Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Parkersburg 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#186
2. Lansing 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#375
3. Maxwell 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#542
4. What Cheer 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#579
5. Klemme 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#603
6. Kellogg 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#658
7. Coalville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#719
8. Ocheyedan 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#724
9. Sabula 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#751
10. Elliott 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#820
11. Lehigh 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#910
12. Pulaski 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#1,039
13. Lohrville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#1,071
14. Frederika 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,127
15. Holy Cross 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,162
16. Granville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,164
17. Clutier 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,210
18. Mooar 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,218
19. Holland 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,229
20. Mallard 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,266
21. Blakesburg 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,309
22. Davis City 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,377
23. Garden Grove 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,400
24. Defiance 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,444
25. Oakland Acres 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,445
26. Harris 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,447
27. Havelock 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,478
28. Garber 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,514
29. Soldier 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,530
30. Drakesville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,540
31. Geneva 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,544
32. Archer 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,565
33. Dickens 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,590
34. Westphalia 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,604
35. Monmouth 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,608
36. Delaware 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,617
37. Panorama Park 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,634
38. St Marys 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,651
39. Springbrook 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,661
40. Palmer 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#1,665
41. Centralia 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,672
42. Andover 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,684
43. Turin 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#1,692
44. Unionville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#44 33.1% (+66.9)#1,703
45. Bridgewater 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#45 33.1% (+66.9)#1,713
46. Meriden 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#46 33.1% (+66.9)#1,723
47. Stanley 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#47 33.1% (+66.9)#1,817
48. Oto 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#49 33.1% (+66.9)#1,822
49. Promise City 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#50 33.1% (+66.9)#1,823
50. Zwingle 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#51 33.1% (+66.9)#1,832
51. Rome 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#52 33.1% (+66.9)#1,842
52. Greenville 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#53 33.1% (+66.9)#1,846
53. Grant 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#54 33.1% (+66.9)#1,868
54. Colwell 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#55 33.1% (+66.9)#1,871
55. Galt 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#56 33.1% (+66.9)#1,910
56. Curlew 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#57 33.1% (+66.9)#1,931
57. Valeria 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#58 33.1% (+66.9)#1,935
58. Graf 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#59 33.1% (+66.9)#1,941
59. Aspinwall 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#60 33.1% (+66.9)#1,955
60. Coppock 100.0% 32.4% (+67.6)#61 33.1% (+66.9)#1,962
61. Thor 96.3% 32.4% (+63.9)#62 33.1% (+63.2)#1,992
62. Decatur City 94.1% 32.4% (+61.7)#63 33.1% (+61.0)#2,026
63. Elma 93.8% 32.4% (+61.3)#64 33.1% (+60.6)#2,037
64. Lorimor 92.3% 32.4% (+59.9)#65 33.1% (+59.2)#2,088
65. New Hartford 90.9% 32.4% (+58.5)#66 33.1% (+57.8)#2,132
66. Prairieburg 90.9% 32.4% (+58.5)#67 33.1% (+57.8)#2,138
67. Milton 90.0% 32.4% (+57.6)#68 33.1% (+56.9)#2,167
68. Farnhamville 90.0% 32.4% (+57.6)#69 33.1% (+56.9)#2,169
69. Aurora 90.0% 32.4% (+57.6)#70 33.1% (+56.9)#2,175
70. Zearing 89.5% 32.4% (+57.1)#71 33.1% (+56.3)#2,185
71. Oxford Junction 88.9% 32.4% (+56.5)#72 33.1% (+55.8)#2,213
72. Charter Oak 87.5% 32.4% (+55.1)#73 33.1% (+54.4)#2,285
73. Union 87.5% 32.4% (+55.1)#74 33.1% (+54.4)#2,289
74. Ackworth 87.5% 32.4% (+55.1)#75 33.1% (+54.4)#2,300
75. Keystone 86.7% 32.4% (+54.3)#76 33.1% (+53.5)#2,322
76. Bayard 86.7% 32.4% (+54.3)#77 33.1% (+53.5)#2,325
77. Stratford 85.7% 32.4% (+53.3)#78 33.1% (+52.6)#2,371
78. Cushing 85.7% 32.4% (+53.3)#79 33.1% (+52.6)#2,401
79. Bradgate 85.7% 32.4% (+53.3)#80 33.1% (+52.6)#2,408
80. Casey 84.6% 32.4% (+52.2)#81 33.1% (+51.5)#2,461
81. Moorhead 84.6% 32.4% (+52.2)#82 33.1% (+51.5)#2,464
82. Churdan 83.3% 32.4% (+50.9)#83 33.1% (+50.2)#2,521
83. Rowan 81.8% 32.4% (+49.4)#84 33.1% (+48.7)#2,648
84. Ferguson 81.8% 32.4% (+49.4)#85 33.1% (+48.7)#2,650
85. Webster City 80.2% 32.4% (+47.8)#86 33.1% (+47.1)#2,729
86. Doon 80.0% 32.4% (+47.6)#87 33.1% (+46.9)#2,749
87. Volga 80.0% 32.4% (+47.6)#88 33.1% (+46.9)#2,775
88. Linn Grove 80.0% 32.4% (+47.6)#89 33.1% (+46.9)#2,791
89. Lake Mills 79.7% 32.4% (+47.3)#90 33.1% (+46.6)#2,804
90. Panora 79.6% 32.4% (+47.2)#91 33.1% (+46.5)#2,811
91. Stanhope 78.9% 32.4% (+46.5)#92 33.1% (+45.8)#2,854
92. Chariton 78.7% 32.4% (+46.3)#93 33.1% (+45.5)#2,871
93. Garnavillo 78.6% 32.4% (+46.2)#94 33.1% (+45.4)#2,879
94. Humeston 78.6% 32.4% (+46.2)#95 33.1% (+45.4)#2,884
95. Rowley 77.8% 32.4% (+45.4)#96 33.1% (+44.6)#2,942
96. Ladora 77.8% 32.4% (+45.4)#97 33.1% (+44.6)#2,949
97. Sigourney 77.3% 32.4% (+44.9)#98 33.1% (+44.1)#2,986
98. Fayette 76.9% 32.4% (+44.5)#99 33.1% (+43.8)#3,011
99. Moravia 76.9% 32.4% (+44.5)#100 33.1% (+43.8)#3,018
100. Farmersburg 76.9% 32.4% (+44.5)#101 33.1% (+43.8)#3,021

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa?
Parkersburg has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Iowa is 32.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.