Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Henderson 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#427
2. Benkelman 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#452
3. Genoa 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#553
4. Hemingford 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#670
5. Elgin 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#689
6. Lyman 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#963
7. Clarks 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#1,002
8. Butte 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#1,023
9. Glenvil 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#1,080
10. Campbell 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#1,099
11. Pilger 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#1,131
12. Litchfield 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#1,133
13. Guide Rock 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#1,148
14. Long Pine 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#1,149
15. Hayes Center 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#1,173
16. Chapman 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#1,185
17. Hallam 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#1,206
18. Diller 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#1,284
19. Union 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#1,299
20. Fordyce 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#1,312
21. North Loup 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#1,365
22. Talmage 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#1,432
23. Farnam 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#1,509
24. Haigler 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#1,532
25. Melbeta 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#1,542
26. Sunol 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#1,599
27. Miller 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,632
28. Inman 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,659
29. Cordova 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,722
30. Alvo 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,738
31. Bow Valley 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,806
32. Harrisburg 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,881
33. Liberty 100.0% 29.1% (+70.9)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,911
34. Waterloo 94.1% 29.1% (+65.0)#34 33.1% (+61.0)#2,020
35. Oxford 91.7% 29.1% (+62.6)#35 33.1% (+58.5)#2,102
36. Fullerton 86.7% 29.1% (+57.6)#36 33.1% (+53.5)#2,315
37. Bellwood 85.7% 29.1% (+56.6)#37 33.1% (+52.6)#2,378
38. Valparaiso 85.7% 29.1% (+56.6)#38 33.1% (+52.6)#2,379
39. Pleasanton 85.7% 29.1% (+56.6)#39 33.1% (+52.6)#2,387
40. Hoskins 84.6% 29.1% (+55.5)#40 33.1% (+51.5)#2,463
41. Brule 83.3% 29.1% (+54.3)#41 33.1% (+50.2)#2,533
42. Linwood 83.3% 29.1% (+54.3)#42 33.1% (+50.2)#2,549
43. Nebraska City 82.8% 29.1% (+53.8)#43 33.1% (+49.7)#2,575
44. Otoe 82.4% 29.1% (+53.3)#44 33.1% (+49.2)#2,606
45. Verdigre 81.8% 29.1% (+52.7)#45 33.1% (+48.7)#2,636
46. Malcolm 80.0% 29.1% (+50.9)#46 33.1% (+46.9)#2,757
47. Holbrook 80.0% 29.1% (+50.9)#47 33.1% (+46.9)#2,771
48. Colon 80.0% 29.1% (+50.9)#48 33.1% (+46.9)#2,793
49. Arapahoe 77.8% 29.1% (+48.7)#49 33.1% (+44.6)#2,929
50. Grafton 77.8% 29.1% (+48.7)#50 33.1% (+44.6)#2,955
51. Broken Bow 76.0% 29.1% (+47.0)#51 33.1% (+42.9)#3,094
52. Holdrege 75.0% 29.1% (+45.9)#52 33.1% (+41.9)#3,148
53. Callaway 75.0% 29.1% (+45.9)#53 33.1% (+41.9)#3,195
54. Shickley 75.0% 29.1% (+45.9)#54 33.1% (+41.9)#3,208
55. Thurston 75.0% 29.1% (+45.9)#55 33.1% (+41.9)#3,247
56. Arthur 75.0% 29.1% (+45.9)#56 33.1% (+41.9)#3,248
57. O Neill 74.4% 29.1% (+45.3)#57 33.1% (+41.2)#3,273
58. Oakland 72.5% 29.1% (+43.4)#58 33.1% (+39.4)#3,471
59. Imperial 71.8% 29.1% (+42.7)#59 33.1% (+38.7)#3,529
60. Trumbull 71.4% 29.1% (+42.4)#60 33.1% (+38.3)#3,600
61. Nickerson 70.0% 29.1% (+40.9)#61 33.1% (+36.9)#3,737
62. Gordon 69.2% 29.1% (+40.2)#62 33.1% (+36.1)#3,814
63. Creighton 69.2% 29.1% (+40.2)#63 33.1% (+36.1)#3,816
64. Pawnee City 69.2% 29.1% (+40.2)#64 33.1% (+36.1)#3,819
65. Wood River 68.0% 29.1% (+38.9)#65 33.1% (+34.9)#3,948
66. Ord 67.1% 29.1% (+38.0)#66 33.1% (+34.0)#4,024
67. Greeley Center 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#67 33.1% (+33.5)#4,141
68. Orchard 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#68 33.1% (+33.5)#4,153
69. Santee 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#69 33.1% (+33.5)#4,186
70. Milligan 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#70 33.1% (+33.5)#4,188
71. Farwell 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#71 33.1% (+33.5)#4,251
72. Henry 66.7% 29.1% (+37.6)#72 33.1% (+33.5)#4,254
73. Laurel 63.6% 29.1% (+34.6)#73 33.1% (+30.5)#4,573
74. Terrytown 62.9% 29.1% (+33.8)#74 33.1% (+29.7)#4,695
75. Curtis 62.5% 29.1% (+33.4)#75 33.1% (+29.4)#4,741
76. Mason City 61.5% 29.1% (+32.5)#76 33.1% (+28.4)#4,895
77. Bridgeport 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#77 33.1% (+26.9)#5,080
78. Murray 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#78 33.1% (+26.9)#5,123
79. Oakdale 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#79 33.1% (+26.9)#5,143
80. Odell 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#80 33.1% (+26.9)#5,146
81. Uehling 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#81 33.1% (+26.9)#5,147
82. Harrison 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#82 33.1% (+26.9)#5,154
83. Roca 60.0% 29.1% (+30.9)#83 33.1% (+26.9)#5,168
84. Alda 59.5% 29.1% (+30.4)#84 33.1% (+26.3)#5,228
85. Cedar Rapids 57.1% 29.1% (+28.1)#85 33.1% (+24.0)#5,572
86. Wolbach 57.1% 29.1% (+28.1)#86 33.1% (+24.0)#5,600
87. Blair 55.6% 29.1% (+26.5)#87 33.1% (+22.4)#5,798
88. Western 55.6% 29.1% (+26.5)#88 33.1% (+22.4)#5,837
89. Upland 55.6% 29.1% (+26.5)#89 33.1% (+22.4)#5,844
90. Macy 55.4% 29.1% (+26.4)#90 33.1% (+22.3)#5,858
91. Osmond 55.2% 29.1% (+26.1)#91 33.1% (+22.0)#5,896
92. Wayne 54.8% 29.1% (+25.7)#92 33.1% (+21.6)#5,951
93. Hardy 54.5% 29.1% (+25.5)#93 33.1% (+21.4)#6,024
94. Minden 53.1% 29.1% (+24.1)#94 33.1% (+20.0)#6,243
95. Hampton 52.9% 29.1% (+23.9)#95 33.1% (+19.8)#6,278
96. Tekamah 52.6% 29.1% (+23.6)#96 33.1% (+19.5)#6,325
97. Bayard 52.6% 29.1% (+23.6)#97 33.1% (+19.5)#6,326
98. Alma 52.6% 29.1% (+23.6)#98 33.1% (+19.5)#6,331
99. Falls City 51.3% 29.1% (+22.2)#99 33.1% (+18.1)#6,563
100. Albion 50.0% 29.1% (+20.9)#100 33.1% (+16.9)#6,760

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska?
Henderson has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Nebraska is 29.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.