Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Forest 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#17
2. Newton 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#68
3. Decatur 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#133
4. Arnold Line 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#180
5. Glendale 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#232
6. Nellieburg 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#277
7. Conehatta 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#305
8. Woodville 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#345
9. Plantersville 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#464
10. Helena 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#607
11. Anguilla 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#687
12. Foxworth 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#693
13. Puckett 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#915
14. North Carrollton 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#956
15. Tucker 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#994
16. Ethel 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,010
17. Bentonia 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,054
18. Harperville 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,067
19. De Soto 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,207
20. Taylor 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,268
21. Alligator 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,278
22. Bond 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,325
23. Glen Allan 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,326
24. Bethlehem 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,349
25. Braxton 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,367
26. Silver City 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,420
27. Doddsville 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,428
28. Sturgis 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,500
29. Gattman 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,558
30. Louise 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,629
31. Winterville 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,737
32. Slate Springs 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,841
33. Mccool 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,883
34. Satartia 100.0% 45.9% (+54.1)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,929
35. Sardis 93.2% 45.9% (+47.3)#36 33.1% (+60.1)#2,061
36. Quitman 92.4% 45.9% (+46.4)#37 33.1% (+59.2)#2,080
37. Osyka 92.3% 45.9% (+46.4)#38 33.1% (+59.2)#2,086
38. Mantee 90.9% 45.9% (+45.0)#39 33.1% (+57.8)#2,134
39. Potts Camp 90.6% 45.9% (+44.7)#40 33.1% (+57.5)#2,143
40. Renova 90.2% 45.9% (+44.3)#41 33.1% (+57.1)#2,155
41. White Oak 88.9% 45.9% (+42.9)#42 33.1% (+55.8)#2,212
42. Silver Creek 87.5% 45.9% (+41.6)#43 33.1% (+54.4)#2,296
43. Leakesville 86.2% 45.9% (+40.3)#44 33.1% (+53.1)#2,341
44. Jonestown 86.1% 45.9% (+40.2)#45 33.1% (+53.0)#2,347
45. Gunnison 86.0% 45.9% (+40.1)#46 33.1% (+52.9)#2,352
46. Mount Olive 85.9% 45.9% (+40.0)#47 33.1% (+52.8)#2,357
