Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
West Virginia
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Madison 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#88
2. Crab Orchard 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#161
3. Cassville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#221
4. Prosperity 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#228
5. Rainelle 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#249
6. Alum Creek 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#251
7. Wayne 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#269
8. Fairlea 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#283
9. Sistersville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#299
10. Enterprise 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#325
11. Bethany 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#344
12. Mount Hope 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#384
13. Sprague 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#404
14. Rand 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#443
15. Chapmanville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#483
16. Hometown 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#485
17. Kopperston 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#539
18. Mill Creek 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#565
19. Great Cacapon 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#566
20. Elizabeth 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#599
21. Beverly 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#614
22. Chattaroy 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#650
23. Beech Bottom 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#666
24. Accoville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#702
25. Gallipolis Ferry 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#731
26. Anmoore 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#733
27. Meadow Bridge 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#750
28. Boomer 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#763
29. Red Jacket 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#797
30. Burnsville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#800
31. Union 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#824
32. Waverly 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#828
33. Gauley Bridge 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#849
34. Robinette 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#850
35. Paw Paw 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#859
36. Powellton 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#860
37. Lester 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#882
38. Harts 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#888
39. Handley 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#930
40. Northfork 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#948
41. Hico 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#982
42. Kimberly 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#996
43. Falls View 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#44 33.1% (+66.9)#1,059
44. Newark 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#45 33.1% (+66.9)#1,065
45. Hendricks 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#46 33.1% (+66.9)#1,087
46. Flemington 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#47 33.1% (+66.9)#1,152
47. Kistler 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#48 33.1% (+66.9)#1,226
48. Bayard 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#49 33.1% (+66.9)#1,228
49. Scarbro 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#50 33.1% (+66.9)#1,269
50. Carolina 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#51 33.1% (+66.9)#1,311
51. Switzer 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#52 33.1% (+66.9)#1,393
52. Iaeger 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#53 33.1% (+66.9)#1,409
53. Huttonsville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#54 33.1% (+66.9)#1,463
54. Anawalt 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#55 33.1% (+66.9)#1,465
55. Brandywine 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#56 33.1% (+66.9)#1,469
56. Whitesville 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#57 33.1% (+66.9)#1,477
57. Cairo 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#58 33.1% (+66.9)#1,536
58. Frank 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#59 33.1% (+66.9)#1,681
59. Colcord 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#60 33.1% (+66.9)#1,711
60. Galloway 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#61 33.1% (+66.9)#1,725
61. Keystone 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#62 33.1% (+66.9)#1,760
62. Harman 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#63 33.1% (+66.9)#1,768
63. Twilight 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#64 33.1% (+66.9)#1,810
64. Pax 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#65 33.1% (+66.9)#1,824
65. Gypsy 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#66 33.1% (+66.9)#1,926
66. Auburn 100.0% 42.0% (+58.0)#67 33.1% (+66.9)#1,943
67. Spencer 92.3% 42.0% (+50.3)#68 33.1% (+59.2)#2,081
68. Rupert 89.6% 42.0% (+47.6)#69 33.1% (+56.5)#2,179
69. Sutton 88.9% 42.0% (+46.9)#70 33.1% (+55.8)#2,210
70. West Logan 87.5% 42.0% (+45.5)#71 33.1% (+54.4)#2,291
71. Junior 86.2% 42.0% (+44.2)#72 33.1% (+53.1)#2,344
72. New Cumberland 84.6% 42.0% (+42.6)#73 33.1% (+51.5)#2,451
73. Sophia 84.2% 42.0% (+42.2)#74 33.1% (+51.1)#2,478
74. Addison Webster Springs 83.3% 42.0% (+41.4)#75 33.1% (+50.2)#2,512
75. Bancroft 78.6% 42.0% (+36.6)#76 33.1% (+45.4)#2,885
76. Kingwood 78.5% 42.0% (+36.5)#77 33.1% (+45.3)#2,888
77. War 77.8% 42.0% (+35.8)#78 33.1% (+44.6)#2,933
78. Cedar Grove 77.8% 42.0% (+35.8)#79 33.1% (+44.6)#2,936
79. Winfield 77.4% 42.0% (+35.4)#80 33.1% (+44.2)#2,982
80. Marlinton 76.9% 42.0% (+34.9)#81 33.1% (+43.8)#3,012
81. Mason 76.9% 42.0% (+34.9)#82 33.1% (+43.8)#3,013
82. Middlebourne 75.0% 42.0% (+33.0)#83 33.1% (+41.9)#3,176
83. Monaville 75.0% 42.0% (+33.0)#84 33.1% (+41.9)#3,181
84. Summersville 74.8% 42.0% (+32.8)#85 33.1% (+41.7)#3,251
85. Harrisville 73.7% 42.0% (+31.7)#86 33.1% (+40.5)#3,329
86. Barrackville 72.7% 42.0% (+30.8)#87 33.1% (+39.6)#3,410
87. Fort Gay 72.1% 42.0% (+30.1)#88 33.1% (+39.0)#3,513
88. Salem 70.6% 42.0% (+28.6)#89 33.1% (+37.5)#3,674
89. Jane Lew 70.0% 42.0% (+28.0)#90 33.1% (+36.9)#3,734
90. Romney 69.6% 42.0% (+27.6)#91 33.1% (+36.4)#3,788
91. Reedsville 68.8% 42.0% (+26.8)#92 33.1% (+35.6)#3,871
92. Marmet 68.3% 42.0% (+26.3)#93 33.1% (+35.2)#3,919
93. Newell 68.2% 42.0% (+26.2)#94 33.1% (+35.0)#3,933
94. Parsons 67.9% 42.0% (+25.9)#95 33.1% (+34.7)#3,960
95. Piedmont 66.7% 42.0% (+24.7)#96 33.1% (+33.5)#4,085
96. Capon Bridge 66.7% 42.0% (+24.7)#97 33.1% (+33.5)#4,125
97. New Martinsville 65.5% 42.0% (+23.5)#98 33.1% (+32.3)#4,332
98. Glen Dale 65.4% 42.0% (+23.4)#99 33.1% (+32.2)#4,343
99. Hartford City 64.7% 42.0% (+22.7)#100 33.1% (+31.6)#4,436
100. Clendenin 64.3% 42.0% (+22.3)#101 33.1% (+31.2)#4,481

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia?
Madison has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of West Virginia?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in West Virginia is 42.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.