Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Greenwood 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#563
2. Brooten 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#722
3. Woodland 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#732
4. Claremont 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#744
5. Willernie 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#861
6. Medicine Lake 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#919
7. Wykoff 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#971
8. Bricelyn 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#1,015
9. Mahtowa 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#1,018
10. Remer 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#1,021
11. Bigfork 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#1,038
12. Kelliher 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#1,043
13. Alvarado 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#1,182
14. Villard 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,217
15. Bowlus 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,276
16. Echo 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,314
17. Lake Lillian 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,419
18. Boyd 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,457
19. Marietta 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,466
20. Okabena 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,483
21. South Haven 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,488
22. Warba 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,550
23. Clements 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,611
24. Harding 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,624
25. Perley 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,694
26. Millerville 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,716
27. Wright 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,727
28. Mckinley 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,742
29. Viking 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,755
30. Lastrup 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,762
31. Garvin 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,769
32. Inger 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,773
33. Sunburg 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,791
34. Nielsville 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,798
35. Beltrami 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,821
36. Walters 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,839
37. Evan 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,844
38. Trosky 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,855
39. Kenneth 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,863
40. Richville 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#1,913
41. Bruno 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,927
42. Wilder 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,934
43. Correll 100.0% 26.5% (+73.5)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#1,965
44. Cosmos 94.1% 26.5% (+67.6)#44 33.1% (+61.0)#2,024
45. Ball Club 93.9% 26.5% (+67.4)#45 33.1% (+60.8)#2,030
46. Wabasso 93.8% 26.5% (+67.2)#46 33.1% (+60.6)#2,036
47. Ivanhoe 88.9% 26.5% (+62.4)#47 33.1% (+55.8)#2,211
48. Lynd 88.9% 26.5% (+62.4)#48 33.1% (+55.8)#2,214
49. Bird Island 87.5% 26.5% (+61.0)#49 33.1% (+54.4)#2,277
50. Ebro 87.5% 26.5% (+61.0)#50 33.1% (+54.4)#2,301
51. Keewatin 86.7% 26.5% (+60.1)#51 33.1% (+53.5)#2,316
52. Herman 85.7% 26.5% (+59.2)#52 33.1% (+52.6)#2,384
53. Emmons 85.7% 26.5% (+59.2)#53 33.1% (+52.6)#2,392
54. Granada 85.7% 26.5% (+59.2)#54 33.1% (+52.6)#2,402
55. Miltona 84.6% 26.5% (+58.1)#55 33.1% (+51.5)#2,460
56. Wrenshall 83.3% 26.5% (+56.8)#56 33.1% (+50.2)#2,528
57. Bena 83.3% 26.5% (+56.8)#57 33.1% (+50.2)#2,545
58. Pipestone 82.2% 26.5% (+55.7)#58 33.1% (+49.1)#2,616
59. Pelican Rapids 81.7% 26.5% (+55.2)#59 33.1% (+48.6)#2,651
60. Kenyon 81.6% 26.5% (+55.1)#60 33.1% (+48.5)#2,659
61. Dent 81.0% 26.5% (+54.4)#61 33.1% (+47.8)#2,700
62. Mahnomen 80.8% 26.5% (+54.2)#62 33.1% (+47.6)#2,711
63. St James 80.6% 26.5% (+54.1)#63 33.1% (+47.5)#2,714
64. Prinsburg 80.0% 26.5% (+53.5)#64 33.1% (+46.9)#2,754
65. Windom 79.8% 26.5% (+53.3)#65 33.1% (+46.7)#2,802
66. Blackduck 79.2% 26.5% (+52.6)#66 33.1% (+46.0)#2,841
67. Kasota 77.8% 26.5% (+51.2)#67 33.1% (+44.6)#2,932
68. Eagle Bend 77.8% 26.5% (+51.2)#68 33.1% (+44.6)#2,934
69. Foxhome 77.8% 26.5% (+51.2)#69 33.1% (+44.6)#2,957
70. Sherburn 77.3% 26.5% (+50.7)#70 33.1% (+44.1)#2,988
71. Stockton 76.9% 26.5% (+50.4)#71 33.1% (+43.8)#3,014
72. Starbuck 76.2% 26.5% (+49.7)#72 33.1% (+43.1)#3,079
73. Verndale 76.0% 26.5% (+49.5)#73 33.1% (+42.9)#3,098
74. Grant 75.0% 26.5% (+48.5)#74 33.1% (+41.9)#3,151
75. Grand Marais 75.0% 26.5% (+48.5)#75 33.1% (+41.9)#3,157
76. Karlstad 75.0% 26.5% (+48.5)#76 33.1% (+41.9)#3,182
77. Grygla 75.0% 26.5% (+48.5)#77 33.1% (+41.9)#3,216
78. Warroad 74.8% 26.5% (+48.3)#78 33.1% (+41.7)#3,252
79. Coleraine 74.6% 26.5% (+48.0)#79 33.1% (+41.4)#3,259
80. Blue Earth 74.1% 26.5% (+47.6)#80 33.1% (+41.0)#3,289
81. Ada 74.1% 26.5% (+47.5)#81 33.1% (+40.9)#3,291
82. Evansville 72.7% 26.5% (+46.2)#82 33.1% (+39.6)#3,421
83. Twin Lakes 72.7% 26.5% (+46.2)#83 33.1% (+39.6)#3,446
84. Delavan 72.7% 26.5% (+46.2)#84 33.1% (+39.6)#3,447
85. Waite Park 72.0% 26.5% (+45.4)#85 33.1% (+38.8)#3,521
86. Staples 71.4% 26.5% (+44.9)#86 33.1% (+38.3)#3,558
87. Tamarack 71.4% 26.5% (+44.9)#87 33.1% (+38.3)#3,613
88. White Earth 70.0% 26.5% (+43.5)#88 33.1% (+36.9)#3,732
89. Clinton 70.0% 26.5% (+43.5)#89 33.1% (+36.9)#3,747
90. Squaw Lake 70.0% 26.5% (+43.5)#90 33.1% (+36.9)#3,758
91. Two Harbors 69.6% 26.5% (+43.1)#91 33.1% (+36.5)#3,787
92. Jeffers 68.4% 26.5% (+41.9)#92 33.1% (+35.3)#3,908
93. Gilbert 67.8% 26.5% (+41.2)#93 33.1% (+34.6)#3,967
94. Riverland 67.3% 26.5% (+40.7)#94 33.1% (+34.1)#4,012
95. Cold Spring 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#95 33.1% (+33.5)#4,044
96. Canby 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#96 33.1% (+33.5)#4,067
97. Hallock 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#97 33.1% (+33.5)#4,099
98. Raymond 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#98 33.1% (+33.5)#4,106
99. Kandiyohi 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#99 33.1% (+33.5)#4,130
100. Vermillion 66.7% 26.5% (+40.1)#100 33.1% (+33.5)#4,132

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota?
Greenwood has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Minnesota is 26.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.