47. Sunflower 85.8% 45.9% (+39.9)#48 33.1% (+52.7)#2,361
48. Fayette 85.2% 45.9% (+39.3)#49 33.1% (+52.1)#2,422
49. Raymond 84.6% 45.9% (+38.7)#50 33.1% (+51.5)#2,450
50. Union 84.5% 45.9% (+38.6)#51 33.1% (+51.4)#2,469
51. New Augusta 84.0% 45.9% (+38.1)#52 33.1% (+50.9)#2,492
52. Benoit 83.9% 45.9% (+37.9)#53 33.1% (+50.7)#2,499
53. Weir 82.9% 45.9% (+36.9)#54 33.1% (+49.7)#2,574
54. Scooba 82.5% 45.9% (+36.6)#55 33.1% (+49.4)#2,588
55. Glendora 81.0% 45.9% (+35.0)#56 33.1% (+47.8)#2,701
56. Taylorsville 80.5% 45.9% (+34.6)#57 33.1% (+47.4)#2,720
57. New Houlka 80.0% 45.9% (+34.1)#58 33.1% (+46.9)#2,751
58. Marietta 80.0% 45.9% (+34.1)#59 33.1% (+46.9)#2,786
59. Laurel 79.8% 45.9% (+33.9)#60 33.1% (+46.7)#2,800
60. Lucedale 79.6% 45.9% (+33.6)#61 33.1% (+46.4)#2,816
61. Rosedale 79.2% 45.9% (+33.2)#62 33.1% (+46.0)#2,840
62. Isola 79.1% 45.9% (+33.1)#63 33.1% (+45.9)#2,844
63. Louisville 78.4% 45.9% (+32.5)#64 33.1% (+45.3)#2,893
64. Walls 78.3% 45.9% (+32.3)#65 33.1% (+45.1)#2,900
65. Kosciusko 77.4% 45.9% (+31.5)#66 33.1% (+44.3)#2,980
66. Crosby 76.9% 45.9% (+31.0)#67 33.1% (+43.8)#3,023
67. Artesia 76.5% 45.9% (+30.5)#68 33.1% (+43.3)#3,059
68. Ripley 76.4% 45.9% (+30.4)#69 33.1% (+43.2)#3,066
69. Gloster 75.9% 45.9% (+30.0)#70 33.1% (+42.8)#3,102
70. Burnsville 75.0% 45.9% (+29.1)#71 33.1% (+41.9)#3,177
71. Seminary 75.0% 45.9% (+29.1)#72 33.1% (+41.9)#3,211
72. Arcola 75.0% 45.9% (+29.1)#73 33.1% (+41.9)#3,229
73. Lula 75.0% 45.9% (+29.1)#74 33.1% (+41.9)#3,231
74. Hollandale 73.8% 45.9% (+27.8)#75 33.1% (+40.6)#3,320
75. Cleary 73.1% 45.9% (+27.1)#76 33.1% (+39.9)#3,382
76. Hazlehurst 72.9% 45.9% (+27.0)#77 33.1% (+39.8)#3,397
77. Collins 72.7% 45.9% (+26.8)#78 33.1% (+39.6)#3,408
78. Wesson 71.4% 45.9% (+25.5)#79 33.1% (+38.3)#3,559
79. North Tunica 71.1% 45.9% (+25.1)#80 33.1% (+37.9)#3,634
80. Shaw 70.8% 45.9% (+24.9)#81 33.1% (+37.7)#3,657
81. Durant 70.7% 45.9% (+24.8)#82 33.1% (+37.6)#3,668
82. Wade 70.7% 45.9% (+24.7)#83 33.1% (+37.5)#3,670
83. Shelby 70.4% 45.9% (+24.5)#84 33.1% (+37.3)#3,692
84. Byhalia 69.8% 45.9% (+23.8)#85 33.1% (+36.6)#3,768
85. Pachuta 69.2% 45.9% (+23.3)#86 33.1% (+36.1)#3,832
86. Okolona 69.1% 45.9% (+23.2)#87 33.1% (+36.0)#3,842
87. West Hattiesburg 69.1% 45.9% (+23.1)#88 33.1% (+35.9)#3,845
88. Como 68.9% 45.9% (+23.0)#89 33.1% (+35.8)#3,854
89. Cleveland 68.8% 45.9% (+22.9)#90 33.1% (+35.7)#3,859
90. Flowood 68.3% 45.9% (+22.4)#91 33.1% (+35.2)#3,916
91. Friars Point 67.6% 45.9% (+21.6)#92 33.1% (+34.5)#3,986
92. Macon 67.5% 45.9% (+21.6)#93 33.1% (+34.4)#3,989
93. Drew 67.5% 45.9% (+21.6)#94 33.1% (+34.4)#3,991
94. Canton 66.8% 45.9% (+20.9)#95 33.1% (+33.7)#4,040
95. Eupora 66.7% 45.9% (+20.7)#96 33.1% (+33.5)#4,055
96. Stonewall 66.7% 45.9% (+20.7)#97 33.1% (+33.5)#4,094
97. Eden 66.7% 45.9% (+20.7)#98 33.1% (+33.5)#4,204
98. Hickory Flat 65.9% 45.9% (+20.0)#99 33.1% (+32.8)#4,301
99. Pontotoc 65.6% 45.9% (+19.7)#100 33.1% (+32.5)#4,319
100. Pascagoula 65.4% 45.9% (+19.5)#101 33.1% (+32.3)#4,341

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi?
Forest has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Mississippi is 45.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.