Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Livingston 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#61
2. Hanceville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#64
3. Centreville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#97
4. Whitesboro 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#144
5. Steele 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#231
6. Clio 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#252
7. Brookside 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#336
8. Dunnavant 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#340
9. Gallant 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#353
10. Hollywood 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#419
11. Hayneville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#466
12. Our Town 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#568
13. Sterrett 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#574
14. Eva 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#575
15. Hackneyville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#703
16. Epes 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#720
17. Hytop 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#755
18. Trafford 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#798
19. Newville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#806
20. Nectar 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#843
21. St Stephens 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#847
22. Avon 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#870
23. Rock Mills 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#899
24. Stockton 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#916
25. Uriah 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#957
26. Thomaston 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#992
27. Castleberry 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#1,046
28. Mentone 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#1,056
29. Hodges 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#1,102
30. Lockhart 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,113
31. Geiger 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,167
32. Gainesville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,201
33. Horn Hill 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,267
34. Waverly 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,275
35. Anderson 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,300
36. Fredonia 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,328
37. Gantt 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,359
38. Gaylesville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,535
39. Haleburg 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,562
40. Ridgeville 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#1,569
41. Five Points 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,570
42. Chunchula 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,578
43. Lester 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#43 33.1% (+66.9)#1,614
44. Yellow Bluff 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#44 33.1% (+66.9)#1,618
45. Gu Win 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#45 33.1% (+66.9)#1,642
46. Fruitdale 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#46 33.1% (+66.9)#1,683
47. Bellamy 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#47 33.1% (+66.9)#1,709
48. Panola 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#48 33.1% (+66.9)#1,802
49. Billingsley 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#49 33.1% (+66.9)#1,865
50. Putnam 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#50 33.1% (+66.9)#1,872
51. Bon Air 100.0% 42.7% (+57.3)#51 33.1% (+66.9)#1,882
52. Dutton 98.0% 42.7% (+55.3)#52 33.1% (+64.9)#1,975
53. Pine Hill 97.7% 42.7% (+55.0)#53 33.1% (+64.5)#1,976
54. Guin 95.6% 42.7% (+52.9)#54 33.1% (+62.4)#1,999
55. Vina 95.5% 42.7% (+52.8)#55 33.1% (+62.3)#2,003
56. Forkland 94.9% 42.7% (+52.2)#56 33.1% (+61.7)#2,011
57. Fort Deposit 92.2% 42.7% (+49.6)#57 33.1% (+59.1)#2,089
58. Adamsville 92.0% 42.7% (+49.3)#58 33.1% (+58.8)#2,095
59. Rockford 91.7% 42.7% (+49.0)#59 33.1% (+58.5)#2,103
60. Ragland 91.2% 42.7% (+48.6)#60 33.1% (+58.1)#2,128
61. Ariton 87.8% 42.7% (+45.1)#61 33.1% (+54.7)#2,264
62. Thorsby 86.4% 42.7% (+43.7)#62 33.1% (+53.2)#2,333
63. Dozier 85.7% 42.7% (+43.0)#63 33.1% (+52.6)#2,380
64. Detroit 85.7% 42.7% (+43.0)#64 33.1% (+52.6)#2,395
65. Brent 85.2% 42.7% (+42.6)#65 33.1% (+52.1)#2,421
66. Altoona 85.1% 42.7% (+42.4)#66 33.1% (+52.0)#2,427
67. Notasulga 85.0% 42.7% (+42.3)#67 33.1% (+51.9)#2,432
68. Addison 84.2% 42.7% (+41.5)#68 33.1% (+51.1)#2,480
69. Harpersville 84.0% 42.7% (+41.3)#69 33.1% (+50.9)#2,489
70. Goodwater 83.5% 42.7% (+40.9)#70 33.1% (+50.4)#2,505
71. Phil Campbell 83.3% 42.7% (+40.7)#71 33.1% (+50.2)#2,516
72. Fairview 83.3% 42.7% (+40.7)#72 33.1% (+50.2)#2,517
73. Flomaton 82.9% 42.7% (+40.2)#73 33.1% (+49.8)#2,569
74. Lisman 82.8% 42.7% (+40.1)#74 33.1% (+49.6)#2,578
75. Fort Rucker 82.7% 42.7% (+40.0)#75 33.1% (+49.6)#2,579
76. Double Springs 82.3% 42.7% (+39.6)#76 33.1% (+49.2)#2,609
77. Chatom 81.8% 42.7% (+39.1)#77 33.1% (+48.7)#2,634
78. Talladega 81.6% 42.7% (+39.0)#78 33.1% (+48.5)#2,654
79. Uniontown 81.6% 42.7% (+38.9)#79 33.1% (+48.5)#2,656
80. Newton 81.0% 42.7% (+38.3)#80 33.1% (+47.8)#2,699
81. Hackleburg 80.6% 42.7% (+37.9)#81 33.1% (+47.4)#2,717
82. Arley 80.0% 42.7% (+37.3)#82 33.1% (+46.9)#2,750
83. River Falls 80.0% 42.7% (+37.3)#83 33.1% (+46.9)#2,755
84. Douglas 79.1% 42.7% (+36.4)#84 33.1% (+45.9)#2,843
85. Atmore 78.7% 42.7% (+36.1)#85 33.1% (+45.6)#2,867
86. Samson 77.1% 42.7% (+34.4)#86 33.1% (+43.9)#2,996
87. Bay Minette 76.9% 42.7% (+34.2)#87 33.1% (+43.8)#3,025
88. Camden 76.8% 42.7% (+34.2)#88 33.1% (+43.7)#3,028
89. Slocomb 76.8% 42.7% (+34.1)#89 33.1% (+43.7)#3,035
90. Aliceville 76.5% 42.7% (+33.8)#90 33.1% (+43.4)#3,049
91. Alexandria 76.2% 42.7% (+33.5)#91 33.1% (+43.1)#3,076
92. Hobson City 75.7% 42.7% (+33.0)#92 33.1% (+42.5)#3,118
93. Collinsville 75.5% 42.7% (+32.8)#93 33.1% (+42.3)#3,133
94. Marion 75.1% 42.7% (+32.4)#94 33.1% (+42.0)#3,144
95. Brighton 73.8% 42.7% (+31.2)#95 33.1% (+40.7)#3,314
96. Brundidge 73.8% 42.7% (+31.1)#96 33.1% (+40.6)#3,321
97. Vance 73.5% 42.7% (+30.9)#97 33.1% (+40.4)#3,347
98. Leighton 72.7% 42.7% (+30.1)#98 33.1% (+39.6)#3,420
99. Elkmont 72.7% 42.7% (+30.1)#99 33.1% (+39.6)#3,438
100. Pine Apple 72.7% 42.7% (+30.1)#100 33.1% (+39.6)#3,451

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama?
Livingston has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Alabama is 42.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.