Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Notre Dame 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#12
2. Salt Creek Commons 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#172
3. Jimmerson Lake 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#327
4. Francesville 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#444
5. Thayer 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#647
6. Hatfield 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#678
7. Lewis 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#701
8. Perrysville 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#738
9. Richland 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#759
10. Hanna 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#769
11. Prairieton 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#788
12. Williamsburg 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#897
13. Servia 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#959
14. Lyford 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,050
15. Geneva 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,132
16. Crane 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,203
17. Napoleon 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,221
18. Hartz Lake 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,233
19. Brimfield 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,308
20. Crandall 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,322
21. Liberty Mills 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,333
22. Ambia 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,335
23. Uniondale 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,355
24. Little York 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,366
25. Straughn 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,382
26. Marion 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,403
27. Cadiz 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,474
28. Centerton 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,484
29. Mount Etna 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,490
30. Merom 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,495
31. Deer Creek 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,533
32. Eugene 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,553
33. Newberry 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,622
34. Elizabeth 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,668
35. Grayford 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,673
36. Mount Auburn 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,776
37. Hobbs 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,780
38. Cross Plains 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,788
39. Florence 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,814
40. Laconia 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#1,870
41. Mauckport 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,885
42. Alamo 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,893
43. Burney 100.0% 35.1% (+64.9)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#1,953
44. Hardinsburg 93.3% 35.1% (+58.2)#44 33.1% (+60.2)#2,060
45. Bargersville 90.4% 35.1% (+55.4)#45 33.1% (+57.3)#2,151
46. Country Squire Lakes 90.2% 35.1% (+55.1)#46 33.1% (+57.0)#2,157
47. Fremont 88.5% 35.1% (+53.4)#47 33.1% (+55.3)#2,243
48. Hymera 87.8% 35.1% (+52.7)#48 33.1% (+54.7)#2,263
49. Spring Grove 87.0% 35.1% (+51.9)#49 33.1% (+53.8)#2,311
50. Cannelton 86.1% 35.1% (+51.0)#50 33.1% (+53.0)#2,348
51. Culver 85.2% 35.1% (+50.1)#51 33.1% (+52.0)#2,423
52. Marengo 85.2% 35.1% (+50.1)#52 33.1% (+52.0)#2,424
53. Palmyra 84.8% 35.1% (+49.8)#53 33.1% (+51.7)#2,441
54. La Paz 84.6% 35.1% (+49.5)#54 33.1% (+51.5)#2,457
55. Michiana Shores 83.3% 35.1% (+48.2)#55 33.1% (+50.2)#2,526
56. Amboy 83.3% 35.1% (+48.2)#56 33.1% (+50.2)#2,527
57. Pierceton 82.4% 35.1% (+47.3)#57 33.1% (+49.2)#2,594
58. Russellville 81.5% 35.1% (+46.4)#58 33.1% (+48.3)#2,668
59. Shadeland 81.2% 35.1% (+46.2)#59 33.1% (+48.1)#2,673
60. Monterey 80.0% 35.1% (+44.9)#60 33.1% (+46.9)#2,767
61. Amo 77.8% 35.1% (+42.7)#61 33.1% (+44.6)#2,939
62. Montpelier 76.5% 35.1% (+41.4)#62 33.1% (+43.3)#3,051
63. Lynn 75.7% 35.1% (+40.6)#63 33.1% (+42.5)#3,117
64. Heritage Lake 75.3% 35.1% (+40.3)#64 33.1% (+42.2)#3,136
65. Seelyville 75.0% 35.1% (+39.9)#65 33.1% (+41.9)#3,172
66. Poneto 75.0% 35.1% (+39.9)#66 33.1% (+41.9)#3,238
67. Laurel 74.6% 35.1% (+39.5)#67 33.1% (+41.5)#3,256
68. Liberty 74.3% 35.1% (+39.2)#68 33.1% (+41.2)#3,277
69. Boswell 74.3% 35.1% (+39.2)#69 33.1% (+41.2)#3,281
70. Nappanee 73.8% 35.1% (+38.7)#70 33.1% (+40.7)#3,319
71. Sunman 73.7% 35.1% (+38.6)#71 33.1% (+40.5)#3,330
72. Lyons 73.7% 35.1% (+38.6)#72 33.1% (+40.5)#3,338
73. Switz City 73.3% 35.1% (+38.2)#73 33.1% (+40.2)#3,371
74. Arcadia 72.9% 35.1% (+37.8)#74 33.1% (+39.8)#3,398
75. Leavenworth 72.7% 35.1% (+37.6)#75 33.1% (+39.6)#3,437
76. Shelburn 72.4% 35.1% (+37.4)#76 33.1% (+39.3)#3,474
77. La Crosse 71.4% 35.1% (+36.3)#77 33.1% (+38.3)#3,575
78. Roachdale 69.8% 35.1% (+34.7)#78 33.1% (+36.7)#3,765
79. Milltown 69.2% 35.1% (+34.1)#79 33.1% (+36.1)#3,820
80. Staunton 68.2% 35.1% (+33.1)#80 33.1% (+35.0)#3,938
81. Morgantown 67.3% 35.1% (+32.2)#81 33.1% (+34.2)#4,008
82. Larwill 66.7% 35.1% (+31.6)#82 33.1% (+33.5)#4,146
83. Johnson 66.7% 35.1% (+31.6)#83 33.1% (+33.5)#4,161
84. Patriot 66.7% 35.1% (+31.6)#84 33.1% (+33.5)#4,208
85. Orleans 66.2% 35.1% (+31.1)#85 33.1% (+33.0)#4,277
86. Milan 66.0% 35.1% (+30.9)#86 33.1% (+32.9)#4,294
87. Boston 65.0% 35.1% (+29.9)#87 33.1% (+31.9)#4,400
88. Selma 64.6% 35.1% (+29.5)#88 33.1% (+31.4)#4,451
89. Paragon 64.3% 35.1% (+29.2)#89 33.1% (+31.2)#4,493
90. Pine Village 64.3% 35.1% (+29.2)#90 33.1% (+31.2)#4,499
91. Wanatah 64.0% 35.1% (+28.9)#91 33.1% (+30.9)#4,523
92. Tipton 63.9% 35.1% (+28.8)#92 33.1% (+30.8)#4,532
93. Schneider 63.6% 35.1% (+28.5)#93 33.1% (+30.5)#4,602
94. Farmersburg 63.3% 35.1% (+28.2)#94 33.1% (+30.2)#4,625
95. Fairmount 62.7% 35.1% (+27.6)#95 33.1% (+29.6)#4,711
96. Batesville 61.8% 35.1% (+26.7)#96 33.1% (+28.7)#4,839
97. Fillmore 61.5% 35.1% (+26.5)#97 33.1% (+28.4)#4,879
98. Michigantown 61.1% 35.1% (+26.0)#98 33.1% (+28.0)#4,937
99. Sullivan 61.1% 35.1% (+26.0)#99 33.1% (+27.9)#4,944
100. Gilmer Park 60.9% 35.1% (+25.8)#100 33.1% (+27.7)#4,974

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana?
Notre Dame has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Indiana is 35.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.