Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina

City Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1. Welcome 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#1 33.1% (+66.9)#53
2. Mountain View 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#2 33.1% (+66.9)#56
3. Fairplains 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#3 33.1% (+66.9)#194
4. Biltmore Forest 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#4 33.1% (+66.9)#197
5. Advance 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#5 33.1% (+66.9)#217
6. Gorman 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#6 33.1% (+66.9)#243
7. Cordova 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#7 33.1% (+66.9)#278
8. Bonnetsville 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#8 33.1% (+66.9)#286
9. Saxapahaw 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#9 33.1% (+66.9)#320
10. Barker Heights 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#10 33.1% (+66.9)#412
11. Woodlawn 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#11 33.1% (+66.9)#434
12. Warrenton 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#12 33.1% (+66.9)#487
13. Varnamtown 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#13 33.1% (+66.9)#512
14. Silver City 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#14 33.1% (+66.9)#516
15. White Plains 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#15 33.1% (+66.9)#547
16. Ingold 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#16 33.1% (+66.9)#557
17. Pikeville 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#17 33.1% (+66.9)#615
18. Light Oak 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#18 33.1% (+66.9)#617
19. Cove City 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#19 33.1% (+66.9)#662
20. South Mills 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#20 33.1% (+66.9)#665
21. South Weldon 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#21 33.1% (+66.9)#674
22. Ronda 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#22 33.1% (+66.9)#791
23. Cape Colony 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#23 33.1% (+66.9)#819
24. Minnesott Beach 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#24 33.1% (+66.9)#825
25. Pantego 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#25 33.1% (+66.9)#881
26. Fair Bluff 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#26 33.1% (+66.9)#886
27. Ivanhoe 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#27 33.1% (+66.9)#891
28. Calypso 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#28 33.1% (+66.9)#900
29. Seagrove 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#29 33.1% (+66.9)#943
30. Grimesland 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#30 33.1% (+66.9)#1,011
31. Cerro Gordo 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#31 33.1% (+66.9)#1,042
32. Raemon 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#32 33.1% (+66.9)#1,123
33. Evergreen 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#33 33.1% (+66.9)#1,129
34. Hobgood 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#34 33.1% (+66.9)#1,189
35. Waco 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#35 33.1% (+66.9)#1,192
36. Everetts 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#36 33.1% (+66.9)#1,213
37. Colerain 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#37 33.1% (+66.9)#1,239
38. Lansing 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#38 33.1% (+66.9)#1,319
39. Norman 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#39 33.1% (+66.9)#1,510
40. Hamilton 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#40 33.1% (+66.9)#1,528
