.6%(+67.4)#33.8%(+67.2)#45
46.Glenwood, GA70.9%4.5%(+66.4)#23.8%(+67.1)#46
47.Mehan, OK70.0%4.1%(+65.9)#23.8%(+66.2)#47
48.Annapolis, IL70.0%4.4%(+65.6)#43.8%(+66.2)#48
49.Whatley, AL69.7%4.6%(+65.1)#13.8%(+65.9)#49
50.Blyn, WA67.2%3.7%(+63.6)#33.8%(+63.4)#50
51.Nelagoney, OK66.7%4.1%(+62.6)#33.8%(+62.8)#51
52.Spivey, KS65.4%4.2%(+61.1)#23.8%(+61.6)#52
53.Padroni, CO64.3%2.9%(+61.3)#13.8%(+60.5)#53
54.Hartly, DE63.8%3.6%(+60.1)#13.8%(+59.9)#54
55.Forest, IN63.6%5.4%(+58.2)#73.8%(+59.8)#55
56.Bristow Cove, AL63.6%4.6%(+59.0)#23.8%(+59.8)#56
57.Switzer, WV63.3%4.5%(+58.8)#33.8%(+59.5)#57
58.Ratamosa, TX63.3%3.9%(+59.5)#43.8%(+59.5)#58
59.Robbins, TN62.5%5.0%(+57.5)#13.8%(+58.7)#59
60.Dayton Lakes, TX62.5%3.9%(+58.6)#53.8%(+58.7)#60
61.Williamstown, MO62.1%4.3%(+57.8)#23.8%(+58.2)#61
62.Nathalie, VA61.8%3.0%(+58.8)#23.8%(+58.0)#62
63.Little, OK61.5%4.1%(+57.5)#43.8%(+57.7)#63
64.Alpine Northwest, WY60.9%3.2%(+57.7)#13.8%(+57.1)#64
65.Kokomo, MS60.8%4.7%(+56.1)#23.8%(+57.0)#65
66.Oketo, KS60.4%4.2%(+56.2)#33.8%(+56.6)#66
67.Kiskimere, PA60.0%4.6%(+55.4)#23.8%(+56.2)#67
68.Auburn, WV60.0%4.5%(+55.5)#43.8%(+56.2)#68
69.Zeandale, KS59.3%4.2%(+55.0)#43.8%(+55.4)#69
70.Leggett, CA59.1%3.8%(+55.3)#23.8%(+55.3)#70
71.Hoyt, OK58.3%4.1%(+54.2)#53.8%(+54.5)#71
72.Rosewood, OH58.2%4.9%(+53.3)#13.8%(+54.4)#72
73.Yadkin College, NC58.2%4.1%(+54.1)#23.8%(+54.3)#73
74.Holladay, TN58.1%5.0%(+53.1)#23.8%(+54.2)#74
75.Glen Jean, WV58.1%4.5%(+53.6)#53.8%(+54.2)#75
76.Cal Nev Ari, NV57.1%4.2%(+53.0)#13.8%(+53.3)#76
77.Wainiha, HI56.4%2.9%(+53.5)#13.8%(+52.5)#77
78.Serena, IL56.1%4.4%(+51.7)#53.8%(+52.3)#78
79.Jeff, KY56.0%5.6%(+50.5)#13.8%(+52.2)#79
80.East Sharpsburg, PA55.7%4.6%(+51.1)#33.8%(+51.9)#80
81.Wawaka, IN55.4%5.4%(+50.0)#83.8%(+51.6)#81
82.Alford, IN55.3%5.4%(+49.9)#93.8%(+51.5)#82
83.Murphy, ID55.2%3.6%(+51.5)#23.8%(+51.3)#83
84.De Witt, MO54.5%4.3%(+50.3)#33.8%(+50.7)#84
85.Combs, KY54.5%5.6%(+49.0)#23.8%(+50.7)#85
86.Donaldson, AR54.4%4.7%(+49.7)#43.8%(+50.6)#86
87.Boulevard, CA54.0%3.8%(+50.2)#33.8%(+50.2)#87
88.La Esperanza, TX53.3%3.9%(+49.5)#63.8%(+49.5)#88
89.Frystown, PA53.3%4.6%(+48.8)#43.8%(+49.5)#89
90.Old Fort, OH53.1%4.9%(+48.1)#23.8%(+49.2)#90
91.Harperville, MS52.4%4.7%(+47.7)#33.8%(+48.6)#91
92.Connerville, OK52.4%4.1%(+48.3)#63.8%(+48.6)#92
93.Placitas Cdp Dona Ana County, NM51.2%3.2%(+48.0)#23.8%(+47.3)#93
94.Doyle, CA51.1%3.8%(+47.3)#43.8%(+47.3)#94
95.Pomona, MO51.1%4.3%(+46.8)#43.8%(+47.3)#95
96.Plains, GA51.1%4.5%(+46.6)#33.8%(+47.2)#96
97.Mitiwanga, OH50.6%4.9%(+45.6)#33.8%(+46.7)#97
98.Savage Town, VA50.4%3.0%(+47.4)#33.8%(+46.6)#98
99.Old Hundred, NC50.0%4.1%(+45.9)#33.8%(+46.2)#99
100.Biggersville, MS50.0%4.7%(+45.3)#43.8%(+46.2)#100

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Rancho Mesa Verde has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.