Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Spring Arbor 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#126
2. Detroit Beach 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#139
3. Wakefield 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#225
4. Weidman 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#289
5. Lake Leann 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#291
6. Dollar Bay 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#326
7. Napoleon 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#447
8. Crystal 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#465
9. Mackinac Island 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#505
10. Calumet 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#583
11. Parkdale 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#631
12. Barnes Lake 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#668
13. Atlantic Mine 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#743
14. Republic 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#772
15. Millburg 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#834
16. Woodland 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#838
17. Dodgeville 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#860
18. Alba 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#898
19. Shaftsburg 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#923
20. Palo 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#939
21. Empire 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#967
22. Brimley 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#983
23. New Troy 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,016
24. Otter Lake 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,027
25. Oden 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,103
26. Bendon 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,143
27. Paris 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,188
28. Amasa 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,242
29. Falmouth 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,258
30. Mohawk 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,323
31. Riverdale 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,354
32. Twining 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,361
33. Allen 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,387
34. Elm Hall 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,417
35. Mcbride 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,448
36. Ironton 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,512
37. Turner 100.0% 35.5% (+64.5)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,835
38. Thompsonville 92.9% 35.5% (+57.3)#38 33.1% (+59.7)#2,070
39. Lawrence 92.7% 35.5% (+57.2)#39 33.1% (+59.6)#2,075
40. Frankfort 91.7% 35.5% (+56.1)#40 33.1% (+58.5)#2,101
41. Paw Paw Lake 90.1% 35.5% (+54.6)#41 33.1% (+57.0)#2,159
42. Walkerville 90.0% 35.5% (+54.5)#42 33.1% (+56.9)#2,173
43. Lakes Of The North 88.5% 35.5% (+52.9)#43 33.1% (+55.3)#2,245
44. Harrison 87.2% 35.5% (+51.7)#44 33.1% (+54.1)#2,305
45. Hopkins 86.7% 35.5% (+51.1)#45 33.1% (+53.5)#2,321
46. South Range 86.7% 35.5% (+51.1)#46 33.1% (+53.5)#2,323
47. Lincoln 85.7% 35.5% (+50.2)#47 33.1% (+52.6)#2,400
48. Maple Rapids 85.2% 35.5% (+49.6)#48 33.1% (+52.0)#2,425
49. St Helen 83.5% 35.5% (+48.0)#49 33.1% (+50.4)#2,506
50. Gagetown 83.3% 35.5% (+47.8)#50 33.1% (+50.2)#2,529
51. Lakeview 82.9% 35.5% (+47.4)#51 33.1% (+49.8)#2,570
52. Port Sanilac 82.4% 35.5% (+46.8)#52 33.1% (+49.2)#2,597
53. Fountain 82.4% 35.5% (+46.8)#53 33.1% (+49.2)#2,607
54. Woodland Beach 82.2% 35.5% (+46.7)#54 33.1% (+49.1)#2,617
55. Attica 81.6% 35.5% (+46.0)#55 33.1% (+48.4)#2,661
56. Alma 81.5% 35.5% (+46.0)#56 33.1% (+48.4)#2,662
57. Whitehall 80.9% 35.5% (+45.4)#57 33.1% (+47.8)#2,703
58. Clare 79.9% 35.5% (+44.3)#58 33.1% (+46.7)#2,798
59. River Rouge 79.2% 35.5% (+43.7)#59 33.1% (+46.1)#2,837
60. Beaverton 78.9% 35.5% (+43.4)#60 33.1% (+45.8)#2,851
61. Mesick 78.3% 35.5% (+42.7)#61 33.1% (+45.1)#2,903
62. Three Oaks 77.8% 35.5% (+42.2)#62 33.1% (+44.6)#2,926
63. Imlay City 77.2% 35.5% (+41.7)#63 33.1% (+44.1)#2,991
64. Onaway 77.1% 35.5% (+41.6)#64 33.1% (+44.0)#2,994
65. Kalkaska 76.6% 35.5% (+41.0)#65 33.1% (+43.4)#3,045
66. South Boardman 76.5% 35.5% (+40.9)#66 33.1% (+43.3)#3,056
67. New Lothrop 76.2% 35.5% (+40.7)#67 33.1% (+43.1)#3,080
68. Manistique 75.9% 35.5% (+40.4)#68 33.1% (+42.8)#3,103
69. Almont 75.0% 35.5% (+39.5)#69 33.1% (+41.9)#3,154
70. Evart 75.0% 35.5% (+39.5)#70 33.1% (+41.9)#3,158
71. Northport 75.0% 35.5% (+39.5)#71 33.1% (+41.9)#3,199
72. Port Hope 75.0% 35.5% (+39.5)#72 33.1% (+41.9)#3,217
73. Copper City 75.0% 35.5% (+39.5)#73 33.1% (+41.9)#3,228
74. Vermontville 74.3% 35.5% (+38.7)#74 33.1% (+41.2)#3,280
75. Colon 74.2% 35.5% (+38.7)#75 33.1% (+41.1)#3,286
76. Freeport 73.3% 35.5% (+37.8)#76 33.1% (+40.2)#3,368
77. Harrisville 72.7% 35.5% (+37.2)#77 33.1% (+39.6)#3,427
78. Gladstone 72.7% 35.5% (+37.1)#78 33.1% (+39.5)#3,453
79. Zeba 72.2% 35.5% (+36.7)#79 33.1% (+39.1)#3,504
80. Sebewaing 72.1% 35.5% (+36.5)#80 33.1% (+38.9)#3,515
81. Fennville 71.6% 35.5% (+36.0)#81 33.1% (+38.4)#3,546
82. Scottville 71.4% 35.5% (+35.9)#82 33.1% (+38.3)#3,563
83. Breedsville 71.4% 35.5% (+35.9)#83 33.1% (+38.3)#3,593
84. Luna Pier 71.0% 35.5% (+35.4)#84 33.1% (+37.8)#3,643
85. Tustin 70.0% 35.5% (+34.5)#85 33.1% (+36.9)#3,755
86. Yale 69.4% 35.5% (+33.9)#86 33.1% (+36.3)#3,804
87. Charlevoix 69.1% 35.5% (+33.6)#87 33.1% (+36.0)#3,841
88. Dowagiac 68.6% 35.5% (+33.0)#88 33.1% (+35.5)#3,885
89. South Haven 68.5% 35.5% (+33.0)#89 33.1% (+35.4)#3,891
90. Morley 68.4% 35.5% (+32.9)#90 33.1% (+35.3)#3,903
91. Jasper 68.4% 35.5% (+32.9)#91 33.1% (+35.3)#3,907
92. Reading 67.6% 35.5% (+32.1)#92 33.1% (+34.5)#3,981
93. Marquette 67.6% 35.5% (+32.1)#93 33.1% (+34.5)#3,985
94. Kincheloe 67.3% 35.5% (+31.7)#94 33.1% (+34.1)#4,009
95. Marine City 67.0% 35.5% (+31.5)#95 33.1% (+33.9)#4,032
96. White Pigeon 66.7% 35.5% (+31.1)#96 33.1% (+33.5)#4,065
97. Kingston 66.7% 35.5% (+31.1)#97 33.1% (+33.5)#4,159
98. Michigamme 66.7% 35.5% (+31.1)#98 33.1% (+33.5)#4,199
99. Carney 66.7% 35.5% (+31.1)#99 33.1% (+33.5)#4,205
100. Minden City 66.7% 35.5% (+31.1)#100 33.1% (+33.5)#4,206

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan?
Spring Arbor has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Michigan is 35.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.