41. Creswell 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#41 33.1% (+66.9)#1,580
42. Long Creek 100.0% 35.6% (+64.4)#42 33.1% (+66.9)#1,830
43. Brunswick 97.4% 35.6% (+61.8)#43 33.1% (+64.3)#1,977
44. Fremont 97.0% 35.6% (+61.4)#44 33.1% (+63.9)#1,981
45. Dana 95.5% 35.6% (+59.9)#45 33.1% (+62.4)#2,001
46. Conetoe 95.2% 35.6% (+59.6)#46 33.1% (+62.1)#2,005
47. Patterson Springs 94.9% 35.6% (+59.2)#47 33.1% (+61.7)#2,012
48. Columbia 94.1% 35.6% (+58.5)#48 33.1% (+61.0)#2,023
49. Tabor City 93.5% 35.6% (+57.8)#49 33.1% (+60.3)#2,049
50. Edneyville 93.2% 35.6% (+57.6)#50 33.1% (+60.1)#2,062
51. Momeyer 92.3% 35.6% (+56.7)#51 33.1% (+59.2)#2,085
52. Hamlet 91.9% 35.6% (+56.3)#52 33.1% (+58.8)#2,096
53. Franklin 91.3% 35.6% (+55.7)#53 33.1% (+58.2)#2,122
54. Garland 88.9% 35.6% (+53.3)#54 33.1% (+55.8)#2,209
55. Cricket 88.5% 35.6% (+52.9)#55 33.1% (+55.4)#2,242
56. Rich Square 88.5% 35.6% (+52.8)#56 33.1% (+55.3)#2,246
57. Brogden 88.1% 35.6% (+52.5)#57 33.1% (+55.0)#2,254
58. Mooresboro 87.5% 35.6% (+51.9)#58 33.1% (+54.4)#2,297
59. Taylorsville 86.4% 35.6% (+50.7)#59 33.1% (+53.2)#2,334
60. Murphy 85.7% 35.6% (+50.1)#60 33.1% (+52.6)#2,365
61. Harrells 85.7% 35.6% (+50.1)#61 33.1% (+52.6)#2,404
62. Robbins 85.5% 35.6% (+49.9)#62 33.1% (+52.4)#2,412
63. Maury 85.5% 35.6% (+49.8)#63 33.1% (+52.3)#2,416
64. Andrews 83.9% 35.6% (+48.3)#64 33.1% (+50.8)#2,495
65. Belhaven 83.2% 35.6% (+47.5)#65 33.1% (+50.0)#2,557
66. Pink Hill 82.8% 35.6% (+47.1)#66 33.1% (+49.6)#2,576
67. Woodland 82.4% 35.6% (+46.7)#67 33.1% (+49.2)#2,600
68. Dudley 82.2% 35.6% (+46.6)#68 33.1% (+49.1)#2,615
69. Ramseur 81.9% 35.6% (+46.3)#69 33.1% (+48.8)#2,625
70. Roxobel 81.5% 35.6% (+45.8)#70 33.1% (+48.3)#2,667
71. Benson 80.3% 35.6% (+44.6)#71 33.1% (+47.1)#2,728
72. Farmville 80.1% 35.6% (+44.5)#72 33.1% (+47.0)#2,732
73. Lake Lure 80.0% 35.6% (+44.4)#73 33.1% (+46.9)#2,738
74. Love Valley 80.0% 35.6% (+44.4)#74 33.1% (+46.9)#2,792
75. Mocksville 78.9% 35.6% (+43.3)#75 33.1% (+45.8)#2,857
76. Laurel Park 78.8% 35.6% (+43.2)#76 33.1% (+45.7)#2,864
77. Old Hundred 78.4% 35.6% (+42.8)#77 33.1% (+45.3)#2,892
78. Greenevers 78.1% 35.6% (+42.5)#78 33.1% (+45.0)#2,907
79. Kenansville 77.4% 35.6% (+41.8)#79 33.1% (+44.3)#2,978
80. Skippers Corner 77.2% 35.6% (+41.6)#80 33.1% (+44.1)#2,992
81. Fairmont 76.7% 35.6% (+41.1)#81 33.1% (+43.6)#3,039
82. St Pauls 76.4% 35.6% (+40.8)#82 33.1% (+43.3)#3,063
83. Scotland Neck 76.1% 35.6% (+40.5)#83 33.1% (+43.0)#3,084
84. Hot Springs 75.9% 35.6% (+40.2)#84 33.1% (+42.7)#3,106
85. Fountain 75.8% 35.6% (+40.1)#85 33.1% (+42.6)#3,114
86. Elizabethtown 75.5% 35.6% (+39.9)#86 33.1% (+42.4)#3,130
87. White Lake 75.0% 35.6% (+39.4)#87 33.1% (+41.9)#3,170
88. Catawba 75.0% 35.6% (+39.4)#88 33.1% (+41.9)#3,185
89. Rockingham 74.5% 35.6% (+38.9)#89 33.1% (+41.4)#3,260
90. Vanceboro 74.2% 35.6% (+38.6)#90 33.1% (+41.1)#3,283
91. Mount Airy 73.9% 35.6% (+38.3)#91 33.1% (+40.8)#3,301
92. Hollister 73.7% 35.6% (+38.0)#92 33.1% (+40.5)#3,337
93. Wallace 73.6% 35.6% (+38.0)#93 33.1% (+40.5)#3,342
94. Southmont 73.5% 35.6% (+37.9)#94 33.1% (+40.4)#3,348
95. Edenton 73.4% 35.6% (+37.8)#95 33.1% (+40.3)#3,356
96. East Spencer 73.2% 35.6% (+37.5)#96 33.1% (+40.0)#3,377
97. Silver Lake 73.0% 35.6% (+37.4)#97 33.1% (+39.9)#3,386
98. Cove Creek 72.7% 35.6% (+37.1)#98 33.1% (+39.6)#3,411
99. Middleburg 72.7% 35.6% (+37.1)#99 33.1% (+39.6)#3,445
100. Cleveland 72.6% 35.6% (+37.0)#100 33.1% (+39.5)#3,462

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina?
Welcome has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in North Carolina is 35.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.