Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Tioga 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#260
2. Napoleon 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#523
3. Ashley 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#682
4. Minto 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#691
5. Pembina 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#745
6. Stanton 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#748
7. East Dunseith 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#864
8. Grenora 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#1,078
9. Halliday 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#1,098
10. Hope 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#1,100
11. Granville 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#1,184
12. Kensal 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#1,196
13. Gladstone 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#1,243
14. Powers Lake 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,262
15. Wing 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,363
16. Hazelton 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,384
17. Bowdon 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,429
18. Page 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,446
19. Binford 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,494
20. Mooreton 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,564
21. Wimbledon 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,566
22. Litchville 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,579
23. Fort Yates 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,603
24. Noonan 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,610
25. Ruthville 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,612
26. Sanborn 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,660
27. Zeeland 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,767
28. Egeland 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,809
29. Pettibone 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,876
30. Souris 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,890
31. Nome 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,901
32. Jud 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,918
33. Sentinel Butte 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,924
34. Alice 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,930
35. Springbrook 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,952
36. Hansboro 100.0% 28.6% (+71.4)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,964
37. Maddock 92.3% 28.6% (+63.7)#38 33.1% (+59.2)#2,087
38. Ryder 88.9% 28.6% (+60.2)#39 33.1% (+55.8)#2,227
39. Hazen 88.0% 28.6% (+59.4)#40 33.1% (+54.9)#2,255
40. Tappen 87.5% 28.6% (+58.9)#41 33.1% (+54.4)#2,292
41. Gackle 85.7% 28.6% (+57.1)#42 33.1% (+52.6)#2,394
42. Lakota 84.6% 28.6% (+56.0)#43 33.1% (+51.5)#2,455
43. Lignite 80.0% 28.6% (+51.4)#44 33.1% (+46.9)#2,781
44. Rugby 75.6% 28.6% (+47.0)#45 33.1% (+42.5)#3,121
45. Four Bears Village 73.3% 28.6% (+44.7)#46 33.1% (+40.2)#3,372
46. Towner 72.1% 28.6% (+43.4)#47 33.1% (+39.0)#3,514
47. Cannon Ball 71.4% 28.6% (+42.8)#48 33.1% (+38.3)#3,568
48. Carrington 68.9% 28.6% (+40.2)#49 33.1% (+35.8)#3,857
49. Mapleton 66.7% 28.6% (+38.0)#50 33.1% (+33.5)#4,080
50. Drake 66.7% 28.6% (+38.0)#51 33.1% (+33.5)#4,175
51. Lansford 66.7% 28.6% (+38.0)#52 33.1% (+33.5)#4,195
52. Marion 66.7% 28.6% (+38.0)#53 33.1% (+33.5)#4,240
53. Reeder 66.7% 28.6% (+38.0)#54 33.1% (+33.5)#4,246
54. Walhalla 62.5% 28.6% (+33.9)#55 33.1% (+29.4)#4,737
55. Center 59.3% 28.6% (+30.6)#56 33.1% (+26.1)#5,250
56. Rolette 59.1% 28.6% (+30.4)#57 33.1% (+26.0)#5,275
57. Beach 58.3% 28.6% (+29.7)#58 33.1% (+25.2)#5,378
58. Glen Ullin 58.3% 28.6% (+29.7)#59 33.1% (+25.2)#5,386
59. Fort Totten 56.4% 28.6% (+27.8)#60 33.1% (+23.3)#5,700
60. Devils Lake 56.1% 28.6% (+27.4)#61 33.1% (+22.9)#5,752
61. Elgin 55.0% 28.6% (+26.4)#62 33.1% (+21.9)#5,925
62. Lincoln 53.7% 28.6% (+25.1)#63 33.1% (+20.6)#6,137
63. Enderlin 52.0% 28.6% (+23.4)#64 33.1% (+18.9)#6,444
64. Harvey 50.0% 28.6% (+21.4)#65 33.1% (+16.9)#6,755
65. Hoople 50.0% 28.6% (+21.4)#66 33.1% (+16.9)#7,033
66. Crystal 50.0% 28.6% (+21.4)#67 33.1% (+16.9)#7,120
67. Minot Afb 45.5% 28.6% (+16.8)#68 33.1% (+12.3)#7,983
68. Wishek 45.5% 28.6% (+16.8)#69 33.1% (+12.3)#8,005
69. Bottineau 44.8% 28.6% (+16.2)#70 33.1% (+11.7)#8,159
70. Hankinson 44.8% 28.6% (+16.2)#71 33.1% (+11.7)#8,171
71. Garrison 44.4% 28.6% (+15.8)#72 33.1% (+11.3)#8,248
72. New Rockford 44.4% 28.6% (+15.8)#73 33.1% (+11.3)#8,250
73. Lisbon 43.2% 28.6% (+14.6)#74 33.1% (+10.1)#8,535
74. Wilton 42.9% 28.6% (+14.2)#75 33.1% (+9.72)#8,629
75. Parshall 42.3% 28.6% (+13.7)#76 33.1% (+9.17)#8,769
76. Mohall 42.1% 28.6% (+13.5)#77 33.1% (+8.97)#8,814
77. Fairmount 41.2% 28.6% (+12.5)#78 33.1% (+8.04)#9,040
78. Cando 40.0% 28.6% (+11.4)#79 33.1% (+6.86)#9,294
79. Wahpeton 38.8% 28.6% (+10.1)#80 33.1% (+5.61)#9,690
80. Grand Forks Afb 38.5% 28.6% (+9.82)#81 33.1% (+5.33)#9,742
81. Selfridge 38.5% 28.6% (+9.82)#82 33.1% (+5.33)#9,778
82. New Town 37.6% 28.6% (+8.98)#83 33.1% (+4.49)#9,970
83. Wyndmere 36.2% 28.6% (+7.56)#84 33.1% (+3.07)#10,406
84. Larimore 36.0% 28.6% (+7.35)#85 33.1% (+2.86)#10,458
85. Turtle Lake 35.3% 28.6% (+6.65)#86 33.1% (+2.16)#10,656
86. Fargo 34.9% 28.6% (+6.26)#87 33.1% (+1.77)#10,734
87. Bowman 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#88 33.1% (+0.198)#11,105
88. Plaza 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#89 33.1% (+0.198)#11,294
89. Adams 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#90 33.1% (+0.198)#11,343
90. Crary 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#91 33.1% (+0.198)#11,344
91. Esmond 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#92 33.1% (+0.198)#11,346
92. Solen 33.3% 28.6% (+4.69)#93 33.1% (+0.198)#11,354
93. Valley City 33.2% 28.6% (+4.53)#94 33.1% (+0.040)#11,373
94. Belcourt 31.9% 28.6% (+3.27)#95 33.1% (-1.22)#11,658
95. Mayville 30.8% 28.6% (+2.12)#96 33.1% (-2.37)#11,938
96. Watford City 30.3% 28.6% (+1.70)#97 33.1% (-2.79)#12,067
97. Dunn Center 30.0% 28.6% (+1.35)#98 33.1% (-3.14)#12,174
98. Grand Forks 29.9% 28.6% (+1.25)#99 33.1% (-3.24)#12,213
99. Mandaree 29.8% 28.6% (+1.14)#100 33.1% (-3.35)#12,248
100. Emerado 29.4% 28.6% (+0.766)#101 33.1% (-3.72)#12,354

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota?
Tioga has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of North Dakota?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Dakota is 28.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.